I'm trying to create a shell script getting the process id of the Skype app on my Mac.
ps -clx | grep 'Skype' | awk '{print $2}' | head -1
The above is working fine, but there are two problems:
1)
The grep command would get all process if their name just contains "Skype". How can I ensure that it only get the result, if the process name is exactly Skype?
2)
I would like to make a shell script from this, which can be used from the terminal but the process name should be an argument of this script:
#!/bin/sh
ps -clx | grep '$1' | awk '{print $2}' | head -1
This isn't returning anything. I think this is because the $2 in the awk is treated as an argument too. How can I solve this?
Your ps -cl1 output looks like this:
UID PID PPID F CPU PRI NI SZ RSS WCHAN S ADDR TTY TIME CMD
501 185 172 104 0 31 0 2453272 1728 - S ffffff80145c5ec0 ?? 0:00.00 httpd
501 303 1 80004004 0 31 0 2456440 1656 - Ss ffffff8015131300 ?? 0:11.78 launchd
501 307 303 4004 0 33 0 2453456 7640 - S ffffff8015130a80 ?? 0:46.17 distnoted
501 323 303 40004004 0 33 0 2480640 9156 - S ffffff80145c4dc0 ?? 0:03.29 UserEventAgent
Thus, the last entry in each line is your command. That means you can use the full power of regular expressions to help you.
The $ in a regular expression means the end of the string, thus, you could use $ to specify that not only does the output must have Skype in it, it must end with Skype. This means if you have a command called Skype Controller, you won't pull it up:
ps -clx | grep 'Skype$' | awk '{print $2}' | head -1
You can also simplify things by using the ps -o format to just pull up the columns you want:
ps -eo pid,comm | grep 'Skype$' | awk '{print $1}' | head -1
And, you can eliminate head by simply using awk's ability to select your line for you. In awk, NR is your record number. Thus you could do this:
ps -eo pid,comm | grep 'Skype$' | awk 'NR == 1 {print $1}'
Heck, now that I think of it, we could eliminate the grep too:
ps -eo pid,comm | awk '/Skype$/ {print $1; exit}'
This is using awk's ability to use regular expressions. If the line contains the regular expression, 'Skype$', it will print the first column, then exit
The only problem is that if you had a command Foo Skype, this will also pick it up. To eliminate that, you'll have to do a bit more fancy footwork:
ps -eo pid,comm | while read pid command
do
if [[ "$command" = "Skype" ]]
then
echo $pid
break
fi
done
The while read is reading two variables. The trick is that read uses white space to divide the variables it reads in. However, since there are only two variables, the last one will contain the rest of the entire line. Thus if the command is Skype Controller, the entire command will be put into $command even though there's a space in it.
Now, we don't have to use a regular expression. We can compare the command with an equality.
This is longer to type in, but you're actually using fewer commands and less piping. Remember awk is looping through each line. All you're doing here is making it more explicit. In the end, this is actually much more efficient that what you originally had.
If pgrep is available on Mac, you can use pgrep '^Skype$'. This will list the process id of all processes called Skype.
You used the wrong quotes in your script:
ps -clx | grep "$1" | awk '{print $2}' | head -1
or
pgrep "^$1$"
The problem with your second example is that the $1 is in single quotes, which prevents bash from expanding the variable. There is already a utility that accomplishes what you want without manually parsing ps output.
pgrep "$1"
You can do this in AppleScript:
tell application "System Events"
set skypeProcess to the process "Skype"
set pid to the unix id of skypeProcess
pid
end tell
which means you can use 'osascript' to get the PID from within a shell script:
$ osascript -e "tell application \"System Events\"" -e "set skypeProcess to the process \"Skype\"" -e "set pid to the unix id of skypeProcess" -e "pid" -e "end tell"
3873
You can format the output of ps using the -o [field],... and list by process name using -C [command_name] ;however, ps will still print the column header, which can be removed by piping it through grep -v PID
ps -o pid -C "$1" |grep -v PID
where $1 would be the command name (in this case Skype)
I'd so something like:
ps aux | grep Skype | awk 'NR==1 {print $2}'
==== UPDATE ====
Use the parameter without quotes and use single quotes for awk
#!/bin/bash
ps aux | grep $1 | awk 'NR==1 {print $2}'
Method 1 - Use awk
I don't see any reason to use the -l flag (long format), I also don't see any reason to use grep and awk at the same time: awk has grep capability built in. Here is my plan: use ps and output just 2 columns: pid and command, then use awk to pick out what you want:
ps -cx -o pid,command | awk '$2 == "Skype" { print $1 }'
Method 2 - Use bash
This method has the advantage that if you already script in bash, you don't even need awk, which save one process. The solution is longer than the other method, but very straight forward.
