I have a cube geometry and a mesh, and i don't know how to change the width (or height... i can change x, y and z though).
Here's a snippet of what i have right now:
geometry = new THREE.CubeGeometry( 200, 200, 200 );
material = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { color: 0xff0000, wireframe: true } );
mesh = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, material );
// WebGL renderer here
function render(){
mesh.rotation.x += 0.01;
mesh.rotation.y += 0.02;
renderer.render( scene, camera );
}
function changeStuff(){
mesh.geometry.width = 500; //Doesn't work.
mesh.width = 500; // Doesn't work.
geometry.width = 500; //Doesn't work.
mesh.position.x = 500// Works!!
render();
}
Thanks!
EDIT
Found a solution:
mesh.scale.x = 500;
Just to complete comment and solution from question (and have an answer present with example code):
// create a cube, 1 unit for width, height, depth
var geometry = new THREE.CubeGeometry(1,1,1);
// each cube side gets another color
var cubeMaterials = [
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({color:0x33AA55, transparent:true, opacity:0.8}),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({color:0x55CC00, transparent:true, opacity:0.8}),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({color:0x000000, transparent:true, opacity:0.8}),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({color:0x000000, transparent:true, opacity:0.8}),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({color:0x0000FF, transparent:true, opacity:0.8}),
new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({color:0x5555AA, transparent:true, opacity:0.8}),
];
// create a MeshFaceMaterial, allows cube to have different materials on each face
var cubeMaterial = new THREE.MeshFaceMaterial(cubeMaterials);
var cube = new THREE.Mesh(geometry, cubeMaterial);
cube.position.set(0,0,0);
scene.add( cube );
cube.scale.x = 2.5; // SCALE
cube.scale.y = 2.5; // SCALE
cube.scale.z = 2.5; // SCALE
A slightly advanced, dynamic example (still the same scaling) implemented here:
You can dispose the geometry of cube and affect the new one like this :
let new_geometry = new THREE.CubeGeometry(500,200,200);
geometry.dispose();
cube.geometry = new_geometry;
Scale properties can be used to for changing width, height and and depth of cube.
//creating a cube
var geometry = new THREE.BoxGeometry(1,1,1);
var material = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({color:"white"});
var cube = new THREE.Mesh(geometry, material);
//changing size of cube which is created.
cube.scale.x = 30;
cube.scale.y = 30;
cube.scale.z = 30;
Related
I was just experimenting with some lightning in three.js and came across a problem which I seem to be the only on having.
The setup is simple, two PointLight, one PlaneGeometry and one BoxGeometry.
"use strict";
var scale = 0.8;
var w = parseInt('' + Math.floor(innerWidth * scale));
var h = parseInt('' + Math.floor(innerHeight * scale));
var camera = new THREE.PerspectiveCamera(75, w / h, 0.1, 1000);
var renderer = new THREE.WebGLRenderer({
antialias: true
});
var scene = new THREE.Scene();
// init
{
scene.background = new THREE.Color(0x404040);
renderer.shadowMap.enabled = true;
renderer.shadowMap.type = THREE.BasicShadowMap;
renderer.setSize(w, h);
document.body.appendChild(renderer.domElement);
}
// plane
{
let geometry = new THREE.PlaneGeometry(40, 40, 10, 10);
let material = new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial({
color: 0x70B009,
side: THREE.DoubleSide
});
var plane = new THREE.Mesh(geometry, material);
plane.lookAt(new THREE.Vector3());
plane.rotateX(90 / 180 * Math.PI);
plane.receiveShadow = true;
scene.add(plane);
}
// box
{
let geometry = new THREE.BoxGeometry(1, 1, 1);
let material = new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial({
color: 0xFF6C00
});
var orangeCube = new THREE.Mesh(geometry, material);
orangeCube.castShadow = true;
scene.add(orangeCube);
}
// pointlights
{
var mapSize = 2 << 10;
var pointLight1 = new THREE.PointLight(0xFFFFFF, 0.6, 100);
pointLight1.castShadow = true;
pointLight1.shadow.mapSize.set(mapSize, mapSize);
scene.add(pointLight1);
var pointLight2 = new THREE.PointLight(0xFFFFFF, 0.6, 100);
pointLight2.castShadow = true;
pointLight2.shadow.mapSize.set(mapSize, mapSize);
scene.add(pointLight2);
}
// position camera, lights and box
{
pointLight1.position.set(0, 15, -15);
pointLight2.position.set(0, 15, 15);
orangeCube.position.set(0, 5, 0);
camera.position.set(10, 10, 0);
camera.lookAt(new THREE.Vector3());
}
// render once
{
renderer.render(scene, camera);
}
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/three.js/91/three.min.js"></script>
Which works quite well, but one problem. The lights do not eliminate the shadow projected by the other PointLight.
