I want to make a query on an automatic generated table under Doctrine 1.2. In this particular case I have the following query:
SELECT F.id FROM ficha as F JOIN ficha_has_tema FT ON FT.ficha_id = F.id WHERE FT.tema_id = ? GROUP BY F.id HAVING COUNT(F.id) > 1
But I get the error:
Uncaught exception 'Doctrine_Exception' with message 'Couldn't find
class ficha_has_tema' in...
So, is there a way to make this query using doctrine without creating the class ficha_has_tema? I need to do the COUNT.
Thanks!
I assume you are executing DQL query here. It's impossible to use tables that have no associated entities wihthin the SQL queries.
However, you may run good-old SQL with
$q = Doctrine_Manager::getInstance()->getCurrentConnection();
$result = $q->execute("SELECT F.id FROM ficha as F JOIN ficha_has_tema FT ON FT.ficha_id = F.id WHERE FT.tema_id = ? GROUP BY F.id HAVING COUNT(F.id) > 1");
as suggested in "Using Raw SQL with Doctrine"
Or Doctrine Native SQL Support with something like (never tried that personally, might require some modification)
$q = new Doctrine_RawSql();
$q->select("{F.id}")
->from("
From ficha as F
JOIN ficha_has_tema FT ON FT.ficha_id = F.id
WHERE FT.tema_id = ?
GROUP BY F.id
HAVING COUNT(F.id) > 1"
);
$result = $q->execute(array($tema_id));
Related
I have sql query as below, i need to convert sql to codeigniter active record.
select * from color c
left join (select pc.* from product_color pc
LEFT join product p on pc.product_id=p.product_id
WHERE p.product_id=1)x on c.id=x.color_id
In codeigniter you can get compiled query using get_compiled_select function.
Let's create inner query first.
$inner_query = $this->db->select('pc.*')
->from('product_color pc')
->join('product p','pc.product_id = p.product_id','left')
->where('p.product_id',1)
->get_compiled_select();
Now we will use inner query to create our final query.
$final_query = $this->db->select('*')
->from('color c')
->join("($inner_query) x",'c.id=x.color_id','left')
->get_compiled_select();
echo $final_query; die;
Try this into model file. and it's always better to keep sql keywords in capital.
$query = "SELECT * FROM color c
LEFT JOIN (SELECT pc.* FROM product_color pc
LEFT JOIN product p ON pc.product_id=p.product_id
WHERE p.product_id=1)x on c.id=x.color_id"
$query = $this->db->query($query);
$data = $query->result_array();
I have a master table and I intend to use a left join with LINQ.
Unfortunately the left join multiplies the result (I need only a top 1 result from that).
Here comes the problem: my query should have SQL 8 conformance.
So when I use the following query:
var query = from user in context.User
join group in context.Groups on user.ID equals group.GroupID into groupJoin
from subGroup in groupJoin.Take(1).DefaultIfEmpty()
select new
{
Name = user.Name,
GroupName = subGroup!=null ? subGroup.Name : null
};
I get this exception:
The execution of this query requires the APPLY operator, which is not
supported in versions of SQL Server earlier than SQL Server 2005.
How could I replace my query to have SQL8 conformance?
Unfortunately I have no EF4 to test (it does the trick in the latest EF6), but you can try to force usage of a SQL subquery expression(s) like this:
var query = from user in context.User
select new
{
Name = user.Name,
GroupName = (from g in context.Groups where g.GroupId == user.Id select g.Name).FirstOrDefault()
};
Used your linq-query without take(1) and after that use next code:
query = query.Take(1);
A "case" can have many action types and each action is logged in a journal.
I want to show a list of "cases" only with the latest journal entry
This is the T-SQL sub query
SELECT SagId, max(Dato) as maxdate FROM vOpgaveliste o group by SagId
And this is the T-SQL main query
select o.* from
(
SELECT SagId, max(Dato) as maxdate
FROM vOpgaveliste o
group by SagId
)
as nyeste
join vOpgaveliste o on o.SagId = nyeste.SagId and o.Dato = nyeste.maxdate
I can create the subquery in linq
var queryInner = from o in query
where o.SagsbehandlerInit == "chr"
where o.Dato >= DateTime.Today && o.Dato <= DateTime.Today.AddDays(-7)
group o by o.SagId
into g
select new { SagId = g.Key, MaxDate = g.Max(d => d.Dato) };
I then created this query
var outer = from o in query
from s in queryInner
where s.SagId == o.SagId && s.MaxDate == o.Dato
select o;
But NHibernate throws a System.NotSupportedException was unhandled by user code exception
I also tried this syntax https://stackoverflow.com/a/16918106/1147577 but get an syntax error on the join statement
Thanks
NHibernate simply does not support sub queries within from statement block. It only supports it in the Select and Where block.
I guess you have to figure out another way to get your result.
Of course the linq to object or many other linq providers support all kind of crazy query constructs, the linq to Nhibernate implementation simply has tons of limitations.
