FileSystemObject - default location - vb6

When I debug my application (in the VB6 IDE), I have to specify the absolute path (e.g. c:\logfile.log) to the log file otherwise nothing is written to the log file. However, when the application is live I do not have to specify the absolute path i.e. I can specify logfile.log. Why is this?
The log file is always in the same directory as the .exe and .dll.

Your file is being written to the current working directory.
When your exe is running this is the folder the exe is sat in, however in Debug mode your exe is actually running from the temporary build location (can't actually remember where this is in VB6).
You can test this simply by doing MsgBox(App.Path) in your program and seeing what location appears.
You'll probably find that there is a logfile.log in the location that appears when you run the above command while debugging.

Related

Writer initialization failed.Error opening output file.The system cannot find the path specified

In informatica pc I got an error like Writer initialization failed.Error opening output file.The system cannot find the path specified.
Even I checked the directories and file names but what exactly confused.
It's exactly as it says: the Writer failed to initialize, as it was not able to locate the path and file specified.
Note that PowerCenter Workflows and Mappings are executed on the Server. So while you develop on your local laptop (for example) and place a file in C:\Temp folder, and you are able to see the file, once you run the process, it will be executed on the Server. And the Server will not refer your laptop. It will look for C:\Temp location on its local disk. And if that's a unix box, there won't even be a C: path!
Hence, the process will fail with exactly the message you've seen: initialization failed, error opening output file. You need to place the file in the location accessible by Server.
In case of Writer, you name target location where the file will be created - make sure the user used by PowerCenter does have the write access.

Removing "This program might not have installed correctly" warning from SFX

I am creating a self extracting executable, which is not an installer. It's a standalone exe, but it uses the app.config as a file based resource so I need to have it be a self extracting executable (Cannot avoid requirement that it must be one file that's double clickable). I would like those who download my exe to be able to run it without getting the "This program might not have installed correctly" message that pops up. I've added the manifest file with the correct settings to my project, but it seems that this did not do the trick.
I've read that you can change the PE headers of the SFX file before you create the self extracting executable to fix the problem, but I'm not sure how I can actually do this (for free). I'm currently using 7zip's SFX file as a base, and I already edited the icon file and version info via Resource Hacker, but I'm lost on how to edit the PE headers.

Windows Bat file run from Autosys - Failed to load the sqljdbc_auth.dll

I have a question and wondering if you guys could help.. Here are the details -
Program Flow ->
Autosys Job -> Windows .bat job on network path-> Internally calls java program along with few other components
When the .bat runs through Autosys job, it gives below warning and does partial processing and exits out without any failure
(i guess the internal code might not have good error handling..but sadly I do not have access to view/modify the same). However, when I logon to that
windows box and run the .bat file from cmd prompt, it works like a charm and throws no error.
Warning in Logs - "WARNING: Failed to load the sqljdbc_auth.dll"
Things I tried-
I tried creating a wrapper bat file in windows C drive (not the netwrok path where the actual .bat is in) and placed sqljdbc_auth.dll in that custom folder.
Job went to SU , after partial processing.
Appreciate your help.
Many Thanks,
Raj
I'd suspect there is a path error. Try echo %path% just before calling your batch, even simply run
echo %path%>alogfile
call yourbatch
and if the displayed path doesn't include a directory in which your .dll resides, add it into the path before calling yourbatch.
It may very well be that your logon includes the required directory as part of your user-defined path and the username under which the job runs does not include the directory.
Or, you could try moving the dll into somewhere like system32 which should be common to everyone.
(Windows should use the standard path-scanning algorithm to locate any required dll that isn't invoked from a full pathname)

Windows 7: Running application using App Paths vs Batch File

I have an (PowerBuilder) application (let's call it MyApp.exe) in a folder with a sub-directory that has all the required dlls. I am able to run this application, by adding the application path and associated path variable to Windows App Paths registry key.
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\App Paths\MyApp.EXE]
"Path"="C:\\Prog32\\MyAPP;C:\\Prog32\\MyAPP\\DLL\\;"
#="C:\\Prog32\\MyApp\\MyApp.EXE"
The above runs file. I didn't even have to register DLLs.
If possible, I would like to run it using a batch file though, as users may install multiple versions of the same application in separate folders. When I tried to do the same thing in a batch file, it cannot find the DLLs.
#SETLOCAL
SET CURDIR=%~dp0
CD %CURDIR%
PUSHD %CURDIR%
SET PATH=%CURDIR%;%CURDIR%\dll;%PATH%
start "" %CURDIR%\myApp.exe
POPD
ENDLOCAL
I created this batch in the same directory as the executable, MyApp.exe. I was expecting it would find the DLLs, same way App Paths PATH setting did. The Batch file errors out not being able to find the DLLs. Do we need to register DLLs in this case? Why is it treated differently?
Notes:
If I copied all the required DLLs to the same directory as the executable (without a DLL sub-directory), it runs fine without needing to worry about PATH or registering dlls.
We used to use installShield to install before, but admins have automated scripts to copy files, they shied away from InstallShield programs after the first install. I am trying to refine the process, so what they copy will be simplified.
Thanks in advance for all your valuable comments and suggestions.-Sam
Why is it treated differently?
Because Windows is a mess when searching for libraries. See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms682586.aspx#search_order_for_desktop_applications
There are many elements to how the search order is determined, but in general it is like this
Check for the library...
already loaded in memory
on the KnownDLL list
in the application's directory
in the System directory
in the 16-bit System directory
in the Windows directory
in the current working directory
in the directories listed in the PATH environment variable
Overall I would agree with what MSDN states on their DLL Redirection page
It is good practice to install application DLLs in the same directory that contains the application
However, if using sub-folders is how you want to organize your application,
you might take a look into using Application Manifests. Something else to try would be to set the library directory as the working directory
#ECHO off
SETLOCAL
SET "CURDIR=%~dp0"
PUSHD "%CURDIR%\dll"
start "" /D "%CURDIR%\dll" "%CURDIR%\myApp.exe"
POPD
ENDLOCAL

error when i want to save java file in jdk/bin

when i save java file error is you dont have permission to save in this location contact the administrator to obtain permission on window7
Don't store application data in the "Program Files" directory.
It is very bad design and regular users don't have write access to that directory (for a very good reason).
So even if you changed your settings locally to open up the door for viruses your application won't run on other computers.
Besides: storing a Java file in the JDK directory serves no purpose at all.
Btw: your uppercase letters are broken, as well as the dot or the comma...
That's normal - jdk/bin is the installation directory of the JDK, regular users cannot (and should not) write files there. You'll have the same problem on Linux/Unix and on Mac OS X, where installation directories are off-limits to regular users.
Write your files to the users home directory (System property "user.home", works across platforms), or let the user choose where you save stuff.
Bin directory do not allow directly to save program in it.
it is so simple, just save your .java file on desktop and then copy paste it in Bin. done ;)
If the file can't save directly to c:\program files\java\jdk1.8.0\bin\
Solution:-
Click start Menu type Notepad command in run run as administrator
Right click the Notepad run as Administrator, then type the program file can save directly to c:\program files\java\jdk1.8.0\bin\
Just try it......

Resources