I'm new to Ruby and trying to determine how I can call a class from a child object. Something like the below; however when I try it, I get an error saying "undefined local variable or method `me'"
class my_object < Object
attr_accessor :me
def initialize(attributes ={})
end
def setvalue(passed_value)
#passed_value = passed_value.to_s
end
def search(passed_value)
#passed_value.include?(passed_value)
end
end
def getMe
me_too = my_object.new
me_too.me = "test"
me_too.me.search("test")
end
end
instance.class
will give you a reference to the class
This works:
But your code had multiple errors.
class MY
attr_accessor :me
def initialize(attributes ={})
end
def setvalue(passed_value)
passed_value = passed_value.to_s
end
def search(passed_value)
passed_value.include?(passed_value)
end
def getMe
me_too = MY.new
me_too.me = "test"
me_too.search("test")
end
end
my = MY.new
my.getMe
You don't need to explicity extend Object, everything extends Object in ruby.
Your class name needs to start with a capital letter.
class MyObject
attr_accessor :me
end
me_too = MyObject.new
me_too.me = "test"
in console
me_too => #<MyObject:0x106b2e420 #me="test">
Check out some introductory ruby tutorials maybe http://ruby.learncodethehardway.org/
Related
I'm working to create a few Ruby builder objects, and thinking on how I could reuse some of Ruby's magic to reduce the logic of the builder to a single class/module. It's been ~10 years since my last dance with the language, so a bit rusty.
For example, I have this builder:
class Person
PROPERTIES = [:name, :age]
attr_accessor(*PROPERTIES)
def initialize(**kwargs)
kwargs.each do |k, v|
self.send("#{k}=", v) if self.respond_to?(k)
end
end
def build
output = {}
PROPERTIES.each do |prop|
if self.respond_to?(prop) and !self.send(prop).nil?
value = self.send(prop)
# if value itself is a builder, evalute it
output[prop] = value.respond_to?(:build) ? value.build : value
end
end
output
end
def method_missing(m, *args, &block)
if m.to_s.start_with?("set_")
mm = m.to_s.gsub("set_", "")
if PROPERTIES.include?(mm.to_sym)
self.send("#{mm}=", *args)
return self
end
end
end
end
Which can be used like so:
Person.new(name: "Joe").set_age(30).build
# => {name: "Joe", age: 30}
I would like to be able to refactor everything to a class and/or module so that I could create multiple such builders that'll only need to define attributes and inherit or include the rest (and possibly extend each other).
class BuilderBase
# define all/most relevant methods here for initialization,
# builder attributes and object construction
end
module BuilderHelper
# possibly throw some of the methods here for better scope access
end
class Person < BuilderBase
include BuilderHelper
PROPERTIES = [:name, :age, :email, :address]
attr_accessor(*PROPERTIES)
end
# Person.new(name: "Joe").set_age(30).set_email("joe#mail.com").set_address("NYC").build
class Server < BuilderBase
include BuilderHelper
PROPERTIES = [:cpu, :memory, :disk_space]
attr_accessor(*PROPERTIES)
end
# Server.new.set_cpu("i9").set_memory("32GB").set_disk_space("1TB").build
I've been able to get this far:
class BuilderBase
def initialize(**kwargs)
kwargs.each do |k, v|
self.send("#{k}=", v) if self.respond_to?(k)
end
end
end
class Person < BuilderBase
PROPERTIES = [:name, :age]
attr_accessor(*PROPERTIES)
def build
...
end
def method_missing(m, *args, &block)
...
end
end
Trying to extract method_missing and build into the base class or a module keeps throwing an error at me saying something like:
NameError: uninitialized constant BuilderHelper::PROPERTIES
OR
NameError: uninitialized constant BuilderBase::PROPERTIES
Essentially the neither the parent class nor the mixin are able to access the child class' attributes. For the parent this makes sense, but not sure why the mixin can't read the values inside the class it was included into. This being Ruby I'm sure there's some magical way to do this that I have missed.
Help appreciated - thanks!
I reduced your sample to the required parts and came up with:
module Mixin
def say_mixin
puts "Mixin: Value defined in #{self.class::VALUE}"
end
end
class Parent
def say_parent
puts "Parent: Value defined in #{self.class::VALUE}"
end
end
class Child < Parent
include Mixin
VALUE = "CHILD"
end
child = Child.new
child.say_mixin
child.say_parent
This is how you could access a CONSTANT that lives in the child/including class from the parent/included class.
