In Unix I could run myscript '"test"' and I would get "test".
In Windows cmd I get 'test'.
How can I pass double-quotes as a parameter? I would like to know how to do this manually from a cmd window so I don't have to write a program to test my program.
Another way to escape quotes (though probably not preferable), which I've found used in certain places is to use multiple double-quotes. For the purpose of making other people's code legible, I'll explain.
Here's a set of basic rules:
When not wrapped in double-quoted groups, spaces separate parameters:program param1 param2 param 3 will pass four parameters to program.exe: param1, param2, param, and 3.
A double-quoted group ignores spaces as value separators when passing parameters to programs:program one two "three and more" will pass three parameters to program.exe: one, two, and three and more.
Now to explain some of the confusion:
Double-quoted groups that appear directly adjacent to text not wrapped with double-quotes join into one parameter:hello"to the entire"world acts as one parameter: helloto the entireworld.
Note: The previous rule does NOT imply that two double-quoted groups can appear directly adjacent to one another.
Any double-quote directly following a closing quote is treated as (or as part of) plain unwrapped text that is adjacent to the double-quoted group, but only one double-quote:"Tim says, ""Hi!""" will act as one parameter: Tim says, "Hi!"
Thus there are three different types of double-quotes: quotes that open, quotes that close, and quotes that act as plain-text.
Here's the breakdown of that last confusing line:
" open double-quote group
T inside ""s
i inside ""s
m inside ""s
inside ""s - space doesn't separate
s inside ""s
a inside ""s
y inside ""s
s inside ""s
, inside ""s
inside ""s - space doesn't separate
" close double-quoted group
" quote directly follows closer - acts as plain unwrapped text: "
H outside ""s - gets joined to previous adjacent group
i outside ""s - ...
! outside ""s - ...
" open double-quote group
" close double-quote group
" quote directly follows closer - acts as plain unwrapped text: "
Thus, the text effectively joins four groups of characters (one with nothing, however):
Tim says, is the first, wrapped to escape the spaces
"Hi! is the second, not wrapped (there are no spaces)
is the third, a double-quote group wrapping nothing
" is the fourth, the unwrapped close quote.
As you can see, the double-quote group wrapping nothing is still necessary since, without it, the following double-quote would open up a double-quoted group instead of acting as plain-text.
From this, it should be recognizable that therefore, inside and outside quotes, three double-quotes act as a plain-text unescaped double-quote:
"Tim said to him, """What's been happening lately?""""
will print Tim said to him, "What's been happening lately?" as expected. Therefore, three quotes can always be reliably used as an escape.However, in understanding it, you may note that the four quotes at the end can be reduced to a mere two since it technically is adding another unnecessary empty double-quoted group.
Here are a few examples to close it off:
program a b REM sends (a) and (b)
program """a""" REM sends ("a")
program """a b""" REM sends ("a) and (b")
program """"Hello,""" Mike said." REM sends ("Hello," Mike said.)
program ""a""b""c""d"" REM sends (abcd) since the "" groups wrap nothing
program "hello to """quotes"" REM sends (hello to "quotes")
program """"hello world"" REM sends ("hello world")
program """hello" world"" REM sends ("hello world")
program """hello "world"" REM sends ("hello) and (world")
program "hello ""world""" REM sends (hello "world")
program "hello """world"" REM sends (hello "world")
Final note: I did not read any of this from any tutorial - I came up with all of it by experimenting. Therefore, my explanation may not be true internally. Nonetheless all the examples above evaluate as given, thus validating (but not proving) my theory.
I tested this on Windows 7, 64bit using only *.exe calls with parameter passing (not *.bat, but I would suppose it works the same).
I cannot quickly reproduce the symptoms: if I try myscript '"test"' with a batch file myscript.bat containing just #echo.%1 or even #echo.%~1, I get all quotes: '"test"'
Perhaps you can try the escape character ^ like this: myscript '^"test^"'?
Try this:
myscript """test"""
"" escape to a single " in the parameter.
The 2nd document quoted by Peter Mortensen in his comment on the answer of Codesmith made things much clearer for me. That document was written by windowsinspired.com. The link repeated: A Better Way To Understand Quoting and Escaping of Windows Command Line Arguments.
Some further trial and error leads to the following guideline:
Escape every double quote " with a caret ^. If you want other characters with special meaning to the Windows command shell (e.g., <, >, |, &) to be interpreted as regular characters instead, then escape them with a caret, too.