#!/bin/bash
ps -cx -o pid,command | {
while read pid command
do
if [ "_$command" = "_$1" ]
then
# Do something with the pid
echo Found: pid=$pid, command=$command
break
fi
done
}
pgrep myAwesomeAppName
This works great under Catalina 10.15.2
Use double quotes to allow bash to perform variable substitution.
Single quotes disable bash variable substitution mechanism.
ps -clx | grep "$1" | awk "{print $2}" | head -1
Related
$ ps -ef | grep python | awk -F' ' '{print $2}'
9825
4470
4619
$ htop -p 9825,4470,4619
For now, I have to make two separate commands in order to watch all python processes within htop. Is there a way that I can pipe all the results from awk and feed them into htop?
If you have pgrep (you probably do):
htop -p $(pgrep python | paste -sd,)
You could avoid grep and use only awk using something like:
ps -ef | awk '/[p]ython/{print $2}'
Then you could use:
htop -p $(ps -ef | awk -v ORS=, '/[p]ython/{print $2}')
Notice the [] around the p, this is a nice trick to avoid printing the second command itself:
ps -ef | awk '/[p]ython/{print $2}'
| |
cmd 1 cmd 2
it works because awk will translate the regex [p] to say something like "match characters from [p] in this case, p only, followed by ython:
[p]ython != python
here is what I want to do
while ["ps a | grep '[m]ono' | awk '{print $1}'" != ""] ; do
kill ps a | grep '[m]ono' | awk '{print $1}'
done
meaning if the grep returns nothing, don't try a kill.
The thing is I've always been lost with the expression evaluation in bash, sometime I use " " around something, sometime it's eval, sometime it's ''.
Could someone explain to me how to write the condition in my loop and explain the difference between the above? I'm used to find the working one with many tries and it feels like a huge loss of time.
Best choice: Do something else.
Utilities already exist for this purpose. Example:
killall mono
pkill mono
...or, even better, something targeted to the specific executable you want to terminate:
fuser -k /path/to/something.exe
...which would kill only programs with a file handle on that specific executable, rather than all applications running with mono on the machine.
...but, to explain the bugs:
There are two things wrong here: Missing command substitutions, and missing whitespace.
Missing whitespace:
["ps a | grep '[m]ono' | awk '{print $1}'" != ""]
...is literally trying to run a command with a name starting with [ps, as in, looking in the PATH for...
/bin/[ps\ a
/usr/bin/[ps\ a
...etc. [ is a command, and needs a space after its name like any other command. Thus:
[ "ps a | grep '[m]ono' | awk '{print $1}'" != "" ]
...fixes this problem (but leaves another one).
Missing command substitutions:
[ "ps a | grep '[m]ono' | awk '{print $1}'" != "" ]
...is comparing a string that starts with "ps a" to to ""; it does not compare the output of running a command that starts with ps a. To do that, you'd instead run:
[ "$(ps a | grep '[m]ono' | awk '{print $1}')" != "" ]
The content of $(...) is replaced with the output of the command within; thus, running your pipeline and comparing its output to an empty string.
This question already has answers here:
How do I set a variable to the output of a command in Bash?
(15 answers)
Closed 8 years ago.
I'm trying to write a simple script for killing a process. I've already read Find and kill a process in one line using bash and regex so please don't redirect me to that.
This is my code:
LINE=$(ps aux | grep '$1')
PROCESS=$LINE | awk '{print $2}'
echo $PROCESS
kill -9 $PROCESS
I want to be able to run something like
sh kill_proc.sh node and have it run
kill -9 node
But instead what I get is
kill_process.sh: line 2: User: command not found
I found out that when I log $PROCESS it is empty.
Does anyone know what I'm doing wrong?
PROCESS=$(echo "$LINE" | awk '{print $2}')
or
PROCESS=$(ps aux | grep "$1" | awk '{print $2}')
I don't know why you're getting the error you quoted. I can't reproduce it. When you say this:
PROCESS=$LINE | awk '{print $2}'
the shell expands it to something like this:
PROCESS='mayoff 10732 ...' | awk '{print $2}'
(I've shortened the value of $LINE to make the example readable.)
The first subcommand of the pipeline sets variable PROCESS; this variable-setting command has no output so awk reads EOF immediately and prints nothing. And since each subcommand of the pipeline runs in a subshell, the setting of PROCESS takes place only in a subshell, not in the parent shell running the script, so PROCESS is still not set for later commands in your script.
