I have a DLL that is installed with a WIX MSI. I want to create a patch that will allow an end user to run and automatically update that DLL.
I've been able to successfully get the patch created and the DLL does update ONLY if I update the DLLs version number. This is a pain because I'm not really interested in versioning the DLL necessarily every time I patch. I want to do this without changing the version number of the DLL.
I'm hesistant to share this with you because it's a hack that's usually reserved for when some vendor gives you a DLL and they have failed to follow the component rules and versioned the file. It's really bad form to do this yourself in house.
You want to google "WiX Version Lying". Basically use update the File#DefaultVersion attribute in the WXS to specify a higher version number. (Frequently 65535.0.0.0 ) This tricks MSI into always overwriting the file.
But it really would be better to just automate the versioning of your DLL's as part of the build process so MSI has real data to work with and you can easily audit the deployed environment.
Related
I need some help regarding Install4J and the auto online update function.
We have a JRE bundled Install4J installer which works fine. We use the auto online update functionality which works fine, too. All this functionality in integrated to a continuous integration process in TeamCity.
Unfortunately the update installation setup file has a size of around 100MB which is inconvenient to download if we only want to apply a patch or a minor update.
As far as I have understood from other similar questions and the Install4J documentation the right way to deal with that is using a second project file with another application ID and setting up an Add-On-Installer which only contains relevant files and points to the full installer application ID.
To enable the auto online update functionality I have to upload the update.xml file from the Add-On installer, am I right?
By the way, does the Add-on online auto update procedure automatically detect the locally installed version correctly?
But in that case we have to adapt the add-on installer each and every time we are deploying a new patch or minor feature which is difficult to implement in the CI process.
Is there a way to configure an Install4J installer so that it automatically gets the information online which elements have to be updated so that the download size is as small as possible and we could just use one default add-on installer which contains all sources beside the JRE bundle?
Something like an online incremental update procedure which is managed internally by Install4J?
Thank you.
You should never use the add-on installer for updating, because it cannot change the version number.
In order to get smaller update installers, you create a second project where the distribution tree only contains the changed files - or at least does not contain some large files that did not change. To do that, you simply copy the original installer and delete the files in the distribution tree that you do not need to update.
Then you build two sets of installers, those for a new installation and those for the update.
I have an InstallShield InstallScript MSI project that contains the FLEXnet Connect without Software Manager merge module. The version of this product is 6.0.32. I created a second installer for version 6.1 that also contains the FLEXnet Connect without Software Manager merge module. When I perform a major upgrade on a system that contains the 6.0.32 version I get a message in the MSI log stating:
Disallowing installation of component: {FF970098-B748-427B-B946-AA8E1A1F82AD} since the same component with higher versioned keyfile exists
The component is referencing the isusweb.dll file located in the FLEXnet Connect folder.
It looks like this check occurs prior to the 6.0.32 product being removed. The install proceeds to remove the 6.0.32 product, which removes isusweb.dll. During the 6.1 install the isusweb.dll is not put back because of the component version check.
The upgrade succeeds. When I attempt to run the application from a shortcut it verifies the components. Since the isusweb.dll is missing the MSI attempts a repair, then cannot find the MSI and does not allow the application to open.
Is there some way to get the merge module to always overwrite?
This sounds suspiciously like this bug:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905238/en-us
and I've come across this bug and you do see that log message, and RemoveExistingProducts is early in the install. It decides to not install the file based on the higher version being there, but doesn't re-evaluate that decision after the REP removes it. Then a repair restores it when you use a shortcut. The bug should apply only to files in the GAC or SxS, so that's a bit puzzling.
If you can schedule REP at the end of the transaction sequence (InstallExecute, REP, InstallFinalize) that should fix it - might be worth a try, all other effects of the move being ok.
Merge modules don't get installed, they get merged. Product MSI's get installed. One of the problems with using third party merge modules is if they have a bug, there isn't much you can do about it.
I'd consider creating an MSI solely for the purpose of encapsulating this MSM. Then I'd create a setup prereq or suite installer to install this MSI apart from your product MSI.
You have got two really good answers already, but to try and synthesize:
It really sounds like a buggy merge module. Phil suggests to fix your REP placement in the InstallExecuteSequence to work around the bug. Chris suggests to put the faulty merge module in its own setup. I agree with both and think you should follow both suggestions:
Remove the merge module from your main setup.
Create a new setup and add the faulty merge module and ensure the right REP sequencing.
