I just started blogging using jekyll. I write my posts in markdown. Now, I want to include a youtube video in my post. How can I do this?
Also, I dont really like the pygments highlighting provided by jekyll by default. Is there anyway I can change this to some other style? If yes, can you point me to some nice styles/plugins?
You should be able to put the HTML for embedding directly into your markdown. Under the video, there is a "Share" button, click on this, and then the "Embed" button, which should give you something that looks a little like:
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dQw4w9WgXcQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Just copy and paste that into your post, the Markdown preprocessor won't touch it.
For Pygments, there is a whole pile of CSS stylesheets for various colour themes in this repository, you could experiment with them. (Note that you will have to replace .codehilite with .highlight for these to work with Jekyll.)
I did similar thing but in my case, simple copy and paste doesn't work. The error message is below:
REXML could not parse this XML/HTML:
To avoid this error, I deleted allowfullscreen from copied source as below:
<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/WO82PoAczTc" frameborder="0"> </iframe>
It is important that Adding a whitespace before the closing </iframe>.
Then, I succeeded to embed the video into my site.
The html code to insert a youtube video can be produced in Jekyll using a simple plugin
as described in https://gist.github.com/1805814.
The syntax becomes as simple as:
{% youtube oHg5SJYRHA0 %}
In my case issue has been resolved with jQuery:
jQuery
$('.x-frame.video').each(function() {
$(this).after("<iframe class=\"video\" src=\"" + ($(this).attr('data-video')) + "\" frameborder=\"0\"></iframe>");
});
Usage
<div class="x-frame video" data-video="http://player.vimeo.com/video/52302939"> </div>
Note that whitespace is required between <div> </div>
One of the nicer features of WordPres is that you can just paste a Youtube URL in the content (on a new line) and WordPress transforms this into an embed code.
The following code does the same for Jekyll. Just put this code in your footer (or use a Jekyll include) and all paragraphs with JUST a Youtube URL are automagically converted to responsive Youtube embeds by Vanilla JS.
<style>
.videoWrapper {position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.333%; height: 0;}
.videoWrapper iframe {position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%;}
</style>
<script>
function getId(url) {
var regExp = /^.*(youtu.be\/|v\/|u\/\w\/|embed\/|watch\?v=|\&v=)([^#\&\?]*).*/;
var match = url.match(regExp);
if (match && match[2].length == 11) {
return match[2];
} else {
return 'error';
}
}
function yt_url2embed() {
var p = document.getElementsByTagName('p');
for(var i = 0; i < p.length; i++) {
var pattern = /^((http|https|ftp):\/\/)/;
if(pattern.test(p[i].innerHTML)) {
var myId = getId(p[i].innerHTML);
p[i].innerHTML = '<div class="videoWrapper"><iframe width="720" height="420" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/' + myId + '?rel=0&showinfo=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>';
}
}
}
yt_url2embed();
</script>
Although just adding the HTML code to your Markdown is a very good (maybe even better) and valid solution, this solution might be more user-friendly.
(Source)
How often did you find yourself googling "How to embed a video in markdown?"
While its not possible to embed a video in markdown, the best and easiest way is to extract a frame from the video. To add videos to your markdown files easier, I think the jekyll plugin below would help you, and it will parse the video link inside the image block automatically.
jekyll-spaceship - 🚀 A Jekyll plugin to provide powerful supports for table, mathjax, plantuml, emoji, youtube, vimeo,dailymotion, etc.
https://github.com/jeffreytse/jekyll-spaceship
For now, these video links parsing are provided:
Youtube
Vimeo
DailyMotion
...
There are two ways to embed a video in your Jekyll blog page:
Inline-style:
![]({video-link})
Reference-style:
![][{reference}]
[{reference}]: {video-link}
Then, you succeeded to embed the video into your site.
In nowadays:
<iframe width="840" height="473" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/IQf-vtIC-Uc" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Or
right click on the video in your browser and copy-past the embed code.
Related
We are using a YouTube video on our website as a hero banner.
However few days ago it started showing it's title, watch later button and a share button. We were able to hide them using &showinfo=0 at the end if the URL.
I found out that showinfo has been deprecated and thus you can no longer hide the fact that it is a YouTube video showing there.
Is there any other parameter that might be able to do the same thing?
You cannot do it with CSS or JavaScript as it is an iframe.
Any ideas are much appreciated.
UPDATE:
Any layer or mask over the video doesn't help, as the info shows when the video is loading, or if you click outside the browser, the video will pause and the info shows.
