I have following cursor definition
cMultiplier NUMBER := 100000000000000000 ;
CURSOR CR_TABLE1 IS
SELECT to_char((COL_ID * cMultiplier) + SEQ,'0999999999999999999') "NEW_COL"
FROM TABLE1;
Then this cursor is being fetched as
FETCH CR_TABLE1
BULK COLLECT INTO AR_TABLE1 LIMIT I_BULK_LIMIT;
EXIT WHEN AR_TABLE1.COUNT = 0;
Where AR_TABLE1 is of type
TYPE T_TABLE1 IS TABLE OF CR_TABLE1%ROWTYPE;
AR_TABLE1 T_TABLE1;
The test values for COL_ID is 1 for all cases and the test values for SEQ is 1234567654322 (13 digit number). This value is being inserted as of length 19 in another table of type VARCHAR.
The problem is No sooner the cursor comes to FETCH, it throws exception stating ORA-06500: PL/SQL: storage error
I know it has to do something with select statement, but i am converting it into a string (varchar). Why i am running into this issue?
What value are you assigning to I_BULK_LIMIT?
The PLS-06500 error often means the application has run out of memory. So you need to look at the variables you assign in your program. But the memory used by the array is the most likely culprit. If the limit is currently set to more than a few thousand you should consider setting a lower limit.
The problem is in your mask, oracle adds a leading space for positive numbers or a "-" for negative numbers, this is causing the resulting string to be of 20 characters. Add FM to the format (like this: FM0999999999999999999). That way Oracle will suppress the leading space.
Related
I have a table with several number columns that are inserted through a Asp.Net application using bind variables.
Due to upgrade of Oracle client to 19c and server change, the code instead of giving an error on insert of invalid data, inserts trash and the application crashes aftewards.
Any help is appreciated in finding the root cause.
SELECT trial1,
DUMP (trial1, 17),
DUMP (trial1, 1016),
trial3,
DUMP (trial3,17),
DUMP (trial3, 1016)
Result in SQL Navigator
results of query
Oracle 12c
Oracle client 19
My DBA found this on Oracle Support and that lead to us find the error in the application side:
NaN is a specific IEEE754 value. However Oracle NUMBER is not IEEE754
compliant. Therefore if you force the data representing NaN into a
NUMBER column results are unpredicatable. SOLUTION If you can put a
value in a C float, double, int etc you can load this into the
database as no checks are undertaken - just as with the Oracle NUMBER
datatype it's up to the application to ensure the data is valid. If
you use the proper IEEE754 compliant type, eg BINARY_FLOAT, then NaN
is recognised and handled correctly.
You have bad data as you have tried to store an double precision NAN value in a NUMBER column rather than a BINARY_DOUBLE column.
We can duplicate the bad data with the function (never use this in a production environment):
CREATE FUNCTION createNumber(
hex VARCHAR2
) RETURN NUMBER DETERMINISTIC
IS
n NUMBER;
BEGIN
DBMS_STATS.CONVERT_RAW_VALUE( HEXTORAW( hex ), n );
RETURN n;
END;
/
Then, we can duplicate your bad values using the hexadecimal values from your DUMP output:
CREATE TABLE table_name (trial1 NUMBER, trial3 NUMBER);
INSERT INTO table_name (trial1, trial3) VALUES (
createNumber('FF65'),
createNumber('FFF8000000000000')
);
Then:
SELECT trial1,
DUMP(trial1, 16) AS t1_hexdump,
trial3,
DUMP(trial3, 16) AS t3_hexdump
FROM table_name;
Replicates your output:
TRIAL1
T1_HEXDUMP
TRIAL3
T3_HEXDUMP
~
Typ=2 Len=2: ff,65
null
Typ=2 Len=8: ff,f8,0,0,0,0,0,0
Any help is appreciated in finding the root cause.
You need to go back through your application and work out where the bad data came from and see if you can determine what the original data was and debug the steps it went through in the application to work out if it was:
Always bad data, and then you need to put in some validation into your application to make sure the bad data does not get propagated; or
Was good data but there is a bug in your code that changed it and then you need to fix the bug.
As for the existing bad data, you either need to correct it (if you know what it should be) or delete it.
We cannot help with any of that as we do not have visibility of your application nor do we know what the correct data should have been.
