Bespoke Like / Comment / Share functionality - comments

One of my developers is building a Facebook tab application for a promotion we're running. During this promotion, some users will be given trophy awards. One of the pages in the tab application will list the trophies and their winners and we would like to have Like / Comment / Share links underneath them, like with URL shares:
Now it would be relatively easy to hand-roll this functionality for items that have a distinct URL (and so can be nodes in the OpenGraph) and that's what I think we'll have to do for the blog-like functionality, I think. (For clarity's sake, none of the current Social Plugins meets the right needs.) But I can't see how to do so for these trophies, which don't have a distinct URL.
I am right in thinking that "things that don't have a unique URL" can't be OpenGraph nodes, right?

Correct. Every node in the Open Graph has its own distinct URL.
The querystring is considered part of the URL: you could use it to make the URL unique but render the same page.

Related

Localization of Domain Models in Neos / Flow

A website I am currently developing with Neos / Flow includes a self-developed shop system implemented as a Flow Plugin. The products, variants and vouchers are kept as domain models.
Since the customer wants to provide their website in different languages I need to find a way to manage translations for the domain objects.
I cannot find a way which is baked into Neos/Flow so my first thought was to simply insert translation identifiers inside the translatable fields (description & stuff like that) which are then used inside the view with the translation viewhelper. This would work totally fine if the customer would not want to edit those fields by themselves.
My next idea was to just implement an extra field for each language-dimension and each translatable field (like description_en; description_es, …). But this would be the worst approach in terms of maintainability and changeability.
I usually worked on TYPO3 projects where translation of domain objects is really easy and working out of the box. So this experience inside Neos is very frustrating.
Does anybody came across a similar problem or even has found a solution to this?
whenever we've got the requirement to have multi-language content so far, we've solved that, by storing the data within the Neos Content Repository. This way language handling aka dimensions work out of the box. Also, building a UI for that records is very easy by using inline editing or the inspector of the content module.
Note, that storing data in the CR does not necessarily means, that you have to store it under the /site root node. You could also add a new root node /products to store your products.
You could have a look at https://github.com/neos/metadata-contentrepositoryadapter where meta data is stored under its own root.
Hope that helps,
Cheers, Daniel
For the record, something like that could also be achieved with the Doctrine Translateable extension in pure Flow:
https://github.com/Atlantic18/DoctrineExtensions/blob/master/doc/translatable.md
See http://flowframework.readthedocs.io/en/stable/TheDefinitiveGuide/PartIII/Persistence.html#on-the-doctrine-event-system on how to activate the extension in Flow.
However, the cleaner aproach indeed is to actually separate domain model and content (unless you build a CMS and the content is your domain ;)

Goal not working with pagePath filter in Analytics API

I would like to find the conversion rates for one of my goals. However, I just want to see the results based on pages with "profile/" in the URL. I've tried using the following filter separately in the Analytics API add-on for Google sheets: ga:pagePath=#profile/ or ga:pagePath=~profile
The filter works, but I don't get any conversion hits. Can anyone help?
Thanks,
Josh
Unless your goal actually is the page with the path of /profile you should use a segment rather than a filter. The difference is that a segment will give you the visits that include (exclude etc. depending on the conditions for you segment) visitors via the profile page, whereas a filter will only include pageviews to the exact /profile page.
So you are looking for a segment definition like
sessions::condition::ga:pagePath==/profile
This will limit the data to sessions that have at some point visited the profile page (but will also show what happenend before and after).
A more convinient way to get your segment definition is to define the segment in the GA interface, then head over to the query explorer and select your newly created segment via the segments dropdown. You can copy it from there (either by id or you can copy the segment definition if you click the checkbox below the dropdown).