For the REP fix to work your component referencing must be 100% correct - now and in the future. To eliminate this as a problem creating a separate setup allows you to contain the buggy module inside its own MSI. This will help you avoid re-activating the bug by mistake or by changed design in the future - and the latter is never unlikely.
As Chris says: a merge module isn't delivered, it is merged. An updated merge module may be available for all I know, but even then it is wise to contain it. Especially when you are dealing with the GAC (Global Assembly Cache).
Another solution that I applied when encountered this bug was to set to update the "Version" column from File table, in the merge module, using Orca. Set that to the maximum 65535.65535.65535.65535, this will force the upgrade to always install the DLL from the merge module.
I have an Installer created with WIX that installs a bunch of DLL and Config files. Once the installation is complete, obviously there are times when I would like to update JUST the DLL files and leave the configs as they were.
I've looked at the NeverOverwrite="yes" option and that looks promising, however I am now running into this issue. When I try and re-run my installer after an installation is complete, I get this error.
The problem is that I do not want to mess with Build Numbers or Product Ids. I just want the installer to re-run and overrwite the necessary DLL files. Does this make sense?
If you recompile to update the dlls you should really think about updating the versioning in your installer. If you have a build process that updates the build number every time you compile your dlls and your installer this shouldn't be a problem.
The reason you are getting the error is because the Product Id and version numbers match, but the package codes differ. To resolve the error you have the following options:
Update the version number and treat it like an upgrade.
Change the product id (and version) and treat it like an upgrade.
The product id and version can match if you set the package code, however this is not really recommended, especially if you are modifying the files in the installer. If you do set the package code to match the previous installer, you will get the maintenance dialog and if you do a repair or modify, I'm not sure if it will use the cached MSI or the recompiled MSI when performing the repair, so I'm not sure what results you can expect.
Like BryanJ says, the error indicates that you are installing a new package which has the same product code as a previously installed package.
The solution is most likely to just set the product Id attribute to *. You only need stable product ids when you want the ability to do minor upgrades.
A minor upgrade does not allow any reorganization of the feature-component tree, and AFAIK only has the advantage of being quicker for huge installations. We just do all upgrades as major upgrades, which are easier to manage.
We have an installer solution written in Visual Studio 2005 Installer; that calls a C# custom action and we have hit a known issue, regarding the fact that on an upgrade - the old install code is run and not the new code, because Windows is running a cached version of the custom action dll. We know this and although not over the moon about it - we have moved on.
When we release a new version of the installer and a user runs it, we now want it to check to see if an ealier version is installed - if there is one; we want to display a message telling them that they have to remove the old version via Add/Remove Programs. We know if they do a manual uninstall followed by an install, then all is fine and dandy - BUT it doesn't matter how many times we tell our users, via documentation; that this is what they have to do - they will still try and just run the new installer, without removing the old version first.
Therefore, we would like to put up a message and thus force them to to what they are told !! I've seen some installers do this ( though of course not sure what installer package was used to create these ). We only have VS 2005 and of course orca !!
Cheers,
Chris.
This can be done through a custom launch condition:
create a search which determines if the old version is installed (you can search for a component, registry entry or file)
use the search property as a custom launch condition
For example, if the search property is OLD_VERSION, the launch condition can look like this:
Condition: NOT OLD_VERSION
Description: An older version was found. Please uninstall it using "Programs and Features" in Control Panel.
When OLD_VERSION property is set to a value (an older version is found), this launch condition will show the message and stop the install process.
This doesn't quite make sense. Have you remembered to change the package GUID in your new setup? The package GUID identifies a specific setup file, and if two MSI files have identical GUID they will be treated as the same file regardless of whether they are or not. This could trigger a cached version of the MSI to be invoked and all sorts of hell breaks loose.
I would recommend reading up on "major upgrades" which will allow automatic uninstall of the existing version before the new version is installed. You also need to make sure you understand the basics of the technology before deploying to the wild. You must NEVER use identical package GUIDs for any MSI files. It's practically always wrong, and will lead to very mysterious problems.
I can't write up the whole major upgrade solution here, but basically it involves authoring the "Upgrade" table of your MSI to detect versions to uninstall. You need to change the package code, product code and version number (only 3 digits matter) and keep the same upgrade code (two MSI files with the same upgrade code "know" they are related - i.e they are from the same product family). Check MSDN for samples of major upgrades.
NB! If you have deployed MSI files with duplicate package GUIDs to your developer machine, it could have stray installs that must be cleaned up with MSIZap or similar. Use caution, or better yet test your new installer on a clean test system. Developer systems are full of junk and not generally good for MSI testing.