Hiding the top ~60px works, but it is not a good solution for me.
Directly from show info
Note: This is a deprecation announcement for the showinfo parameter. In addition, the behavior for the rel parameter is changing. Titles, channel information, and related videos are an important part of YouTube’s core user experience, and these changes help to make the YouTube viewing experience consistent across different platforms.
The behavior for the rel parameter is changing on or after September 25, 2018. The effect of the change is that you will not be able to disable related videos. However, you will have the option of specifying that the related videos shown in the player should be from the same channel as the video that was just played.
It clearly states that this is something they consider to be part of the cor youtube experience. There is no suggestion of a workaround or a new parameter that you could send to archive the old results. They are removing it. If you tried to force it out using javascript and css i would almost suggest you are against the TOC which states your not allowed to change that display. People should know you are showing something from YouTube
If you need to hide the info, ideally go for Vimeo pro (which properly supports a no info embed),
Otherwise there is a simple workaround:
https://jsfiddle.net/10ov5hgw/1/
It cuts off the bottom & top 60px of the iframe, but via overflow rather than a gross looking black bar on top, so video still looks fullscreen the entire time (and barely any of the video is cutout if you force 720) ,
This hack supports having to support mobile views aswell, without heavily impacting the visible area of the video.
.video-container{
width:100vw;
height:100vh;
overflow:hidden;
position:relative;
}
.video-container iframe,{
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.video-container iframe, {
pointer-events: none;
}
.video-container iframe{
position: absolute;
top: -60px;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: calc(100% + 120px);
}
.video-foreground{
pointer-events:none;
}
<div class="video-container" >
<div class="video-foreground">
<iframe
src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/W0LHTWG-UmQ?controls=0&showinfo=0&rel=0&autoplay=1&loop=1&playlist=W0LHTWG-UmQ&mute=1"
frameBorder="0" allowFullScreen>
</iframe>
</div>
</div>
The solution I found aesthetically most pleasing is to lay a high res thumbnail over the video and hide it at hover. This also deals with the problem that the youtube preview is low res and looks cheap in my opinion.
Check it out here:
http://jsfiddle.net/d9D9E/1/
Had to write code in order to show the js fiddle :/
.video-thumbnail{
z-index:300;
position:absolute;
top:0;
left:0;
width:100%;
}
.video-thumbnail:hover{
display:none;
}
Not having 'rel=0' is irritating, but there is a work around. If you work with the IFrame API, (as opposed to embedding an iframe ex http://youtu.be/?videoIDxxx...) you can get the event for the stopping (completing) of the video, then cue up the video by ID into the player. See https://developers.google.com/youtube/iframe_api_reference#Playback_controls for reference to the basic player.
....
<div id="player1"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
var tag = document.createElement('script');
tag.src = "https://www.youtube.com/iframe_api";
var firstScriptTag = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
firstScriptTag.parentNode.insertBefore(tag, firstScriptTag);
var player ;
function onYouTubeIframeAPIReady()
{
player = new YT.Player('player1',
{
videoId: 'YourVideoId',
events: {
'onStateChange': onPlayerStateChange
}
});
}; // onYOuTubeIframeAPIReady
function onPlayerStateChange(event)
{
// Alt approach //if( event.data == 0){ location.reload()}
if( event.data == 0)
{ player.cueVideoById({videoId:'YourVideoID',
suggestedQuality: 'hd720'})
};
}
</script>
I was looking at the same problem and the only solution I found is to set the video in autoplay and place a transparent layer over the youtube box.
The user would not be able to interact with the player, but it can be useful in some situation like banner.
Unfortunately the code doesn't seem to run correctly on stackoverflow I also add a jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/z3dqpuy0/
.yt-cntainer {
position: relative;
}
.yt-mask {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
}
<div class="yt-cntainer">
<iframe id="vid-player-1" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Bey4XXJAqS8?enablejsapi=1&rel=0&controls=0&showinfo=0&autoplay=1" frameborder="0"></iframe>
<div class="yt-mask"></div>
</div>
Well, I just noticed it as well. It sucks and ruins the aesthetics. So I just did a
header {
/* remove when YT got its brain back */
margin-top: -56px;
}
while hoping that they'll re-add showinfo=0 again.
What about this. Yeah this will zoom the video.
iframe {
transform:scale(1.4);
}
<div id="schnitt">
<iframe width="500" height="280" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/rlR4PJn8b8I?controls=1" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div>
<style>
#schnitt {
height:250px;
overflow:hidden;
}
iframe {
margin-top:-55px;
}
I'm using animate.css to add some transistions to my meteor app. However, there is this problem that animate.css creates an almost transparant overlay over my buttons/images etc.
