Does the Windows Phone Test Framework by Expensify support testing on real mobile devices running windows phone 7 OS ?
If yes, which devices does it support? Please reply.
It depends what functionality you want to test.
The framework uses 3 different APIs to talk to the apps:
a COM API to talk to install/uninstall and start/stop apps
Silverlight automation peer support (communicated to using HTTP) to
talk to the silverlight controls within the apps - this allows get
and set of values, some list manipulation and inspection of the
visual tree.
Mouse and keyboard emulation to control the emulator
device - this is needed to do things like physical touches, hard
button presses (and other emulator interactions when the app isn't
running - e.g. taking photos).
For devices attached using USB: 1 and 2 are available
For devices attached using a network: 2 only is available
In summary, you can do some things if you want to... but I don't use the test framework to test real phones - I stick to the emulator. When external inputs (e.g. camera or gps) are needed then I find a way to mock them
according to the first few seconds of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JkJfHZDd2g "there is some support for devices".
I would hope/expect all devices to devices to behave the same way, subject ot how they're configured.
Related
I have a question to you and I really hope you can provide me some information.
I wish to build a media center because I have not found any possibilities to cast my stuff straight to the big screen from my Windows mobile phone.
Off course there is the wireless display adapter from Microsoft but I wish not to cast my whole display to my tv.
After testing a few product (Amazon fire tv box, apple tv 3, display dock and the wireless dock) I came to the conclusion that I can not have an all in one solution which fits my perceptions.
From that point I thought that I have to build my own "tv application".
Ok ok... There is kodi(xbmc) and so on... But I think this is just making a detour.
Following features must be included:
running on Windows 10
Cast music, videos and pictures.
Ability to launch and download windows store apps.
Project Rome implementation to share data across devices.
Seems possible but here´s one big problem...
If we are talking about mediaboxes, we do talk about those small boxes besides your tv. Instead off building a micro ATX setup, I want to take this to the next level... using IoT (Raspberry Pi 3).
Using IoT may have some advantages but there are a few disadvantages I have to worry about.
Will Windows 10 work properly on IoT (advantages - disadvantages)
Media streaming?
ARM architecture
Bluetooth, WIFI, Ethernet connectivity
I have never ever worked on IoT before, so I am kinda noob again. I´am asking for some advices to make this possible.
[UWP] How can I stream data (e.g. video, music, images) to another application?
[UWP] Implement a remote control - just like the amazon fire tv controler ?
Advantages - Disadvantages of using Windows 10 on a Raspberry Pi ?
Using windows 10 default applications (Groove Music, Images, Videos - Application) to play incomming data?
What do you think? Is it possible to create a Mediacenter which is running on a raspberry pi using windows 10?
Thank you in advance.
The most straightforward idea would be to create an always-running app with a MediaPlayerElement with a Source property that can be set programmatically by a remote control app. A remote control app could also control the pause, play, next, previous actions.
Be aware that there is no hardware video acceleration support for Raspberry Pi on Windows IoT Core yet, and probably that also won't come soon. There are other devices that do have proper video drivers (look at the hardware support page of Windows IoT Core).
Also be aware that there is no Windows Store on Windows IoT Core, unless you are an OEM (then you can publish your properly signed apps in an official way to devices that are managed by you).
A simpler way would be to buy a Windows 10 box from aliexpress. Then you can use Miracast to stream your screen, install apps from the App Store and play films directly on it, for example using Kodi for which remote control apps exist.
I accessed the Chrome BLE API page (5/7/2016). there seem to be conflicting information messages (see image below). Does this work on Chrome OS only, or OS X and Windows also?
EDIT/UPDATE:
I tried the demo application (demo BLE API) on Windows 10. It was able to see paired devices, but not unpaired devices. I got an error message: Battery device not supported on this platform. I'm not sure if this is because of the test vector I used (LightBlue), or another issue.
