Related
I am trying to scientific-format tick labels on a my Plot which is somehow a frame. By searching Mathgroup archives, it looks like the usual way to mess with tick labels is to extract them using AbsoluteOptions, run a replacement rule with the custom format, and then explicitly feed them to the plotting function with the Ticks->{...} option. However, the following doesn't work for FrameTicks:
makePlotLegend[names_, markers_, origin_, markerSize_, fontSize_,
font_] :=
Join ## Table[{Text[Style[names[[i]], FontSize -> fontSize, font],
Offset[{1.5*markerSize, -(i - 0.5)*
Max[markerSize, fontSize]*1.25}, Scaled[origin]], {-1, 0}],
Inset[Show[markers[[i]], ImageSize -> markerSize],
Offset[{0.5*markerSize, -(i - 0.5)*
Max[markerSize, fontSize]*1.25}, Scaled[origin]], {0, 0},
Background -> Directive[Opacity[0], White]]}, {i, 1,
Length[names]}];
LJ[r_] := 4 e ((phi/r)^12 - (phi/r)^6)
phi = 2.645;
e = 10.97 8.621738 10^-5;
l1 = Plot[LJ[r], {r, 2, 11}, PlotStyle -> {Blue},
PlotRange -> {{2, 6}, {0.001, -0.002}}, Frame -> True,
LabelStyle -> {8},
Epilog ->
makePlotLegend[{"He-He",
"H-H"}, (Graphics[{#, Line[{{-1, 0}, {1, 0}}]}]) & /# {Blue,
Red}, {0.80, 0.35}, 7.5, 7.3, "Times New Roman"]]
daList={{0.059, 0.298, 0.726, 0.735, 1.461, 2.311, 3.315},
{0.05, 0.404,0.664, 0.782, 1.376, 2.328, 3.432},
{0.087, 0.628, 0.986, 1.187,1.914, 3.481, 4.993},
{0.073, 0.594, 0.975, 1.147, 2.019, 3.417,5.037},
{0.143, 0.821, 1.442, 1.595, 2.983, 4.98, 7.604},
{0.107,0.871, 1.431, 1.684, 2.964, 5.015, 7.394}}
ListPlot[daList,
Joined -> True,
PlotRange -> {{1, 7}, {0, 7}},
PlotStyle -> {{Thick, Lighter[Red, .5]},
{Dashed, Black},
{Thick,Lighter[Red, .3]},
{Dashed, Black},
{Thick,Lighter[Red, .1]},
{Dashed, Black}},
Prolog ->{GrayLevel[0.5], EdgeForm[Thickness[.005]],
Rectangle[{1.01, 0.01}, {6.99, 6.99}]}]
As you can see, I need to assign different directive to each line.
I would like the Dashed Black Line to be Points (Joined->False).
I can`t grasp the methods to group directive for sublist yet.
Thank You for your attention.
If you want every other plot to be joined, you could just set Joined->{True, False}, e.g.
ListPlot[daList, Joined -> {True, False},
PlotRange -> {{1, 7}, {0, 7}},
PlotStyle -> {{Thick, Lighter[Red, .5]}, {Dashed, Black}, {Thick,
Lighter[Red, .3]}, {Dashed, Black}, {Thick,
Lighter[Red, .1]}, {Dashed, Black}},
Prolog -> {GrayLevel[0.5], EdgeForm[Thickness[.005]],
Rectangle[{1.01, 0.01}, {6.99, 6.99}]}]
which produces
Edit
Concerning your comment, I guess you could always plot the even and odd sets of points separately and combine them with show. So for your example:
joinedStyle = {Thick, Lighter[Red, #]} & /# {.5, .3, .1};
pointStyle = Black;
plot1 = ListPlot[daList[[1 ;; ;; 2]], Joined -> True, PlotStyle -> joinedStyle,
PlotRange -> {{1,7},{0,7}}];
plot2 = ListPlot[daList[[2 ;; ;; 2]], Joined -> False, PlotStyle -> pointStyle];
Show[plot1, plot2, PlotRange -> {{1, 7}, {0, 7}},
Prolog -> {GrayLevel[0.5], EdgeForm[Thickness[.005]],
Rectangle[{1.01, 0.01}, {6.99, 6.99}]}]
You may consider constructing your plots separately, and layering them with Show. Here is an example that hopefully is not too far from the mark.
{d1, d2} = Partition[daList, 2]\[Transpose];
lambda = {541, 550, 560, 570, 580, 590, 600};
colors = {Thick, Red~Lighter~#} & /# {0.5, 0.3, 0.1};
g1 = ListPlot[d1, Joined -> True, PlotStyle -> colors];
g2 = ListPlot[d2, PlotStyle -> {{Black, AbsolutePointSize[5]}}];
Show[{g1, g2}, PlotRange -> {{1, 7}, {0, 7}},
AspectRatio -> 1/GoldenRatio, Frame -> True, FrameStyle -> 20,
FrameTicks -> {{Automatic,
None}, {MapIndexed[{#2[[1]], #} &, lambda], Automatic}},
Prolog -> {GrayLevel[0.5], EdgeForm[Thickness[.005]],
Rectangle[Scaled[{0, 0}], Scaled[{1, 1}]]}, ImageSize -> 600]
I think I am almost copying Heike here, but it is not intentional. Hopefully both answers add something.
