Guid values in Oracle with fluentnhibernate - oracle

I've only been using fluent nhibernate a few days and its been going fine until trying to deal with guid values and Oracle. I have read a good few posts on the subject but none that help me solve the problem I am seeing.
I am using Oracle 10g express edition.
I have a simple test table in oracle
CREATE TABLE test (Field RAW(16));
I have a simple class and interface for mapping to the table
public class Test : ITest
{
public virtual Guid Field { get; set; }
}
public interface ITest
{
Guid Field { get; set; }
}
Class map is simple
public class TestMap : ClassMap<Test>
{
public TestMap()
{
Id(x => x.Field);
}
}
I start trying to insert a simple easily recognised guid value
00112233445566778899AABBCCDDEEFF
Heres the code
var test = new Test {Field = new Guid("00112233445566778899AABBCCDDEEFF")};
// test.Field == 00112233445566778899AABBCCDDEEFF here.
session.Save(test);
// after save guid is changed, test.Field == 09a3f4eefebc4cdb8c239f5300edfd82
// this value is different for each run so I pressume nhibernate is assigning
// a value internally.
transaction.Commit();
IQuery query = session.CreateQuery("from Test");
// or
// IQuery query = session.CreateSQLQuery("select * from Test").AddEntity(typeof(Test));
var t in query.List<Test>().Single();
// t.Field == 8ef8a3b10e704e4dae5d9f5300e77098
// this value never changes between runs.
The value actually stored in the database differs each time also, for the run above it was
EEF4A309BCFEDB4C8C239F5300EDFD82
Truly confused....
Any help much appreciated.
EDIT: I always delete data from the table before each test run. Also using ADO directly works no problem.
EDIT: OK, my first problem was that even though I thought I was dropping the data from the table via SQL command line for oracle when I viewed the table via oracle UI it still had data and the first guid was as I should have expected 8ef8a3b10e704e4dae5d9f5300e77098.
Fnhibernate still appears to be altering the guid value on save. it alters it to the value it stores in the database but I'm still not sure why it is doing this or how\if I can control it.

If you intend on assigning the id yourself you will need to use a different id generator than the default which is Guid.comb. You should be using assigned instead. So your mapping would look something like this:
Id(x => x.Field).GeneratedBy.Assigned();
You can read more about id generators in the nhibernate documentation here:
http://www.nhforge.org/doc/nh/en/index.html#mapping-declaration-id-generator

Related

NHibernate: How to know if, on Flush() SQL will be sent?

I'm a bit puzzled with the NHibernate's IsDirty() method.
Directly after getting a (very large) complex object from my database, NHibernate's ISession.IsDirty() gives 'true'.
IFacadeDAL fd = new FacadeDAL();
// Session's not dirty
IProject proj = fd.GetByID<IProject, string>("123611-3640");
// Session is dirty
However, if i call Commit() like so:
using (ITransaction trans = Facade.Session.Transaction)
{
trans.Begin();
Facade.Session.Save(entity);
trans.Commit();
return true;
}
this results in no sql (exept for "exec sp_reset_connection").
I have read that due to 'mapping-choices' you can get "ghosts" in your session (causing the session to say it's dirty), but wouldn't it then also try to update something? Also, if this is caused e.g. by "converting" an sql bit to a c# bool i don't think i can change it... (no clue if that could be a cause for ghosts, though).
Update 2:
There are several (sql server) views and tables involved here. This is the (very) simplified class:
public class Project : IProject
{
private string id;
private List<IPlantItem> plantItems;
public Project() { }
public virtual string ID
{
get { return id; }
}
public virtual IEnumerable<IPlantItem> PlantItems
{
get { return plantItems; }
}
}
'PlantItem is being stored in a table. So i expect when i change anything in a PlantItem, IsDirty should change to 'true'.
My question is: is there a way to check if the session at that point, on flush() (or in my case on commit() for that matter) would generated actual sql statements? And if not: is there another way of (manually) storing some sort of a snapshot of the session to compare the current session to?
Update 1: I should really also mention these aspects:
that my FlushMode is set to 'None'.
that the underlying data of 'IProject'-object itself is based on a sql-view and therefore has most properties in the mapping set to update="false"
that when i actually change something in an object and use the same method for saving, sql update statements are being sent (and thus all is committed just fine)
In my experience Ghosts can be caused by the database being a nullable int and the mapping an ordinary int.
When the entity gets hydrated the nullable db int is converted to zero and hence it is now dirty.
Another way to get dirty records is by specifying a wrong type in the XML mapping, e.g.
public enum Sex
{
Unspecified,
Male,
Female
}
...
public virtual Sex Sex { get; set; }
and specify an int in the mapping.
<property name="Sex" type="int"/>
See this link to test your mappings which explains in more details.
If some of your entities is dirty - and therefore the ISession is dirty - they you have a mismatch between the properties and the database. For example, imagine you have a column in a table that is nullable, but in your code it is set as not null (an int, for example). NHibernate will consider it dirty, because its current value (0 in case of an integer) is different from the value that came from the db (null). Look for "Ghost properties NHibernate" in Google.