System:
Windows 10 64 bit
Surface Pro 3
The chrome.bluetoothLowEnergy API works only for paired devices on Windows as it still uses (at that time) Windows 8 APIs to retrieve paired devices only: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/08c9d69b0c0d625d2ce38e3d8402f36e1226f0fc/device/bluetooth/bluetooth_low_energy_win.h#117
For info, the Web Bluetooth team plans to support Windows 10 as much as feasible: https://github.com/WebBluetoothCG/web-bluetooth/blob/gh-pages/implementation-status.md#chrome
Reading through your given documentation wherein you referenced the use of navigator.bluetooth, Interact with BLE devices on the Web also states that:
Web Bluetooth API is at the time of writing partially implemented in Chrome OS and Chrome Dev for Android behind an experimental flag.
Hence, you got undefined as a return value.
Functionalities were provided by Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) through key/value pairs provided by the Generic Attribute Profile (GATT).
I have been long interested to develop on the platform. I even got the tools installed already on my desktop but I can't upgrade my WDDM from 1.0 to 1.1. To make things simple: my graphics chips are not up to the task of running the emulator.
If I still buy a Windows Phone (e.g. a Nokia Lumia) for development purposes, can I sideload and test my apps there efficiently instead of going against the emulator?
If I still buy a Windows Phone (e.g. a Nokia Lumia) for development purposes, can I sideload and test my apps there efficiently instead of going against the emulator
Yes, of course. It's very easy and convenient. You have debugger and all the goodies. Advantage of the emulator is the test option for 256MB devices.
That's exactly what I used to do prior to upgrading my devstation. The nominal min spec says 3G but with a real phone it worked fine in 2G and as you say this also sorts out graphics limitations.
Note that the setting for whether the emulator or physical device is used is stored in the project, so if you accept a project from someone else you will have to set it once prior to debugging.
Well there are 2 sides of the coin. With the physical device you can test most of the things, but with a few limitations
You will not be able to test internet related test cases - For example, if you have an app which uses internet connectivity then you will not be able to test it on the device easily because
The device does not use the machine internet connectivity
When connected to the PC the device's internet connectivity(Data connection 3G/ wifi/GPRS) is broken.
You will have to purchase an account right from the first day you want to test your app. If you have the emulator working then you could postpone this for atleast few days.
is there a assembly or API to get isolated storage in windows phone using WPF or win form while connecting the windows phone device via USB?
please note the devise will be running offline so cannot use web service or WCF
thanks
Check out this article on emulator automation. It includes details of adding and removing files from isolated storage and should also work on an actual device as well as the emulator.
This isn't really a supported activity. I too have been thinking about what to do when you want a desktop version with extended features and you want the two to share data.
I think the key here is to think about how Microsoft achieves this with email and calendaring. There's no shared filesystem, rather Outlook on the desktop and Outlook on the phone both function as clients for the same Exchange server.
At one point I considered running a webservice in a desktop app so that the phone app could push data to the desktop app, but that would be a very manual process. The common-server model will provide a much better UX.
It's not an exact match to your situation, but a good tool is the Windows Phone 7 IsolatedStorage Explorer.
The reason I say it may not be the best match is this note from the documentation:
The WP7 Isolated Storage Explorer
supports connections from the emulator
or actual devices. For applications
running on devices a data connection
must be enabled (WiFi or the mobile
data connection).
It's at least a great start and keeps you from having to do the heavy lifting. Is there any reason you have to be offline and check the contents of IsolatedStorage? If you elaborate on why you have that requirement, we might be able to offer some work arounds.
I've seen examples of using the Microsoft.Smartdevice.Connectivity.dll library to deploy WP7 applications to the emulator.
Is it possible to then automate user input to the device as well to perform UI testing of the application running in the emulator?
The emulator doesn't include support for this.
However, if you were using a UI test automation tool you may be able to simulate the clicks/UI interaction from a script runnign on the host PC.
I've never used a UI automation test tool with a VM/emulator but that's currently the only option available to you.
Unless you have a very complicated application it may be quicker and easier to test the UI manually though as a tool wouldn't be able to query the state of the app running in the emulator and so would only have limited usage.