What should be the superclass of my new controller? - macos

I'm the developer of an in-house program for modeling harmonics and other properties of liquid-filled shells. Right now, the whole program assumes that there's only one set of physical properties (temperature, pressure, etc.) being used at a time in calculations. I have already broken all of the calculations out into a Sphere model. I have a controller which owns a sphere. When the user changes the physical properties the controller has the sphere recalculate everything and updates all the windows which are displaying the results of sphere calculations.
Now someone has asked me to make a table displaying the frequencies of a specific harmonic over a range of temperatures and pressures. I think this is going to require a new controller that has its own sphere model because it needs to be independent of all the other windows.
Here's my question: Should my new controller be an NSWindowController subclass or should it be an NSObject subclass with a property that is an NSWindow whose text fields are bound to values in the controller (or something completely different)? I'm the only developer in the company and I learned Cocoa on my own as I wrote this program over the past four years so I'm not sure I've always followed best practices. Since I'm about to introduce a new significant functionality I'd like to make sure I'm doing it right.
Not sure this matters, but the solution has to run under OS X 10.5 because we still have some G5 machines in the organization.

If you have a controller that controls a particular window, then you should definitely use an NSWindowController subclass, if only because NSWindowController handles some of the more complex nib-loading and memory management issues for you.
Unless the Sphere model in your new window will be showing a different set of data than the one in your main controller, you don't need to create a new model for your new controller. You can just reference the sphere instance in your main controller.
Something like this:
.h:
#import <Cocoa/Cocoa.h>
#class Sphere;
#interface FrequenciesController : NSWindowController
{
Sphere* sphere;
}
- (id)initWithSphere:(Sphere*)aSphere;
#end
.m:
#import "FrequenciesController.h"
#import "Sphere.h"
#implementation FrequenciesController
- (id)initWithSphere:(Sphere*)aSphere
{
self = [super initWithWindowNibName:#"NameOfYourNib"];
if (self)
{
sphere = [aSphere retain];
}
return self;
}
- (void)dealloc
{
[sphere release];
[super dealloc];
}
#end
To create the window, you then just have to do something like this in your main controller, assuming that you have declared frequenciesController as an ivar:
- (IBAction)showFrequenciesWindow:(id)sender
{
if(!frequenciesController)
{
frequenciesController = [[FrequenciesController alloc] initWithSphere:self.sphere];
[frequenciesController showWindow:self];
}
}