Does someone know how to fix this?
Thank you for your help.
As explained in this SO answer, shadows in MeshLambertMaterial are an approximation. Try MeshPhongMaterial, for example.
In MeshPhongMaterial and MeshStandardMaterial, shadows are the absence of light. If there is light from two light sources, shadow intensity can vary where the shadows overlap. See this three.js example.
three.js r.91
Codepen demonstrating the problem
https://codepen.io/anon/pen/GjJpYw?editors=0010
I have 2 meshes, one which contains 2 cubes, and the other which is 1 cube. The mesh with 2 cubes sandwiches the mesh with one cube (so the single cube is in the center). When I set all cubes to transparent but set the opacity of the center cube to 1, I would not expect to be able to see the back cube when looking through the front cube but I can.
I was wondering is there any easy way to fix this? This is a very simplified version of the problem I'm facing so I can't easily split the geometries. I also cannot just set transparent to false since ideally I would like to be able to have the middle cube partially transparent as well. Any suggestions?
var width = window.innerWidth;
var height = window.innerHeight;
var renderer = new THREE.WebGLRenderer({ antialias: true });
renderer.setSize(width, height);
document.body.appendChild(renderer.domElement);
var scene = new THREE.Scene();
var cubeGeometry = new THREE.CubeGeometry(100, 100, 100);
var cube = new THREE.Mesh(cubeGeometry);
cube.position.set(0, 25, -200);
var cube2 = new THREE.Mesh(cubeGeometry);
cube2.position.set(0, -25, 200);
cube.updateMatrix();
cube2.updateMatrix();
var singleGeometry = new THREE.Geometry();
singleGeometry.merge(cube.geometry, cube.matrix);
singleGeometry.merge(cube2.geometry, cube2.matrix);
var combinedMaterial = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({ color: 0xff0000, opacity: 0.5, transparent: true});
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh(singleGeometry, combinedMaterial);
var cubeGeometry = new THREE.CubeGeometry(200, 200, 200);
var cubeMaterial = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({ color: 0x0000ff, opacity: 0.8, transparent: true});
var cube = new THREE.Mesh(cubeGeometry, cubeMaterial);
scene.add(cube);
scene.add(mesh);
var camera = new THREE.PerspectiveCamera(60, width / height, 1, 1000);
camera.position.z = 500;
var controls = new THREE.OrbitControls(camera);
controls.addEventListener('change', render);
var pointLight = new THREE.PointLight(0xffffff);
pointLight.position.set(0, 300, 200);
scene.add(pointLight);
render();
animate();
function animate() {
requestAnimationFrame( animate );
controls.update();
}
function render() {
renderer.render( scene, camera );
}
UPDATE:
I made jsfiddle example - jsfiddle.net/NEXny/1/
[ignore this - just including a code block so stackoverflow will
let me post the above JSFiddle link. Yeah, seriously.]
I'm having trouble with applying texture to RingGeometry and CylinderGeometry, hope this image will explain my issue.
It is possible to apply texture by one of this ways ?
Currently i'm getting very unexpected results...
You have to modify the geometry vertex UVs to your liking.
Instead, why not just use CircleGeometry for your cylinder end-caps. That is, construct the end-caps yourself?
// cylinder
geometry = new THREE.CylinderGeometry( 192, 192, 40, 64, 1, true ); // open-ended
geometry1 = new THREE.CircleGeometry(192, 64);
// end-cap material
material1 = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({
map: textures.circle,
overdraw: 0.5 // for canvas renderer only
});
// cylinder material
material = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({
map: textures.line,
overdraw: 0.5 // for canvas renderer only
});
object = new THREE.Object3D();
scene.add(object);
// end-caps
var mesh1 = new THREE.Mesh(geometry1, material1);
mesh1.rotation.x = - Math.PI / 2;
mesh1.position.y = 20
object.add(mesh1);
var mesh2 = new THREE.Mesh(geometry1, material1);
mesh2.rotation.x = Math.PI / 2;
mesh2.position.y = -20
object.add(mesh2);
// cylinder
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh(geometry, material);
object.add(mesh);
fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/NEXny/2/
three.js r.61
For my project I need collision tests in Three.js. In my CollisionDetection class I'm trying to get a Raycaster to work. And I found some weirdness that I can't explain and can't find a way around:
My CollisionDetector works fine for Cubes.. but when I use Spheres instead, it doesn't give me the same results – Am I wrong to expect the same results as for the cubes? Or do I miss something else?
