i am working on BIRT reporting tool. which is need to called by spring MVC.
i got one example from spring which is here. in this example, configuration is done via bean. can anyone help me convert this configuration in to xml based configuration ?
#EnableWebMvc
#ComponentScan({ "org.eclipse.birt.spring.core","org.eclipse.birt.spring.example" })
#Configuration
public class BirtWebConfiguration extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter {
#Override
public void addViewControllers(ViewControllerRegistry registry) {
registry.addViewController("/reports").setViewName("birtView");
}
#Bean
public BirtView birtView() {
BirtView bv = new BirtView();
// bv.setReportFormatRequestParameter("ReportFormat");
// bv.setReportNameRequestParameter("ReportName");
bv.setBirtEngine(this.engine().getObject());
return bv;
}
#Bean
public BeanNameViewResolver beanNameResolver() {
BeanNameViewResolver br = new BeanNameViewResolver();
return br;
}
#Bean
protected BirtEngineFactory engine() {
BirtEngineFactory factory = new BirtEngineFactory();
return factory;
}
}
I wants a similar configuration in xml file.
There's really no tool for extracting Spring annotations to Spring bean context xml file. You'll have to do it by hand, shouldn't be too hard as all the Spring annotations functionality can be duplicated into Spring context xml tags.
if you want to use spingmvc, so no need the configuration files.
my solution is that in Birt Script i call the impl java file like this :
sampleService = new Packages.com.example.warlock.service.SampleServiceImpl();
pojo = new Packages.com.example.warlock.entity.Sample();
iterator = sampleService.getSamples().iterator();
because my SampleService is a interface and SampleServiceImpl is impl java, the two java file are not config as #Bean.
At first i want to get the data from ModelMap but failed, so i skip the controller and straight to call Service, then final call the DAO to get the Data from DB
Related
I am trying to implement Hibernate second level caching in a Spring boot project using Redisson.
I have followed this blog as a reference
https://pavankjadda.medium.com/implement-hibernate-2nd-level-cache-with-redis-spring-boot-and-spring-data-jpa-7cdbf5632883
Also i am trying to initialize the RedissionClient programmatically and not through declaratively /through a config file
Created a spring bean to be initialized which should create the RedissonClient instance.
#Configuration
#Lazy(value = false)
public class RedissonConfig {
#Bean
public RedissonClient redissionClient() {
Config config = new Config();
config.useSingleServer().setAddress("redis://127.0.0.1:6379");
return Redisson.create(config);
}
}
However this bean is never intialized and i get the following error while application startup.
Caused by: org.hibernate.cache.CacheException: Unable to locate Redisson configuration
at org.redisson.hibernate.RedissonRegionFactory.createRedissonClient(RedissonRegionFactory.java:107) ~[redisson-hibernate-53-3.12.1.jar:3.12.1]
at org.redisson.hibernate.RedissonRegionFactory.prepareForUse(RedissonRegionFactory.java:83) ~[redisson-hibernate-53-3.12.1.jar:3.12.1]
It seems Spring boot Hibernate still trying to load the Redisson config through a config file.
is it possible to load the Redission config in spring boot programmatically ?
Best Regards,
Saurav
I just did exactly this, here is how:
you need a custom RegionFactory that is similar to the JndiRedissonRegionFactory but gets its RedissonClient injected somehow.
an instance of this Class, fully configured, is put into the hibernate-properties map. Hibernates internal code is flexible: if the value of hibernate.cache.region.factory_class is a string it is treated as a FQDN. If it is an instance of Class<?>, it will be instantiated. If it is an Object, it will be used.
Spring offers a rather simple way to customize hibernate properties with a bean:
#AutoConfiguration(after = RedissonAutoConfiguration.class, before = JpaAutoConfiguration.class)
#ConditionalOnProperty("spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.cache.use_second_level_cache")
public class HibernateCacheAutoConfiguration {
#Bean
public HibernatePropertiesCustomizer setRegionFactory(RedissonClient redisson) {
return hibernateProperties -> hibernateProperties.put(AvailableSettings.CACHE_REGION_FACTORY, new SpringBootRedissonRegionFactory(redisson));
}
}
My RegionFactory is really simple:
#AllArgsConstructor
public class SpringBootRedissonRegionFactory extends RedissonRegionFactory {
private RedissonClient redissonClient;
#Override
protected RedissonClient createRedissonClient(Map properties) {
return redissonClient;
}
#Override
protected void releaseFromUse() {
}
}
I used the redisson-starter to get a RedissonClient, hence the reference to RedissonAutoConfiguration, but you could just create an instance by hand.