There is a more complete example of the use of Scaled and ImageScaled for this very application in: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6303500/mathematica-matlab-like-figure-plot
As an alternative to ListPlot, you could consider Graphics
tdata = MapIndexed[{#2[[1]], #1} &, #] & /# daList;
and
Graphics[
{ GrayLevel[0.7], EdgeForm[AbsoluteThickness[2]],
Rectangle[{1.02, 0.05}, {7.2, 7.75}],
(*lines*)
AbsoluteThickness[2],
Transpose[{Lighter[Red, #] & /# {0.5, 0.3, 0.1},
Line#tdata[[#]] & /# {1, 3, 5}}],
(*points*)
Black, PointSize[0.016],
Point#tdata[[#]] & /# {2, 4, 6}
}, Axes -> True, PlotRange -> {{1, 7.2}, {0, 7.8}},
AspectRatio -> 1/GoldenRatio]
gives
or, to give each data set a different symbol,as in the following plot:
Code:
Graphics[
{ GrayLevel[.7], EdgeForm[AbsoluteThickness[2]],
Rectangle[{1.02, 0.05}, {7.2, 7.75}],
(*lines*)
AbsoluteThickness[2],
Transpose[{Lighter[Red, #] & /# {0.5, 0.3, 0.1},
Line#tdata[[#]] & /# {1, 3, 5}}],
(*points*)
Inset[Graphics[{EdgeForm[Black], White, Rectangle[]},
ImageSize -> 8], #] & /# tdata[[2]],
Inset[Graphics[{EdgeForm[Black], White,
Polygon[{{1, 0}, {0, Sqrt[3]}, {-1, 0}}]},
ImageSize -> 10], #] & /# tdata[[4]],
Inset[Graphics[{ EdgeForm[Black], White, Disk[]},
ImageSize -> 9], #] & /# tdata[[6]]
}, Axes -> True, PlotRange -> {{1, 7.2}, {0, 7.8}},
AspectRatio -> 1/GoldenRatio]
Please Consider :
intense = Reverse[Round[Rationalize /# N[10^Range[0, 3, 1/3]]]];
values = Range[0, 9/10, 1/10];
intensityLegend = Column[Prepend[MapThread[
Function[{intensity, values},
Row[{Graphics[{(Lighter[Blue, values]),
Rectangle[{0, 0}, {4, 1}], Black,
Text[Style[ToString[intensity], 16, Bold], {2, .5}]}]}]],
{intense, values}], Text[Style["Photons Number", Bold, 15]]]];
IntersectionDp1={{1., 588.377}, {2.15443, 580.306}, {4.64159, 573.466}, {10.,560.664},
{21.5443, 552.031}, {46.4159, 547.57}, {100.,545.051},
{215.443, 543.578}, {464.159, 542.281}, {1000., 541.346}}
FindD1=ListLogLinearPlot[Map[List, IntersectionDp1],
Frame -> True,
AxesOrigin -> {-1, 0},
PlotMarkers ->
With[{markerSize = 0.04}, {Graphics[{Lighter[Blue, #], Disk[]}],
markerSize} & /#Range[9/10, 0, -1/10]], Filling -> Axis,
FillingStyle -> Opacity[0.8],
PlotRange -> {{.5, 1100}, {540, 600}},
ImageSize->400];
Grid[{{intensityLegend, FindD1}, {intensityLegend, FindD1}},
ItemSize -> {50, 20}, Frame -> True]
How could I get the legend Column Size to Fit the Height of the Plot Area ?
While Row adjust the size I need to use Grid. This is why I duplicated in grid.
Working with Image Sizes. The (* <- *) marks the important modifications to your code, the rest are mainly font size thingies:
intense = Reverse[Round[Rationalize /# N[10^Range[0, 3, 1/3]]]];
values = Range[0, 9/10, 1/10];
imgSize = 400; (* <- *)
Off[Ticks::ticks]
IntersectionDp1 = {{1., 588.377}, {2.15443, 580.306}, {4.64159, 573.466},
{10., 560.664}, {21.5443, 552.031}, {46.4159, 547.57}, {100., 545.051},
{215.443, 543.578}, {464.159, 542.281}, {1000., 541.346}}
FindD1 = ListLogLinearPlot[Map[List, IntersectionDp1], Frame -> True,
AxesOrigin -> {-1, 0},
PlotMarkers ->
With[{markerSize = 0.04},
{Graphics[{Lighter[Blue, #], Disk[]}], markerSize} &
/# Range[9/10, 0, -1/10]], Filling -> Axis, FillingStyle -> Opacity[0.8],
PlotRange -> {{.5, 1100}, {540, 600}}, ImageSize -> imgSize]; (* <- *)
intensityLegend =
Rasterize[Column[
Prepend[
Reverse#MapThread[ (* <- *)
Function[{intensity, values},
Row[{Graphics[{(Lighter[Blue, values]),
Rectangle[{0, 0}, {4, 1}], Black,
Text[Style[ToString[intensity], 30, Bold], {2, .5}]}]}]],
{intense, values}],
Text[Style["Photons Number", Bold, 25]]]],
ImageSize -> {Automatic, (* <- *)
IntegerPart#
First[imgSize Cases[AbsoluteOptions[FindD1],
HoldPattern[AspectRatio -> x_] -> x]]}];
Grid[{{intensityLegend, FindD1}, {intensityLegend, FindD1}}, Frame -> True]
Where I reversed the intensities column for aesthetic purposes.
