So I have written a test which populates a form, saves (in the admin tool), and then publishes.
However, my form is being lost between the save click and the publish click. I would show what the form looks like in HTML, but its pretty huge (like 20-30 fields)
In psuedo code, filling out the form looks like this:
1) Fill in form using dropdowns
2) Hit the save button - saves all form data
3) Hit the publish button
When I pause the script to see what is happening within selenium, I see the form properly being populated. I then see the Save button properly being clicked. When I pause the screen before hitting publish, I see that the content I have saved after clicking the save button was lost or is in the wrong fields.
When I do this manually, it works correctly. I know selenium submits forms differently than the standard user, however, is there anything I can do on my end to make sure that form is being submitted properly?
What does the Save button actually do? Is it Javascript, or a simple ` button?
Are you using the C# interface to Selenium webdriver? You probably have code that looks something like this:
FillInForm();
selenium.click(By.CssSelector("input[value='Save']"));
selenium.click(By.CssSelector("input[value='Publish']"));
Have you tried inserting, between save and publish, lines like the following:
// further up: By saveButton = ...
// By formField = ...
selenium.click(saveButton);
var formField = selenium.FindElement(formField);
Assert.That(formField.GetAttribute("value")
.contains("The text you typed into the form")
);
The point here being to check that save really is doing what it says on the tin. Generally, when you ask the WebDriver to "click" on a button, it does do exactly (more or less) what the user does. Alternatively, you can inject some javascript to force the form to submit - but then you're explicitly not testing what the user actually does (but you might find it's closer to what you experience).
Related
I am working on xamarin.forms. I have a content page which contains one webview which load 3rd party url(www.xyz.com) site and one button in shell.
On button click event I am trying to get user input data using
webview.eval(javascript: var data = document.getElementById('first-name').value;alert(data)).
It works fine but due to void return type I could not store data in local variable and I have a customrender(webviewrender) but don't know on shell button click event how can I get userinput data from webview
Please suggest me how do I achieve this functionality.I do not want XLab-Hybridwebview.
You'll probably need to have the JavaScript code call out to the external code when the result is available. You could then wrap that whole process in a TaskCompletionSource to make everything nice and easy to use.
I'm using TempData to show a message to the user. I put a string in the TempData and later I read the string, and if it is not empty, then I show a DIV that contain the message.
All works fine, and if the user refresh the page the message are not shown (Thats what I want). The problem is that if the user navigate to other page and then press the back button in the browser, then the message are shown again, and I do not want this.
What could I do to avoid this behaviour?
Thanks.
This is the code I use to read the TempData (Razor + VB). There is a DIV #commonMessage, with this code I put the string inside the div and show it. As I said before, it's working, but the only problem is that the TempData is still there if the user click back in the browser.
#If Not IsNothing(TempData("MessageUser")) AndAlso TempData("MessageUser") <> String.Empty Then
Dim str As String = TempData("MessageUser")
#<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
$('#commonMessage').html("#str");
$('#commonMessage').delay(400).slideDown(400).delay(4000).slideUp(400);
})
</script>
End If
EDIT: Seems like the TempData are being catched, because if I Disable the cache for the action where I'm showing the message (Using the Attribute System.Web.Mvc.OutputCache(NoStore:=True, Duration:=0, VaryByParam:="*")) the problem dissapears. But It would be better I we could find a method that not involve disabling the cache...
REQUESTED EDIT: I'm very newby in ASP, so I try to clarify what i'm triying to do. When an user performs an action (edit a client, for example), I redirect the client to the client list page, and I show a message that tell to the user "The client data was update susessfully". I'm triying to do it in a way that makes the message to be show only once. Maybe the TempData is not the right way (I don't know, 'cos i'm learning yet), but the target is to show a message to an user only once (no matter if the urser refresh or if the user go to other page and then press back in the browser)... using TempData or using something more adequate to our purpose.
Essentially, you are wanting TempData to do what you want, rather than using the right tool for what you want.
TempData is, by design, intended to be used for caching data across HTTP redirections. That is what it exists for. It is not clear from your post if this is the scenario that you are using.
Ie:
Page redirection, with data in TempData, that is then displayed to the user. Refresh the page you have arrived on, and the TempData is no longer there (there has been no redirection, just a refresh).
If the user then navigates to another page, then uses the back button, the browser will have cached the html of your page and will redisplay that. That is the correct behaviour.
