I have a spring based web-application that needs to get data from ActiveMQ via a JMX connection.
I am using MBeanServerConnectionFactoryBean (in Spring) to get various MBean attributes from ActiveMQ.
I have only one MBeanServerConnectionFactoryBean as a member variable, which is used to get the data. If multiple requests/threads come concurrently will there be any issues? Will there be any race conditions?
Please suggest the best way to keep the code thread-safe.
Spring FactoryBean objects are not intended to be used directly from your code, they're supposed to be used in your Spring config. As such, they are designed to be executed once and once only.
If you want to use them, including MBeanServerConnectionFactoryBean, then you need to create them, configure them, use them and discard them each and every time you want to get the object they create. They are most definitely not thread-safe.
Better yet, do it as the design intended and use them in your Spring config.
Related
I have an application with file-supplier Srping Cloud module included. My workflow is like track file creating/modifying in particular directory->push events to Kafka topic if there are such events. FileSupplierConfiguration is used to configure this file supplier. But now I have to track one more directory and push events to another relevant Kafka topic. So, there is an issue, because there is no possibility to include multiple FileSupplierConfiguration in project for configuration another file supplier. I remember that one of the main principles of microservices for which spring-cloud-stream was designed for is you do one thing and do it well without affecting others, but it still the same microservice with same tracking/pushing functionality but for another directory and topic. Is there any possibility to add one more file supplier with relevant configuration with file-supplier module? Or is the best solution for this issue to run one more application instance with another configuration?
Yes, the best way is to have another instance of this application, but with its own specific configuration properties. This is really how these functions have been designed: microservice based on the convention on configuration. What you are asking really contradicts with Spring Boot expectations. Imaging you'd need to connect to several data bases. So, you only can have a single JdbcTemplate auto-configured. The rest is only possible manually. But better to have the same code base which relies on the auto-configuration and may apply different props.
I have a REST web service exposed at http://server:8080/my-production-ws by JBoss (7). My spring (3.2) configuration has a datasource which points to a my-production-db database. So far so good.
I want to test that web service from the client side, including PUT/POST operations but I obviously don't want my tests to affect the production database.
Is there an easy way to have spring auto-magically create another web service entry point at http://server:8080/my-test-ws or maybe http://server:8080/my-production-ws/test that will have the exact same semantics as the production web service but will use a my-test-db database as a data source instead of my-production-db?
If this is not possible, what is the standard approach to integration testing in that situation?
I'd rather not duplicate every single method in my controllers.
Check the spring Profiles functionality, this should solve the problem. With it its possible to create two datasources with the same bean name in different profiles and then activate only one depending on a parameter passed to the the JVM.
I am working on an app that uses SimpleJDBCTemplate as the wrapper to make JDBC calls.
However, instead of a conventional Datasource, I am choosing to use AbstractDataSource so I can choose from multiple data sources.
I am using ThreadLocal to inject keys to choose the appropriate Datasource.
However, it appears Spring is eagerly creating all my DAOs and my jdbcTemplate and hence I cannot figure out how to have the jdbcTemplate get Connection on demand.
Any clues.?
Do you mean AbstractRoutingDataSource? If not, you really should be using that, since this is exactly what it's for. Mark Fisher wrote a useful blog about it back when it was added to the framework.
Yes Spring will create your DAOs and JdbcTemplates eagerly if they're singletons, which is the default, but that doesn't mean they all obtain a connection immediately. A connection will only be obtained when you start some kind of operation that uses that data source. Typically, that would be starting a transaction. In other words, what you say you want to happen is what already happens.
So this is a rather "big" question, but what I'm trying to accomplish is the following:
I have a Spring application, MVC, JDBC (MySQL) and JSP running on tomcat.
My objective is to test the entire "stack" using a proper method.
What I have so far is Junit using Selenium to simulate an actual user interacting with the application (requires a dummy account for that), and performing different validations such as, see if element is present in the page, see if the database has a specific value or if a value matches the database.
1st concern is that this is actually using the database so it's hard to test certain scenarios. I would really like to be able to mock the database. Have it emulate specific account configs, data states etc
2nd concern is that given the fact that I use what is in the database, and data is continuously changing, it is hard to predict behavior, and therefore properly asserting
I looked at Spring Test but it allows for testing outside a servlet container, so no JSP and no Javascript testing possible.
I saw DBUtils documentation but not sure if it will help me in this case
So, to my fellow developers, I would like to ask for tips to:
Run selenium tests on top of a mocked database
Allow different configs per test
Keep compatibility with Maven/Gradle
I have started with an ordered autowire feature to support this kind of stubbing.
It's basically an idea that i took over from the Seam framework i was working with in the past but i couldnt find yet a similar thing in spring.
The idea is to have a precedence annotation (fw, app,mock,...) that will be used to resolve the current implementation of an autowired bean. This is easy already in xml but not with java config.
So we have our normal repository beans in with app precedence and a test package stubbing these classes with mock precedence.
If both are in the classpath spring would normally fail with a duplicate bean found exception. In our case the extended beanfactory simply takes the bean with the highest precedence.
Im not sure if the order annotation of spring could be used directly but i prefered to have "well defined" precedence scopes anyway, so it will be clear for our developers what this is about.
! While this is a nice approach to stub so beans for testing i would not use it to replace a database definition but rather go with an inmemory database like hsql, like some previous answers mentionned already. !
Say I have a file with each line depicting a different command (but of the same kind), which I want to read out and check and run and maybe do other operations such as merging, comparing and most importantly, store the commands into database.
To do that, I create the Command Class, and new a new Command object while reading each line of the file. Now the problem is, a Command object need to make use of, say a Spring bean which provides database access. As a result, I have to pass in that bean as a constructor argument of the Command class, which is very ugly, which doesn't seem to be the "Spring way"...
and I don't want to use ApplicationContextAware to make my class coupled to the Spring context.
Is there a best practice for this situation?
I very new to Spring and I know it might be a dumb question ...
I would create a CommandFactory that is coupled with spring and use that in your consumer instead. If the factory implements an interface you are not coupling yourself in the consumer and you don't close your possibilities of using a different -non spring coupled- one at a later point (e.g. testing).
In this case I think it is the best way to make the classes created by new Spring Beans.
Therefor annotate them with #Configurable, enable AspectJ, and read the Spring Reference Chapter 7.8.1 Using AspectJ to dependency inject domain objects with Spring