Edit
If you don't explicitly specify the ImageSize option for the Plot, you'll disappointingly find that AbsoluteOptions[Plot, "ImageSize"] returns "Automatic" !
Edit Answering the #500's comment bellow
The expression:
ImageSize -> {Automatic, (* <- *)
IntegerPart#
First[imgSize Cases[AbsoluteOptions[FindD1],
HoldPattern[AspectRatio -> x_] -> x]]}];
is really a working replacement for something that should work but doesn't to get the image size of a Plot:
ImageSize -> {Automatic, Last#AbsoluteOptions[FindD1,"ImageSize"]}
So, what the IntegerPart[...] thing is doing is getting the vertical size of the plot image, multiplying imgSize by the AspectRatio of the Plot.
To understand how it works, run the code and then type:
AbsoluteOptions[FindD1]
and you will see the Plot options there. Then the Cases[] function is just extracting the AspectRatio option.
In fact there is a cleaner way to do what the Cases[] does. It is:
AbsoluteOptions[FindD1,"AspectRatio"]
but there is another bug in the AbsoluteOptions function that prevents us to use it this way.
How about making the legend a bit smaller?
intensityLegend =
Column[Prepend[
MapThread[
Function[{intensity, values},
Row[{Graphics[{(Lighter[Blue, values]),
Rectangle[{0, 0}, {4, 1}], Black,
Text[Style[ToString[intensity], 12, Bold], {2, .5}]},
ImageSize -> 50]}]], {intense, values}],
Text[Style["Photons Number", Bold, 15]]]];
There are times when exporting to a pdf image is simply troublesome. If the data you are plotting contains many points then your figure will be big in size and the pdf viewer of your choice will spend most of its time rendering this high quality image. We can thus export this image as a jpeg, png or tiff. The picture will be fine from a certain view but when you zoom in it will look all distorted. This is fine to some extent for the figure we are plotting but if your image contains text then this text will look pixelated.
In order to try to get the best of both worlds we can separate this figure into two parts: Axes with labels and the 3D picture. The axes can thus be exported as pdf or eps and the 3D figure as a raster. I wish I knew how later combine the two in Mathematica, so for the moment we can use a vector graphics editor such as Inkscape or Illustrator to combine the two.
I managed to achieve this for a plot I made in a publication but this prompt me to create routines in Mathematica in order to automatize this process. Here is what I have so far:
SetDirectory[NotebookDirectory[]];
SetOptions[$FrontEnd, PrintingStyleEnvironment -> "Working"];
I like to start my notebook by setting the working directory to the notebook directory. Since I want my images to be of the size I specify I set the printing style environment to working, check this for more info.
in = 72;
G3D = Graphics3D[
AlignmentPoint -> Center,
AspectRatio -> 0.925,
Axes -> {True, True, True},
AxesEdge -> {{-1, -1}, {1, -1}, {-1, -1}},
AxesStyle -> Directive[10, Black],
BaseStyle -> {FontFamily -> "Arial", FontSize -> 12},
Boxed -> False,
BoxRatios -> {3, 3, 1},
LabelStyle -> Directive[Black],
ImagePadding -> All,
ImageSize -> 5 in,
PlotRange -> All,
PlotRangePadding -> None,
TicksStyle -> Directive[10],
ViewPoint -> {2, -2, 2},
ViewVertical -> {0, 0, 1}
]
Here we set the view of the plot we want to make. Now lets create our plot.
g = Show[
Plot3D[Sin[x y], {x, 0, Pi}, {y, 0, Pi},
Mesh -> None,
AxesLabel -> {"x", "y", "z"}
],
Options[G3D]
]
Now we need to find a way of separating. Lets start by drawing the axes.
axes = Graphics3D[{}, AbsoluteOptions[g]]
fig = Show[g,
AxesStyle -> Directive[Opacity[0]],
FaceGrids -> {{-1, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 0}}
]
I included the facegrids so that we can match the figure with the axis in the post editing process. Now we export both images.
Export["Axes.pdf", axes];
Export["Fig.pdf", Rasterize[fig, ImageResolution -> 300]];
You will obtain two pdf files which you can edit in and put together into a pdf or eps. I wish it was that simple but it isn't. If you actually did this you will obtain this:
The two figures are different sizes. I know axes.pdf is correct because when I open it in Inkspace the figure size is 5 inches as I had previously specified.
