This may not be possible, but I have a DIV that I am transforming using CSS3.
#mydiv.fallback {
-webkit-transform: scale(.9);
-webkit-transform-origin: center;
}
Works like a charm. Except, I'm trying to create an effect similar to Mac OSX's Timemachine (faux 3D effect), where the DIV falls back in the background. For this to work aesteitcally, I need the transform-origin to NOT use it's element's center, but the user's web browser's center. It would work even if I was able to change it to use it's parent's elements coordinates for its transform.
Not sure if this is possible or not sadly. Quick image to help illustrate.
Just update 'transform-origin' whenever you want to pop out the modal window. For example:
function modal() {
var transOrigin = window.innerHeight/2 + document.body.scrollTop;
container.style.webkitTransformOrigin = "50% " + transOrigin + "px";
}
Here is a working example for webkit.
http://jsfiddle.net/GprNe/
Related
I need to implement a plotly.js chart on a page with a very restricted width. As a result, a tooltip is partially cut. Is it possible to cause tooltip not to be limited by plotly.js container size?
My code example at codepen: https://codepen.io/anatoly314/pen/gOavXzZ?editors=1111
//my single trace defined as following but it's better to see example at codepen
const yValue1 = [1000];
const trace1 = {
x: [1],
y: yValue1,
name: `Model 1`,
text: yValue1.map(value => Math.abs(value)),
type: 'bar',
textposition: 'outside'
};
It is, by design, not possible for any part of the chart to overflow its container.
I would say it is wrong to say that by design this is not possible! It is a bit hacky, but when you add the following lines, it shows the label outside of svg:
svg.main-svg,svg.main-svg *
{
overflow:visible !important;
}
The answer given by rokdd works. However the css selector should be more specific, otherwise it's natural that you will introduce subtle bugs (particularly if you need to scroll the content where the plotly chart is contained).
If we look at the DOM tree constructed by Plotly, we find that the tooltips are created inside the <g class="hoverlayer"></g> element (which is a direct child of one of the three <svg class="main-svg"></svg>). So that parent (that svg.main-svg element) is only one that needs to affected.
The ideal css selector in this case would be the :has selector. However it's still not supported (as of 2022): https://css-tricks.com/the-css-has-selector/
So the next simplest thing is to use a little bit of javascript right after we call Plotly.newPlot:
// get the correct svg element
var mainSvgEl = document.querySelector('#positive g.hoverlayer').parentElement;
mainSvgEl.style['overflow'] = 'visible';
Or in a more generic way (works for any chart):
Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('g.hoverlayer')).forEach(hoverEl => {
let mainSvgEl = hoverEl.parentElement;
mainSvgEl.style['overflow'] = 'visible';
});
I'm using Waypoints and their Sticky shortcut to 'stick' an element with the id stick-this to the top of the viewport once it gets scrolled past. I am having some difficulty positioning the element past another fixed element on the screen, however.
There is a <div> with a class .header which always remains fixed. I am trying to position the top of the new element to the height() of the .header element so they are 'stacked' on top of one another and both visible. This is the code I am using to accomplish this:
var sticky = new Waypoint.Sticky({
element: $('#stick-this')[0],
handler: function() {
$(".stuck").css({ "top" : $(".header").height() });
}
})
So, essentially, once the #stick-this is scrolled past, it becomes sticky with a position:fixed class and the top is dynamically determined by the height() of .header.
This works great until I scroll back up, and the top style is still applied to this element, in spite of the stuck class not being applied anymore.
So when I scroll past, the element ends up like this
<div id="stick-this" class="stuck" style="top:70px /*or whatever the height() ends up being */">
and when I scroll back up the element ends up like this with the top property still in place
<div id="stick-this" class="" style="top:70px /*I need this back to 0px */">
Is it possible to have a function called when the "sticky" is removed, so that the inline style property can be set to top:0px or something like that?
For anyone else struggling with this, I ended up dynamically writing the CSS when the sticky element's class is initiated and inserting it into the head:
var sticky = new Waypoint.Sticky({
element: $('#stick-this')[0],
offset: $('.header').outerHeight(true),
handler: function(direction) {
$("<style>")
.prop("type", "text/css")
.html("\
.stuck {\
position: fixed;\
top:" + $(".header").height() + "px;\
}")
.appendTo("head");
}
})
so, the class will be added with the correct top positioning, and once the class is removed, the top property is inherently returned back to 0px.
It's important to have the \ after each line break in the .html() portion of this code in order for it to work.
I'm using kendo tooltips on a graphic (within an anchor link) which is 24px tall. Accordingly, when the tooltip shows up (default position of bottom), it covers the bottom third of the graphic and so the bottom third of the graphic can't be clicked.
I can do the following:
.k-tooltip {
margin-top: 8px;
}
But the problem with this is that if the tooltip is on a graphic at the bottom of the page, the position will be "top" instead of "bottom" but it'll now be covering about 1/2 the graphic instead of just a third because it's still being pushed down by 8px.
What I'd like is if the position is bottom, then the margin-top is 8px, but if the position is top, the the margin-bottom is 8px.
