I have a following question. We use log4j in our two projects, that are hosted on the same GlassFish server. Each project has inside log4j.properties file, that points to the files, that are based in different catalogs (let's name them Project1 and Project2).
Now, for some unclear reasons sometimes the info messages of the first project are written to Project2 log files, and the reverse is also true. I checked the log4j.properties files for both of the projects, there is nothing pointing in them to the log of the other project.
The suspicion is that log4j is not actually thread-safe, therefore if two users are working in two systems in the same time, the messages of the loggers can get mixed. Is this suspicion correct?
Yes, log4j is thread safe:
Yes, log4j is thread-safe. Log4j components are designed to be used in
heavily multithreaded systems.
Ref.
What you are describing sounds more like a config mistake, rather than a cross process/threading issue.
Yes, log4j is thread safe. The reason is the method AppenderSkeleton.doAppend() is synchronized. But be carefull configuring programmatically!
For example you can't use the same instance of TTCCLayout in different appenders(read javadoc)! Take a look at PatternLayout method format(). It changes instance field(StringBuffer sbuf), so if you use same PatternLayout instance in different appenders you are to face race conditions. EnhancedPatternLayout is better, cause they modified format method.
Related
I am trying to do a log4j migration for a legacy application. I made the changes to the configuration files and tested it locally with Tomcat, where the logs were displayed correctly. However when I deploy on WAS, the logging stops.
I checked a lot of pages about the necessary dependencies and the possible problems, but now I feel I'm stuck. Here is what I already tried:
Added the log4j jars manually to the lib/ext directory in WAS (together with commons-logging, I read an article where it helped, although all these jar-s were already present in the ear)
Double checked, that the configuration file is on the classpath and that it's syntax is correct
Added logj42-web dependency
Added the necessary filters in web.xml (Spring version is 3.8, so also the config listener with the config name context-param)
Checked classloader in WAS - it's parent first
Am I missing something?
Any ideas are appreciated. Thank you in advance!
WAS includes its own commons-logging API (that does not utilize Log4j), so bringing your own logger requires a bit of extra class-loader-related config. Typically, that would go something like this:
Put your commons-logging and log4j jars, along with your logging properties files, in some directory (not WAS_HOME/lib/ext) readable by the user running the server.
Create a shared library on the server, with that directory as its class path, and select the "use an isolated class loader" option. Associate that shared library with your application or web module.
Ideally, that should be it. Isolated shared libraries search themselves before delegating to the server's loaders, so your application will "see" the commons-logging/log4j classes in the shared library instead of in the server, and likewise, it should pick up the configuration files from that directory instead of the ones found in the server.
You can also accomplish this same basic thing by leaving all the logging stuff in your WAR or EAR and setting its class loader to parent-last (which causes the class loader to search locally before delegating to the server-level loaders), but that is a bit riskier configuration - if your application includes APIs that are also provided by the server, parent-last class loading increases the possibility of ClassCastExceptions or LinkageErrors.
New to Spring Boot here, long-time Spring Framework user though.
I'm looking for a way to split my externalised configuration into multiple .properties files, for better readability and manageability.
I already saw this SO answer: having the ability to specify a list of configuration file names in spring.config.name (which, by the way, doesn't seem to be mentioned in Boot reference documentation, correct me if I'm wrong) would solve my problem perfectly, however that configuration property can be specified only via system properties or environment variables. If I try to specify it inside my application.properties file, it gets ignored. The same happens for spring.config.additional-location. I understand this happens because, when application.properties is read, it's too late to tell Spring Boot to search for different externalised configuration file names. However this is not a proper solution, because the way I split my configuration should be an "implementation detail" that the consumer of my application shouldn't be aware of, so I don't expect the consumer to specify an external parameter otherwise my application breaks out-of-the-box.
I think that a way to do this should be provided. Perhaps some import mechanism for .properties files or the ability to specify spring.config.name even in application.properties (some known and reasonable limitations would be acceptable).
The best I could find out is to use #PropertySource, but this is not profile aware: unless you use some ugly nested class hack, or you put spring.profiles.active variable in the resource name (which will break if multiple profiles have been activated), you won't get the benefit you have for application.properties profile-specific files.
I was not able to find an "official way" to do this, apart from some statements from Spring Boot devs that say that they're rather promoting the use of a single (possibly giant...) externalised configuration file. It seems like this position is not so popular, judging from the post reactions on GitHub, and IMHO it really seems to be a basic feature missing. I have been working with multiple properties files in Spring Framework (using XML configuration) for years and I never felt that having an only huge file would have been better.
If I understand it right, in Boot 1.x this was in some way possible using the location attribute of #ConfigurationProperties, which is however missing in Boot 2.x.
Any suggestion?
Have you tried with Spring Profile?