I have a main div where the animate.css class is added depending on changing page views etc. Very simplified this is my HTML.
<body>
<header class="header></header>
<div class="animate-holder {{animated class}}>
<div class="class1></div>
<div class="class2></div>
</div>
</body>
From what I've tested this will happen all the time and it doesn't matter how I use transistions. Is there a simple way to NOT have this overlay?
EDIT:
I can hack it like this, but this is very very ugly. But maybe it creates more insight into the problem:
Template.DetailsSubmit.rendered = function() {
Meteor.setTimeout(function() {
var classes = $('div.animated').attr('class');
$('div.animated').removeClass(classes);
}, 1000)
}
You can make this specific div clickable through using the very useful (and not famous enough) pointer-events css property:
div.animated {
pointer-events: none;
}
I simply cannot get this code to work. I want to put a different background image on each page. I think I should do this by creating different class selectors, and then putting those in the body tags for each page, rather than using an inline style element.
Here's my css class selector:
.contact-grad
{
background-image:url('images/Backgrounds/contact-grad.png');
position:absolute;
left:0px;
top:0px;
z-index:-1;
}
And here I put it in the html for contact:
<body id="contact-grad">
As you can see, it's not working.
Let me know if it will be helpful for me to post the entire html and css. I cannot get any background image to work. I put my code into the w3 validator, and got a "parse" error. Hm...
Thank you!
The body has an id 'contact-grad' but your selector in the css is on a class (that's what the dot do). Try using a hash '#' instead. as in
#contact-grad
{
background-image:url('images/Backgrounds/contact-grad.png');
position:absolute;
left:0px;
top:0px;
z-index:-1;
}
Addendum:
This resource is a good starter for CSS-selectors.
.contact-grad is for a class, use #contact-grad for your id="contact-grad".
You shouldn't have your body as absolute position, better use a div inside the body ;).
The text-overflow:ellipsis; CSS property must be one of the few things that Microsoft has done right for the web.
All the other browsers now support it... except Firefox.
The Firefox developers have been arguing over it since 2005 but despite the obvious demand for it, they can't seem to actually bring themselves to implement it (even an experimental -moz- implementation would be sufficient).
A few years ago, someone worked out a way to hack Firefox 3 to make it support an ellipsis. The hack uses the -moz-binding feature to implement it using XUL. Quite a number of sites are now using this hack.
The bad news? Firefox 4 is removing the -moz-binding feature, which means this hack won't work any more.
So as soon as Firefox 4 is released (later this month, I hear), we're going to be back to the problem of having it not being able to support this feature.
So my question is: Is there any other way around this? (I'm trying to avoid falling back to a Javascript solution if at all possible)
[EDIT]
Lots of up-votes, so I'm obviously not the only one who wants to know, but I've got one answer so far which basically says 'use javascript'. I'm still hoping for a solution that will either not need JS at all, or at worst only use it as a fall-back where the CSS feature doesn't work. So I'm going to post a bounty on the question, on the off chance that someone, somewhere has found an answer.
[EDIT]
An update: Firefox has gone into rapid development mode, but despite FF5 now being released this feature still isn't supported. And now that the majority of users have upgraded from FF3.6, the hack is no longer a solution. The good news I'm told that it might be added to Firefox 6, which with the new release schedule should be out in only a few months. If that's the case, then I guess I can wait it out, but it's a shame they couldn't have sorted it sooner.
[FINAL EDIT]
I see that the ellipsis feature has finally been added to Firefox's "Aurora Channel" (ie development version). This means that it should now be released as part of Firefox 7, which is due out toward the end of 2011. What a relief.
Release notes available here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Releases/7
Spudley, you could achieve the same thing by writing a small JavaScript using jQuery:
var limit = 50;
var ellipsis = "...";
if( $('#limitedWidthTextBox').val().length > limit) {
// -4 to include the ellipsis size and also since it is an index
var trimmedText = $('#limitedWidthTextBox').val().substring(0, limit - 4);
trimmedText += ellipsis;
$('#limitedWidthTextBox').val(trimmedText);
}
I understand that there should be some way that all browsers support this natively (without JavaScript) but, that's what we have at this point.