Related

How to create a reusable button

I'm new to Xcode and objective c. I want to create a button (probably a UIBarButtonItem, for a navigation bar) with a particular appearance, which I will use repeatedly in different views. I've searched at length but can't figure out how.
Would it be appropriate to subclass UIBarButtonItem? I tried to do that, but I was quickly in over my head. Once I create the .h and .m files as a subclass of UIBarButtonItem, do I then have to instantiate a UIBarButtonItem? Do those files not automatically create a button object for me (imported from the parent class), which I can refer to as self? It seems like it would be weird to instantiate a button within its own subclass.
One thing I want to do is add the line,
button.titleLabel.lineBreakMode = NSLineBreakByWordWrapping;
but I'm at a loss as to how to create reusable button with that property.
Even if that is completely the wrong approach to creating a reusable custom button, I clearly need to improve my understanding of objects, so explanation of my misunderstandings would be much appreciated!
Please?
You can do this without subclassing - by making a category (a preferred way of doing things in Objective-C). With a category you can provide custom methods for an object without having to subclass it. You can't (easily) provide custom properties, but in your case this is not relevant.
Using a Category
This is how your category header file could look:
// UIButton+StyledButton.h
#import <UIKit/UIKit.h>
#interface UIButton (StyledButton)
- (void) styleButton;
#end
Then in the implementation file:
//
// UIButton+StyledButton.m
//
#import "UIButton+StyledButton.h"
#implementation UIButton (StyledButton)
- (void) styleButton {
//style your button properties here
self.titleLabel.lineBreakMode = NSLineBreakByWordWrapping;
}
('self' refers to the button object, which also acquires the custom methods you write in the category.)
To use it, #import "UIButton+StyledButton.h" then you can do this sort of thing...
on viewDidLoad {
[super viewDidLoad];
UIButton* myButton = [[UIButton alloc] initWithFrame:myFrame];
[myButton styleButton];
}
Using a Subclass
The subclassed equivalent would look something like this:
The header file...
// MyCustomButton.h
#import <UIKit/UIKit.h>
#interface MyCustomButton : UIButton
- (id)initWithCoder:(NSCoder *)coder;
- (id)initWithFrame:(CGRect)frame;
#end
The implementation file...
// MyCustomButton.m
#import "MyCustomButton.h"
#implementation MyCustomButton
- (id)initWithFrame:(CGRect)frame
{
self = [super initWithFrame:frame];
if (self) {
[self styleButton];
}
return self;
}
- (id)initWithCoder:(NSCoder *)coder
{
self = [super initWithCoder:coder];
if (self) {
[self styleButton];
}
return self;
}
- (void) styleButton {
//style your button properties here
self.titleLabel.lineBreakMode = NSLineBreakByWordWrapping;
}
You provide two init methods - initWithFrame is the method to call when alloc/initing the object in code; initWithCoder is the init method called by the system if loading the object from a storyboard or xib.
To create one of your custom buttons in code, you alloc/init as you would any other object:
MyCustomButton* button = [[MyCustomButton alloc] initWithFrame:buttonFrame];
You wouldn't also alloc/init the superclass instance, this is done by the initWithFrame: method in the subclass when it calls [super initWithFrame:frame]. self refers to your custom subclass instance, but that includes all of the (public) properties and methods from it's superclass - unless you have implemented overrides in the subclass.
To use your subclassed button in a storyboard/xib, just drag out a regular button then set it's type to your custom button class in the Identity Inspector. The initWithCoder method is called automatically when the button is loaded from the storyboard/xib into a view.
update
From your comments, you seem to harbour a few confusions still, so here are some highly compressed de-obfuscating notes...
Keep away from subclassing UINavigationController unless you really know what you are doing. It's rarely necessary.
The buttons on a navController's interface are properties of it's contained viewControllers. Look up the navigationItem property of UIViewController (similarly - in the case of a UIToolbar - the View Controller has a toolbarItems property). This allows Navigation Controllers to be context-aware.
The 'viewDidLoad' in my example is assumed to be in a regular UIViewController. My example is also a category on the regular UIBUtton which has no formal relationship with UIBarButtonItem.
Try getting a UIButton category to work with a regular ViewController first before experimenting with UIBarButtonItem (which does not inherit from UIButton).
UIBarbuttonItem has no initWithFrame, because the thing that organises the bar (UINavigationBar or UIToolbar) - in this case a Navigation Controller - is responsible for it's ultimate size and positioning. The viewController governs the relative order of barButtonItems, and whether they appear on the left or the right, and the content and (some aspects of) it's appearance, but the rest is up to the NavController.

Accessing controls of views of NSCollectionView

I'm using an NSCollectionView to display various objects. The whole things works rather well, except for one annoying thing. I cannot figure out how to access the various controls on the view used to represent each object in the collection.
Here's the setup:
I have dragged an NSCollectionView into my view in IB.
I made a custom subclass of NSCollectionViewItem. Mapped my class in IB.
I made a custom subclass of NSBox to act as the view for each object in the collection. Also mapped this class in IB and connected it to the view property of my NSCollectionViewItem subclass.
I made all the bindings in IB to display the correct information for each object.
The view:
The resulting collection view:
Reasoning that that my subclass of NSCollectionViewItem is basically a controller for each view in the collection, I made referencing outlets of the various controls in the view in my controller subclass:
#interface SourceCollectionViewItem : NSCollectionViewItem
#property (weak) IBOutlet NSTextField *nameTextField;
#property (weak) IBOutlet NSTextField *typeTextField;
#property (weak) IBOutlet RSLabelView *labelView;
#property (weak) IBOutlet NSButton *viewButton;
#end
When I inspect any instance of SourceCollectionViewItem in the debugger, all the properties show up as nil despite the fact that I can actually see them on my screen and that everything is displayed as it should be.
My setup was inspired by Apple's sample app IconCollection.
I am obviously missing something. What?
EDIT: I found various posts hinting at a similar issue:
CocoaBuilder.com and this question on SO.
EDIT: Just to be complete: this post deals with the subject as well and delivers a solution based on a combination of the options mentioned in the accepted answer.
Outlets are set during nib loading, and only the prototype item is loaded from nib and has its outlets assigned. All other ViewItems and their Views are cloned from the prototype, in that case outlets are just instance variables that are never initialized.
Here are the options I could come up with:
Override newItemForRepresentedObject: of collection view and reload nib instead of cloning the prototype. But this will probably hurt the performance greatly.
Override copyWithZone of collection view item and assign outlets manually using viewWithTag: to find them.
Give up and try to provide data via bindings only.
I found that overriding NSCollectionViewItem's -setRepresentedObject: could also be a good choice, as it is called on the new Item when all IBOutlet seem to be ready. After the call to super you can do whatever is needed:
- (void)setRepresentedObject:(id)representedObject
{
if (representedObject) {
[super setRepresentedObject:representedObject];
[self.anOutlet bind:#"property" toObject:self.representedObject withKeyPath:#"representeProperty" options:nil];
}
}
I used this method to bind a custom property of an interface object. The check is there to avoid useless calls, when the representedObject is not yet ready. The project uses a separate xib for the ViewItem, as explained in the links in the original edits.
Great question. Like #hamstergene suggests, you can use copyWithZone, it will be much more efficient compared to newItemForRepresentedObject. However viewWithTag is not always an option, first, because not everything can be tagged (easily), and, second, using tag for this purpose is a little wrong. Here's a cool approach with performance in mind, in Swift.
import AppKit
class MyViewController: NSCollectionItemView
{
// Here you are cloning the original item loaded from the storyboard, which has
// outlets available, but as you've seen the default implementation doesn't take
// care of them. Each view has a unique identifiers, which you can use to find it
// in sublayers. What's really cool about this, is that you don't need to assign
// any tags or do anything else while having advantage of better performance using
// cached nib object.
override func copyWithZone(zone: NSZone) -> AnyObject {
let copy: NSCollectionItemView = super.copyWithZone(zone) as! NSCollectionItemView
let oldView: RecordingView = self.view as! MyView
let newView: RecordingView = copy.view as! MyView
newView.foo = newView.viewWithIdentifier(oldView.foo.identifier!) as! NSTextfield
newView.bar = newView.viewWithIdentifier(oldView.bar.identifier!) as! NSImageView
return copy
}
}
#IBDesignable class MyView: View
{
// Custom collection view item view. Lets assume inside of it you have two subviews which you want
// to access in your code.
#IBOutlet weak var foo: NSTextfield!
#IBOutlet weak var bar: NSImageView!
}
extension NSView
{
// Similar to viewWithTag, finds views with the given identifier.
func viewWithIdentifier(identifier: String) -> NSView? {
for subview in self.subviews {
if subview.identifier == identifier {
return subview
} else if subview.subviews.count > 0, let subview: NSView = subview.viewWithIdentifier(identifier) {
return subview
}
}
return nil
}
}