I mentioned before that I managed to get this with one of my plots. I will clean the file and change the plots to make it more accessible for anyone who wants to see that this is in fact true. In any case, does anyone know why I can't get the two pdf files to be the same size? Also, keep in mind that we want to obtain a pretty plot for the Rasterized figure. Thank you for your time.
PS.
As a bonus, can we avoid the post editing and simply combine the two figures in mathematica? The rasterized version and the vector graphics version that is.
EDIT:
Thanks to rcollyer for his comment. I'm posting the results of his comment.
One thing to mention is that when we export the axes we need to set Background to None so that we can have a transparent picture.
Export["Axes.pdf", axes, Background -> None];
Export["Fig.pdf", Rasterize[fig, ImageResolution -> 300]];
a = Import["Axes.pdf"];
b = Import["Fig.pdf"];
Show[b, a]
And then, exporting the figure gives the desired effect
Export["FinalFig.pdf", Show[b, a]]
The axes preserve the nice components of vector graphics while the figure is now a Rasterized version of the what we plotted. But the main question still remains.
How do you make the two figures match?
UPDATE:
My question has been answered by Alexey Popkov. I would like to thank him for taking the time to look into my problem. The following code is an example for those of you want to use the technique I previously mentioned. Please see Alexey Popkov's answer for useful comments in his code. He managed to make it work in Mathematica 7 and it works even better in Mathematica 8. Here is the result:
SetDirectory[NotebookDirectory[]];
SetOptions[$FrontEnd, PrintingStyleEnvironment -> "Working"];
$HistoryLength = 0;
in = 72;
G3D = Graphics3D[
AlignmentPoint -> Center, AspectRatio -> 0.925, Axes -> {True, True, True},
AxesEdge -> {{-1, -1}, {1, -1}, {-1, -1}}, AxesStyle -> Directive[10, Black],
BaseStyle -> {FontFamily -> "Arial", FontSize -> 12}, Boxed -> False,
BoxRatios -> {3, 3, 1}, LabelStyle -> Directive[Black], ImagePadding -> 40,
ImageSize -> 5 in, PlotRange -> All, PlotRangePadding -> 0,
TicksStyle -> Directive[10], ViewPoint -> {2, -2, 2}, ViewVertical -> {0, 0, 1}
];
axesLabels = Graphics3D[{
Text[Style["x axis (units)", Black, 12], Scaled[{.5, -.1, 0}], {0, 0}, {1, -.9}],
Text[Style["y axis (units)", Black, 12], Scaled[{1.1, .5, 0}], {0, 0}, {1, .9}],
Text[Style["z axis (units)", Black, 12], Scaled[{0, -.15, .7}], {0, 0}, {-.1, 1.5}]
}];
fig = Show[
Plot3D[Sin[x y], {x, 0, Pi}, {y, 0, Pi}, Mesh -> None],
ImagePadding -> {{40, 0}, {15, 0}}, Options[G3D]
];
axes = Show[
Graphics3D[{}, FaceGrids -> {{-1, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 0}},
AbsoluteOptions[fig]], axesLabels,
Epilog -> Text[Style["Panel A", Bold, Black, 12], ImageScaled[{0.075, 0.975}]]
];
fig = Show[fig, AxesStyle -> Directive[Opacity[0]]];
Row[{fig, axes}]
At this point you should see this:
The magnification takes care of the resolution of your image. You should try different values to see how this changes your picture.
fig = Magnify[fig, 5];
fig = Rasterize[fig, Background -> None];
Combine the graphics
axes = First#ImportString[ExportString[axes, "PDF"], "PDF"];
result = Show[axes, Epilog -> Inset[fig, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, ImageDimensions[axes]]];
Export them
Export["Result.pdf", result];
Export["Result.eps", result];
The only difference I found between M7 and M8 using the above code is that M7 does not export the eps file correctly. Other than that everything is working fine now. :)
The first column shows the output obtained from M7. Top is the eps version with file size of 614 kb, bottom is the pdf version with file size of 455 kb. The second column shows the output obtained from M8. Top is the eps version with file size of 643 kb, bottom is the pdf version with file size of 463 kb.
I hope you find this useful. Please check Alexey's answer to see the comments in his code, they will help you avoid pitfalls with Mathematica.