If you want your program foo to receive the command line text "a\"b c" > d and redirect its output to file out.txt, then start your program as follows from the Windows command shell:
foo ^"a\^"b c^" ^> d > out.txt
If foo interprets \" as a literal double quote and expects unescaped double quotes to delimit arguments that include whitespace, then foo interprets the command as specifying one argument a"b c, one argument >, and one argument d.
If instead foo interprets a doubled double quote "" as a literal double quote, then start your program as
foo ^"a^"^"b c^" ^> d > out.txt
The key insight from the quoted document is that, to the Windows command shell, an unescaped double quote triggers switching between two possible states.
Some further trial and error implies that in the initial state, redirection (to a file or pipe) is recognized and a caret ^ escapes a double quote and the caret is removed from the input. In the other state, redirection is not recognized and a caret does not escape a double quote and isn't removed. Let's refer to these states as 'outside' and 'inside', respectively.
If you want to redirect the output of your command, then the command shell must be in the outside state when it reaches the redirection, so there must be an even number of unescaped (by caret) double quotes preceding the redirection. foo "a\"b " > out.txt won't work -- the command shell passes the entire "a\"b " > out.txt to foo as its combined command line arguments, instead of passing only "a\"b " and redirecting the output to out.txt.
foo "a\^"b " > out.txt won't work, either, because the caret ^ is encountered in the inside state where it is an ordinary character and not an escape character, so "a\^"b " > out.txt gets passed to foo.
The only way that (hopefully) always works is to keep the command shell always in the outside state, because then redirection works.
If you don't need redirection (or other characters with special meaning to the command shell), then you can do without the carets. If foo interprets \" as a literal double quote, then you can call it as
foo "a\"b c"
Then foo receives "a\"b c" as its combined arguments text and can interpret it as a single argument equal to a"b c.
Now -- finally -- to the original question. myscript '"test"' called from the Windows command shell passes '"test"' to myscript. Apparently myscript interprets the single and double quotes as argument delimiters and removes them. You need to figure out what myscript accepts as a literal double quote and then specify that in your command, using ^ to escape any characters that have special meaning to the Windows command shell. Given that myscript is also available on Unix, perhaps \" does the trick. Try
myscript \^"test\^"
or, if you don't need redirection,
myscript \"test\"
I'm calling powershell from cmd, and passing quotes and neither escapes here worked. The grave accent worked to escape double quotes on this Win 10 surface pro.
>powershell.exe "echo la`"" >> test
>type test
la"
Below are outputs I got for other characters to escape a double quote:
la\
la^
la
la~
Using another quote to escape a quote resulted in no quotes.
As you can see, the characters themselves got typed, but didn't escape the double quotes.
Maybe you came here, because you wonder how to escape quotes that you need in the command that you pass to /c on cmd.exe? Well you don't:
CMD /c "MKDIR "foo bar""
will execute
MKDIR "foo bar"
which is really a behavior that I did not expect in the first glance.
Related
In cmd I'm trying to do something like
program.exe -command "otherprogram.exe %thing% %path%"
The issue I'm having is that I can't figure out how to escape the % characters when they're inside double quotes, but I need the double quotes because of the spaces in this argument. Basically I don't want cmd to do variable expansion before passing the argument value to program.exe.
Just to be clear, this is directly in cmd, not in a batch script.
A simple semi solution is:
program.exe -command ^"otherprogram.exe %th^ing% %pa^t^h%^"
The positions of the carets inside the variable name are random.
This still could fail, but only for the rare case, if variables exists named thi^ng or pa^t^h
It seems strange, but don't escape the percent signs. Put a caret (the escape sign for every other special char) anywhere within the variable name: echo %^username% or `echo %use^rname%.
The first parsing removes the ^ (because there is (hopefully) no variable with that name). On command line (other than in a batch file), an empty variable doesn't show nothing, but the variable name including the surrounding %'s.
Any further level of parsing then receives the "normal" variable and expands it. Prove:
echo %usern^ame%
call echo %usern^ame%
Not your question, but for the sake of completeness: in a batch script, simply escape the % with another %:
echo %%username%%
call echo %%username%%
I want to run a command from a bash script which has single quotes and some other commands inside the single quotes and a variable.
e.g. repo forall -c '....$variable'
In this format, $ is escaped and the variable is not expanded.