Control instances of specific CCSprites with separate class file in Cocos2d

I have just started working on my first cocos2d ios app.
I am very used to creating games in Game Maker, in which everything is simpler, and would like some help on creating separate .m/.h class files that contains functions that will affect all instances of a specific CCSprite. Obviously different class files for different CCSprites are needed.
In game maker, objects have code applied to them, and when i want something to happen when an instance is created its pretty easy, by just adding code to the create event.
In xcode i can't think how to do this.
One way to go would be to subclass CCSprite. Check out this guide for more info:
http://www.cocos2d-iphone.org/wiki/doku.php/prog_guide:sprites
Separate classes may also not be necessary, consider just having different initiators. Here is an example of a CCSprite subclass that can make both minions and evil rabbits:
BadGuySprite *minion = [[BadGuySprite alloc] initAMinion];
BadGuySprite *evilRabbit = [[BadGuySprite alloc] initAEvilRabbit];
BadGuySprite.h
#import "cocosd.h"
#interface BadGuySprite: CCSprite
{
int lifebar;
}
+(id) initAMinion;
+(id) initAEvilRabbit;
#end
BadGuySprite.m
#import "BadGuySprite.h"
#implementation BadGuySprite
- (id)initAMinion{
self = [CCSprite spriteWithFile:#"minion.png"];
lifebar = 1000;
return self;
}
- (id)initAEvilRabbit{
self = [CCSprite spriteWithFile:#"rabbit.png"];
lifebar = 1;
return self;
}
#end