Telerik OpenAccess - Search With Non-Persistent Property

I'm using Telerik OpenAccess and SQL Server on a project and I need to be able to search by what someone's age will be on a certain date. The problem that I am running into is that the person's date of birth is stored in one table and the date to compare to is in another table, which prevents me from using a computed column. They are, however, joined together so that I can calculate the age by creating my own non-persistent property in the partial class like so:
public partial class Student
{
[Telerik.OpenAccess.Transient]
private int? _ageUponArrival;
public virtual int? AgeUponArrival
{
get
{
try
{
var dob = DateTime.Parse(this.StudentProfiles.First().Person.YearOfBirth);
var programStart = (DateTime)(this.StudentPrograms.First().ProgramStart);
this._ageUponArrival = programStart.Year - dob.Year;
if (dob > programStart.AddYears(-(int)(this._ageUponArrival)))
{
(this._ageUponArrival)--;
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
this._ageUponArrival = null;
}
return _ageUponArrival;
}
set { }
}
}
Please ignore how bad the tables are set up, it's something that I inherited and can't change at this point. The problem with this approach is that the property is not available to search on with Linq. I know that I could create a view that would do this for me, but I would much rather not have to maintain a view just for this. Is there any way at all to create a calculated property through Telerik that would be calculated on the db server in such a way as to be searchable?
It appears that this is not possible at this point. http://www.telerik.com/community/forums/orm/linq-questions/dynamic-query-with-extended-field.aspx

How do I store a comma-separated list in Orchard CMS?

Using Orchard CMS, I am dealing with a record and a part proxy, but cannot figure out how to save it into the DB. In fact, I confess I don't even know how to get the items I'm trying to save into this paradigm. I was originally using enum's for choices:
MyEmum.cs:
public enum Choices { Choice1, Choice2, Choice3, Choice4 }
MyRecord.cs:
public virtual string MyProperty { get; set; }
MyPart.cs:
public IEnumerable<string> MyProperty
{
get
{
if (String.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(Record.MyProperty)) return new string[] { };
return Record
.MyProperty
.Split(new[] { '.' }, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries)
.Select(r => r.Trim())
.Where(r => !String.IsNullOrEmpty(r));
}
set { Record.MyProperty = value == null ? null : String.Join(",", value); }
}
Now, in my service class, I tried something like:
public MyPart Create(MyPartRecord record)
{
MyPart part = Services.ContentManager.Create<MyPart>("My");
...
part.MyProperty = record.MyProperty; //getting error here
...
return part;
}
However, I am getting the following error: Cannot implicitly convert 'string' to System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<string>'
Essentially, I am trying to save choices from a checkboxlist (one or more selections) as a comma-separated list in the DB.
And this doesn't even get me over the problem of how do I use the enum. Any thoughts?
For some background:
I understand that the appropriate way to handle this relationship would be to create a separate table and use IList<MyEnum>. However, this is a simple list that I do not intend to manipulate with edits (in fact, no driver is used in this scenario as I handle this on the front-end with a controller and routes). I am just capturing data and redisplaying it in the Admin view for statistical/historical purposes. I may even consider getting rid of the Part (considering the following post: Bertrand's Blog Post.
It should be:
part.MyProperty = new[] {"foo", "bar"};
for example. The part's setter will store the value on the record's property as a comma-separated string, which will get persisted into the DB.
If you want to use enum values, you should use the Parse and ToString APIs that .NET provide on Enum.