I tried the following variations but they were rejected:
repo forall -c '...."$variable" '
repo forall -c " '....$variable' "
" repo forall -c '....$variable' "
repo forall -c "'" ....$variable "'"
If I substitute the value in place of the variable the command is executed just fine.
Please tell me where am I going wrong.
Inside single quotes everything is preserved literally, without exception.
That means you have to close the quotes, insert something, and then re-enter again.
'before'"$variable"'after'
'before'"'"'after'
'before'\''after'
Word concatenation is simply done by juxtaposition. As you can verify, each of the above lines is a single word to the shell. Quotes (single or double quotes, depending on the situation) don't isolate words. They are only used to disable interpretation of various special characters, like whitespace, $, ;... For a good tutorial on quoting see Mark Reed's answer. Also relevant: Which characters need to be escaped in bash?
Do not concatenate strings interpreted by a shell
You should absolutely avoid building shell commands by concatenating variables. This is a bad idea similar to concatenation of SQL fragments (SQL injection!).
Usually it is possible to have placeholders in the command, and to supply the command together with variables so that the callee can receive them from the invocation arguments list.
For example, the following is very unsafe. DON'T DO THIS
script="echo \"Argument 1 is: $myvar\""
/bin/sh -c "$script"
If the contents of $myvar is untrusted, here is an exploit:
myvar='foo"; echo "you were hacked'
Instead of the above invocation, use positional arguments. The following invocation is better -- it's not exploitable:
script='echo "arg 1 is: $1"'
/bin/sh -c "$script" -- "$myvar"
Note the use of single ticks in the assignment to script, which means that it's taken literally, without variable expansion or any other form of interpretation.
The repo command can't care what kind of quotes it gets. If you need parameter expansion, use double quotes. If that means you wind up having to backslash a lot of stuff, use single quotes for most of it, and then break out of them and go into doubles for the part where you need the expansion to happen.
repo forall -c 'literal stuff goes here; '"stuff with $parameters here"' more literal stuff'
Explanation follows, if you're interested.
When you run a command from the shell, what that command receives as arguments is an array of null-terminated strings. Those strings may contain absolutely any non-null character.
But when the shell is building that array of strings from a command line, it interprets some characters specially; this is designed to make commands easier (indeed, possible) to type. For instance, spaces normally indicate the boundary between strings in the array; for that reason, the individual arguments are sometimes called "words". But an argument may nonetheless have spaces in it; you just need some way to tell the shell that's what you want.
You can use a backslash in front of any character (including space, or another backslash) to tell the shell to treat that character literally. But while you can do something like this:
reply=\”That\'ll\ be\ \$4.96,\ please,\"\ said\ the\ cashier
...it can get tiresome. So the shell offers an alternative: quotation marks. These come in two main varieties.
Double-quotation marks are called "grouping quotes". They prevent wildcards and aliases from being expanded, but mostly they're for including spaces in a word. Other things like parameter and command expansion (the sorts of thing signaled by a $) still happen. And of course if you want a literal double-quote inside double-quotes, you have to backslash it:
reply="\"That'll be \$4.96, please,\" said the cashier"
Single-quotation marks are more draconian. Everything between them is taken completely literally, including backslashes. There is absolutely no way to get a literal single quote inside single quotes.
Fortunately, quotation marks in the shell are not word delimiters; by themselves, they don't terminate a word. You can go in and out of quotes, including between different types of quotes, within the same word to get the desired result:
reply='"That'\''ll be $4.96, please," said the cashier'
So that's easier - a lot fewer backslashes, although the close-single-quote, backslashed-literal-single-quote, open-single-quote sequence takes some getting used to.
Modern shells have added another quoting style not specified by the POSIX standard, in which the leading single quotation mark is prefixed with a dollar sign. Strings so quoted follow similar conventions to string literals in the ANSI standard version of the C programming language, and are therefore sometimes called "ANSI strings" and the $'...' pair "ANSI quotes". Within such strings, the above advice about backslashes being taken literally no longer applies. Instead, they become special again - not only can you include a literal single quotation mark or backslash by prepending a backslash to it, but the shell also expands the ANSI C character escapes (like \n for a newline, \t for tab, and \xHH for the character with hexadecimal code HH). Otherwise, however, they behave as single-quoted strings: no parameter or command substitution takes place:
reply=$'"That\'ll be $4.96, please," said the cashier'
The important thing to note is that the single string that gets stored in the reply variable is exactly the same in all of these examples. Similarly, after the shell is done parsing a command line, there is no way for the command being run to tell exactly how each argument string was actually typed – or even if it was typed, rather than being created programmatically somehow.
