I have tried refraining from asking for help, but I have had enough! I am trying to get the child elements of a node; all except one with a particular id. This is what I have thus far:
//*[#id='a']/*[#id!='b']
It works to some extent. It gets all child elements of 'a' that do not have an id of 'b', but I want it to get all child elements, regardless whether it has an id attribute or not.
Any ideas?
Try using not(), eg
//*[#id="a"]/*[not(#id="b")]
Related
I have this xpath:
.//*[#id='some_id']/td//div
and now I want to select any child of the div that is of certain type, for example every child that is either a label or span. Something like this
.//*[#id='some_id']/td//div/(label|span)/.......
but that is not valid xpath. How can I do that (wthout writing two full xpaths for the given 2 example for child types)
descendant:: finds on all level below, to find only children use
.//*[#id='some_id']/td//div/*[self::label or self::span]
you need to use
descendant::
to select child elements of particular element. look at the below example,
.//*[#id='some_id']/td//div/descendant::label[#class='some-class']
the above xpath will get all label with class "some-class" which is actually the child of ".//*[#id='some_id']/td//div/" element.
to find multiple child elements then use below xpath,
.//*[#id='some_id']/td//div/descendant::*[local-name()='label' or local-name='span']
I am trying to find XPath of an element which has no attribute. It can only be identified by its parent's attribute. However, the parent also does not have unique attribute.
Eg: //*[#id="btn"][1]/ul/li[2]/a/span
Here there are 2 elements with id=btn. How do i get the 2nd element. The above syntax gives me 1st element.. However if i use:
//*[#id="btn"][2]/ul/li[2]/a/span
I get an error message
"The xpath expression '//*[#id="btn"][2]/ul/li[2]/a/span' cannot be evaluated or does not result in a WebElement "
Try this, you select those two first, then use brackets around and index them.
(//*[#id="btn"]/ul/li[2]/a/span)[2]
By the way, it's not a good practice to have multiple elements sharing same ids, if you are the developer, may consider change them.
Edit: I think I found the answer but I'll leave the open for a bit to see if someone has a correction/improvement.
I'm using xpath in Talend's etl tool. I have xml like this:
<root>
<employee>
<benefits>
<benefit>
<benefitname>CDE</benefitname>
<benefit_start>2/3/2004</benefit_start>
</benefit>
<benefit>
<benefitname>ABC</benefitname>
<benefit_start>1/1/2001</benefit_start>
</benefit>
</benefits>
<dependent>
<benefits>
<benefit>
<benefitname>ABC</benefitname>
</benefit>
</dependent>
When parsing benefits for dependents, I want to get elements present in the employee's
benefit element. So in the example above, I want to get 1/1/2001 for the dependent's
start date. I want 1/1/2001, not 2/3/2004, because the dependent's benefit has benefitname ABC, matching the employee's benefit with the same benefitname.
What xpath, relative to /root/employee/dependent/benefits/benefit, will yield the value of
benefit_start for the benefit under parent employee that has the same benefit name as the
dependent benefit name? (Note I don't know ahead of time what the literal value will be, I can't just look for 'ABC', I have to match whatever value is in the dependent's benefitname element.
I'm trying:
../../../benefits/benefit[benefitname=??what??]/benefit_start
I don't know how to refer to the current node's ancestor in the middle of
the xpath (since I think "." at the point I have ??what?? will refer to
the benefit node of the employee/benefits.
EDIT: I think what I want is "current()/benefitname" where the ??what?? is. Seems to work with saxon, I haven't tried it in the etl tool yet.
Your XML is malformed, and I don't think you've described your siduation very well (the XPath you're trying has a bunch of ../../s at the beginning, but you haven't said what the context node is, whether you're iterating through certain nodes, or what.
Supposing the current context node were an employee element, you could select benefit_starts that match dependent benefits with
benefits/benefit[benefitname = ../../dependent/benefits/benefit/benefitname]
/benefit_start
If the current context node is a benefit element in a dependents section, and you want to get the corresponding benefit_start for just the current benefit element, you can do:
../../../benefits/benefit[benefitname = current()/benefitname]/benefit_start
Which is what I think you've already discovered.
I have several nodes with some particular attribute and I need to select one of them by index. For example I need to select second <div> with 'test' class - //div[#class='test'][2] doesn't work.
Is there a way to select node with some attribute by index ? How to do it?
This is a FAQ.
In XPath the [] operator has a higher precedence (binds stronger) than the // pseudo-operator.
Because of this, the expression:
//div[#class='test'][2]
selects all div elements whose class attribute is "test" and who (the div elements) are the second such div child of their parent. This is not what you want.
Use:
(//div[#class='test'])[2]
I believe per XML specification, attributes are not considered to have an order.
Note that the order of attribute specifications in a start-tag or empty-element tag is not significant.
See here
I think you'd be best of re-factoring your structure such that attribute order does not describe anything. If you can give any more details we might be able to offer suggestions.
EDIT: Re-reading your post, looks like you are trying to find node order and not attribute order. Node order is allowed and your syntax looks OK off-hand. What software are you doing this in?
When using the dollar-dollar-function in prototype I alway get an array of elements back, instead of just one element with the dollar-function. How can I combine the power of CSS-selectors of $$ but still get only one element back?
Changing the structure of the source is not possible, so I can't just select it with the id. It needs to get selected with CSS, but should just return one element.
You can also do
$$('.foo').first()
It looks cleaner than $$('.foo')[0] for my taste :)
It does not make sense to return a single element when selecting by class name because potentially there could be many elements in the DOM that have this class. So you could always use the first element of the returned array if you are sure that it will be unique.
$$('.foo')[0]