The complete solution for Mathematica 7.0.1: fixing bugs
The code with comments:
(*controls the resolution of rasterized graphics*)
magnification = 5;
SetOptions[$FrontEnd, PrintingStyleEnvironment -> "Working"]
(*Turn off history for saving memory*)
$HistoryLength = 0;
(*Epilog will give us the bounding box of the graphics*)
g1 = Plot3D[Sin[x y], {x, 0, Pi}, {y, 0, Pi},
AlignmentPoint -> Center, AspectRatio -> 0.925,
Axes -> {True, True, True},
AxesEdge -> {{-1, -1}, {1, -1}, {-1, -1}},
BaseStyle -> {FontFamily -> "Arial", FontSize -> 12},
Boxed -> False, BoxRatios -> {3, 3, 1},
LabelStyle -> Directive[Black], ImagePadding -> All,
ImageSize -> 5*72, PlotRange -> All, PlotRangePadding -> None,
TicksStyle -> Directive[10], ViewPoint -> {2, -2, 2},
ViewVertical -> {0, 0, 1}, AxesStyle -> Directive[Opacity[0]],
FaceGrids -> {{-1, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 0}}, Mesh -> None,
ImagePadding -> 40,
Epilog -> {Red, AbsoluteThickness[1],
Line[{ImageScaled[{0, 0}], ImageScaled[{0, 1}],
ImageScaled[{1, 1}], ImageScaled[{1, 0}],
ImageScaled[{0, 0}]}]}];
(*The options list should NOT contain ImagePadding->Full.Even it is \
before ImagePadding->40 it is not replaced by the latter-another bug!*)
axes = Graphics3D[{Opacity[0],
Point[PlotRange /. AbsoluteOptions[g1] // Transpose]},
AlignmentPoint -> Center, AspectRatio -> 0.925,
Axes -> {True, True, True},
AxesEdge -> {{-1, -1}, {1, -1}, {-1, -1}},
AxesStyle -> Directive[10, Black],
BaseStyle -> {FontFamily -> "Arial", FontSize -> 12},
Boxed -> False, BoxRatios -> {3, 3, 1},
LabelStyle -> Directive[Black], ImageSize -> 5*72,
PlotRange -> All, PlotRangePadding -> None,
TicksStyle -> Directive[10], ViewPoint -> {2, -2, 2},
ViewVertical -> {0, 0, 1}, ImagePadding -> 40,
Epilog -> {Red, AbsoluteThickness[1],
Line[{ImageScaled[{0, 0}], ImageScaled[{0, 1}],
ImageScaled[{1, 1}], ImageScaled[{1, 0}],
ImageScaled[{0, 0}]}]}];
(*fixing bug with ImagePadding loosed when specifyed as option in \
Plot3D*)
g1 = AppendTo[g1, ImagePadding -> 40];
(*Increasing ImageSize without damage.Explicit setting for \
ImagePadding is important (due to a bug in behavior of \
ImagePadding->Full)!*)
g1 = Magnify[g1, magnification];
g2 = Rasterize[g1, Background -> None];
(*Fixing bug with non-working option Background->None when graphics \
is Magnifyed*)
g2 = g2 /. {255, 255, 255, 255} -> {0, 0, 0, 0};
(*Fixing bug with icorrect exporting of Ticks in PDF when Graphics3D \
and 2D Raster are combined*)
axes = First#ImportString[ExportString[axes, "PDF"], "PDF"];
(*Getting explicid ImageSize of graphics imported form PDF*)
imageSize =
Last#Transpose[{First##, Last##} & /#
Sort /# Transpose#
First#Cases[axes,
Style[{Line[x_]}, ___, RGBColor[1.`, 0.`, 0.`, 1.`], ___] :>
x, Infinity]]
(*combining Graphics3D and Graphics*)
result = Show[axes, Epilog -> Inset[g2, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, imageSize]]
Export["C:\\result.pdf", result]
Here is what I see in the Notebook:
And here is what I get in the PDF:
Just checking (Mma8):
SetOptions[$FrontEnd, PrintingStyleEnvironment -> "Working"];
in = 72;
G3D = Graphics3D[AlignmentPoint -> Center, AspectRatio -> 0.925,
Axes -> {True, True, True},
AxesEdge -> {{-1, -1}, {1, -1}, {-1, -1}},
AxesStyle -> Directive[10, Black],
BaseStyle -> {FontFamily -> "Arial", FontSize -> 12},
Boxed -> False, BoxRatios -> {3, 3, 1},
LabelStyle -> Directive[Black], ImagePadding -> All,
ImageSize -> 5 in, PlotRange -> All, PlotRangePadding -> None,
TicksStyle -> Directive[10], ViewPoint -> {2, -2, 2},
ViewVertical -> {0, 0, 1}];
g = Show[Plot3D[Sin[x y], {x, 0, Pi}, {y, 0, Pi}, Mesh -> None,
AxesLabel -> {"x", "y", "z"}], Options[G3D]];
axes = Graphics3D[{}, AbsoluteOptions[g]];
fig = Show[g, AxesStyle -> Directive[Opacity[0]],
FaceGrids -> {{-1, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 0}}];
Export["c:\\Axes.pdf", axes, Background -> None];
Export["c:\\Fig.pdf", Rasterize[fig, ImageResolution -> 300]];
a = Import["c:\\Axes.pdf"];
b = Import["c:\\Fig.pdf"];
Export["c:\\FinalFig.pdf", Show[b, a]]
In Mathematica 8 the problem may be solved even simpler using new Overlay function.