What you can do is create application-file1.properties/yml, application-file2.properties/yml and put it in config location and then add spring.profile.active=<your env profiles>,file1,file2.
It will load the files.
This profile entry can be in bootstrap.yml, or JVM args to application, in Manifest-<env>.yml in case of Pivotal Cloud Foundry. Not sure on AWS and other cloud provider.
Hope this will help.
When we run a sample main program which reads a applicationContext.xml with a single bean..
how does Spring do the logging..and how can one overwrite the default logging.
I didnt see any log4j.xml in the spring dependencies as well..
Regards
This is described in the documentation:
Logging is a very important dependency for Spring because a) it is the only mandatory external dependency, b) everyone likes to see some output from the tools they are using, and c) Spring integrates with lots of other tools all of which have also made a choice of logging dependency. One of the goals of an application developer is often to have unified logging configured in a central place for the whole application, including all external components. This is more difficult than it might have been since there are so many choices of logging framework.
The mandatory logging dependency in Spring is the Jakarta Commons Logging API (JCL). We compile against JCL and we also make JCL Log objects visible for classes that extend the Spring Framework. It's important to users that all versions of Spring use the same logging library: migration is easy because backwards compatibility is preserved even with applications that extend Spring. The way we do this is to make one of the modules in Spring depend explicitly on commons-logging (the canonical implementation of JCL), and then make all the other modules depend on that at compile time. If you are using Maven for example, and wondering where you picked up the dependency on commons-logging, then it is from Spring and specifically from the central module called spring-core.
The nice thing about commons-logging is that you don't need anything else to make your application work. It has a runtime discovery algorithm that looks for other logging frameworks in well known places on the classpath and uses one that it thinks is appropriate (or you can tell it which one if you need to). If nothing else is available you get pretty nice looking logs just from the JDK (java.util.logging or JUL for short). You should find that your Spring application works and logs happily to the console out of the box in most situations, and that's important.
(emphasis mine)
Follow several sections describing how to use various logging frameworks.
I am having problems integrating perf4j in an existing maven application.
I tried several approaches, but none of them seemed to work, so I was wondering if anyone has some insight into how this is done.
What I want to do is use the AOP part of perf4j on some methods and log them into a different file than the one used for app logging. Thanks
You might be suffering from the same declaration order issue as mentioned in another perf4j/logback related question. In short, it is always a good idea to enable printing of logback's internal status messages by setting the debug attribute to true within the configuration element. Also do not forget that any referenced appender must be declared beforehand.
I have a Maven 3 project that uses Hibernate 3. In the Hibernate properties file, there is an entry for hibernate.connection.provider_class with the class corresponding to the C3P0 connection provider (org.hibernate.connection.C3P0ConnectionProvider). Obviously, this class is only used at runtime, so I don't need to add the corresponding dependency in my POM with the compile scope. Now, I want to give the possibility to use any connection pooling framework desired, so I also don't add a runtime dependency to the POM.
What is the best practice?
I thought about adding an entry to the classpath corresponding to the runtime dependency (in this case, hibernate-c3p0) when the application is run (for example, using the command line). But, I don't know if it's possible.
This is almost (maybe exactly) the same problem as with SLF4J. I don't know if Hibernate also uses the facade pattern for connection pooling.
Thanks
Since your code doesn't depend on the connection pooling (neither the main code nor the tests need it), there is no point to mention the dependency anywhere.
If anyone should mention it, then that would be Hibernate because Hibernate offers this feature in its config.
But you can add it to your POM with optional: true to indicate:
I support this feature
If you use it, then I recommend this framework and this version
That will make life slightly more simple for consumers of your project.
But overall, you should not mention features provided/needed by other projects unless they have some impact on your code (like when you offer a more simple way to configure connection pooling for Hibernate).
[EDIT] Your main concern is probably how to configure the project for QA. The technical term for this new movement is "DevOps" - instead of producing a dump WAR which the customer (QA) has to configure painstakingly, configuration is part of the development process just like everything else. What you pass on is a completely configured, ready-to-run setup.
To implement this, create another Maven module called "project-qa" which depends on your project and everything else you need to turn the dead code into a running application (so it will depend on DBCP plus it will contain all the necessary config files).
Maven supports overlayed WARs which will allow you to implement this painlessly.
You can mark your dependency as optional. In this case it will not be packaged into archives. In this case you have to ensure that your container provides required library.
You could use a different profile for each connection provider. In each profile you put the runtime dependency that correspond to the connection provider you want to use and change the hibernate.connection.provider_class property accordingly.
For more details about how to configure dependencies in profiles, see Different dependencies for different build profiles in maven.
To see how to change the value of the hibernate.connection.provider_class property see How can I change a .properties file in maven depending on my profile?