Below is what worked for me -
QUOTE="'"
hive -e "alter table TBL_NAME set location $QUOTE$TBL_HDFS_DIR_PATH$QUOTE"
EDIT: (As per the comments in question:)
I've been looking into this since then. I was lucky enough that I had repo laying around. Still it's not clear to me whether you need to enclose your commands between single quotes by force. I looked into the repo syntax and I don't think you need to. You could used double quotes around your command, and then use whatever single and double quotes you need inside provided you escape double ones.
just use printf
instead of
repo forall -c '....$variable'
use printf to replace the variable token with the expanded variable.
For example:
template='.... %s'
repo forall -c $(printf "${template}" "${variable}")
Variables can contain single quotes.
myvar=\'....$variable\'
repo forall -c $myvar
I was wondering why I could never get my awk statement to print from an ssh session so I found this forum. Nothing here helped me directly but if anyone is having an issue similar to below, then give me an up vote. It seems any sort of single or double quotes were just not helping, but then I didn't try everything.
check_var="df -h / | awk 'FNR==2{print $3}'"
getckvar=$(ssh user#host "$check_var")
echo $getckvar
What do you get? A load of nothing.
Fix: escape \$3 in your print function.
Does this work for you?
eval repo forall -c '....$variable'
I have program whose textual output I want to directly execute in a shell. How shall I format the output of this program such that the paths with spaces are accepted by the shell ?
$(echo ls /folderA/folder\ with\ spaces/)
Some more info: the program that generates the output is coded in Haskell (source). It's a simple program that keeps a list of my favorite commands. It prints the commands with 'cmdl -l'. I can then choose one command to execute with 'cmdl -g12' for command number 12. Thanks for pointing out that instead of $( ) use 'cmdl -g12 | bash', I wasn't aware of that...
How shall I format the output of this program such that the paths with
spaces are accepted by the shell ?
The shell cannot distinguish between spaces that are part of a path and spaces that are separator between arguments, unless those are properly quoted. Moreover, you actually need proper quoting using single quotes ('...') in order to "shield" all those characters combinations that might otherwise have special meaning for the shell (\, &, |, ||, ...).
Depending the language used for your external tool, their might be a library available for that purpose. As as example, Python has pipes.quote (shlex.quote on Python 3) and Perl has String::ShellQuote::shell_quote.
I'm not quite sure I understand, but don't you just want to pipe through the shell?
For a program called foo
$ foo | sh
To format output from your program so Bash won't try to space-separate them into arguments either update, probably easiest just to double-quote them with any normal quoting method around each argument, e.g.
mkdir "/tmp/Joey \"The Lips\" Fagan"
As you saw, you can backslash the spaces alternatively, but I find that less readable ususally.
EDIT:
If you may have special shell characters (&|``()[]$ etc), you'll have to do it the hard/proper way (with a specific escaper for your language and target - as others have mentioned.
It's not just spaces you need to worry about, but other characters such as [ and ] (glob a.k.a pathname-expansion characters) and metacharacters such as ;, &, (, ...
You can use the following approach:
Enclose the string in single quotes.
Replace existing single quotes in the string with '\'' (which effectively breaks the string into multiple parts with spliced in \-escaped single quotes; the shell then reassembles the parts into a single string).
Example:
I'm good (& well[1];) would encode to 'I'\''m good (& well[1]);'
Note how single-quoting allows literal use of the glob characters and metacharacters.
Since single quotes themselves can never be used within single-quoted strings (there's not even an escape), the splicing-in approach described above is needed.
As described by #mklement0, a safe algorithm is to wrap every argument in a pair of single quotes, and quote single quotes inside arguments as '\''. Here is a shell function that does it:
function quote {
typeset cmd="" escaped
for arg; do
escaped=${arg//\'/\'\\\'\'}
cmd="$cmd '$escaped'"
done
printf %s "$cmd"
}
$ quote foo "bar baz" "don't do it"
'foo' 'bar baz' 'don'\''t do it'
I want to run a command from a bash script which has single quotes and some other commands inside the single quotes and a variable.
e.g. repo forall -c '....$variable'
In this format, $ is escaped and the variable is not expanded.