But I don't see why you want to have this whole Builder thing in the first place. Would an OpenStruct not work for your case?
Interesting question. As mentioned by #Pascal, an OpenStruct might already do what you're looking for.
Still, it might be more concise to explicitly define the setter methods. It might also be clearer to replace the PROPERTIES constants by methods calls. And since I'd expect a build method to return a complete object and not just a Hash, I renamed it to to_h:
class BuilderBase
def self.properties(*ps)
ps.each do |property|
attr_reader property
define_method :"set_#{property}" do |value|
instance_variable_set(:"##{property}", value)
#hash[property] = value
self
end
end
end
def initialize(**kwargs)
#hash = {}
kwargs.each do |k, v|
self.send("set_#{k}", v) if self.respond_to?(k)
end
end
def to_h
#hash
end
end
class Person < BuilderBase
properties :name, :age, :email, :address
end
p Person.new(name: "Joe").set_age(30).set_email("joe#mail.com").set_address("NYC").to_h
# {:name=>"Joe", :age=>30, :email=>"joe#mail.com", :address=>"NYC"}
class Server < BuilderBase
properties :cpu, :memory, :disk_space
end
p Server.new.set_cpu("i9").set_memory("32GB").set_disk_space("1TB").to_h
# {:cpu=>"i9", :memory=>"32GB", :disk_space=>"1TB"}
I think no need to declare PROPERTIES, we can create a general builder like this:
class Builder
attr_reader :build
def initialize(clazz)
#build = clazz.new
end
def self.build(clazz, &block)
builder = Builder.new(clazz)
builder.instance_eval(&block)
builder.build
end
def set(attr, val)
#build.send("#{attr}=", val)
self
end
def method_missing(m, *args, &block)
if #build.respond_to?("#{m}=")
set(m, *args)
else
#build.send("#{m}", *args, &block)
end
self
end
def respond_to_missing?(method_name, include_private = false)
#build.respond_to?(method_name) || super
end
end
Using
class Test
attr_accessor :x, :y, :z
attr_reader :w, :u, :v
def set_w(val)
#w = val&.even? ? val : 0
end
def add_u(val)
#u = val if val&.odd?
end
end
test1 = Builder.build(Test) {
x 1
y 2
z 3
} # <Test:0x000055b6b0fb2888 #x=1, #y=2, #z=3>
test2 = Builder.new(Test).set(:x, 1988).set_w(6).add_u(2).build
# <Test:0x000055b6b0fb23b0 #x=1988, #w=6>
I have a ruby class, and in one of the methods, it calls an external function, and pass in all instance variables, and continue with the return value. Here is the code:
class MyClass
attr_accessor :name1
attr_accessor :name2
...
attr_accessor :namen
def inner_func():
all_vars = ???? # how to collect all my instance variables into a dict/Hash?
res = out_func(all_vars)
do_more_stuff(res)
end
end
The problem is the instance variables might vary in subclasses. I can't refer them as their names. So, is there a way to do this? Or Am I thinking in a wrong way?
You can use instance_variables to collect them in an Array. You will get all initialized instance variables.
class MyClass
attr_accessor :name1
attr_accessor :name2
...
attr_accessor :namen
def inner_func():
all_vars = instance_variables
res = out_func(all_vars)
do_more_stuff(res)
end
end
You could keep track of all accessors as you create them:
class Receiver
def work(arguments)
puts "Working with #{arguments.inspect}"
end
end
class MyClass
def self.attr_accessor(*arguments)
super
#__attribute_names__ ||= []
#__attribute_names__ += arguments
end
def self.attribute_names
#__attribute_names__
end
def self.inherited(base)
parent = self
base.class_eval do
#__attribute_names__ = parent.attribute_names
end
end
def attributes
self.class.attribute_names.each_with_object({}) do |attribute_name, result|
result[attribute_name] = public_send(attribute_name)
end
end
def work
Receiver.new.work(attributes)
end
attr_accessor :foo
attr_accessor :bar
end
class MySubclass < MyClass
attr_accessor :baz
end
Usage
my_class = MyClass.new
my_class.foo = 123
my_class.bar = 234
my_class.work
# Working with {:foo=>123, :bar=>234}
my_subclass = MySubclass.new
my_subclass.foo = 123
my_subclass.bar = 234
my_subclass.baz = 345
my_subclass.work
# Working with {:foo=>123, :bar=>234, :baz=>345}
I have the following class:
module StatCalculators
class Passing
def initialize(user_id, game_id)
#user_id = user_id
#game_id = game_id
end
def save_completion_percentage
completions = StatType.find_by_name("Completions").stats.where(athlete_id: #user_id).sum(:float_value)
attempts = StatType.find_by_name("Pass Attempts").stats.where(athlete_id: #user_id).sum(:float_value)
value = completions/attempts
stat = Stat.new(value: value, game_id: #game_id, athlete_id: #user_id, float_value: value)
stat.save(validate: false)
end
end
end
The class above has the potential to have a lot more methods that need to be run without having to call each method individually... is there a way to run all instance methods in the initialize method?
