I read that whenever the client needs to create a file in HDFS (The Hadoop Distributed File System), client's file must be of 64mb. Is that true? How can we load a file in HDFS which is less than 64 MB? Can we load a file which will be just for reference for processing other file and it has to be available to all datanodes?
I read that whenever the client needs to create a file in HDFS (The Hadoop Distributed File System), client's file must be of 64mb.
Could you provide the reference for the same? File of any size can be put into HDFS. The file is split into 64 MB (default) blocks and saved on different data nodes in the cluster.
Can we load a file which will be just for reference for processing other file and it has to be available to all datanodes?
It doesn't matter if a block or file is on a particular data node or on all the data nodes. Data nodes can fetch data from each other as long as they are part of a cluster.
Think of HDFS as a very big hard drive and write the code for reading/writing data from HDFS. Hadoop will take care of the internals like 'reading from' or 'writing to' multiple data nodes if required.
Would suggest to read the following 1 2 3 on HDFS, especially the 2nd one which is a comic on HDFS.
Related
If I am trying to write a file of 200MB into HDFS where HDFS block size is 128MB. What happens if the write fails after writing 150MB out of 200MB. Will I be able to read data from the portion of data written? What if I try to write the same file again? Will that be a duplicate? What happens to the 150MB of data written earlier to failure?
HDFS default Block Size is 128MB, if it fails while writing (it will show the status in Hadoop Administration UI, with file extension copying.)
Only 150MB data will be copied.
yeah you can read only portion of data(150MB).
Once you reinstate the copying it will continue from previous point(if both the paths are same and file name is same).
For every piece of data you can find the replication based on your replication factor.
Previous written data will be available in HDFS.
How can I read tar.bzip2 file in spark in parallel.
I have created a java hadoop custom reader that read the tar.bzip2 file but it is taking too much time to read file as only one core is being used and after some time application failed because only one executor get all the data.
So as we know bzipped files are splittable so when reading a bzipped into an RDD the data will get distributed across the partitions. However the underlying tar file will also get distributed across the partitions and it is not splittable therefore if you try and perform an operation on a partition you will just see a lot of binary data.
To solve this I simply read the bzipped data into an RDD with a single partition. I then wrote this RDD out to a directory, so now you have only a single file containing all the tar file data. I then pulled this tar file from hdfs down to my local file system and untarred it.
I have a conceptual doubt in Hive. I know that Hive s a data warehouse tool that runs on top of Hadoop. We know that Hadoop has a distributed file system -HDFS.
Suppose, I have one master and three slaves. Now, I have created a table employees in HiveQL. The table is so huge that it cant be stored in one machine. Hence it must be stored in all four machines. How can I load such data. Should it be done manually. Or like I type "LOAD DATA ... " in the master and it will be automatically get distributed among all the machines.
Hive uses HDFS as warehouse to store the data. So HDFS concept is used for data storage.
HDFS has a master/slave architecture. An HDFS cluster consists of a single NameNode, a master server that manages the file system namespace and regulates access to files by clients. In addition, there are a number of DataNodes, usually one per node in the cluster, which manage storage attached to the nodes that they run on. HDFS exposes a file system namespace and allows user data to be stored in files.
Internally, a file is split into one or more blocks and these blocks are stored in a set of DataNodes. The NameNode executes file system namespace operations like opening, closing, and renaming files and directories. It also determines the mapping of blocks to DataNodes. The DataNodes are responsible for serving read and write requests from the file system’s clients. The DataNodes also perform block creation, deletion, and replication upon instruction from the NameNode.
Please refer HDFS architecture for more detail.
In Hadoop, I understand that the master node(Namenode) is responsible for storing the blocks of data in the slave machines(Datanode).
When we use -copyToLocal or -get, from the master, the files could be copied from the HDFS to the local storage of the master node. Is there any way the slaves can copy the blocks(data) that are stored in them, to their own local file system?
For ex, a file of 128 MB could be split among 2 slave nodes storing 64MB each. Is there any way for the slave to identify and load this chunk of data to its local file system? If so, how can this be done programmatically? Can the commands -copyToLocal or -get be used in this case also? Please help.
Short Answer: No
The data/files cannot be copied directly from Datandode's. The reason is, Datanodes store the data but they don't have any metadata information about the stored files. For them, they are just block of bits and bytes. The metadata of the files is stored in the Namenode. This metadata contains all the information about the files (name, size, etc.). Along with this, Namenode keeps track of which blocks of the file are stored on which Datanodes. The Datanodes are also not aware of the ordering of the blocks, when actual files are splits in multiple blocks.
Can the commands -copyToLocal or -get be used in this case also?
Yes, you can simply run these from the slave. The slave will then contact the namenode (if you've configured it properly) and download the data to your local filesystem.
What it doesn't do is a "short-circuit" copy, in which it would just copy the raw blocks between directories. There is also no guarantee it will read the blocks from the local machine at all, as your commandline client doesn't know its location.
HDFS blocks are stored on the slaves local FS only . you can dig down the directory defined under property "dfs.datanode.dir"
But you wont get any benefit of reading blocks directly (without HDFS API). Also reading and editing block files directory can corrupt the file on HDFS.
If you want to store data on different slave local then you will have to implement your logic of maintaining block metadata (which is already written in Namenode and do for you).
Can you elaborate more why you want to distribute blocks by yourself when Hadoop takes care of all challenges faced in distributed data?
You can copy particular file or directory from one slave to another slave by using distcp
Usage: distcp slave1address slave2address
In hadoop mapreduce programming model; when we are processing files is it mandatory to keep the files in HDFS file system or can I keep the files in other file system's and still have the benefit of mapreduce programming model ?
Mappers read input data from an implementation of InputFormat. Most implementations descend from FileInputFormat, which reads data from local machine or HDFS. (by default, data is read from HDFS and the results of the mapreduce job are stored in HDFS as well.) You can write a custom InputFormat, when you want your data to be read from an alternative data source, not being HDFS.
TableInputFormat would read data records directly from HBase and DBInputFormat would access data from relational databases. You could also imagine a system where data is streamed to each machine over the network on a particular port; the InputFormat reads data from the port and parses it into individual records for mapping.
However, in your case, you have data in a ext4-filesystem on a single or multiple servers. In order to conveniently access this data within Hadoop you'd have to copy it into HDFS first. This way you will benefit from data locality, when the file chunks are processed in parallel.
I strongly suggest reading the tutorial from Yahoo! on this topic for detailed information. For collecting log files for mapreduce processing also take a look at Flume.
You can keep the files elsewhere but you'd lose the data locality advantage.
For example. if you're using AWS, you can store your files on S3 and access them directly from Map-reduce code, Pig, Hive, etc.
In order to user Apache Haddop you must have your files in HDFS, the hadoop file system. Though there are different abstract types of HDFS, like AWS S3, these are all at their basic level HDFS storage.
The data needs to be in HDFS because HDFS distributed the data along your cluster. During the mapping phase each Mapper goes through the data stored in it's node and then sends it to the proper node running the reducer code for the given chunk.
You can't have Hadoop MapReduce, withput using HDFS.