I tried the following variations but they were rejected:
repo forall -c '...."$variable" '
repo forall -c " '....$variable' "
" repo forall -c '....$variable' "
repo forall -c "'" ....$variable "'"
If I substitute the value in place of the variable the command is executed just fine.
Please tell me where am I going wrong.
Inside single quotes everything is preserved literally, without exception.
That means you have to close the quotes, insert something, and then re-enter again.
'before'"$variable"'after'
'before'"'"'after'
'before'\''after'
Word concatenation is simply done by juxtaposition. As you can verify, each of the above lines is a single word to the shell. Quotes (single or double quotes, depending on the situation) don't isolate words. They are only used to disable interpretation of various special characters, like whitespace, $, ;... For a good tutorial on quoting see Mark Reed's answer. Also relevant: Which characters need to be escaped in bash?
Do not concatenate strings interpreted by a shell
You should absolutely avoid building shell commands by concatenating variables. This is a bad idea similar to concatenation of SQL fragments (SQL injection!).
Usually it is possible to have placeholders in the command, and to supply the command together with variables so that the callee can receive them from the invocation arguments list.
For example, the following is very unsafe. DON'T DO THIS
script="echo \"Argument 1 is: $myvar\""
/bin/sh -c "$script"
If the contents of $myvar is untrusted, here is an exploit:
myvar='foo"; echo "you were hacked'
Instead of the above invocation, use positional arguments. The following invocation is better -- it's not exploitable:
script='echo "arg 1 is: $1"'
/bin/sh -c "$script" -- "$myvar"
Note the use of single ticks in the assignment to script, which means that it's taken literally, without variable expansion or any other form of interpretation.
The repo command can't care what kind of quotes it gets. If you need parameter expansion, use double quotes. If that means you wind up having to backslash a lot of stuff, use single quotes for most of it, and then break out of them and go into doubles for the part where you need the expansion to happen.
repo forall -c 'literal stuff goes here; '"stuff with $parameters here"' more literal stuff'
Explanation follows, if you're interested.
When you run a command from the shell, what that command receives as arguments is an array of null-terminated strings. Those strings may contain absolutely any non-null character.
But when the shell is building that array of strings from a command line, it interprets some characters specially; this is designed to make commands easier (indeed, possible) to type. For instance, spaces normally indicate the boundary between strings in the array; for that reason, the individual arguments are sometimes called "words". But an argument may nonetheless have spaces in it; you just need some way to tell the shell that's what you want.
You can use a backslash in front of any character (including space, or another backslash) to tell the shell to treat that character literally. But while you can do something like this:
reply=\”That\'ll\ be\ \$4.96,\ please,\"\ said\ the\ cashier
...it can get tiresome. So the shell offers an alternative: quotation marks. These come in two main varieties.
Double-quotation marks are called "grouping quotes". They prevent wildcards and aliases from being expanded, but mostly they're for including spaces in a word. Other things like parameter and command expansion (the sorts of thing signaled by a $) still happen. And of course if you want a literal double-quote inside double-quotes, you have to backslash it:
reply="\"That'll be \$4.96, please,\" said the cashier"
Single-quotation marks are more draconian. Everything between them is taken completely literally, including backslashes. There is absolutely no way to get a literal single quote inside single quotes.
Fortunately, quotation marks in the shell are not word delimiters; by themselves, they don't terminate a word. You can go in and out of quotes, including between different types of quotes, within the same word to get the desired result:
reply='"That'\''ll be $4.96, please," said the cashier'
So that's easier - a lot fewer backslashes, although the close-single-quote, backslashed-literal-single-quote, open-single-quote sequence takes some getting used to.
Modern shells have added another quoting style not specified by the POSIX standard, in which the leading single quotation mark is prefixed with a dollar sign. Strings so quoted follow similar conventions to string literals in the ANSI standard version of the C programming language, and are therefore sometimes called "ANSI strings" and the $'...' pair "ANSI quotes". Within such strings, the above advice about backslashes being taken literally no longer applies. Instead, they become special again - not only can you include a literal single quotation mark or backslash by prepending a backslash to it, but the shell also expands the ANSI C character escapes (like \n for a newline, \t for tab, and \xHH for the character with hexadecimal code HH). Otherwise, however, they behave as single-quoted strings: no parameter or command substitution takes place:
reply=$'"That\'ll be $4.96, please," said the cashier'
The important thing to note is that the single string that gets stored in the reply variable is exactly the same in all of these examples. Similarly, after the shell is done parsing a command line, there is no way for the command being run to tell exactly how each argument string was actually typed – or even if it was typed, rather than being created programmatically somehow.
