My application puts in messages in a JMS queue. A bean that implements MDB and MessageListener pops messages from this queue. All this happens on a single JVM .
What I want to do is: I want the MDB and the other instances that it would get from pool for concurrent processing to run on a different JVM. How can I do it? The application server that I am using is JBOSS 4.0.5.GA.
Thanks in advance.
If I understand correctly, you want to split your application into "producer" part (stays in the same server) and "consumer" part (MDBs moved to another server), and still be able to communicate.
In this case you need to configure the ConnectionFactory in the "consumer" server to plug in to the "producer" server's MQ. Have you read this part of JBoss 4.x docs?
Related
While doing some load tests with the ActiveMQ Artemis broker and my Spring Boot application I am getting into performance issues.
What I am doing is, sending e.g. 12,000 messages per second to the broker with JMSeter and the application receives them and saves them to a DB. That works fine. But when I extend my application by a filter mechanism, which forwards events after saving to DB, back to the broker using jmsTemplate.send(destination, messageCreator) it goes very slow.
I first used ActiveMQ 5.x and there this mechanism works fine. There you could configure the ActiveMQConnectionFactory with setAsyncSend(true) to tune performance. For the ActiveMQ Artemis ConnectionFactory implementation there is no such a possibility. Is there another way to tune performance like in ActiveMQ 5.x?
I am using Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.16.0 (but also tried 2.15.0), artemis-jms-client 2.6.4, and Spring Boot 1.5.16.RELEASE.
The first thing to note is that you need to be very careful when using Spring's JmsTemplate to send messages as it employs a well-known anti-pattern that can really kill performance. It will actually create a new JMS connection, session, and producer for every message it sends. I recommend you use a connection pool like this one which is based on the ActiveMQ 5.x connection pool implementation but now supports JMS 2. For additional details about the danger of using JmsTemplate see the ActiveMQ documentation. This is also discussed in an article from Pivotal (i.e. the "owners" of Spring).
The second point here is that you can tune if persistent JMS messages are sent synchronously or not using the blockOnDurableSend URL property, e.g.:
tcp://localhost:61616?blockOnDurableSend=false
This will ensure that persistent JMS messages are sent asynchronously. This is discussed further in the ActiveMQ Artemis documentation.
I have a embedded ActiveMQ instance in my Spring Boot app and I would like to consume a queue on that instance, from another processes or machine.
Is that possible?
Yes, that is definitely possible given the proper broker configuration. It just needs connectors that are bound to network interfaces visible from remote clients.
So using JMS and ActiveMQ, I can be sure that my message sent from my Spring Boot application using JmsTemplate will reach it's destination application even if that destination application is down at the time I send the message to ActiveMQ. As when the destination application starts up, it grabs the message from the queue. Great!
However.
What happens if my Spring Boot application tries to send a JMS message to a queue on the ActiveMQ server, but the ActiveMQ server is down at that point or the network is down and I get a connection refused exception?
What is the recommended way to make sure my application keeps trying to re-sends the message to ActiveMQ until it is successful? Is this something I have to develop into my application myself? Are there any nifty Spring tools or annotations which do this for me? Any advice on best practice or how I should be handling this scenario?
You can try Spring-Retry. Has lots of fine grain controls for it:
http://www.baeldung.com/spring-retry
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-retry
If it is critical that you don't lose this message, you will want to save it to some alternative persistent store (e.g. filesystem, local mq server) along with whatever retry code you come up with. But for those occasional network glitches or a very temporary mq shutdown/restart, Spring-Retry alone should do the trick.
Couple of approaches I can think of
1. You can set up another ActiveMq as fallback. In your code you don't have to do anything, just change your broker url from
activemq.broker.url=tcp://amq01.blah.blah.com:61616
to
activemq.broker.url=failover:(tcp://amq01.blah.blah.com:61616,tcp://amq02.blah.blah.com:61616)?randomize=false
The rest is automatically taken care of. i.e. when one of them is down, the messages are sent to other.
Another approach is to send to a internal queue (like seda, direct) when activemq is down and read from there.
Adding failover to the url is one appropriate way.
And another reasonable way is to making sure activemq always online , as activemq has the master-slave mode(http://activemq.apache.org/masterslave.html) to get high availability.
Currently I have setup two queues on WebSphere 7. One for sending and one for recieving messages.
I have configured a activation spec on the receiving queue and the messages are consumed fine by a Message Bean.
Also I have written a client that can run on a separate jvm which can send messages fine to the queue.
I am sure that the queues work.
Now I want to know how can I connect them with WebMetods. I know that WebMethods supports JBoss and WebLogic but no support for WebSphere.
I should be able to get this working just by providing:
a provider url - "iiop://172.17.13.65:2809"
a connection factory - "jms/ConnectionFactroy"
a queue name- "jms/inQueue"
and an initial context - "com.ibm.websphere.naming.WsnInitialContextFactory"
(at least this is what my client is using)
Is there anybody that has resolved this issue? And what are the steps they took?
Thank you in advance for your help.
We were able to get this implementation happen.
To solve this Web Methods had to import some jar files for Client JMS:
com.ibm.ws.ejb.thinclient_7.0.0 + com.ibm.ws.orb_7.0.0 + com.ibm.ws.sib.client.thin.jms_7.0.0
And use a bootstrap of this type PROVIDER_URL: "iiop://natasha:2810"
Alaso these details as previously mentioned:
a factory - "jms/ConnectionFactroy"
a queue name- "jms/inQueue" and
an initial context - "com.ibm.websphere.naming.WsnInitialContextFactory"
Want to know how to create physical queue in JMS at run time.
when I search for this I got Creating JMS Queues at runtime
But when I read http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-i-create-new-destinations.html I come to know queue which mention in Creating JMS Queues at runtime is not creating any physical queue at server side.
Please correct me if I m wrong. If any one know to create physical queue at run time please replay.
Thanks in advance.
The creation of "normal" queues is not adressed by the JMS standard. Depending on what you want to do there are two approaches:
use temporary queues -> however they have many restrictions, most commonly they are used forrequest-reply scenarios
use the API of the JMS provider - however your solution will be depending on this specific provider then
The JMS standard only addresses sending and receiving data from objects like queues and topics. Creation of JMS artefacts is vendor specific and most often requires using:
1)specific vendor APIs (not JMS)
2)command/admin messages aimed at the JMS server (command agents on activemq)
3)JMX API
I have used JMX method, which is the most powerful, but also the most work.
JMX Method for activemq (version 5.0+)
a) JMS Server Setup
1) Enable JMX in activemq startup scripts and activemq.xml files
2) If you are authenticating to to the server, make sure your user has admin privileges setup in activemq.xml (see http://activemq.apache.org/security.html)
3)restart activemq server
b) Your Client Code
1) create an instance of org.apache.activemq.broker.jmx.BrokerViewMBean (you will need to connect with some JMX connectivity code which is a bit messy)
2) use its addQueue method. This will create a queue on the server
(The process is similar for hornetq but since you mentioned Activemq I have omitted hornetq details here.)
I have used this method myself and it works.
An alternative is to use Command Agents in Activemq, but I have no personal experience with these. These are special messages contain admin commands and may do what you want as well.