I also think that in your testing, you are getting it wrong. Ie, by disabling the caching, you are just knocking out TempData altogether and you will not get the correct behaviour. Ie, the message will NEVER appear, not just when you hit the back button.
Your jQuery looks inefficient. You are making it do things it doesn't need to do. You could use razor to populate your div with your message. Set the div to not display, ie:
<div id="commonMessage" style="display:none;">
Then use jQuery to show it:
$('#commonMessage').show();
Your post isn't that clear, but in summary, I would say you are seeing what you should.
Maybe you should describe, in an Edit, what you want your app to do. That way it would be easier to answer. As things stand, you have told us what happens and what you put in your view, but it is not clear what you expect.
You should also understand TempData better: it only persists between Controller actions, ie, when a redirect occurs. It stores its data in the Session store, which I believe is affected by the caching attribute you mention.
I am trying to use CodeIgniter and jQuery-ui dialog to create a modal window with form to update user information.
The process should be like:
1. Press a button on a view page.
2. A modal window pops up.
3. Inside the window is a form that a user can fill.
4. If the user filled something before, the information should be shown in corresponding field
5. Click the update button on the modal window to save the changes to database.
Can anyone provide a good sample of this process?
I used ajax to pass the data but it didn't work when I was trying to update the data to the database. It would be nice if an example of how to pass data from ajax to php and how php handle that.
Thanks,
Milo
well the jquery bit for post(), get(), ajax() works the same in any measure you would normally use it.. key difference here is with CI you can't post directly to a file-name file-location due to how it handles the URI requests. That said your post URL would be the similar to how you would access a view file normally otherwise
ie: /viewName/functionName (how you've done it with controllers to view all along. post, get, ajax doesnt have to end in a extension. I wish I had a better example then this but I can't seem to find one at the moment..
url = '/home/specialFunction';
jQuery.get(url, function(data) {
jQuery("#div2display").html(data);
});
in the case of the above you notice despite it not being a great example that. you have the url with 2 parameters home and specialFunction
home in this case is the controller file for home in the control folder for the home file in views the specialFunction is a "public function" within the class that makes the home controller file. similar to that of index() but a separate function all together. Best way I have found to handle it is through .post() and a callback output expected in JSON cause you can form an array of data on the php side json_encode it and echo out that json_encode and then work with that like you would any JSON output. or if your just expecting a sinlge output and not multiples echoing it out is fine but enough of the end run output thats for you to decide with what your comfortable doing currently. Hopefully all around though this gives you some clairity and hopefully it works out for you.
I'm using Watir 1.6.7.
I'm working on developing some regression tests for a PeopleSoft App using Watir and Cucumber. I have run into a few issues with forms in the application.
First, when entering a value into a text_field, the page refreshes when the user clicks outside the text_field. Waiting for the next text_field element to exist is problematic because it may locate the element before the page reloads, or after the page reloads as expected. Increasing the wait time never feels like a good solution, even though it "works".
The second issue is that the page refresh is not triggered until the user clicks outside the current field. In this case, that happens when the script tries to access the next text_field to be populated. One solution here would be to send a or keystroke, but I can feel the script becoming more brittle with every addition like this.
Are there any other approaches that would be less brittle, and not require 2-3 extra commands in between each text_field action?
The play-by-play looks like:
Browser navigates to page that contains the form.
Browser fills in first form field. (fix: send keystroke to cause page refresh, wait_until second field is visible again)
Browser selects the second form field to be filled out. (again, keystroke & wait_until)
Page refreshes, script fails. (resolved)
Browser selects the third form field...
The application started exceeding the 5 second sleep duration, and I did not want to increase the wait time any longer. I wanted to see what would happen if I populated the text field faster using "element.value =" rather than character by character with "element.set ".
This change completely resolved all complications. The page no longer refreshes when entering text, and no long requires a send_keys statement to use TAB or ENTER to move to another field. The form is storing all of the data entered even though there are no refreshes or state saves between fields.
Previous method:
def enter_text(element, text)
element.set text
#browser.send_keys("+{TAB}")
sleep 5
Watir:Wait.until { element.exists? }
end
New method:
def enter_text(element, text)
element.value = text
end
Firstly, there are interesting Wait methods here: How do I use Watir::Waiter::wait_until to force Chrome to wait?
Overall, I don't quite understand your problem. As I understand it your script is working. If you could be a bit clearer about your desires compared to what you already have that would help, as would some sample source code.
