I have a problem running my application on other machines.
I am developing with Visual Studio 2008 in a Win7 x64 machine.
The solution contains several C# projects (the main application is written in C#, all others are library projects) and two c++/CLI libraries. The C++ libraries are Win32 and all C# projects are set to x86 target processor. No third party libraries used. Framework used is v3.5.
The application builds and runs fine on my machine.
I copied the whole "bin\release" folder to a Win7 x86 machine and it ran fine, too.
But when I tried on a XP x86 system, it did not start. No error message, not even showing up shortly in the task manager. The XP system has all updates installed, all available .NET frameworks installed and all Visual Studio Runtimes installed.
I checked with DependencyWalker and the only missing dlls are "IEShim.dll" and "wer.dll" which are only for Vista or higher.
I tried another of my applications that's not using C++ libraries and they work fine. So I guess I am doing something wrong deploying the C++ dlls.
Registering the C++ dlls with "regsvr32" failed with a "DllEntryPoint" not found message. Registering with "regasm" was successful, but had no effect.
What is it that I am missing?
Well, seems like I was a bit hasty stating "no third party components".
Actually it was the SQL Server Compact who was missing its runtime.
Related
I have built a program using Visual studio 2013 in visual basic. I am using a set of DLLs to communicate to some external hardware. The computer I developed the software on is a Win7 64bit machine and I can compile and run the software with no hiccups on it. I also have another computer (Surface Pro 3 64bit) that I use to test my software on and that works as well. Basically I just locate the debug directory of the development computer and copy the EXE and support DLLs to the new computer and run the EXE. This all works with my surface pro 3 computer.
My company purchased some other surface pro 3 computers for our production department and I am trying to get the software running on those as well. I do the same thing. Grab the EXE and support DLLs from the debug directory of the development computer. Except on these computers when I run the software program it tells me it can't find the DLL for the program. The DLL is sitting right in the application's folder, yet it says it can't find it.
I have tried multiple things, like publishing the software and including the DLLs in the installation, then running the installation on the "problem" computers. This still doesn't work. Same issue, it can't find the DLL.
This could be a number of things:
Incorrect version of .NET - do the new computers have the target version of .NET installed on them?
A required DLL is not being found, you should enable assembly bind failure logging and try again - How to enable assembly bind failure logging (Fusion) in .NET
So it turns out that the DLL I was referencing requires the VC++ redistributable packages to be installed on the computer. I downloaded and installed these on all of the problem computers and now the software recognizes the DLL and run.
I built an application in C++ using Visual Studio 2010 Express. When I tried to run it on a certain computer today I got this error:
MyApplication.exe - Bad Image
C:\Path to My Application\MSVCP100.dll is either not designed to run on Windows or it contains an error. Try installing the program again using the original installation media or contact your system administrator or the software vendor for support.
The DLL mentioned is one of the Visual C++ Redistributable DLLs. My application’s installer used to launch Microsoft’s installer for those DLLs but I recently tweaked it just to install msvcp100.dll and msvcr100.dll alongside my application. The new way worked fine on a handful of other computers, though I can’t rule out the possibility that that was only because the DLLs had already been installed at system level on those other computers.
What is causing this sudden DLL mismatch?
That's STATUS_INVALID_IMAGE_FORMAT, the Machine property in the DLL header doesn't match the architecture of the application.
Do keep in mind that you are likely to have two copies of this DLL on your build machine, the x86 and the x64 version. Later versions of VS have a 3rd copy, the ARM version. So very high odds that you picked the wrong one. Usually you'd target x86, the one you tested your program with is stored in the c:\windows\syswow64 directory. The 64-bit version is in c:\windows\system32.
How these directories got these seemingly backward names is a story for another day :) Favor using the vc/redist subdirectory of the VS install directory as a source for the copy, it is less ambiguous.
This .dll file is related to the Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 Redistributable x64 Package.
Try removing the Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 Redistributable x64 Package by using the Add or Remove Programs item in Control Panel.
Then, install the latest version Visual C++ (file name= vcredist_x64.exe) from the site:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=26999
Hope that helped..
If all above suggested solutions not worked for you than download MSVCR100.dll 32 bit or 64 bit as per your system configuration.
Download DLL from below link
https://www.sts-tutorial.com/sites/downloadCenter.php?MSVCR100
Follow da steps
1.Download the dll from here
https://www.sts-tutorial.com/sites/downloadCenter.php?MSVCR100
2.open with winrar
3.Extract MSVCR100.dll to C:\Windows\System32
hope it will work c:
I googled a lot but no answer found. My project is a plugin of a .Net application.
The project was started 2 years ago on WinXp 32bit platform. A 32bit COM component was used for some reasons. Because I have the source codes, I can debug into the COM component freely. Everything is fantastic at that time.
At the beginning of this year, my project is upgrading to x64 because of memory benefit. And the x64 version of the COM component is also ready. Everything works fine except debugging.
Now I can't debug into the COM dlls anymore. There is no any COM dll or interop dll listed in the Debug\Windows\Modules window. Thus, I can't specify the symbol directory for dll.
I know there is no mix mode support for debugging. So When I attach the exe, I select "Native".
