I have materialized views that ran in production but hare having problems refreshing. The error message is
ORA-32411: materialized view definition query exceeds the maximum length
The ones that are having the problems are 76kb,70kb,75kb, and 67kb. Is there anything that can be done, besides splitting up the query? The scripts are one long query each so it will be hard to split up.
Recreate your materialized views as just views, and then recompile your materialized view select statement as
select * from your_new_view
I don't believe there is a limit to how long a view can be. I've also found this makes updating the MV query quite simple as you only have to recompile the view instead of dropping and recreating the MV.
Related
I am migrating Oracle objects to Snowflake. I have materialized view in Oracle that fetches data from multiple tables but in Snowflake a materialized view can be created on single table only. Can I use Oracle materialized view script and use it as a simple view to load into a temporary table and then use this temporary table to create a materialized view on top of it?
Can I use Oracle materialized view script and use it as a simple view to load into a temporary table and then use this temporary table to create a materialized view on top of it?
No, this won't work. A materialized view in Snowflake cannot be based on another view. But don't despair, just because you needed a materialised view in Oracle does not mean that you will need one in Snowflake ! On the contrary, it is typical in scenarios where a materialized view was needed in traditional RDBMS, that no special handling is required in Snowflake due to it's superior performance. Snowflake recommends the following considerations when deciding to use a materialized or regular view:
Create a materialized view when all of the following are true:
The query results from the view don’t change often. This almost always means that the underlying/base table for the view doesn’t change often, or at least that the subset of base table rows used in the materialized view don’t change often.
The results of the view are used often (typically significantly more often than the query results change).
The query consumes a lot of resources. Typically, this means that the query consumes a lot of processing time or credits, but it could also mean that the query consumes a lot of storage space for intermediate results.
Create a regular view when any of the following are true:
The results of the view change often.
The results are not used often (relative to the rate at which the results change).
The query is not resource intensive so it is not costly to re-run it.
We have a table TB_1 which has monthly and weekly data partitioned by monthly and weekly columns. We also have materialized view MV_1 inherited from the table TB_1.
We would like to refresh the materialized view by certain weekly or monthly basis.
Not sure how we can filter out weekly or monthly changes from all the changes captured in the materialized log for partial refresh.
Right now we are thinking to have a flag column in TB_1. By clearing the materialized log and updating the flag, We think we can achieve this.
Is there anyway efficient way than the process for partial refresh on specific criteria?
We have a similar case here: the solution we found was to partition the materialized view month by month (using PCT ). If you have this as an option in your licensing, this could be a solution. Then you must partition the "details tables", TB_1, and probably the "details tables" of MV_1.
execute dbms_mview.refresh(
list => 'your_partitioned_mview'
, method => 'P' -- this is where PCT is specified
, atomic_refresh => false
);
There are also other solution on Is it possible to partially refresh a materialized view in Oracle? .
edit:
I'd say the solution of a fast refresh using a "to be refreshed" flag is worth being tried. Not sure you need to clear the Mview log beforehand. Just changing the value of the flag for the record to be updated should work. Here is a nice howto I found.
If you have Oracle 12.2, they introduced real-time Mviews, which might be what you are looking for...
Oracle 12.2 introduced the concept of real-time materialized views, which allow a statement-level wind-forward of a stale materialised view, making the data appear fresh to the statement. This wind-forward is based on changes computed using materialized view logs, similar to a conventional fast refresh, but the operation only affect the current statement. The changes are not persisted in the materialized view, so a conventional refresh is still required at some point.
#use416, please keep us posted for what actually worked for your case.
Good day,
Is it technically possible to create a materialized view against a another view in the master database (as opposed to a solid table)?
My DBA advises that oracle does not allow creation of materialized view logs against a view. IMO a view is pretty much the same as a table, so it ought to be possible.
Has anyone ever done this successfully (Oracle 11g).
The documentation is pretty clear about this:
Restrictions on Master Tables of Materialized View Logs
The following restrictions apply to master tables of materialized view logs:
You cannot create a materialized view log for a temporary table or for a view.
You cannot create a materialized view log for a master table with a virtual column.
A view is not pretty much the same as a table. It's a stored query, so it has no storage and DML is only possible through instead-of triggers. It doesn't have the basis for noticing an underlying data change.
Just thinking about it, in order to support a view log - even for a simple single-table view - an update to the view's base table would have to check if there were any views; check if any of those had materialized view logs; and then work out if the change needed to be logged - which would mean executing each view's query and looking at the entire result set. Imagine doing that for every change to the underlying table. And then imagine a more complicated view query, with aggregates or multiple tables, etc.
You'd effectively be materialising the view query to decide whether was a change that needed to be logged, to update an actual materialized view. This is partly what actual materialized views do - stop you having to repeatedly re-execute an expensive view query by tracking changes on the master table(s).
You have to create the materialized view logs on the (normal) view's base tables.
I have following query which has select query that returns data in 5sec. But when I add create materialized view command infront it takes ever for the query to create materialized view.
When you create a materialized view, you actually create a copy of the data that Oracle takes care to keep synchronized (and it makes those views somewhat like indexes). If your view operates over a big amount of data or over data from other servers, it's natural that the creating this view can take time.
From docs.oracle.com:
A materialized view is a replica of a target master from a single
point in time.
Just for "yuks", try
create table temp_tab nologging as select ...
I've seen cases where MV creation is long for some reason, probably logging.
Also, query development tools sometimes begin returning the data to the screen right away, but if you "paged" to the last row, you would find out how long it really takes to get all the data.
You should profile the select statement with explain plan and understand the table cardinality, indexes, waits states when running, ... in order to see if the query needs tuning.
How can I update a materialized view? Is there any downside to updating materialized views? I'm in a situation where I can either
Update the materialized view (OR)
Copy the records to another table, update them, truncate or drop the materialized view table, insert the updated records back into the materialized view.
These two options revolve around the long amount of time required to rebuild the materialized view (literally 5+ days).
Version : Oracle 10g
The intention of a materialized view is to store the results of some complex long running query that the query rewrite mechanism can use to save lots of time. It looks like the sql that is used to build the MV needs some tweeking.
You cannot update an MV, unless you meant doing a full/fast refresh/rebuild.
What is eating the time in during the MV refresh? Did you check the addm reports?
Did you configure full or fast refreshes?