How to "let" in lambda expression? - linq

Question

How can I rewrite this linq query to Entity on with lambda expression?
I want to use let keyword or an equivalent in my lambda expression.
var results = from store in Stores
let AveragePrice = store.Sales.Average(s => s.Price)
where AveragePrice < 500 && AveragePrice > 250
For some similar questions like what is commented under my question, it's suggested to
.Select(store=> new { AveragePrice = store.Sales.Average(s => s.Price), store})
which will calculate AveragePrice for each item, while in Query style I mentioned, let expression prevents to calculate average many times.

Answer 1

So, you can use the extension method syntax, which would involve one lambda expression more than you are currently using. There is no let, you just use a multi-line lambda and declare a variable:
var results = Stores.Where(store =>
{
var averagePrice = store.Sales.Average(s => s.Price);
return averagePrice > 250 && averagePrice < 500;
});
Note that I changed the average price comparison, because yours would never return any results (more than 500 AND less that 250).
The alternative is
var results = Stores.Select(store => new { Store = store, AveragePrice = store.Sales.Average(s => s.Price})
.Where(x => x.AveragePrice > 250 && x.AveragePrice < 500)
.Select(x => x.Store);

Answer 2

Basically, you need to use Select and an anonymous type to add the average to your object, followed by the rest of your statement.
Not tested but it should look like this:
Stores.Select(
x => new { averagePrice = x.Sales.Average(s => s.Price), store = x})
.Where(y => y.averagePrice > 500 && y.averagePrice < 250)
.Select(x => x.store);
Warning: This works well for Linq-to-Entities, but be careful with these constructs in Linq-to-Objects. Using let creates a new anonymous type per object in your collection, it consumes a lot of memory with large collections.
Look here for details:
Let in chained extension methods

Answer 3

Another option is to define this extension method:
public static class Functional
{
public static TResult Pipe<T, TResult>(this T value, Func<T, TResult> func)
{
return func(value);
}
}
Then write your query like this:
var results = Stores
.Where(store => store.Sales.Average(s => s.Price)
.Pipe(averagePrice => averagePrice < 500 && averagePrice > 250));

Answer 4

We can avoid the overhead of the lambda used in all the other answers with an inline out declaration:
public static class FunctionalExtensions
{
public static T Assign<T>(this T o, out T result) =>
result = o;
}
And call it like this
var results = Stores
.Where(store => store.Sales
.Average(s => s.Price)
.Assign(out var averagePrice) < 500 && averagePrice > 250);