It is possible:
module StatCalculators
class Passing
def initialize(user_id, game_id)
#user_id = user_id
#game_id = game_id
klass = self.class
klass.instance_methods(false).each do |method|
klass.instance_method(method).bind(self).call
end
end
...
end
end
I have a test class and a box class, in the test class i have a var called boxHolder, which is an array, i want to override the << method for this array. Inside the singleton how can i access moski_call ?
class Test
attr_accessor :boxHolder
def initialize()
super
self.boxHolder = Array.new
class << #boxHolder
def <<(box)
box.setPositionWithinColumn(moski_call)
super(box)
end
end
end
def moski_call
"YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
end
end
class Box
def initialize
end
def setPositionWithinColumn(str)
puts "got a string #{str}"
end
end
# test
box = Box.new
test = Test.new
test.boxHolder
like this:
# need this or else `moski_call` method is looked up in context of #boxholder
moski_call_output = moski_call
class << #boxholder; self; end.send(:define_method, :<<) { |box|
box.setPositionWithinColumn(moski_call_output)
super(box)
}
What about:
def self.boxHolder.<< (box)
box.setPositionWithinColumn(moski_call)
super(box)
end
This would declare a method for your instance boxHolder. But boxHolder does not have access to the method moski_call
You need to maintain access to the "parent" Test object. This can be done using the fact that blocks are closures:
parent = self # to be accessible in the closure
#boxHolder.define_singleton_method(:<<) do |box|
box.setPositionWithinColumn(parent.moski_call)
super(box)
end
Note: define_singleton_method is new in Ruby 1.9, so either upgrade, require 'backports/1.9.1/kernel/define_singleton_method' or do class << #boxHolder; define_method(:<<){ "..." } end if using an older Ruby.
I'm studying Ruby and my brain just froze.
In the following code, how would I write the class writer method for 'self.total_people'? I'm trying to 'count' the number of instances of the class 'Person'.
class Person
attr_accessor :name, :age
##nationalities = ['French', 'American', 'Colombian', 'Japanese', 'Russian', 'Peruvian']
##current_people = []
##total_people = 0
def self.nationalities #reader
##nationalities
end
def self.nationalities=(array=[]) #writer
##nationalities = array
end
def self.current_people #reader
##current_people
end
def self.total_people #reader
##total_people
end
def self.total_people #writer
#-----?????
end
def self.create_with_attributes(name, age)
person = self.new(name)
person.age = age
person.name = name
return person
end
def initialize(name="Bob", age=0)
#name = name
#age = age
puts "A new person has been instantiated."
##total_people =+ 1
##current_people << self
end
You can define one by appending the equals sign to the end of the method name:
def self.total_people=(v)
##total_people = v
end
You're putting all instances in ##current_people you could define total_people more accurately:
def self.total_people
##current_people.length
end
And get rid of all the ##total_people related code.
I think this solves your problem:
class Person
class << self
attr_accessor :foobar
end
self.foobar = 'hello'
end
p Person.foobar # hello
Person.foobar = 1
p Person.foobar # 1
Be aware of the gotchas with Ruby's class variables with inheritance - Child classes cannot override the parent's value of the class var. A class instance variable may really be what you want here, and this solution goes in that direction.
One approach that didn't work was the following:
module PersonClassAttributes
attr_writer :nationalities
end
class Person
extend PersonClassAttributes
end
I suspect it's because attr_writer doesn't work with modules for some reason.
I'd like to know if there's some metaprogramming way to approach this. However, have you considered creating an object that contains a list of people?