I tried VS 2005, VS 2008 and VS 2010, all of them give me the same issue. Then I thought may be it is because x64. So I use the old 32 bit code which was debugged fine on WinXP to try again. But I still can't debug either.
Any idea? Is this because of the win7 platform? Or if I need to add some entries in the exe's config file?
Thanks in advance.
Perhaps, I should ask in this way:
What are the rules for the debugger to decide which module should be in the module list? If you compare the module list between ProcessExplorer and VS, you would find these two are not the same.
I have an application that I compile as x86 code but as a separate version, as x64 code as well. The application basically has two parts, a c# managed exe and a c++ unmanaged dll. I have problems with the latter. On my development PC (Windows 7 64-bit, Visual Studio 2008) I create a setup with a deployment project and this setup installs the application in Program Files... as it should and the application runs. I also have a test PC (Windows 7 64-bit with practically nothing else). There the application still installs into Program Files... but it does not run, I get the BadImageFormatException when a function (any function) of the unmanaged dll is called. The problem is that my own project that produces the dll also makes use of quite a few freely available libraries (e.g. glew32, openal, freeimage, etc.) I took as much care is possible to make sure that I use the x64 versions of these libraries, but something still must be wrong. For some reason one of the libraries used by my dll is not available as x64 code on the test PC but it is on the development PC. At least that is the only explanation I have at the moment why my setup works on the development PC but not on the test PC.
My question is: how can I find out where the problem is. The error message I receive does not tell any helpful detail. I tried to analyze my dll with depends but it looks OK. It lists a lot of dependent libraries as X86 (these are probably system files) but all those that I use on purpose are listed as x64.
Is there any way to test why the Windows on my test PC tries to run the DLL as x86 code even though it should be x64?
Thanks.
I noticed something very strange: My application is being deployed in the Program Files folder as it should be for a x64 application but it fails to run. However if I copy all the files in the folder it is installed to to another folder (inside the Documents folder) the application runs perfectly.
Run Fusion Log Viewer in the machine where you want to diagnose the issue. Look carefully at the logs and you'll see exactly which dlls are being loaded, and where from.
You have build your .NET executable (or DLL) with Any CPU configuration, and you have given x64/Win32 native DLL for Win32/x64 (i.e. wrong config).
On x64 systems, your .NET binary will try to load the native DLL as if native DLL is x64.
And on 32-bit systems, it will try to load 32-bit native DLL.
I found the answer. The problem was not the 64-bit dll at all. One of the libraries I did not make but I link to (I do not know which yet, there) seems to try to write a file to the application folder. Of course, this is not allowed inside the Program Files folder unless you run the application as an administrator. Sorry for asking help for the wrong question.
I have a c++/cli dll that I load at runtime and which works great in debug mode. If I try and load the dll in release mode it fails to load stating that one or more dependencies are missing. If I run depends against it I am missing MSVCR90.DLL from MSVCM90.DLL. If I check the debug version of the dll it also has the missing dependency, but against the debug (D) version.
I have made sure debug/release embed the manifest file. I read something about there being issues with the app loading the dll being build as Any CPU and the dll being built as x86, but I don't see how to set them both to x86.
I am using VS2010.
Anyway, I've been messing around for a while now and have no idea what is wrong. I'm sure someone out there knows what is going on. Let me know if I need to include additional info.
alt text http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/fb31c0e256.png
UPDATE:
This ended up being the resolution to my problem: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vclanguage/thread/07794679-159b-4363-ae94-a68fe258d827
MSVCR90 is the runtime for Visual Studio 2008. If you are running your application on your development PC, then you should have the debug and release runtimes installed (as part of Visual Studio) but it is possible something has gone awry with your install, or that VS2010 doesn't actually include the older runtimes. If you're trying to run the Release on a different PC, then it just needs the runtime installed.
Either way, you may be able to fix it by installing the Visual Studio 2008 redistributable - but make sure you get the right download for your PC (x86 or x64).
In previous versions of VS, you needed the runtime for the version you were compiling with, so if VS2010 follows this precedent you'd need MSVCR100, not MSVCR90 - which suggests that you may not have recompiled the dll with VS2010 - doing so may be another approach to get it running on your PC (using the redist that is in your VS2010 install) but beware that you will still need other users to install the appropriate (VS2010) redistributable on their PC.
As for "Any CPU" versus "x86", this is a problem only on a 64-bit computer. On those systems a 64-bit application can't link dynamically to 32-bit dlls. If you compile your application as "Any CPU" it will be JIT compiled to be 64-bit on an 64-bit OS, so will crash if it tries to call any 32-bit dlls directly. THe solution is to build the application targeting "x86" as that forces the JIT compiler to generate 32-bit code (even on a 64-bit machine) and thus ensures compatibility with the dll you wish to call. If the DLL is a managed assembly, then you can use Any CPU on both the app an dll as they will both be JITted to the same format.
It happened to me something similar running a website in Vistual Studio 2012, after migrating from Visual Studio 2010. The error message was saying that MSVCR90.DLL was missing. The solution was:
1) Delete the folder _bindeployable located at the project path.
2) Rebuild.
I hope it helps.