I have a code which I need to share so I pasted in from Visual Studio Code into code pen and replace all my image links with imgur links but when I save the code on codepen it doesn't show up.
I've tried uploading to different picture sharing websites but none of them seems to work or sometimes they just dissapear
<img src="https://images.app.goo.gl/PH9vzQEL6deb152b7" alt="logo">
This is a simple code i used but the image just refuses to appear.
I just need to image to show up, if there is any way to share my website without publishing it to the web I would like to be informed about it too. Thanks you.
this is a website that get your image and give you base64 of it and you can put this base64 thing in your src attribute of img element and you are good to go
As you can see below, the icon (in the right corner) is not displayed properly.
Usually, it is an arrow down, as you can see in the showcase of BootsFaces.
My <b:panel> looks like:
<b:panel title="Beiträge (1)" collapsible="true"look="info">
How can I display the correct icon?
I am not using any specific theme and I am using BootsFaces 0.7.0.
We've had a lot of trouble with this. Most likelely the Glyphicons rource file can't be loaded.
Make sure you've added a <h:head></h:head> tag (even if it's empty). Do not use the HTML tag (<head />).
Check the URL pattern of the web.xml. Many tutorials recommend to put the JSF files into a virtual folder, such as <url-pattern>/pages/</url-pattern> . Don't do that. There's nothing wrong with simple patterns like <url-pattern>*.jsf</url-pattern>. By the way, this is the default, so you can safely omit the url-pattern altogether.
If that fails, add the CombinedResourceHandler of OmniFaces. This always does the trick for me.
Check the URL in your browser. Maybe you entered localhost:8080/index.xhtml instead of localhost:8080/index.jsf?
If you're still stuck, open an issue on the BootsFaces GitHub repository (https://github.com/TheCoder4eu/BootsFaces-OSP/issues). But first read https://github.com/TheCoder4eu/BootsFaces-OSP/issues/157 - your problem is probably already fixed there.
I am trying to add an image to the README.md in my repository using markdown below:
But the image is not showing when I visit my repository.
Instead the link to the image is showing up. Clicking the link will open the image in new window.
I have also tried using relative path:
But this is giving page not found error.
What is the correct markdown to display image in README.md
Both README.md and image file are in same path/directory.
What is the correct way to display an image in github README.md?
Complete content of README.md file is as below:
Voice-controlled-MP3-Player
===========================
A MP3 player which accept voice command like PLAY, PAUSE, FORWARD, etc. Using C# and Microsoft Speech API.
Updated content
Since January, 30th 2013, GitHub now supports relative links in markup documents.
This means that your code  would now work flawlessly.
As pointed by #Brad, this may also ease a scenario where the images are different in two branches, but bear the same. In that case, switching from one branch to another, would dynamically switch the image in the rendered view, thus without requiring any change to the Readme content.
Blog post announcement
Help article
Previous answer when GitHub wasn't supporting relative links
You have to use the raw url format. In your case that would be https://raw.githubusercontent.com/i-saumitra/Voice-controlled-MP3-Player/master/screenshot.jpg
This means that the correct markdown would be the following
Using this in a .mdfile on github will display the following picture ;-)
Update following your comment
where is this officialy documented that we have to use raw...i couldn't find it anywhere
This URL format is an undocumented feature of the GitHub site. This means that it could change later. If that ever happens, in order to "rediscover" the new format, click the Raw button when displaying a image. This will "open" the image in your browser. Copy the URL and Voilà!
Note: Although the repository is no longer on hosted on GitHub, I've updated the urls to reflect the new GitHub policy regarding user content
You really should use relative urls. That way they'll work better for private repos as well.
supposing your repo has latest.png inside the screenshots folder.
~B
For relative URL's to work with images, wrap it inside the paragraph tag.
I was facing the problem, especially when working with the single image.
Example:
<p>
<img src="relativePath/file.png" width="220" height="240" />
</p>
An extension to previous answers...
The image would not show for me when the line:
Was directly below a <h2></h2> line and I needed to add an empty line between them.
Hopefully this saves someone some time!
Thought I would update this for 2019 as I had trouble figuring this out for myself. I uploaded my images to a repo on GitHub, and then used the raw url of the image to import it into my markdown file. To get the raw url, click on the specific image link in GitHub so you are on the page for that specific image. To the top right of the photo, there are two buttons, "Download" and "History". If you click "Download", it takes you to that raw url with the picture taking up the full screen. Copy that url, and then paste it like this in your markdown file:
The button used to say "Raw" not "Download" so I hope this helps people find it.
This may not be relevant to previous answers. I have the same question as the OP - I was directed here and it didnt help me. I hope I can help add light to this question however - as it covers the possibilities of why images does not render in README.md file.