(Note that some versions of bash can run the last subcommand of the pipeline in the current shell instead of in a subshell, but that doesn't affect this example.)
Instead of setting PROCESS in a subshell and feeding nothing to awk on standard input, you want to feed the value of LINE to awk and store the result in PROCESS in the current shell. So you need to run a command that writes the value of LINE to its standard output, and connects that standard output to the standard input of awk. The echo command can do this (or the printf command, as chepner pointed out in his answer).
You need to use echo (or printf) to actually put the value of $LINE onto the standard input of the awk command.
LINE=$(ps aux | grep "$1")
PROCESS=$(echo "$LINE" | awk '{print $2}')
echo $PROCESS
kill -9 $PROCESS
There's no need use LINE; you can set PROCESS with a single line
PROCESS=$(ps aux | grep "$1" | awk '{print $2}')
or better, skip the grep:
PROCESS=$(ps aux | awk -v pname="$1" '$1 ~ pname {print $2}')
Finally, don't use kill -9; that's a last resort for debugging faulty programs. For any program that you didn't write yourself, kill "$PROCESS" should be sufficient.
I need to find process by string matching, and the kill it, need to do it in one line in another script file:
here's what I tried:
'kill $(ps -ef|grep xxx|grep -v grep | awk '{print $2 }' )'
"kill $(ps -ef|grep xxx|grep -v grep | awk '{print $2 }' )"
first one didn't work because of the nested single quote, second one didn't work because $2 is taken by the parent script to be argument 2 to parent script.
how do I do this?
The easiest way to accomplish that task is:
pkill xxx
(which you'll find in the debian/ubuntu world in package procps, if you don't have it installed.) You might need to use pkill -f xxx, depending on whether xxx is part of the process name or an argument, which is often the case with script execution.
However, to answer the more general question about shell-quoting, if you need to pass the string
kill $(ps aux | grep xxx | grep -v grep | awk '{print $2}')
as an argument, you need to use backslash escapes:
bash -c "kill \$(ps aux | grep xxx | grep -v grep | awk '{print \$2}')"
Or, you can paste together several quoted strings:
bash -c 'kill $(ps aux | grep xxx | grep -v grep | awk '"'"'{print $2}'"'"')'
Personally, I find the first one more readable but YMMV.
You can only backslash escape a few characters inside a double-quoted string: $, ", \, newline and backtick; and inside a single-quoted string backslash is just backslash. However, that's enough to let you type just about anything.
I am writing a script to monitor the CPU and MEM of any given process. For that i need to send in the name of the process to be monitored as a commandline argument. For example.
./monitorscript <pname>
I need to get the pid of the process in the script so that i can use a ps -p <pid> inside.
How do i get the pid of a process given its process name?
I understand that there might be multiple processes in the same name. I just want to get the first process out of that list.
The answer above was mostly correct, just needed some tweaking for the different parameters in Mac OSX.
ps -A | grep [f]irefox | awk '{print $1}'
You can use the pgrep command like in the following example
$ pgrep Keychain\ Access
44186
You can install pidof with Homebrew:
brew install pidof
pidof <process_name>
This solution matches the process name more strictly:
ps -Ac -o pid,comm | awk '/^ *[0-9]+ Dropbox$/ {print $1}'
This solution has the following advantages:
it ignores command line arguments like tail -f ~/Dropbox
it ignores processes inside a directory like ~/Dropbox/foo.sh
it ignores processes with names like ~/DropboxUID.sh
This is the shortest command I could find that does the job:
ps -ax | awk '/[t]he_app_name/{print $1}'
Putting brackets around the first letter stops awk from finding the awk process itself.
Try this one:
echo "$(ps -ceo pid=,comm= | awk '/firefox/ { print $1; exit }')"
The ps command produces output like this, with the PID in the first column and the executable name (only) in the second column:
bookworm% ps -ceo pid=,comm=
1 launchd
10 kextd
11 UserEventAgent
12 mDNSResponder
13 opendirectoryd
14 notifyd
15 configd
...which awk processes, printing the first column (pid) and exiting after the first match.
You can try this
pid=$(ps -o pid=,comm= | grep -m1 $procname | cut -d' ' -f1)
ps -o ppid=$(ps -ax | grep nameOfProcess | awk '{print $1}')
Prints out the changing process pid and then the parent PID. You can then kill the parent, or you can use that parentPID in the following command to get the name of the parent process:
ps -p parentPID -o comm=
For me the parent was 'login' :\
Why don't you run TOP and use the options to sort by other metrics, other than PID? Like, highest used PID from the CPU/MEM?
top -o cpu <---sorts all processes by CPU Usage