Below is what worked for me -
QUOTE="'"
hive -e "alter table TBL_NAME set location $QUOTE$TBL_HDFS_DIR_PATH$QUOTE"
EDIT: (As per the comments in question:)
I've been looking into this since then. I was lucky enough that I had repo laying around. Still it's not clear to me whether you need to enclose your commands between single quotes by force. I looked into the repo syntax and I don't think you need to. You could used double quotes around your command, and then use whatever single and double quotes you need inside provided you escape double ones.
just use printf
instead of
repo forall -c '....$variable'
use printf to replace the variable token with the expanded variable.
For example:
template='.... %s'
repo forall -c $(printf "${template}" "${variable}")
Variables can contain single quotes.
myvar=\'....$variable\'
repo forall -c $myvar
I was wondering why I could never get my awk statement to print from an ssh session so I found this forum. Nothing here helped me directly but if anyone is having an issue similar to below, then give me an up vote. It seems any sort of single or double quotes were just not helping, but then I didn't try everything.
check_var="df -h / | awk 'FNR==2{print $3}'"
getckvar=$(ssh user#host "$check_var")
echo $getckvar
What do you get? A load of nothing.
Fix: escape \$3 in your print function.
Does this work for you?
eval repo forall -c '....$variable'
A="echo 'q'"
$A
I got the result 'q'
but if I type echo 'q' directly, it's q (without single quote)
So, I wonder what rule does bash follow while facing single quotes inside the double quotes.
The original problem is
A="curl http://123.196.125.62/send -H 'Host: poj.org' -e http://poj.org/send"
$A
I got curl: (6) Couldn't resolve host 'poj.org''
it will be all right if I just type the command into the terminal..
P.S. I'd like to use $A for excuting the command inside A
Please see BashFAQ/050: I'm trying to put a command in a variable, but the complex cases always fail!
It's best to avoid putting commands in variables for the reason you've experienced, among others.
You should use a function and pass it arguments.
Why do you want to do this rather than simply executing the command directly?
If you must do it, use an array:
A=(curl http://123.196.125.62/send -H 'Host: poj.org' -e http://poj.org/send)
${A[#]}
Regarding the treatment of single quotes within double quotes, they are treated literally and as part of the rest of the string. Here is the relevant paragraph from man bash:
Enclosing characters in double quotes preserves the literal value of
all characters within the quotes, with the exception of $, `, \, and,
when history expansion is enabled, !. The characters $ and ` retain
their special meaning within double quotes. The backslash retains its
special meaning only when followed by one of the following characters:
$, `, ", \, or <newline>. A double quote may be quoted within double
quotes by preceding it with a backslash. If enabled, history expansion
will be performed unless an ! appearing in double quotes is escaped
using a backslash. The backslash preceding the ! is not removed.
If you want to "save" a command for later execution, you do NOT want a variable. You want a function.
a() { curl http://123.196.125.62/send -H 'Host: poj.org' -e http://poj.org/send; }
Putting code in variables is bad since variables are containers for data not code. Additionally, you are seeing the problem because $A does NOT execute the bash code in A, what it really does is split the value of A into words, then it performs Pathname Expansion on these words, and as a result of those two operations, it executes a program named by the first resulting word and passes the other words as arguments. In your particular case, this is what happens (I use [] to indicate "units"):
A: [echo 'q']
after wordsplitting: [echo] ['q']
after pathname expansion: [echo] ['q']
Now bash looks for a program called echo and passes the argument 'q' to it.
This is NOT executing bash code, because if you execute echo 'q' as bash code, bash removes the single quotes after it's done with them. Similarly, you cannot do pipes, redirection et al. like this, because they too are bash syntax (just like your single quotes).
Recap: never put code in bash variables. never leave parameters unquoted (if you think doing that fixes something, you are wrong, you've just made things worse, go fix the real problem). The solution is to use a function.
You'd better use backquotes in this case:
A=`curl http://123.196.125.62/send -H 'Host: poj.org' -e 'http://poj.org/send'`