It is possible, but then you need to provide a custom implementation of RegionFactory to Hibernate, which can extends RedissonRegionFactory but uses your own client instance.
As the title states.
I am migrating a Spring-MVC application that uses XML based Configuration.
I don't know where to move the filters located in the web.xml file to the new Spring Boot Project.
You can make use of the annotation : #ImportResource for this
Find more details here
You can define your filters using Java Configurations when using Spring Boot.
As mentioned in the documentation, you only need to declare that filter as a Bean in a configuration class.
#Configuration
public class WebConfig {
#Bean
public Filter someFilter() {
return new someFilter();
}
}
If for some reason "SomeFilter" is not a spring managed bean, or if you need to customize the filter behaviour, then you can register the filter using FilterRegistrationBean as follows
#Configuration
public class WebConfig {
#Bean
public Filter someFilter() {
return new someFilter();
}
#Bean
public FilterRegistrationBean someFilterRegistration() {
FilterRegistrationBean registration = new FilterRegistrationBean();
registration.setFilter(someFilter());
return registration;
}
}
In case of multiple Filters you can specify the order using FilterRegistrationBean.setOrder() as mentioned in the doc
Finally I registered my Interceptors using Java Configuration (no xml) this way.
#Configuration
#EnableWebMvc
public class WebConfig extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter {
#Autowired
ControllerInterceptor controllerInterceptor;
#Override
public void addInterceptors(InterceptorRegistry registry) {
registry.addInterceptor(this.controllerInterceptor).addPathPatterns(this.buildPaths());
}
private String[] buildPaths() {
String paths[] = { "/api/example1/**", "/api/example2/**" };
return paths;
}
}
Back-end, Spring boot project(v1.3.0.RELEASE), supply Rest JSON Api to fron-end, just now encountered an error:
Infinite recursion (StackOverflowError)
I decide to change to a custom FastJsonHttpMessageConverter, and code is below
#Bean
public HttpMessageConverter httpMessageConverter() {
FastJsonHttpMessageConverter fastJsonHttpMessageConverter = new FastJsonHttpMessageConverter();
return fastJsonHttpMessageConverter;
}
but it does not work, in real it uses a default HttpMessageConverter. Although does not have above error, the output is not as I expected. e.g.
suppliers: [
{
$ref: "$.value"
}
]
Now change above code
#Bean
public HttpMessageConverter mappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter() {
FastJsonHttpMessageConverter fastJsonHttpMessageConverter = new FastJsonHttpMessageConverter();
return fastJsonHttpMessageConverter;
}
This time it works, I want to know why the method name have to be mappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter? If use another method name how to configure it?
After seeing this offical document, I know how to customize converters.
#Bean
public HttpMessageConverters customConverters() {
HttpMessageConverter<?> additional = new FastJsonHttpMessageConverter();
return new HttpMessageConverters(additional);
}
A Revise to my main post, actually below code does not work.
#Bean
public HttpMessageConverter mappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter() {
FastJsonHttpMessageConverter fastJsonHttpMessageConverter = new FastJsonHttpMessageConverter();
return fastJsonHttpMessageConverter;
}
Spring boot never enter this method if you set breakpoint inside it.
And below code also works.
#SpringBootApplication
public class FooApplication extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(FooApplication.class, args);
}
#Override
public void configureMessageConverters(List<HttpMessageConverter<?>> converters) {
super.configureMessageConverters(converters);
converters.add(new FastJsonHttpMessageConverter());
}
}
Spring boot says (https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/html/howto-spring-mvc.html#howto-customize-the-responsebody-rendering):
If a bean you add is of a type that would have been included by default anyway (like MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter for JSON conversions) then it will replace the default value.
The bean you are adding is not of the same type, so the above does not happen. Your converter goes somewhere in the list of converters (probably the end), and the first suitable converter (the old one) does the job.
Beans produced by the Java configuration have the name of the method, so when you create a second bean named mappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter, it overrides the one created by spring boot's JacksonHttpMessageConvertersConfiguration and takes it place.