If you want to store that data as a floating point then you need to change from using a NUMBER to using a BINARY_DOUBLE data type:
CREATE TABLE table_name (value BINARY_DOUBLE);
INSERT INTO table_name(value) VALUES (BINARY_DOUBLE_INFINITY);
INSERT INTO table_name(value) VALUES (BINARY_DOUBLE_NAN);
Then:
SELECT value,
DUMP(value, 16)
FROM table_name;
Outputs:
VALUE
DUMP(VALUE,16)
Inf
Typ=101 Len=8: ff,f0,0,0,0,0,0,0
Nan
Typ=101 Len=8: ff,f8,0,0,0,0,0,0
Then BINARY_DOUBLE_NAN exactly matches the binary value in your column and you have tried to insert a Not-A-Number value into a NUMBER column (that does not support it) in the format expected for a BINARY_DOUBLE column (that would support it).
The issue was a division by zero on the application side that was inserted as infinity into the database, but Oracle has an unpredictable behavior with this values.
Please see original post above for all the details.
Have existing table called temptable, column largenumber is a NUMBER field, with no precision set:
largenumber NUMBER;
Query:
select largenumber from temptable;
It returns:
-51524845525550100000000000000000000
But If I do
column largenumber format 999999999999999999999999999999999999999
And then
select largenumber from temptable;
It returns:
-51524845525550:100000000000000000000
Why is there a colon?
To test, I took the number, remove the colon, and insert it to another table temptable2, and did the same column largenumber format, the select returns the number without the colon:
select largenumber from temptable2;
It returns:
-51524845525550100000000000000000000
So the colon is not present here.
So what could possibly be in the original number field to cause that colon?
In the original row, If I do a select and try to do any TO_CHAR, REPLACE, CAST, or concatenate to text, it would give me number conversion error.
For example, trying to generate a csv:
select '"' || largenumber || '",'
FROM temptable;
would result in:
ORA-01722 ("invalid number") error occurs when an attempt is made to convert a character string into a number, and the string cannot be converted into a valid number
In a comment (in response to a question from me), you shared that dump(largenumber) on the offending value returns
Typ=2 Len=8: 45,50,56,53,52,48,46,48
From the outset, that means that the data stored on disk is invalid (it is not a valid representation of a value of number data type). Typ=2 is correct, that is for data type number. The length (8 bytes) is correct (we can all count to eight to see that).
What is wrong is the bytes themselves. And, we only need to inspect the first and the last byte to see that.
The first byte is 45. It encodes the sign and the exponent of your number. The first bit (1 or 0) represents the sign: 1 for positive, 0 for negative. 45 is less than 128, so the first bit in the first byte is 0; so the number is negative. (So far this matches what you know about the intended value.)
But, for negative numbers, the last byte is always the magic value 102. Always. In another comment under your original question, Connor McDonald asks about your platform - but this is platform-independent, it is how Oracle encodes numbers for permanent storage on any platform. So, we already know that the dump value you got tells us the value is invalid.
In fact, Connor, in the same comment, gave the correct representation of that number (according to Oracle's scheme for internal representation of numbers). Indeed, just the last byte is wrong: your dump shows 48, but it should be 102.
How can you fix this? If it's a one-off, just use an update statement to replace the value with the correct one and move on. If your table has a primary key, let's call it id, then find the id for this row, and then
update {your_table} set largenumber = -50...... where id = {that_id};
Question is, how many such corrupt values might you have in your table? If it's just one, you can shrug it off; but if it's many (or even "a handful") you may want to figure out how they got there in the first place.
In most cases, the database will reject invalid values; you can't simply insert 'abc' in a number column, for example. But there are ways to get bad data in; even intentionally, and in a repeatable way. So, you would have to investigate how the bad values were inserted (what process was used for insertion).
For a trivial way to insert bad data in a number column, in a repeatable manner, you can see this thread on the Oracle developers forum: https://community.oracle.com/tech/developers/discussion/3903746/detecting-invalid-values-in-the-db
Please be advised that I had just started learning Oracle at that time (I was less than two months in), so I may have said some stupid things in that thread; but the method to insert bad data is described there in full detail, and it was tested. That shows just one possible (and plausible!) way to insert invalid stuff in a table; how it happened in your specific case, you will have to investigate yourself.