If you're looking for ideas on custom waiting you could check for changes in the HTML of your page, form or text field. You could check that the text field is .visible?. You could try accessing the next text_field (clicking it, or setting the value for example), then catch the exception if it can't find the text_field and retry until it doesn't break, which would solve both your problems at once.
Why would clicking outside the current field be a bad solution? Do you absolutely need the next step to be a text_field access? I haven't gotten my head around how the next field only exists when you click outside the current field, but you cause this refresh by accessing the next field.
Edit: Most welcome, and thank you for clearing that up, I think I now understand better. If you allow Watir to invoke its page wait, or force it to, then it will wait for the refresh and you can then find the new text_field. Keystrokes do not invoke ie.wait, so if you send a single keystroke, then invoke a wait then the rest of your script will be responding to the post-refresh state.
I highly recommend the OpenQA page on waiting in Watir. If what you're doing to invoke the refresh does not appear on the list of things that invoke Watir page waits then you need to invoke your own page wait... but you need to do it before the page refreshes, so the cause of the refresh should end before the end of the refresh itself.
I don't know peoplesoft's app well enough to know this, but Does the app display anything for the user while it's processing.. like some kind of little 'loading' graphic or anything that you might be able to key off of to tell when it's done?
I've seen apps that do this, and the item is just an animated gif or png and it is displayed by altering the visibility attribute of the div that contains the graphic. In that instance you can tell if the app is still loading by using the .visible? method on that element and sleeping for a while if it's still there.
for the app I'm testing (which has one of those 'icons') I created a simple method I called sleepwhileloading. all it that is does is use a one second sleep wrapped in a while loop that looks to see if the loading icon is visible. works like a charm
In grails, I use the mechanism below in order to implement what I'd call a conditional server-side-triggered dialog: When a form is submitted, data must first be processed by a controller. Based on the outcome, there must either be a) a modal Yes/No confirmation in front of the "old" screen or b) a redirect to a new controller/view replacing the "old" screen (no confirmation required).
So here's my current approach:
In the originating view, I have a <g:formRemote name="requestForm" url="[controller:'test', action:'testRequest']", update:"dummyRegion"> and a
<span id="dummyRegion"> which is hidden by CSS
When submitting the form, the test controller checks if a confirmation is necessary and if so, renders a template with a yui-based dialog including Yes No buttons in front of the old screen (which works fine because the dialog "comes from" the dummyRegion, not overwriting the page). When Yes is pressed, the right other controller & action is called and the old screen is replaced, if No is pressed, the dialog is cancelled and the "old" screen is shown again without the dialog. Works well until here.
When submitting the form and test controller sees that NO confirmation is necessary, I would usually directly redirect to the right other controller & action. But the problem is that the corresponding view of that controller does not appear because it is rendered in the invisble dummyRegion as well. So I currently use a GSP template including a javascript redirect which I render instead. However a javascript redirect is often not allowed by the browser and I think it's not a clean solution.
So (finally ;-) my question is: How do I get a controller redirect to cause the corresponding view to "break out" of my AJAX dummyRegion, replacing the whole screen again?
Or: Do you have a better approach for what I have in mind? But please note that I cannot check on the client side whether the confirmation is necessary, there needs to be a server call! Also I'd like to avoid that the whole page has to be refreshed just for the confirmation dialog to pop up (which would also be possible without AJAX).
Thanks for any hints!
I know, it's not an "integrated" solution, but have you considered to do this "manually" with some JS library of your choice (my personal choice would be jQuery, but any other of the established libraries should do the trick)? This way you wouldn't depend on any update "region", but could do whatever you want (such as updating any DOM element) in the response handler of the AJAX request.
Just a thought. My personal experience is that the "built-in" AJAX/JS stuff in Grails often lacks some flexibility and I've always been better off just doing everything in plain jQuery.
This sounds like a good use-case for using web flows. If you want to show Form A, do some kind of check, and then either move onto NextScreen or show a Dialog that later redirects to NextScreen, then you could accomplish this with a flow:
def shoppingCartFlow = {
showFormA {
on("submit") {
if(needToShowDialog())return
}.to "showNextScreen"
on("return").to "showDialog"
}
showDialog {
on("submit").to "showNextScreen"
}
showNextScreen {
redirect(controller:"nextController", action:"nextAction")
}
}
Then you create a showDialog.gsp that pops up the dialog.
--EDIT--
But, you want an Ajax response to the first form submit, which WebFlow does not support. This tutorial, though, will teach you how to Ajaxify your web flow.