I inherited a DNN site running on DNN 5. We have been asked to turn on ssl and from everything I've seen it should be as simple as flipping the secure flag in the admin module. however when we do this and try to save we get the following error.
Message: DotNetNuke.Services.Exceptions.ModuleLoadException: Input string was
not in a correct format. ---> System.FormatException: Input string was not
in a correct format. at System.Number.StringToNumber(String str, NumberStyles
options, NumberBuffer& number, NumberFormatInfo info, Boolean parseDecimal) at
System.Number.ParseInt32(String s, NumberStyles style, NumberFormatInfo info) at
DotNetNuke.Modules.Admin.Portals.SiteSettings.cmdUpdate_Click(Object sender, EventArgs e)
Lots of stuff on Google for this but nothing I've seen so far relating to the https flag. Anyone run across this one before and any ideas on how to resolve it?
When you save in the site settings module, it tries to update/parse all of the settings. So, even though you're setting the HTTPS setting, it's probably an unrelated setting that is causing the error. I'd investigate the results you're finding on Google more.
You might also want to upgrade DNN to a later version (I vaguely remember some issue with bad data causing an issue like this during some version 5 upgrades; I believe it was fixed if you keep upgrading to DNN 5.6.x or DNN 6.x).
Related
I have my website hosted on IIS with window 2016 OS. When I am going to disable the Form Authentication under IIS, it is giving me the following error.
Form Authentication.
Exception from HRESULT: 0xC00CEF03
i had a similar issue but it occurred when i was trying to disable the 'Machine key' - 'automatically generate at runtime' and then Applying the same.
For your error, please verify if the authentication is enabled/disabled for Default Web-site. Change that setting and then try disabling you specific websites status. It should ideally work.
I've seen this error stem from three different controls on the authentication method:
If configuring the authentication method on an application, and the authentication method you're trying to disable is enabled on the containing site.
If configuring the authentication method on a site, and the authentication method you're trying to disable is enabled on the Default Web Site.
If configuring the authentication method that has been defined in a web.config file. You should adjust it in the config file.
0xC00CEF03 error code translates to WR_E_NSPREFIXWITHEMPTYNSURI which refers to “Writer: cannot use prefix with empty namespace URI” (Reference).
This error occurs when there is something wrong with the web.config file. It’s probably corrupted or there are incompatible tags and parameters. As a result of this corruption and incompatibility, IIS is not able to read this file. Therefore, it can’t make a change.
The issue mostly happens after migration because a piece of configuration that works in the older version of IIS (and .NET Framework) probably became unsupported in the newer version.
The shortest way of finding what part of the web.config is causing the issue is to remove sections one by one and test. High-level steps:
Remove a section from the bottom of the file (Let’s say you removed system.serviceModel section)
If the issue goes away, add the section back and start removing the subsections of it one by one. (For example, ws2007HttpBinding subsection in system.serviceModel section)
If the issue goes away again, bring the subsection back and go through each lines. Prefixes like wsid:, asm:, and trust: are the most common causes of this issue
Source: 0xC00CEF03 error (Cannot use prefix with empty namespace URI)
I have searched the answers to similar questions asked about this SagePay error, and checked that the fixes don't appear to apply to my problem.
Specifically:
I am using a correct 2-letter country code for BillingCountry and DeliveryCountry.
I am POSTing VPSProtocol, TxType and Vendor as well as the Crypt value.
I have re-checked that I am using the correct encryption key from the MySagePay test portal.
Now I was using http://localhost:8084/app/success and http://localhost:8084/app/failure for my success and failure URLs, since I thought that although these are (obviously) not visible externally, it shouldn't matter since SagePay is re-directing at the end of its part of the transaction. (Is this assumption correct, or do these URLs need to be externally accessible?) Some of the answers have thrown doubt on this, so I changed them to an external website I own, and I still get the same error.
Another line of thought is that the client I am developing for has already gone live, and there seem to be hints that once you have gone live, you no longer have access to the test server (Is this true?)
Is there anything else I should be checking? (Additional info: I'm using the SagePay api (sagepay-api-1.2.2.0.jar and related libraries) to validate the form contents and encrypt them.
I used the integration from https://github.com/tolzhabayev/sagepayForm-php
I had this error (5080) and spoke to SagePay support and they guided me to the MySagePay portal where you can view Invalid transactions to be able to troubleshoot this error easily!
Hope this helps someone.
Chris Rickards
I had exact same problem and I tried everything that you described as well, one day after I found that the problem was in "VendorEMail" field, it had 2 email addresses separated by ;, once I removed second and left only one email everything worked.
So I has a small problem as I outlined here.
I have made a new question because this is more general and will perhaps help others.
So essentially, I integrated the Facebook SDK Into Codeigniter as a library.
The SDK requires Json and Curl.
In the base_facebook.php file there is the following code:
if (!function_exists('curl_init')) {
throw new Exception('Facebook needs the CURL PHP extension.');
}
if (!function_exists('json_decode')) {
throw new Exception('Facebook needs the JSON PHP extension.');
}
If these functions are not available I expect an error to be fired to tell me such. Then I can install the correct packages and continue.
What actually happened is that even when I had error reporting set to E_ALL a blank page was returned.