Fluent nHibernate query on Oracle is extremely slow

I'm new to nHibernate and am having some really slow results from a simple select query. Maybe I'm missing something obvious. The situation as follow:
I am using fluent nHibernate.
I am querying an oracle database (10g), I am trying to return a person object.
It's taking around 16 seconds per record!
Here's my fluent nHibernate code:
public class Person
{
public virtual string PersonId { get; set; }
public virtual string FirstName { get; set; }
public virtual string LastName { get; set; }
}
public class PersonMap : ClassMap<Person>
{
public PersonMap()
{
Schema("MyTestDB");
Table("Person");
Id(i => i.PersonId);
Map(i => i.FirstName);
Map(i => i.LastName);
}
}
Here is the code that is suppose to retrieve the actual data:
var sessionFactory = Fluently.Configure().Database(OracleClientConfiguration.Oracle10.ConnectionString(#"User Id=tester;Password=tester99!;Data Source=MyTestDB;").ShowSql()).Mappings(m => m.FluentMappings.AddFromAssembly(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly())).BuildSessionFactory();
using (var session = sessionFactory.OpenSession())
{
using (session.BeginTransaction())
{
Stopwatch stopWatch = new Stopwatch();
stopWatch.Start();
var person = session.QueryOver<Person>()
.Where(p => p.PersonId == "1").SingleOrDefault();
stopWatch.Stop();
var ts = stopWatch.Elapsed;
var time = string.Format("{0:00}:{1:00}:{2:00}.{3:00}", ts.Hours, ts.Minutes, ts.Seconds, ts.Milliseconds/10);
Console.WriteLine("Retrieved object: Person, Id: {0}, First Name: {1}, Last Name: {2} in [{3}]", person.PersonId, person.FirstName, person.LastName, time);
}
}
The PersonId column is indexed and is the primary key.
My attempts to figure this out so far has been to run the same sql generated by nHibernate with ADO.Net. The query ran extremely fast (the stopwatch gets a elapsed time of 0).
Using plsql developer to run the same query on the database gave the same fast results. This suggests to me think it is not the query nor the database.
How can I debug this further? Will nHibernate profiler help with this (I don't have this available to me at the moment)?
Any ideas guys?
Firstly, you should try capturing a few more points in time throughout your programs execution. You've assumed that it's the NHibernate component, but without more data-points that's going to be hard to prove, especially when your initial test comes back with 0.
Secondly, the big cost in your NHibernate scenario is the call to BuildSessionFactory(). NHibernate is optimized to have cheap session construction, so it expects you to create this factory once and re-use it throughout the lifetime of your program. If you put trace points around this event, you may find your "expense".
If I had to take a wild guess here, the issue is not with nhibernate querying the database I think it is the initial cost you are paying to build the sessionFactory and/or session and that is why you are seeing the unusual latency.
Why dont you use Jetbrains dotTrace and see where is the actual performance hit, if its in running the query or something else. Just run a sampling query and you will be able to get the timings with the exact number of calls to each function.
P.S: I have no association with jetbrains just a happy customer recommending the product.
The problem ended up being that I didn't specify the datatype for the primary key column, which turned out to be varchar (non-unicode). Turns out you need to specify the datatype for non-unicode columns, as fluent assumes string maps to uni code.
This is how to set the custom type in fluent notation:
Map(x=>x.PersonId).CustomType("AnsiString");

Entity Framework Code-First: "The ObjectStateManager cannot track multiple objects with the same key."

