string result = frame.Eval(javaScriptCode) not returning the results in WatiN.
But it is working fine for browser.Eval(javaScriptCode)
If the page in your iframe has linked to another domain, you cannot execute javascript code for that frame. That is restricted by your browser to prevent CSS (Cross site scripting).
If you try to execute javascript code in such an iframe, you probably get "permis
To get more details about CSS, read this wiki
Related
Here's my issue, I'm trying to load a FB comments module via an AJAX div. Now, it works if I go directly to the php page, but if I load it from within the div, it doesn't. I've looked at the other posts (FB javascript SDK after jquery LOAD (ajax)), but still can't seem to get it to work, looking for clarification.
If you want to see what I'm talking about, check http://azconceptphoto.com/lindsey and check out testimonials.
Ideally, on the normal part of my site, I can just load the HTML5 code and it works fine, though for some reason it doesn't remotely work via the AJAX div. And considering the posts from before are out of date (2011), I was hoping to get more feedback on this.
Based on the code from your link you are not using any of the PrototypeJS Ajax methods to get the backend script. Ajax.Updater is the method you need to use so....
Here is my suggestion
change the definition of loadXMLDoc() to
function loadXMLDoc(div, location)
{
new Ajax.Updater(div,location,{'evalScripts':true});
}
this will update the contents of div with the contents of location. Also if the response has <script> tags in it then the javascript will be parsed and evaluated (thats the option evalScripts)
I am using a script for Ajax from Dynamic Drive on my site to load content into my div. It has worked great for me until I created a page where I want links. For some reason I am finding that if I create a page with a single link, the page will not load. I can click on it all I want and the page still will not load. If I have a page that is just purely text content, it loads. Is this a flaw with Ajax, or am I not doing something right? My intention with my site is to have a "Store" section so I can use Amazon Affiliates. I can't even get my page to load even if I have a simple link say pointing to Amazon.com. Unfortunately this Ajax script has been the only successful way I've been able to get my content to load into my main div. For some odd reason links in the links section on my site will appear and that page will load, but not for my "store" page.
My site is: http://veterinarycare.atspace.cc
I'm not asking for a direct code, but just a step in the right direction.
'store.html' gives a 404 Not found... Does this file exist? That is probably your problem... Your links.html page for example has a link to ASPCA and that works fine.
You may also want to look into jQuery, as this is a bit neater for doing ajax and other javascript effects. You could probably get all that javascript mumbo jumbo down to 5 lines or so...
Also remember that your site isn't going to be particularly google friendly with all the content being loaded in via javascript.
I'm 10000000% sure that this question has been asked before, however, the majority of the responses that I came across were from back in 2005, 2006 and so on. Not to mention, almost all of the questions themselves were too general. Therefore, I'm asking this so that for anyone else needs to find this out, then they won't need to dig through about 50 webpages to get an idea.
My question is simply that I have a webpage that has Google Ads embedded into the HTML of the website. The website was first developed as a static HTML site where each link reloaded a new page. Nevermind the backend technology of the website - the website itself produces purely dynamic content. The website is close to completion and now a fully-ajax listener has been added to all the links. When any of the links are clicked, JavaScript takes over, parses the link and sets that using popstate or the hashbang. The page itself is then queried to the server via AJAX and the content is updated using document.getElementByID('container').innerHTML=ajax.responseText; This way, there is almost a 100% method of accessing content that was replaced by AJAX.
This all works fine, but the responseText itself may, WILL contain Google Ads, and I was just wondering how to display them as if it were a static page. Clearly this doesn't work. Here are the options that I've come across:
Use an IFrame:
An IFrame seems to be an effective way to load the content; just stick the adsense codes a simple adsense.html iframe file and let the browser and
directly into page, it isn't possible
it's against their TOS
there is document.write() omitted in ajax request
Your chance is:
Create simple iframe
<iframe src="advert.html"></iframe>
and in advert.html, add your advert code
It's then loaded fine without problems.
Good luck
I am testing an iframe within a page. When I run my ruby script with selenium-rc, the page loads up fine but the iframe goes into an infinite loading causing my script to time-out. Though on manually checking the same script, we get the expected result.
Any idea if selenium does something with the browser settings?? I have tried it with FF and IE, both.
what do you mean by infinite loop? Also are you having selenium interact with the IFrame, or just visit a page with an iframe on it? One idea would be to create a super simple html page, and put an iframe to google.com in it, and see if this problem still persists.
I have a page that gathers environment status from a couple of IBM WebSphere servers using iframes similar to this:
<iframe src="http://server:9060/ibm/console/status?text=true&type=server&node=NODE&name=ServerName_server_NODE"></iframe>
and it happily prints out "Started" or "Unavailable" etc. But if I load the same url in a normal browser sometimes it works, sometimes it does not? Some of them are showing a login page, while others are simply return HTTP code 500.
So whats the difference between loading the page through an iframe vs through a browser?
I can tell you that the iframe solution works no matter which machine I am doing it on, so I do not belive it has anything to do with the user whos opening the page. And before you ask, why not keep the solution that works, well its because it takes a long time to open the page with the iframes vs a page where everything is requested through ajax.
Update: Using jQuery to perform the ajax call returns "error" and "undefined" for the servers that I can't see in a normal browser.
One difference is an iframe has to render the view while XHR would not.
An iframe is essentially the same as opening with the browser. In both cases the browsers credentials are used, so there will be no difference between the two.
Secondly, loading something in an iframe should take the same amount of time as requesting it through XHR, since in both cases the browser makes an HTTP request and waits for the response. Although I should add that an iframe will take time to render the content onto the page. However if you plan on displaying it with ajax anyways, an iframe/xhr solution will be more or less the same.
In case of ajax request same origin policy (which restricts cross domain call) comes into picture. So you can't make cross domain call using xhr. Alternative for same is embed flex swf file in your page as activex control and make flex call through javascript and then flex is responsible to make cross domain call (flex can if targeted domain allows cross domain using crossdomain.xml) and renders result using javascript again.