This made it impossible to debug and after lots of playing I worked out it was because CURL was not installed on my server.
My question is why does codeigniter show blank pages rather than library based exceptions?
Furthermore even if there is an exception in a library why does the rest of the page not continue executing.
Essentially CI is seemingly making the use of exceptions worthless..
COuld anyone advise?
THanks
My question is why does codeigniter show blank pages rather than library based exceptions?
Most likely because display_errors is set to “off”.
While this is recommended for a production environment (web site users are not supposed to see internal error messages – it might give them info about internals, that they are not supposed to have) – it’s not very helpful while developing, where you as the developer want to be informed about what went wrong.
So check if CI has a “debug” setting for this, or if it’s maybe already set to off in your PHP configuration.
(Maybe CI or your config are set up in a way that errors are logged to a file instead. Also recommended for production; while developing, you’d have to keep an eye on this file then.)
Furthermore even if there is an exception in a library why does the rest of the page not continue executing.
Because that’s how exceptions are supposed to work – if they are not being caught when they reach the “top level” of your app, they cause a fatal error, and scripts die when those occur.
Familiarize yourself with the concept of try { … } catch(…) { … } to handle exceptions that might occur in script flow.
(Actually, it’s kinda surprising you don’t know all this already, if you’re working with an advanced PHP framework …)
This is a problem I get when trying to install Umbraco. I know that Umbraco has its own forum, but they have just moved it to another url, and I can not seem to be able to post a question there. So I try here. I know this problem has been reported before, and have tried to implement the solutions other people have reported. But I still can not seem to get it working. I have tried to both use Windows installer, as well as setting up the site myself. Last week I managed to create a site, and install a starter kit. But now I can not make it work. No idea why. I do the exact same steps as last week. I have .NET 4.0, IIS 7 and Windows 7. The Umbraco version is the latest (4.7).
No matter if I use Windows installer, or the binary-package from Codeplex, the installation process works fine until the step when I am presented the choice of installing a starter kit. I press for example the Business Startkit, but then I get the error below. I have given full permission for my application folder in inetpub, to IIS_IUSRS, Network service and Network. I have done the same for C:/Temp folder (as suggested by someone). I am using an app-pool that runs on .NET 4.0 in Integrated mode. I also set it to use Network service. I have also tried to both start off with a blank database, as well as creating a new one. The database gets populated with tables. The folder in inetpub is also filled with all the folders and files that should be there. I have also tried using SQL CE, but with out luck. And I do have a working internet connection.
Does anybody have any ideas on how to solve this? It's getting really frustrating. I think I have tried all the suggestions in the other threads, but I might have misunderstood something, missed some steps, or forgotten some advice. Any suggestions are highly appreciated.
The error I get:
Server Error in '/site_development' Application.
The given key was not present in the dictionary.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.Collections.Generic.KeyNotFoundException: The given key was not present in the dictionary.
Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.
Stack Trace:
[KeyNotFoundException: The given key was not present in the dictionary.]
System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2.get_Item(TKey key) +2258321
umbraco.cms.businesslogic.datatype.controls.Factory.GetNewObject(Guid DataEditorId) +108
umbraco.cms.businesslogic.datatype.DataTypeDefinition.Import(XmlNode xmlData) +459
umbraco.cms.businesslogic.packager.Installer.InstallBusinessLogic(Int32 packageId, String tempDir) +187
umbraco.presentation.install.steps.Skinning.loadStarterKits.SelectStarterKit(Object sender, EventArgs e) +416
System.Web.UI.WebControls.LinkButton.OnClick(EventArgs e) +118
System.Web.UI.WebControls.LinkButton.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) +113
System.Web.UI.WebControls.LinkButton.System.Web.UI.IPostBackEventHandler.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) +9
System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(IPostBackEventHandler sourceControl, String eventArgument) +13
System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(NameValueCollection postData) +176
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +5563
________________________________________
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP.NET Version:4.0.30319.237
Are you able to install Umbraco firstly without the starter kit?
If so it maybe an issue with the starter kit itself.
Or get the latest nightly build from Umbraco here http://nightly.umbraco.org/
I have an app that I'm creating with CakePHP, which rewrites the url from something illegible to most users to something a little easier to comprehend. I'm having a problem when I use the FBML canvas.
When I try to access, say, http://apps.facebook.com/myapp/articles, I get the following error:
Received HTTP error code 404 while
loading
http://www.myapp.com/myapparticles/
I did notice that when I try to access http://apps.facebook.com/myapp/articles/posts, it changes the error to show the following url, which is slightly different: http://www.myapp.com/myapparticles/posts
Which lead me to try accessing it with this: http://apps.facebook.com/myapp//articles, which does work most of the time, though for some reason sometimes it will give the previous error. (And it also seems like a hack-y way of getting it to work).
I'm at a loss for how to fix this.
Turns out I was missing the trailing slash (http://www.myapp.com/myapp/) on the url that I specified as my canvas callback, which is in the app settings. Putting it there fixes the problem.
This happens when you are not using semantic markup or you have an error or some code not supported by fb. Also that famous error is generated by fb when it is down or slow too.
I would suggest you checking your code thoroughly and going through fb documentation. That should help you the most. thanks