Thanks for any help you can provide!
Billy McCafferty
Would this one help you?
http://dojo.telerik.com/amoZE/5
var tooltip = $("#demo").kendoTooltip({
filter: "a",
show: function (e) {
var position = e.sender.options.position;
if (position == "bottom") {
e.sender.popup.element.css("margin-top", "10px");
} else if(position == "top") {
e.sender.popup.element.css("margin-bottom", "10px");
}
}
}).data("kendoTooltip");
Thank you for your answer, jarno-lahtinen. It was very helpful!
Two problems came up with it and I would like to document the solutions here:
1. Property Error in Typescript
I am using TS and it gave me the following error:
"Property popup does not exist on type Tooltip" for e.sender.popup. I am not sure if this is due to a newer version of Kendo, or of missing type definitions.
Solution:
you can use this.popup instead.
2. Not working for position: "top"
Unfortunately, the "margin-bottom" has absolutely no effect because the popup is positioned "absolute" using top/left.
Solution:
this.popup.element.css("margin-top", "-10px");
This will shift the popup upwards by 10 pixels
I am using FabricJS to create an application. I am finding that scrolling a parent div/container offsets the selectable area of an object to the right in direct relation to amount scrolled.
So, if I have a canvas that is 1200x600 and a container div that is 600x600 and I add a rect to that canvas at 400, 120; when I scroll 200px, I can't click on the rect to select it. Rather, I have to move my mouse to 600, 120 (empty space) to get the cross bar and select the rect.
Not sure if this is known, or has a work around - but I would appreciate any help possible.
You'll have to modify FabricJs code to make it work.
The problem is in the getPointer function, if you search for it in all.js you'll notice the comment "this method needs fixing" from kangax.
A workaround can be substituting this function with
function getPointer(event) {
// TODO (kangax): this method needs fixing
return { x: pointerX(event) + document.getElementById("container").scrollLeft, y: pointerY(event) + document.getElementById("container").scrollTop };
}
where "container" is the wrapper div of you canvas. It's not nice, since you have to put the exact id, but it works.
Hope this helps.
I am brand new to Raphael and am really stuck, I would like to rotate a div and its contents, using a button, with Raphael.
Ideally, I would like to have a smooth animation that goes from 0 degrees to -90 degrees when the button is clicked, then when the button is clicked again, the animation would reverse. I think I will change the id or class on mouse click so that I can use the same button for both animations. Would that be wise?
I really would like some help please, my Sandbox is at http://jsbin.com/isijo/ and you can edit it at http://jsbin.com/isijo/edit
Many thanks in advance for any help.
Hello and welcome to Raphael!
I have been looking at Raphael for more than a few months and although the documentation is not very comprehensive the software is brilliant.
I have been mixing Divs with Raphael objects in many ways and have got a "feel" for what works and what does not work.
I am recommending that you do not try rotating divs but (instead) Raphael objects.
First of all you could make a shiney set of Raphael buttons using this "tweakable" code below..
var bcontrols = new Array();
var yheight = 300;
for (var i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
bcontrols[i] = paper.circle(15 + (35 * i), yheight, 15).attr({
fill: "r(.5,.9)#39c-#036",
stroke: "none"
});
bcontrols[i].shine = paper.ellipse(15 + (35 * i), yheight, 14, 14).attr({
fill: "r(.5,.1)#ccc-#ccc",
stroke: "none",
opacity: 0
});
bcontrols[i].index = i;
bcontrols[i].shine.index = i;
bcontrols[i].shine.mouseover(function (e) {
this.insertBefore(bcontrols[this.index]);
});
bcontrols[i].mouseout(function () {
this.insertBefore(bcontrols[this.index].shine);
});
/* Called from Raphael buttons */
bcontrols[i].click(function () {
alert("Hello you just clicked " + this.index);
});
}
Next you need to know more about rotating Sets:
var s = paper.set();
s.push(paper.rect(10, 10, 30, 30, 10).attr({fill:'red'}));
s.push(paper.rect(50, 10, 30, 30, 5).attr({fill:'blue'}));
s.push(paper.rect(90, 10, 30, 30).attr({fill:'orange'}));
s.animate({rotation: "360 65 25"}, 2000);
This shows the degree of rotation and the centre of rotation of the "set" on the last line.
My additional Raphael resources website which aims to supplement documentation (Amongst other things):
http://www.irunmywebsite.com/raphael/raphaelsource.html
Heres where you can run the above 2 code examples without alteration:
http://raphaeljs.com/playground.html
I'm hoping this helped...
To my knowledge, there is no way to convert a div into a Raphael object. Since the Raphael rotate command is only defined for Raphael objects, your best bet is to create the major elements of your div (images, text, buttons and all) in Raphael instead of HTML, put them together in a single set, and, as the set is a Raphael object, rotate the set.
Consult Rotate a div in CSS and in IE filters. This is not the same as SVG, so if you need more layout magic, Raphael shapes are likely the way to go. You should be able to used JQuery in concert with Raphael to manipulate both in your window, but I am brand new to Raphael and have never done so.