I'm on a remote server without privileges to create a directory and I have a clob column (a xml code) that I want to see. As I'm using a very old version of PL/SQL_developer (8.0.4) and I can't update to a new one, with a single "select X from T", I get "CLOB" as result. So, searching on the Internet I found this in the AskTOM and I try to use the plsql solution
declare
my_var varchar2(32000 char); --tried with long, didn't work too.
begin
for x in ( SELECT X from T)
loop
my_var := dbms_lob.substr( x.X, 32000, 1 );
dbms_output.put_line(my_var);
end loop;
end;
But when i try to run, I have "ORA-20000 ORU-10027 buffer overflow limit of 10000 bytes".
I try to increase the limit with DBMS_OUTPUT.ENABLE(32000); but got error too "ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character string buffer too small", I only can decrease the limit of 10000.
I know I don't have the SET serveroutput ON, but when I tried to add this line, guess what, error: "ORA-00922: missing or invalid option" but if I put 4000 instead of 32000 it works, show the first 4000b of data, so, I don't need this line.
So, I can't print, since the variable is too big, and I can't write the text to a file, since I don't have privilegies, there is any other way to see that variable?
In Oracle, while trying to concatenate two columns of both Number type and then trying to take MAX of it, I am having a question.
i.e column A column B of Number data type,
Select MAX(A||B) from table
Table data
A B
20150501 95906
20150501 161938
when I’m running the query Select MAX(A||B) from table
O/P - 2015050195906
Ideally 20150501161938 should be the output????
I am trying to format column B like TO_CHAR(B,'FM000000') and execute i'm getting the expected output.
Select MAX(A || TO_CHAR(B,'FM000000')) FROM table
O/P - 2015011161938
Why is 2015050195906 is considered as MAX in first case.
Presumably, column A is a date and column B is a time.
If that's true, treat them as such:
select max(to_date(to_char(a)||to_char(b,'FM000000'),'YYYYMMDDHH24MISS')) from your_table;
That will add a leading space for the time component (if necessary) then concatenate the columns into a string, which is then passed to the to_date function, and then the max function will treat as a DATE datatype, which is presumably what you want.
PS: The real solution here, is to fix your data model. Don't store dates and times as numbers. In addition to sorting issues like this, the optimizer can get confused. (If you store a date as a number, how can the optimizer know that '20141231' will immediately be followed by '20150101'?)
You should convert to number;
select MAX(TO_NUMBER(A||B)) from table
Concatenation will result in a character/text output. As such, it sorts alphabetically, so 9 appears after 16.
In the second case, you are specifiying a format to pad the number to six digits. That works well, because 095906 will now appear before 161938.
I want to convert a 9 digit number to 10 digit by appending a 0 to it.
For example In Table ABC say there is a column named B which takes a number which is at the max 10 digit long.
Now sometimes I will get a 9 digit number only.
So in that case when a 9 digit number is faced i need to fire a trigger to make it 10 digit and then insert in the table.
For that you need to create the column with character datatype so that it can hold the leading zeros.
You don't need to write any trigger for this simple operation. you can use lpad for this purpose:
eg.g
Insert into table1(number_col) values ( lpad(999999999, 10, '0'));
select * from table1;
| number_col |
|-----------------|
| 0999999999 |
To use this in trigger, create a trigger as follows (Not Tested);
create or replace trigger trg_table1
before insert or update of number_col on table1
for each row
begin
:new.number_col := lpad( :new.number_col, 10, '0' );
end;
You don't really need to make this a trigger. Adding a 0 to the front of the number is really only for humans, the computer doesn't care and that information can't be stored in the database unless you convert the column to a string format.
What you're looking for is one of three things: Either, change the way your forms display the information to add padding if the number is less 10,000,000,000 to affect the way the user sees the information (most recommended)
Or, use the lpad function to convert the number to a string with 0 padding if necessary
lpad(input,10,'0')
Note that this will require conversion back to a number to insert into the DB if it is possible for the user to edit this number. (second most recommended)
Lastly, you can always store the value in a string format and use lpad as above on insert.
I wouldn't recommend this as strings take up much more space than numbers, and the db won't search them as fast. Also, why store a number as a string purely for the user's sake, when you can change the way your data looks to the user programatically?