I want to achieve the following in Linq to Entities:
Get all Enquires that have no Application or the Application has a status != 4 (Completed)
select e.*
from Enquiry enq
left outer join Application app
on enq.enquiryid = app.enquiryid
where app.Status <> 4 or app.enquiryid is null
Has anyone done this before without using DefaultIfEmpty(), which is not supported by Linq to Entities?
I'm trying to add a filter to an IQueryable query like this:
IQueryable<Enquiry> query = Context.EnquirySet;
query = (from e in query
where e.Applications.DefaultIfEmpty()
.Where(app=>app.Status != 4).Count() >= 1
select e);
Thanks
Mark
In EF 4.0+, LEFT JOIN syntax is a little different and presents a crazy quirk:
var query = from c1 in db.Category
join c2 in db.Category on c1.CategoryID equals c2.ParentCategoryID
into ChildCategory
from cc in ChildCategory.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new CategoryObject
{
CategoryID = c1.CategoryID,
ChildName = cc.CategoryName
}
If you capture the execution of this query in SQL Server Profiler, you will see that it does indeed perform a LEFT OUTER JOIN. HOWEVER, if you have multiple LEFT JOIN ("Group Join") clauses in your Linq-to-Entity query, I have found that the self-join clause MAY actually execute as in INNER JOIN - EVEN IF THE ABOVE SYNTAX IS USED!
The resolution to that? As crazy and, according to MS, wrong as it sounds, I resolved this by changing the order of the join clauses. If the self-referencing LEFT JOIN clause was the 1st Linq Group Join, SQL Profiler reported an INNER JOIN. If the self-referencing LEFT JOIN clause was the LAST Linq Group Join, SQL Profiler reported an LEFT JOIN.
Do this:
IQueryable<Enquiry> query = Context.EnquirySet;
query = (from e in query
where (!e.Applications.Any())
|| e.Applications.Any(app => app.Status != 4)
select e);
I don't find LINQ's handling of the problem of what would be an "outer join" in SQL "goofy" at all. The key to understanding it is to think in terms of an object graph with nullable properties rather than a tabular result set.
Any() maps to EXISTS in SQL, so it's far more efficient than Count() in some cases.
Thanks guys for your help. I went for this option in the end but your solutions have helped broaden my knowledge.
IQueryable<Enquiry> query = Context.EnquirySet;
query = query.Except(from e in query
from a in e.Applications
where a.Status == 4
select e);
Because of Linq's goofy (read non-standard) way of handling outers, you have to use DefaultIfEmpty().
What you'll do is run your Linq-To-Entities query into two IEnumerables, then LEFT Join them using DefaultIfEmpty(). It may look something like:
IQueryable enq = Enquiry.Select();
IQueryable app = Application.Select();
var x = from e in enq
join a in app on e.enquiryid equals a.enquiryid
into ae
where e.Status != 4
from appEnq in ae.DefaultIfEmpty()
select e.*;
Just because you can't do it with Linq-To-Entities doesn't mean you can't do it with raw Linq.
(Note: before anyone downvotes me ... yes, I know there are more elegant ways to do this. I'm just trying to make it understandable. It's the concept that's important, right?)
Another thing to consider, if you directly reference any properties in your where clause from a left-joined group (using the into syntax) without checking for null, Entity Framework will still convert your LEFT JOIN into an INNER JOIN.
To avoid this, filter on the "from x in leftJoinedExtent" part of your query like so:
var y = from parent in thing
join child in subthing on parent.ID equals child.ParentID into childTemp
from childLJ in childTemp.Where(c => c.Visible == true).DefaultIfEmpty()
where parent.ID == 123
select new {
ParentID = parent.ID,
ChildID = childLJ.ID
};
ChildID in the anonymous type will be a nullable type and the query this generates will be a LEFT JOIN.
I have the following Linq statement:
(from order in Orders.AsEnumerable()
join component in Components.AsEnumerable()
on order.ORDER_ID equals component.ORDER_ID
join detail in Detailss.AsEnumerable()
on component.RESULT_ID equals detail.RESULT_ID
where orderRestrict.ORDER_MNEMONIC == "MyOrderText"
select new
{
Mnemonic = detail.TEST_MNEMONIC,
OrderID = component.ORDER_ID,
SeqNumber = component.SEQ_NUM
}).ToList()
I expect this to put out the following query:
select *
from Orders ord (NoLock)
join Component comp (NoLock)
on ord .ORDER_ID = comp.ORDER_ID
join Details detail (NoLock)
on comp.RESULT_TEST_NUM = detail .RESULT_TEST_NUM
where res.ORDER_MNEMONIC = 'MyOrderText'
but instead I get 3 seperate queries that select all rows from the tables. I am guessing that Linq is then filtering the values because I do get the correct values in the end.
The problem is that it takes WAY WAY too long because it is pulling down all the rows from all three tables.
Any ideas how I can fix that?
Remove the .AsEnumerable()s from the query as these are preventing the entire query being evaluated on the server.