Aliasing ID parameter in URL as string in ASP.NET MVC 4

What i'm trying to do is to rewrite URLs to make them more SEO friendly but i still want to pass a parameter as an int ID.
For example, a URL pointing to a news article might look like this:
"www.domain.com/category-id/article-id" or "domain.com/5/3"
What i want to do is to rewrite the URL everywhere so that the title of the category and the title of the article are written into the URL so it becomes f.x. "domain.com/politics/some-title" but i still want to pass the ID of the article as an argument to the controller action. This is less important for the category but it's something i want to do with the article-id since it's unique but the title might not be.
I have checked out Attribute Routing and looked through some Routing guides and questions but haven't found anything that lets me implement this functionality. I've just started using ASP.NET MVC so i haven't been able to look into anything too advanced.
Thanks in advance.
I would advice to make the article title unique and from the controller action you have to get the article based on the title.
I see you are trying to group the articles based on category. When I initially created my blog I thought the same-thing but soon realized it's not a flexible approach because of couple of reasons.
Say you wrote one article with name some-title and dropped it under a category say politics and so the url will be domain.com/politics/some-title but at a later point of time you thought to move the article to another category say 'international-politics' therefore your url now has to be changed to domain.com/international-politics/some-title and you break the old url and whoever has bookmarked that link will now receive 404. A better way would be organize the urls based on the posted date and that's not going to change something like http://domain.com/archive/yyyy/mm/dd/unique_title
Sometimes you want to label an article with more than one category and at that time a tag based approach will become a better choice compared to category based approach.
Quick and dirty solutions:
1) domain.com/categoryName/articleID/articleName/
2) domain.com/date/categoryName/articleName (date should help make articleName unique)
3) domain.com/categoryName/articleName?id=xxx
Nothing fancy, but those approaches will work.

SEO URL Structure

Based on the following example URL structure:
mysite.com/mypage.aspx?a=red&b=green&c=blue
Pages in the application use ASP.net user controls and some of these controls build a query string. To prevent duplicate keys being created e.g. &pid=12&pid=10, I am researching methods of rewriting the URL:
a)
mysite.com/mypage.aspx/red/green/blue
b)
mysite.com/mypage.aspx?controlname=a,red|b,green|c,blue
Pages using this structure would be publishing content that I would like to get indexed and ranked - articles and products (8,000 products to start, with thousands more being added later)
My gut instinct tells me to go with the first method, but would it would be overkill to add all that infrastructure if the second method will accomplish my goal of getting pages indexed AND ranked.
So my question, looking at the pro's and con's, Google Ranking, time to implement etc. which method should I use?
Thanks!
From an SEO perspective you want to try and avoid the querystring, so getting it into the URL and a short form URL is going to get you a better "bang for the buck" on the implementation side of things.
Therefore, I'd recommend the first.
Why don't use MVC pattern, this way all your link will be SEO ready. Check here, you will find what is MVC and also some implementation in .net!
You can easily make SEO-friendly URLs with the help of Helicon Ape (the software which allows having basic Apache functionality on your IIS server). You'll need mod_rewrite I guess.
If you get interested, I can help you with the rules.
Can you explain in more detail your current architecture and what the parameters all mean? There's nothing really wrong with query strings if it's truly dynamic content. Rewriting ?a=red&b=green&c=blue to /red/green/blue is kinda pointless and it's unclear from the URL what might be on the page.
The key is to simplify as much as possible. Split the site into categories and give each "entity" one URL.
For example, if you are selling products, use one URL per product, with keywords in the URL - e.g. mysite.com/products/red-widget or mysite.com/products/12-red-widget if you need the product ID.

How to write a Google Analytics filter to record site searches

I what to record all my website searches with google analytics but the problem is my search links look like this
**www.mywebsite.com/search/category/your+query+here**
From what i found out i must give GA the query parameter (mywebsite.com/search.php?q=your+query+here) but i have none (and don't want any).
Is there a way to rewrite the URL with a google analytics filter? If yes how.
Yes, you can create a custom filter that rewrites URL /search/<category>/<query> to ?q=<query>&c=<category>.
Go to Analytics Settings › Filter Manager, and click Add Filter. Choose Custom Filter in the Filter Type drop-down list, select Search and Replace radio button, and then set two Request URI fields with the corresponding values. For further details, see ’How do I create a filter?’ page in Google Analytics Help Center.
Keep in mind! Since past visitor data cannot be reprocessed, always keep a ’raw’ profile that you do not apply filters against. For further details, see chapter ’Best Practices for Filters & Profiles’ in presentation ’Filters in Google Analytics’.
Site Search is processed BEFORE Filters are applied.
I went through a week of testing to realize this. Yes, the Filter logic is correct, but as of Nov 1, 2009 this will not work with Site Search.
We accomplished this by appeding the ?search= parameter to the page URI in the GA script. Then we strip search params in the Profile Settings and we get the pure URI's in the content section as well as the Searches tracked in Site Search.
I know this is old, but to expand on the prev accepted answer, use a 'virtual url' in the _trackPageview call, so for www.mywebsite.com/search/category/your+query+here have
gat._trackPageview( "/search/content/your+query+here?query=your+query+here&cat=category" )
This means that URLs won't be changed, so everything else works (as noted in the previous answer) - if you really want to you could remove the search params, but unless you're running into a URL limit I'd probably prefer to keep them present so they can be seen in the content reports.

Resources