Instead of adding a converter bean, you might prefer to override the whole list of converters:
As in normal MVC usage, any WebMvcConfigurerAdapter beans that you provide can also contribute converters by overriding the configureMessageConverters method,
I’m considering to replace the DefaultSessionAttributeStore implementation of Spring MVC 3.2.5 with some class of my own, and I’ve known from the source code that in my 3.2.5 spring source, it’s SessionAttributesHandler which possesses a SessionAttributeStore interface reference and invokes the session store function. My question is how to replace that by DI? The SessionAttributesHandler holds a final private sessionAttributeStore reference and can only be set by the constructor:
public class SessionAttributesHandler {
...
private final SessionAttributeStore sessionAttributeStore;
...
public SessionAttributesHandler(Class<?> handlerType, SessionAttributeStore sessionAttributeStore) {
Assert.notNull(sessionAttributeStore, "SessionAttributeStore may not be null.");
this.sessionAttributeStore = sessionAttributeStore;
SessionAttributes annotation = AnnotationUtils.findAnnotation(handlerType, SessionAttributes.class);
if (annotation != null) {
this.attributeNames.addAll(Arrays.asList(annotation.value()));
this.attributeTypes.addAll(Arrays.<Class<?>>asList(annotation.types()));
}
for (String attributeName : this.attributeNames) {
this.knownAttributeNames.put(attributeName, Boolean.TRUE);
}
}
...
}
Are all the components of spring mvc managed in the spring DI container? How to inject my own SessionAttributeStore implementation into SessionAttributesHandler? What does the "Class handlerType" argument mean in the constructor? From source, it seems like it's the "controller" class. Since SessionAttributesHandler is invoked and held by a ModelFactory, and in ModelFactory there is no code instantiating the SessionAttributesHandler, is there any "XML" bean configuration file for the Spring MVC inner components and how to overwrite them?
If you want to provide your own implementation of a SessionAttributeStore you need to manually configure the RequestMappingHandlerAdapter and set your custom implementation on there. That will take care of using it through-out the rest of the infrastructure.
Assuming that you use java config you can do the following
#Configuration
public class MyConfiguration extend WebMvcConfigurationSupport {
#Bean
public SessionAttributeStore sessionAttributeStore() {
return new MyCustomSessionAttributeStore();
}
#Override
#Bean
public RequestMappingHandlerAdapter requestMappingHandlerAdapter() {
RequestMappingHandlerAdapter rmha = super.requestMappingHandlerAdapter();
rmha.setSessionAttributeStore(sessionAttributeStore());
return rmha;
}
}
If you want to do this in XML you either have to write a BeanPostProcessor which sets it on the default RequestMappingHandlerAdapter instance created by <mvc:annotation-driven /> or configure it manually and drop the namespace support.
I'm trying to implement Togglz & Spring using #Configuration beans rather than XML. I'm not sure how to configure the return type of the Configuration bean. For example:
#Configuration
public class SystemClockConfig {
#Bean
public SystemClock plainSystemClock() {
return new PlainSystemClock();
}
#Bean
public SystemClock awesomeSystemClock() {
return new AwesomeSystemClock();
}
#Bean
public FeatureProxyFactoryBean systemClock() {
FeatureProxyFactoryBean proxyFactoryBean = new FeatureProxyFactoryBean();
proxyFactoryBean.setActive(awesomeSystemClock());
proxyFactoryBean.setInactive(plainSystemClock());
proxyFactoryBean.setFeature(Features.AWESOME_SYSTEM_CLOCK.name());
proxyFactoryBean.setProxyType(SystemClock.class);
return proxyFactoryBean;
}
}
The systemClock method returns a FeatureProxyFactoryBean but the clients of this bean require a SystemClock. Of course, the compiler freaks over this.
I imagine it just works when XML config is used. How should I approach it when using a configuration bean?
I'm not an expert for the Java Config configuration style of Spring, but I guess your systemClock() method should return a proxy created with the FeatureProxyFactoryBean. Something like this:
#Bean
public SystemClock systemClock() {
FeatureProxyFactoryBean proxyFactoryBean = new FeatureProxyFactoryBean();
proxyFactoryBean.setActive(awesomeSystemClock());
proxyFactoryBean.setInactive(plainSystemClock());
proxyFactoryBean.setFeature(Features.AWESOME_SYSTEM_CLOCK.name());
proxyFactoryBean.setProxyType(SystemClock.class);
return (SystemClock) proxyFactoryBean.getObject();
}
But I'm not sure if this is the common way to use FactoryBeans with Spring Java Config.