Getting around IBActions limited scope

I have an NSCollectionView and the view is an NSBox with a label and an NSButton. I want a double click or a click of the NSButton to tell the controller to perform an action with the represented object of the NSCollectionViewItem. The Item View is has been subclassed, the code is as follows:
#import <Cocoa/Cocoa.h>
#import "WizardItem.h"
#interface WizardItemView : NSBox {
id delegate;
IBOutlet NSCollectionViewItem * viewItem;
WizardItem * wizardItem;
}
#property(readwrite,retain) WizardItem * wizardItem;
#property(readwrite,retain) id delegate;
-(IBAction)start:(id)sender;
#end
#import "WizardItemView.h"
#implementation WizardItemView
#synthesize wizardItem, delegate;
-(void)awakeFromNib {
[self bind:#"wizardItem" toObject:viewItem withKeyPath:#"representedObject" options:nil];
}
-(void)mouseDown:(NSEvent *)event {
[super mouseDown:event];
if([event clickCount] > 1) {
[delegate performAction:[wizardItem action]];
}
}
-(IBAction)start:(id)sender {
[delegate performAction:[wizardItem action]];
}
#end
The problem I've run into is that as an IBAction, the only things in the scope of -start are the things that have been bound in IB, so delegate and viewItem. This means that I cannot get at the represented object to send it to the delegate.
Is there a way around this limited scope or a better way or getting hold of the represented object?
Thanks.
Firstly, you almost never need to subclass views.
Bind doesn't do what you think - you want addObserver:forKeyPath:options:context: (You should try to understand what -bind is for tho ).
When you say "the key seems to be it being the "prototype" view for an NSCollectionViewItem" I think you are really confused…
Forget IBOutlet & IBAction - they don't mean anything if you are not Interface Builder. "Prototype" means nothing in Objective-c.
The two methods in the view do not have different scope in any way - there is no difference between them at all. They are both methods, equivalent in every way apart from their names (and of course the code they contain).
If wizardItem is null in -start but has a value in -mouseDown this is wholly to do with the timing that they are called. You either have an object that is going away too soon or isn't yet created at a point you think it is.
Are you familiar with NSZombie? You will find it very useful.

Unable to write to NSTextField from Model Controller object

After always running monolithic blocks of code from within my AppController object, I've just learned how to modularize my code using separate model controller objects (so much neater and less confusing to work with :-))
My simple test app has a main AppController and two model objects (Model1 and Model2). I can successfully pass data from the AppController to the models, and the models themselves can run methods and process the passed data 'internally' as they were intended to do -- but I can't get them to communicate with a darned NSTextField in the UI. Here's the relevant parts of my code:
In AppController.m #import "AppController.h"
#implementation AppController
- (IBAction)passObjectsToModelController:(id)sender
{
NSString *stringToPass = #"Hello from Model2 :-)";
int numToPass=12345;
Model2 *ObjController2 = [[Model2 alloc]initWithStuff:stringToPass:numToPass];
[ObjController2 release];
}
#end
...in Model2.h
#import
#interface Model2 : NSObject
{
IBOutlet NSTextField *passedStringField;
}
- (id)initWithStuff:(NSString*)passedString :(int)passedNum;
#end
...and finally in Model2.m
#import "Model2.h"
#implementation Model2
- (id)initWithStuff:(NSString*)passedString :(int)passedNum
{
if(self = [super init])
{
NSLog(#"now inside 'Model2' controller...");
NSLog(#"the passed string reads: %#",passedString); //••• this works •••
NSLog(#"the passed number is:%d",passedNum); //••• this works •••
[passedStringField setStringValue:passedString]; //••• WTF!!... this DOESN'T work! •••
// do something internally with passedNum here...
}
return self;
}
#end
Both model objects have outlets to the common NSTextField and I've control-dragged from both objects to the field and connected them. My AppController doesn't know about the NSTextField (and I assume, doesn't even want to know). No IB connections have been made between the controller object and model objects.
NSLog tells me that the model objects are being created, and that the passed values are making it that far... but not from there into the text field in the GUI window. I'm not getting any compiler errors or warnings. Am I missing some kind of 'setTarget:' call perhaps?
Any help/ideas would be much appreciated. Thanks :-)
Aside from the lack of MVC that mihirsm mentions, the actual problem is that you're trying to access an outlet in an -init method.
When a object is initialized, outlets are not guaranteed to be connected.
If you want to set the value of an NSTextField declared as an outlet, you should implement -awakeFromNib, which is called when the nib has been loaded and all outlets are guaranteed to be live.
in Model1.h:
#interface Model1 : NSObject
{
IBOutlet NSTextField* passedStringField;
NSString* modelString;
}
- (id)initWithString:(NSString*)passedString number:(int)passedNum;
#end
in Model1.m:
#implementation Model1
- (id)initWithString:(NSString*)passedString number:(int)passedNum
{
if(self = [super init])
{
//copy the string to our ivar
modelString = [passedString copy];
}
return self;
}
//awakeFromNib is called when our outlet is live
- (void)awakeFromNib
{
[passedStringField setStringValue:modelString];
}
//don't forget to release the string, because we created it using -copy
- (void)dealloc
{
[modelString release];
}
#end
The Controller sits between the Model and the View. The Model should not communicate with the View.
It should be the job of the Controller to pass any incoming values from the View to the Model. The Model then processes the data and sends back to the Controller which then updates the View with the new data.
So, in your code you should only have one IBOutlet for the TexField declared in the AppController.
Given all this, I am not exactly sure why the TextField is not being updated. From the given code looks like it should. Maybe multople IBOutlets are causing some issue? Can you try with only one Model having the IBOutlet?

Resources