The issue I encountered is that the file name README.md file is written as readME
Not only its missing .md its also written differently.
Apparently, we should not rename the README.md file. It has to be the original name of that file in order to render the images or gifs you want to upload on github README.md page. Hope this helps someone, in rare of occasions, just like I did.
Check the file extensions because .png is not the same as .PNG.
Also use / instead of \ while specifying the file path.
Side note, when using reStructuredText use:
.. image:: /screenshots/latest.png?raw=true
I've tested with "Copy path" and in some locations this was working and in others it didn't.
In the cases it didn't, I copied the permalink and used it instead.
It doesn;t work when there are any html tags just above the line where image is being imported. You can try removing the html code or add some blank lines for the image to show on Readme.
This is just to help someone who is still having issues with image rendering in README.md:
If your image is named Some Name.png and you are trying to attach it in the README.md like , it won't work. The image has to be saved without any spaces in the file name.
So Some_Name.png with  will work.
Make sure you check the case of the file extension. They have to match (either capital or lowercase). If you have my_image.PNG in your root directory and you add  to your README file, it will not work. For some reason, Windows likes to capitalize file extensions sometimes. Unfortunately, Git does not recognize extension case so if you try to fix it by just changing the file name, you won't be able to commit the changes to the repo since Git will think everything is up to date. So you either have to update README.md or do some workaround like moving the file out of the directory, making a commit, then editing the file name then moving it back and doing another commit.
I had to add a <br> to return a line in order for the image to show on mine. This discovery was inspired by the comment in this thread to leave a blank line after a tag.
I am wondering how to prevent people from Save image as.. by right-click images on my webpages.
I was thinking about disable right-click, but it seems I have to write javascript code. Is there a easy way to do this?
The simple answer is "you cannot do that". You might be able to put something on the server side that will check the referer before serving the image, but even that is not 100% guaranteed. Moreover, even if you did manage somehow to prevent this, nothing would prevent somebody from taking a screenshot of the browser page and then cropping the image out of it.
I think a much better approach would be to have a server-side url rewriting and processing of the images to add some sort of a visible watermark identifying the images as owned by you and saving a proper copyright information in the EXIF information.
You can make a div that is the same size and height as the image and then you can set the image as the background for that div. That will prevent people from directly downloading the image but they can still enter the url and download it from there. I made a tutorial on this myself right here: http://www.andytechguy.com/tutorials/html/how_to_nodownload/
There's an easy solution for this which I used in my website. Just add oncontextmenu="return false;" attribute to the Image tag and you are done with it!
<img src="https://source.unsplash.com/random" alt="Random image" oncontextmenu="return false;">
This is my first question to be answered on stackoverflow, so please fair with me if I didn't use the right tools...
As long as the image URL is in the source code, the image is downloadable using the unix command wget, or anything similar. I'm not a javascript expert however, but I believe you could read the location of the photo from a text file instead of the URL being hard coded in the HTML. Then you could configure that text file to return a 403 (Permission denied) when attempted to view with whatever web server you are using. This still wouldn't stop screenshots though.
Something like this:
<img src="some javascript to read text file">
Then have the text file contain:
/path/to/obscurely/named/photo.png
Ya, this isn't really possible. Another option is to use Lightroom or something else to batch add watermarks. Watermarks are the only option that I'm aware of that will almost completely protect you, because even the screenshot idea is not really possible unless they are a wizard in Photoshop.
In conclusion I think Lightroom or something else is your best and easiest shot of getting what your looking for.
You can do this by converting the image format from jpg to svg...there are alot of converters online i.e https://convertio.co/jpg-svg/
After this you copy and paste the svg code into your html code to replace the jpg.
I'm using CKEditor for my site.
Now I found the plugin called "MediaEmbed". I need it for embedding YouTube videos.
I installed it and the integration worked fine, but embedding won't work.
When you paste the code into the text area in the embedding dialog and then click on OK in IE and Chrome nothing happens and in Firefox it just adds a image as a flash-content-placeholder.
Let's say the flash-content-placeholder image would be just in the wysiwyg interface, but then i should get the embed code when I click on "view source" - but no, there you just see the source of the placeholder image div and img tag.
Then let's say the embed code is saved internally, so I save the file I create with CKEditor, and the out I get is just what I entered without the stuff the MediaEmbed plugin has generated at all.
How to fix this?
Please help!
Yours Joern.
use firebug and see, it'll be giving a cross domain error. the plugin has a bug. use try catch in the place where is accesses the windows.name property for a workaround.
Try istead ckeditor youtube plugin