I currently have a project with an installer I made with NSIS, but I would like to have an update to new versions that only has the changed files and will show a changelog. The target platform is windows. What methods/suggestions do you have to do this?
You might want to reconsider using NSIS. If you are into patching and distributing updates you will probably get the most benefit from using an installer technology that utilises the Windows Installer capabilities (msiexec).
NSIS is basically a program that runs and does what you want whereas a Windows Installer type installer forces you to split your application into features and components which can be managed by the windows installer msi service. MSI will track things like what versions of products you have installed, whether running the installer again will run in maintenance mode, whether you are allowed to install 2 products of different versions, whether a patch can be applied to a particular version of a product or any other question relating to updates and installs.
Basically most of the stuff you are requesting will be available out-of-the-box if you change to a Windows Installer technology. Whereas if you use NSIS (which doesn't use Windows Installer technology) then you will have to implement it all yourself.
Just as an example there is a pretty comprehensive installer builder called AdvancedInstaller ( http://www.advancedinstaller.com/ ) that sounds like what you want.
Alternatively, if you want to spend the rest of your life trawling forums and newsgroups then there is an open source product called WiX that does something similar ;)
In spite of my previous comment I have written a 5000 line installer using NSIS with 13 custom pages. I have even looked at patching and it's a bit of a hack. The main bit of advice is to make sure you are patching the version you think you are patching then use one of the patching plugins available.
There are several patching technologies that compare files and produce patch change files and the NSIS code required to "install" them. I have found that NSIS Patch Gen did what I wanted pretty well with the least amount of hassle. The documentation is a bit thin but once you figure it out you think "Oh yeh".
You are probably going to have a little bit of trouble with an automatically generated Change Log. I would suggest that you create the Change Log yourself (or at least add the extra changes to it with each application change you make) and just include it as if it was a normal application file and let the patch generator update it.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/nsispatchgen/
One possible way would be to store an XML file on your download server that has each released version and a list of files that changed for each release. The installer would write a registry key on install of the version of files it installed.
Then, on update, the installer downloads and parses the XML file, and finds any nodes that have higher version numbers than what is currently installed. You display all the files in a text box on an installer page, and when the user confirms, the installer downloads all the files, and then updates the registry to the latest version.
are you familiar with cURL?
http://www.shininglightpro.com/products/Win32OpenSSL.html
http://curl.haxx.se/download.html#openssl
it will download any protocol, and you can use it to download your files. it's a commandline app.
in the installer, schedule a program which should check first to see if the main program is running or not and quit if it is running if not, calls curl to download a batch file from your site with the updates, then runs the batch file.
the batch file it downloads updates the app by downloading the correct files using curl.
the process should run maybe every 2 weeks or once a month, depending on how often you update.
the uninstall part of the installer should be capable of removing all parts of the app in question,including any updates. this can be accomplished by removing all files from that subdir of program files.
RMDir /r /REBOOTOK '$INSTDIR'
RMDir /r /REBOOTOK "$SMPROGRAMS\$StartMenuFolder"
Delete '$SMPROGRAMS\$StartMenuFolder\gpl3license.lnk'
Delete '$SMPROGRAMS\$StartMenuFolder\readme.lnk'
Delete '$SMPROGRAMS\$StartMenuFolder\${PRODUCT_TITLE}.lnk'
DeleteRegKey HKCU "Software\Your major subkey\${PRODUCT_NAME}"
DeleteRegKey HKLM "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\${PRODUCT_NAME}"
DeleteRegKey /ifempty HKCU "Software\${PRODUCT_NAME}"
PRODUCT_NAME is a !define I made because I use these nsi files like a template.
this is only a piece of the installer file's uninstaller section.
I've been able to create a patch updater program for my Windows app (a CLI which uses NSIS as its installer) by releasing the app to my personal CDN (or some hosting platform) and taking advantage of Node.js modules like path to replace the binary (using a similar procedure to equinox.io) with a given version from the CDN and winreg to update the Windows Registry accordingly. Since I've namespaced my Windows Registry key, the uninstaller still works for it.
If anyone wants more details on this, please ask. I'm happy to help.
Some compilers like Delphi make a lot of changes in the final executable even if you change a little part of your code.
So first you should see if it worth patching.
Another consideration is patching by itself.
Patching maybe blocked by some Anti Virus Software specially in some system folders.
and finally incremental patching data size can grow beyond the original files.
Based on above subjects I don't suggest you patching.
Use full installers instead