Here is my Code:
var renderer, camera, scene;
init();
animate();
function init() {
var container = document.getElementById("scene");
var width = window.innerWidth;
var height = window.innerHeight;
renderer = new THREE.WebGLRenderer();
renderer.setSize(width, height);
camera = new THREE.OrthographicCamera( 0, width, 0, height, 1, 10000 );
camera.position.z = 300;
scene = new THREE.Scene();
scene.add(camera);
container.appendChild(renderer.domElement);
var geometry = new THREE.SphereGeometry(10,16, 16);
//var geometry = new THREE.CubeGeometry( 10, 10, 10 );
var material1 = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { color: 0xFF3333} );
var material2 = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { color: 0xFF3333} );
var material3 = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { color: 0xFF3333} );
var material4 = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { color: 0xFF3333} );
var material5 = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { color: 0xFF3333} );
var element1 = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, material1 );
var element2 = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, material2 );
var element3 = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, material3 );
var element4 = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, material4 );
var element5 = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, material5 );
element1.position.set(200,200,0);
element2.position.set(200,100,0);
element3.position.set(200,300,0);
element4.position.set(100,200,0);
element5.position.set(300,200,0);
scene.add(element1);
scene.add(element2);
scene.add(element3);
scene.add(element4);
scene.add(element5);
var CollisionDetector = new CollisionDetection();
CollisionDetector.addRay(new THREE.Vector3(0, -1, 0));
CollisionDetector.addRay(new THREE.Vector3(0, 1, 0));
CollisionDetector.addRay(new THREE.Vector3(1, 0, 0));
CollisionDetector.addRay(new THREE.Vector3(-1, 0, 0));
CollisionDetector.addElement(element1);
CollisionDetector.addElement(element2);
CollisionDetector.addElement(element3);
CollisionDetector.addElement(element4);
CollisionDetector.addElement(element5);
document.onclick = function(){
CollisionDetector.testElement(element1);
};
}
function CollisionDetection(){
var caster = new THREE.Raycaster();
var rays = [];
var elements = [];
this.testElement = function(element){
for(var i=0; i<rays.length; i++) {
caster.set(element.position, rays[i]);
var hits = caster.intersectObjects(elements, true);
for(var k=0; k<hits.length; k++) {
console.log("hit", hits[k]);
hits[k].object.material.color.setHex(0x0000ff);
}
}
}
this.addRay = function(ray) {
rays.push(ray.normalize());
}
this.addElement = function(element){
elements.push(element);
}
}
function animate() {
requestAnimationFrame( animate );
renderer.render( scene, camera );
}
Or best, see for yourself how it behaves: http://jsfiddle.net/mymL5/12/
On Click every element hit by a ray should turn blue and all hits are registered in the console.
Note the (imho) weird console output for spheres.
Also, why is the lower sphere not hit while the upper is?
You can switch between Cubes and Spheres by Commenting/Uncommenting lines 19/20
Can anyone help me? What am I not getting?
PS: I'm new to Three.js, so I'm probably being dumb.
Since this is homework-related, I am only going to provide some tips.
Your scene is rendering upside down because your args to orthographic camera are incorrect.
Your sphere is bigger than your cube.
Your rays are hitting the north and south poles of your spheres exactly. What is different about those points?
The material.side property tells Raycaster which side(s) of a face to consider the "front".
Your fidde example is running an old version (r.54) of three.js.
three.js r.58
Increased spheres size.
Rotated spheres by some non-trivial angle (so they don't get hit right in the N/S pole).
Now it works? :P
var geometry = new THREE.SphereGeometry(20,17, 17);
element1.position.set(0,0,0);
element2.position.set(0,100,0);
element3.position.set(100,0,0);
element4.position.set(0,-100,0);
element5.position.set(-100,0,0);
element1.rotation.set(0,0,10);
element2.rotation.set(0,0,10);
element3.rotation.set(0,0,10);
element4.rotation.set(0,0,10);
element5.rotation.set(0,0,10);
Still, ray test should be aware of the hitting exact vertex or edge of the triangle, so that might be considered as a place-to-improve for Three.js.