Here is the code from the UPDATE section of the question:
SetOptions[$FrontEnd, PrintingStyleEnvironment -> "Working"];
$HistoryLength = 0;
in = 72;
G3D = Graphics3D[AlignmentPoint -> Center, AspectRatio -> 0.925,
Axes -> {True, True, True},
AxesEdge -> {{-1, -1}, {1, -1}, {-1, -1}},
AxesStyle -> Directive[10, Black],
BaseStyle -> {FontFamily -> "Arial", FontSize -> 12},
Boxed -> False, BoxRatios -> {3, 3, 1},
LabelStyle -> Directive[Black], ImagePadding -> 40,
ImageSize -> 5 in, PlotRange -> All, PlotRangePadding -> 0,
TicksStyle -> Directive[10], ViewPoint -> {2, -2, 2},
ViewVertical -> {0, 0, 1}];
axesLabels =
Graphics3D[{Text[Style["x axis (units)", Black, 12],
Scaled[{.5, -.1, 0}], {0, 0}, {1, -.9}],
Text[Style["y axis (units)", Black, 12],
Scaled[{1.1, .5, 0}], {0, 0}, {1, .9}],
Text[Style["z axis (units)", Black, 12],
Scaled[{0, -.15, .7}], {0, 0}, {-.1, 1.5}]}];
fig = Show[Plot3D[Sin[x y], {x, 0, Pi}, {y, 0, Pi}, Mesh -> None],
ImagePadding -> {{40, 0}, {15, 0}}, Options[G3D]];
axes = Show[
Graphics3D[{}, FaceGrids -> {{-1, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 0}},
AbsoluteOptions[fig]], axesLabels,
Epilog ->
Text[Style["Panel A", Bold, Black, 12],
ImageScaled[{0.075, 0.975}]]];
fig = Show[fig, AxesStyle -> Directive[Opacity[0]]];
And here is the solution:
gr = Overlay[{axes,
Rasterize[fig, Background -> None, ImageResolution -> 300]}]
Export["Result.pdf", gr]
In this case we need not to convert fonts to outlines.
UPDATE
As jmlopez pointed out in the comments to this answer, the option Background -> None does not work properly under Mac OS X in Mathematica 8.0.1. One workaround is to replace white non-transparent points by transparent:
gr = Overlay[{axes,
Rasterize[fig, Background -> None,
ImageResolution -> 300] /. {255, 255, 255, 255} -> {0, 0, 0, 0}}]
Export["Result.pdf", gr]
Here I present another version of the original solution which uses the second argument of Raster instead of Inset. I think that this way is a little more straightforward.
Here is the code from the UPDATE section of the question (modified a bit):
SetOptions[$FrontEnd, PrintingStyleEnvironment -> "Working"];
$HistoryLength = 0;
in = 72;
G3D = Graphics3D[AlignmentPoint -> Center, AspectRatio -> 0.925,
Axes -> {True, True, True},
AxesEdge -> {{-1, -1}, {1, -1}, {-1, -1}},
AxesStyle -> Directive[10, Black],
BaseStyle -> {FontFamily -> "Arial", FontSize -> 12},
Boxed -> False, BoxRatios -> {3, 3, 1},
LabelStyle -> Directive[Black], ImagePadding -> 40,
ImageSize -> 5 in, PlotRange -> All, PlotRangePadding -> 0,
TicksStyle -> Directive[10], ViewPoint -> {2, -2, 2},
ViewVertical -> {0, 0, 1}];
axesLabels =
Graphics3D[{Text[Style["x axis (units)", Black, 12],
Scaled[{.5, -.1, 0}], {0, 0}, {1, -.9}],
Text[Style["y axis (units)", Black, 12],
Scaled[{1.1, .5, 0}], {0, 0}, {1, .9}],
Text[Style["z axis (units)", Black, 12],
Scaled[{0, -.15, .7}], {0, 0}, {-.1, 1.5}]}];
fig = Show[Plot3D[Sin[x y], {x, 0, Pi}, {y, 0, Pi}, Mesh -> None],
ImagePadding -> {{40, 0}, {15, 0}}, Options[G3D]];
axes = Show[
Graphics3D[{}, FaceGrids -> {{-1, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 0}},
AbsoluteOptions[fig]], axesLabels,
Prolog ->
Text[Style["Panel A", Bold, Black, 12],
ImageScaled[{0.075, 0.975}]]];
fig = Show[fig, AxesStyle -> Directive[Opacity[0]]];
fig = Magnify[fig, 5];
fig = Rasterize[fig, Background -> None];
axes2D = First#ImportString[ExportString[axes, "PDF"], "PDF"];
The rest of the answer is the new solution.
At first, we set the second argument of Raster so that it will fill the complete PlotRange of axes2D. The general way to do this is:
fig = fig /.
Raster[data_, rectangle_, opts___] :>
Raster[data, {Scaled[{0, 0}], Scaled[{1, 1}]}, opts];
Another way is to make direct assignment to the corresponding Part of the original expression:
fig[[1, 2]] = {Scaled[{0, 0}], Scaled[{1, 1}]}
Note that this last code is based on the knowledge of internal structure of the expression generated by Rasterize which is potentially version-dependent.