I'm running into an issue with Entity Framework code-first in MVC3. I'm hitting this exception:
An object with the same key already exists in the ObjectStateManager.
The ObjectStateManager cannot track multiple objects with the same
key.
This is addressed many times on SO, but I'm having trouble utilizing any of the suggested solutions in my situation.
Here is a code sample:
FestORM.SaleMethod method = new FestORM.SaleMethod
{
Id = 2,
Name = "Test Sale Method"
};
FestContext context = new FestContext();
//everything works without this line:
string thisQueryWillMessThingsUp =
context.SaleMethods.Where(m => m.Id == 2).Single().Name;
context.Entry(method).State = System.Data.EntityState.Modified;
context.SaveChanges();
EDITED to clarify: I am attempting to update an object that already exists in the database.
Everything works fine without the query noted in the code. In my application, my controller is instantiating the context, and that same context is passed to several repositories that are used by the controller--so I am not able to simply use a different context for the initial query operation. I've tried to remove the entity from being tracked in the ObjectStateManager, but I can't seem to get anywhere with that either. I'm trying to figure out a solution that will work for both conditions: sometimes I will be updating an object that is tracked by the ObjectStateManager, and sometimes it will happen to have not been tracked yet.
FWIW, my real repository functions look like this, just like the code above:
public void Update(T entity)
{
//works ONLY when entity is not tracked by ObjectStateManager
_context.Entry(entity).State = System.Data.EntityState.Modified;
}
public void SaveChanges()
{
_context.SaveChanges();
}
Any ideas? I've been fighting this for too long...
The problem is that this query
string thisQueryWillMessThingsUp =
context.SaleMethods.Where(m => m.Id == 2).Single().Name;
brings one instance of the SaleMethod entity into the context and then this code
context.Entry(method).State = System.Data.EntityState.Modified;
attaches a different instance to the context. Both instances have the same primary key, so EF thinks that you are trying to attach two different entities with the same key to the context. It doesn't know that they are both supposed to be the same entity.
If for some reason you just need to query for the name, but don't want to actually bring the full entity into the context, then you can do this:
string thisQueryWillMessThingsUp =
context.SaleMethods.Where(m => m.Id == 2).AsNoTracking().Single().Name;
If what you are tying to do is update an existing entity and you have values for all mapped properties of that entity, then the simplest thing to do is to not run the query and just use:
context.Entry(method).State = System.Data.EntityState.Modified;
If you don't want to update all properties, possibly because you don't have values for all properties, then querying for the entity and setting properties on it before calling SaveChanges is an acceptable approach. There are several ways to do this depending on your exact requirements. One way is to use the Property method, something like so:
var salesMethod = context.SaleMethods.Find(2); // Basically equivalent to your query
context.Entry(salesMethod).Property(e => e.Name).CurrentValue = newName;
context.Entry(salesMethod).Property(e => e.SomeOtherProp).CurrentValue = newOtherValue;
context.SaveChanges();
These blog posts contain some additional information that might be helpful:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2011/01/29/using-dbcontext-in-ef-feature-ctp5-part-4-add-attach-and-entity-states.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2011/01/30/using-dbcontext-in-ef-feature-ctp5-part-5-working-with-property-values.aspx
The obvious answer would be that your not actually saving the method object to the database before you call:
//everything works without this line:
string thisQueryWillMessThingsUp = context.SaleMethods.Where(m => m.Id == 2).Single().Name;
However, I think perhaps this is just a bit a code you left out.
What if you make your entities inherit from an abstract class ie.
public abstract class BaseClass
{
public int Id { get; set; }
}
Then update your Repository to
public class Repository<T> where T : BaseClass
{
.....
public void Update(T entity)
{
_context.Entry(entity).State = entity.Id == 0 ? System.Data.EntityState.Added : System.Data.EntityState.Modified;
}
}
Also you might want to not set the ID of your SaleMethod and let it be generated by the database. Problem could also be because SaleMethod Object in the database has Id of 2 and then you try to add another SaleMethod object with Id 2.
The error you see stems from trying to add another SaleMethod object with ID of 2 to the ObjectStateManager.

Resources