I filed an issue about this in the Three.js repository:
https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/issues/3541
// set the scene size
var WIDTH = 1650,
HEIGHT = 700;
// set some camera attributes
var VIEW_ANGLE = 100,
ASPECT = WIDTH / HEIGHT,
NEAR = 0.1,
FAR = 10000;
// get the DOM element to attach to
// - assume we've got jQuery to hand
var $container = $('#container');
// create a WebGL renderer, camera
// and a scene
var renderer = new THREE.WebGLRenderer();
var camera = new THREE.PerspectiveCamera( VIEW_ANGLE,
ASPECT,
NEAR,
FAR );
//camera.lookAt(new THREE.Vector3( 0, 0, 0 ));
var scene = new THREE.Scene();
// the camera starts at 0,0,0 so pull it back
camera.position.x = 200;
camera.position.y = 200;
camera.position.z = 300;
// start the renderer
renderer.setSize(WIDTH, HEIGHT);
// attach the render-supplied DOM element
$container.append(renderer.domElement);
// create the sphere's material
var sphereMaterial = new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial(
{
color: 0xCC0000
});
// set up the sphere vars
var radius = 60, segments = 20, rings = 20;
// create a new mesh with sphere geometry -
// we will cover the sphereMaterial next!
var sphere = new THREE.Mesh(
new THREE.SphereGeometry(radius, segments, rings),
img);
// add the sphere to the scene
scene.add(sphere);
// and the camera
scene.add(camera);
// create a point light
var pointLight = new THREE.PointLight( 0xFFFFFF );
// set its position
pointLight.position.x = 50;
pointLight.position.y = 100;
pointLight.position.z = 180;
// add to the scene
scene.add(pointLight);
// add a base plane
var planeGeo = new THREE.PlaneGeometry(500, 500,8, 8);
var planeMat = new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial({color: 0x666699});
var plane = new THREE.Mesh(planeGeo, planeMat);
plane.position.x = 160;
plane.position.y = 0;
plane.position.z = 20;
//rotate it to correct position
plane.rotation.x = -Math.PI/2;
scene.add(plane);
// add 3D img
var img = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({
map:THREE.ImageUtils.loadTexture('cube.png')
});
img.map.needsUpdate = true;
// draw!
renderer.render(scene, camera);
I've put the var img as a material to the sphere but everytime I render it aoutomaticly changes color...
How do I do so it just will have the image as I want... not all the colors?
I whould possibly put the img on a plane.
You need to use the callback of the loadTexture function. If you refer to the source of THREE.ImageUtils you will see that the loadTexture function is defined as
loadTexture: function ( url, mapping, onLoad, onError ) {
var image = new Image();
var texture = new THREE.Texture( image, mapping );
var loader = new THREE.ImageLoader();
loader.addEventListener( 'load', function ( event ) {
texture.image = event.content;
texture.needsUpdate = true;
if ( onLoad ) onLoad( texture );
} );
loader.addEventListener( 'error', function ( event ) {
if ( onError ) onError( event.message );
} );
loader.crossOrigin = this.crossOrigin;
loader.load( url, image );
return texture;
},
Here, only the url parameter is required. The texture mapping can be passed in as null. The last two parameters are the callbacks. You can pass in a function for each one which will be called at the respective load and error events. The problem you are experiencing is most likely caused by the fact that three.js is attempting to apply your material before your texture is properly loaded. In order to remedy this, you should only do this inside a function passed as the onLoad callback (which will only be called after the image has been loaded up). Also, you should always create your material before you apply it to an object.
So you should change your code from:
// set up the sphere vars
var radius = 60, segments = 20, rings = 20;
// create a new mesh with sphere geometry -
// we will cover the sphereMaterial next!
var sphere = new THREE.Mesh(
new THREE.SphereGeometry(radius, segments, rings),
img);
// add the sphere to the scene
scene.add(sphere);
to something like:
var sphereGeo, sphereTex, sphereMat, sphereMesh;
var radius = 60, segments = 20, rings = 20;
sphereGeo = new THREE.SphereGeometry(radius, segments, rings);
sphereTex = THREE.ImageUtils.loadTexture('cube.png', null, function () {
sphereMat = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({map: sphereTex});
sphereMesh = new THREE.Mesh(sphereGeo, sphereMat);
scene.add(sphereMesh);
});