Now we combine two graphical objects in a very straightforward way:
result = Show[axes2D, fig]
And export the result:
Export["C:/Result.pdf", result];
Export["C:/Result.eps", result];
Both .eps and .pdf are exported perfectly with Mathematica 8.0.4 under Windows XP 32 bit and look identical to the files exported with the original code:
result = Show[axes2D,
Epilog -> Inset[fig, Center, Center, ImageScaled[{1, 1}]]]
Export["C:/Result.pdf", result];
Export["C:/Result.eps", result];
Note that we need not necessarily to convert axes to outlines at least when exporting to PDF. The code
result = Show[axes,
Epilog -> Inset[fig, Center, Center, ImageScaled[{1, 1}]]]
Export["C:/Result.pdf", result];
and the code
fig[[1, 2]] = {ImageScaled[{0, 0}], ImageScaled[{1, 1}]};
result = Show[axes, Epilog -> First#fig]
Export["C:/Result.pdf", result];
produce PDF files looking identical to both previous versions.
This looks like much ado about nothing. As I read it, the problem you want to solve is the following:
You want to export in a vector format, so that when printed the optimal resolution is used for fonts, lines and graphics
In your edit program you don't want be bothered by the slowness of rendering a complex vector drawing
These requirements can be met by exporting as .eps and using an embedded rasterized preview image.
Export["file.eps","PreviewFormat"->"TIFF"]
This will work in many applications. Unfortunately, MS Word's eps filter has been changing wildly over the last four versions or so, and whereas it once worked for me in one of the older functions it doesn't anymore in W2010. I've heard rumors that it might work in the mac version, but I can't check right now.
Mathematica 9.0.1.0 / 64-bit Linux:
In general, it seems to be very tricky to place the vectorized axes at the correct position. In most applications it will be sufficient to simply rasterize everything with a high resolution:
fig = Plot3D[Sin[x y], {x, 0, 3}, {y, 0, 3}, Mesh -> None];
Export["export.eps", fig, "AllowRasterization" -> True,
ImageResolution -> 600];
The code exports the graphic to an EPS-file using a high quality rasterization of both the 3D content and the axis. Finally, you can convert the EPS-file to a PDF using for example the Linux command epspdf:
epspdf export.eps
This is probably sufficient for most of the users and it saves you a lot of time. However, if you really want to export the text as vector graphic, you might want to try the following function:
ExportAsSemiRaster[filename_, dpi_, fig_, plotrange_,
plotrangepadding_] := (
range =
Show[fig, PlotRange -> plotrange,
PlotRangePadding -> plotrangepadding];
axes = Show[Graphics3D[{}, AbsoluteOptions[range]]];
noaxes = Show[range, AxesStyle -> Transparent];
raster =
Rasterize[noaxes, Background -> None, ImageResolution -> dpi];
result =
Show[raster,
Epilog -> Inset[axes, Center, Center, ImageDimensions[raster]]];
Export[filename, result];
);
You need to explicitly specify the PlotRange and the PlotRangePadding. Example:
fig = Graphics3D[{Opacity[0.9], Orange,
Polygon[{{0, 0, 0}, {4, 0, 4}, {4, 5, 7}, {0, 5, 5}}],
Opacity[0.05], Gray, CuboidBox[{0, 0, 0}, {4, 5, 7}]},
Axes -> True, AxesStyle -> Darker[Orange],
AxesLabel -> {"x1", "x2", "x3"}, Boxed -> False,
ViewPoint -> {-8.5, -8, 6}];
ExportAsSemiRaster["export.pdf", 600,
fig, {{0, 4}, {0, 5}, {0, 7}}, {.0, .0, .0}];
Print[Import["export.pdf"]];
What is the simplest way to create a row/column/grid of plots, with the whole grid having a single FrameLabel?
I need something similar to this:
p := ListPlot[RandomInteger[10, 5], Joined -> True, Axes -> False,
Frame -> True, PlotRange -> {0, 11},
FrameLabel -> {"horizontal", None}, AspectRatio -> 1]
GraphicsRow[{Show[p, FrameLabel -> {"horizontal", "vertical"}], p, p}]
For a row format, it could have one or multiple horizontal labels, but only one vertical one.
Issues to consider:
Vertical scale must match for all plots, and must not be ruined by e.g. a too long label or automatic PlotRangePadding.
Good (and resize-tolerant!) control of inter-plot spacing is needed (after all, this is one of the motivations behind removing the redundant labels)
General space-efficiency of the arrangement. Maximum content, minimum (unnecessary) whitespace.
EDIT
I'm trying to be able to robustly create print ready figures, which involves a lot of resizing. (Because the exported PDFs will usually not have the same proportions as what I see in the notebook, and must have readable but not oversized fonts)
You can use LevelScheme to achieve what you want. Here's an example:
<< "LevelScheme`"
Figure[{
Multipanel[{{0, 1}, {0, 1}}, {1, 3},
XFrameLabels -> textit["x"], BufferB -> 3,
YFrameLabels -> textit["Sinc(x)"], BufferL -> 3,
TickFontSize -> 9,
XGapSizes -> {0.1, 0.1},
PanelLetterCorner -> {1, 1}
],
FigurePanel[{1, 1}, PlotRange -> {{-1.6, -0.6}, {-0.5, 1}}],
RawGraphics[Plot[Sinc[20 x], {x, -1.6, -0.6}]],
FigurePanel[{1, 2}, PlotRange -> {{-0.5, 0.5}, {-0.5, 1}}],
RawGraphics[Plot[Sinc[20 x], {x, -0.5, 0.5}]],
FigurePanel[{1, 3}, PlotRange -> {{0.6, 1.6}, {-0.5, 1}}],
RawGraphics[Plot[Sinc[20 x], {x, 0.6, 1.6}]]
},
PlotRange -> {{-0.1, 1.02}, {-0.12, 1.095}}]
LevelScheme offers you tremendous flexibility in the arrangement of your plot.
Instead of naming giving the plot common labels, you can move the definition inside the FigurePanel[] and control the labels for each one individually.
You can set inter-plot spacings both in the X and Y directions and also change the sizes of each panel, for e.g., the left one can take up 2/3 of the space and the next two just 1/6 of the space each.
You can set individual plot ranges, change the frame tick labels for each, control which side of the panel (top/bottom/l/r) the labels should be marked, change panel numberings, etc.
The only drawback is that you might have to wrestle with it in some cases, but in general, I've found it a pleasure to use.
EDIT
Here's one similar to your example:
Figure[{
Multipanel[{{0, 1}, {0, 1}}, {1, 3},
YFrameLabels -> textit["Vertical"], BufferL -> 3,
TickFontSize -> 9,
XGapSizes -> {0.1, 0.1},
PanelLetterCorner -> {1, 1}
],
FigurePanel[{1, 1}, PlotRange -> {{1, 10}, {0, 10}}],
RawGraphics[ListLinePlot[RandomInteger[10, 10]]],
FigurePanel[{1, 2}, PlotRange -> {{1, 10}, {0, 10}},
LabB -> textit["Horizontal"], BufferB -> 3],
RawGraphics[ListLinePlot[RandomInteger[10, 10]]],
FigurePanel[{1, 3}, PlotRange -> {{1, 10}, {0, 10}}],
RawGraphics[ListLinePlot[RandomInteger[10, 10]]]
},
PlotRange -> {{-0.1, 1.02}, {-0.2, 1.095}}]
EDIT 2
To answer Mr. Wizard's comment, here's a blank template for a 2x3 grid
Figure[{Multipanel[{{0, 1}, {0, 1}}, {2, 3},
XFrameTicks -> None,
YFrameTicks -> None,
XGapSizes -> {0.1, 0.1},
YGapSizes -> {0.1}],
FigurePanel[{1, 1}],
FigurePanel[{1, 2}],
FigurePanel[{1, 3}],
FigurePanel[{2, 1}],
FigurePanel[{2, 2}],
FigurePanel[{2, 3}]
}, PlotRange -> {{-0.01, 1.01}, {-0.01, 1.01}}]
And here's one with extended panels
Figure[{Multipanel[{{0, 1}, {0, 1}}, {2, 3},
XFrameTicks -> None,
YFrameTicks -> None,
XGapSizes -> {0.1, 0.1},
YGapSizes -> {0.1}],
FigurePanel[{1, 1}, PanelAdjustments -> {{0, 0}, {1.1, 0}}],
FigurePanel[{1, 2}],
FigurePanel[{1, 3}],
FigurePanel[{2, 2}, PanelAdjustments -> {{0, 1.1}, {0, 0}}]
}, PlotRange -> {{-0.01, 1.01}, {-0.01, 1.01}}]
You already know how to handle multiple horizontal labels through ListPlot.
You can get single labels by using Panel. For example...
p := ListPlot[RandomInteger[10, 5], Joined -> True, Axes -> False,
Frame -> True, PlotRange -> {0, 11}, AspectRatio -> 1]
Panel[GraphicsRow[{p, p, p}], {"horizontal",Rotate["vertical", Pi/2]},
{Bottom, Left}, Background -> White]
You can optionally include labels on Top and Right edges too.
Here is one option I just put together. Its advantage is that it is simple.
I like the look of yoda's LevelScheme plots better, assuming those can be done for a grid as well.
p := ListPlot[RandomInteger[10, 5], Joined -> True, Axes -> False,
Frame -> True, PlotRange -> {0, 11}, AspectRatio -> 1]
gg = GraphicsGrid[{{p, p, p}, {p, p, p}, Graphics /# Text /# {"Left", "Center", "Right"}},
Spacings -> 5, ItemAspectRatio -> {{1, 1, 0.15}}];
Labeled[gg, Rotate["vertical", Pi/2], Left]