EDIT
Also, you could make it more neat by attaching a css class to all those fixed width field say fixWidth
and then do something like the following:
$(document).ready(function() {
$('.fixWidth').each(function() {
var limit = 50;
var ellipsis = "...";
var text = $(this).val();
if (text.length > limit) {
// -4 to include the ellipsis size and also since it is an index
var trimmedText = text.substring(0, limit - 4);
trimmedText += ellipsis;
$(this).val(trimmedText);
}
});
});//EOF
EDIT 09/30/2011
FF7 is out, this bug is resolved and it works!
EDIT 08/29/2011
This issue is marked as resolved and will be available in FF 7; currently set to release on 09/27/2011.
Mark your calendars and get ready to remove all those hacks you've put in place.
OLD
I have another answer: wait.
The FF dev team is in hot pursuit to resolve this issue.
They have tentative fix set for Firefox 6.
Firefox 6!! When will that come
out?!?
Easy there, imaginary, over-reactive person. Firefox is on the fast dev track. FF6 is set for release six weeks after Firefox 5. Firefox 5 is set for release June 21st, 2011.
So that puts the fix sometime in the beginning of August 2011...hopefully.
You can sign up for the mailing list following the bug from the link in the original poster's question.
Or you can click here; whichever is easiest.
I must say I'm a little disappointed that the only browser specific hack in my application is going to be to support FF4. The above javascript solution doesn't account for variable width fonts. Here is a more verbose script that accounts for this. The big problem with this solution is that if the element containing the text is hidden when the code is run then the width of the box isn't known. This was a deal breaker for me so I stopped working on/testing it... but I thought I'd post it here in case it is of use to someone. Be sure to test it well as my testing was less than exhaustive. I intended to add a browser check to only run the code for FF4 and let all the other browsers use their existing solution.
This should be available for fiddling here:
http://jsfiddle.net/kn9Qg/130/
HTML:
<div id="test">hello World</div>
CSS:
#test {
margin-top: 20px;
width: 68px;
overflow: hidden;
white-space: nowrap;
border: 1px solid green;
}
Javascript (uses jQuery)
function ellipsify($c){
// <div $c> content container (passed)
// <div $b> bounds
// <div $o> outer
// <span $i> inner
// </div>
// <span $d></span> dots
// </div>
// </div>
var $i = $('<span>' + $c.html() + '</span>');
var $d = $('<span>...</span>');
var $o = $('<div></div>');
var $b = $('<div></div>');
$b.css( {
'white-space' : "nowrap",
'display' : "block",
'overflow': "hidden"
}).attr('title', $c.html());
$o.css({
'overflow' : "hidden",
'width' : "100%",
'float' : "left"
});
$c.html('').append($b.append( $o.append($i)).append($d));
function getWidth($w){
return parseInt( $w.css('width').replace('px', '') );
}
if (getWidth($o) < getWidth($i))
{
while (getWidth($i) > (getWidth($b) - getWidth($d)) )
{
var content = $i.html();
$i.html(content.substr(0, content.length - 1));
}
$o.css('width', (getWidth($b) - getWidth($d)) + 'px');
}
else
{
var content = $i.html();
$c.empty().html(content);
}
}
It would be called like:
$(function(){
ellipsify($('#test'));
});
I have run into this gremlin over the past week as well.
Since the accepted solution does not account for variable width fonts and wwwhack's solution has a While Loop, I will throw in my $.02.
I was able to drastically reduce the processing time of my problem by using cross-multiplication. Basically, we have a formula that looks like this:
The variable x in this case is what we need to solve. When returned as an Integer, it will give the new length that the over-flowing text should be. I multiplied the MaxLength by 80% to give the ellipses enough room to show.
Here is a full html example:
<html>
<head>
<!-- CSS setting the width of the DIV elements for the table columns. Assume that these widths could change. -->
<style type="text/css">
.div1 { overflow: hidden; white-space: nowrap; width: 80px; }
.div2 { overflow: hidden; white-space: nowrap; width: 150px; }
.div3 { overflow: hidden; white-space: nowrap; width: 70px; }
</style>
<!-- Make a call to Google jQuery to run the javascript below.
NOTE: jQuery is NOT necessary for the ellipses javascript to work; including jQuery to make this example work -->
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.5.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
//Loop through each DIV element
$('div').each(function(index) {
var myDiv = this; //The original Div element which will have a nodeType of 1 (e.g. ELEMENT_NODE)
var divText = myDiv; //Variable used to obtain the text from the DIV element above
//Get the nodeType of 3 (e.g. TEXT_NODE) from the DIV element. For this example, it will always be the firstChild
divText = divText.firstChild;
//Create another variable to hold the display text
var sDisplayText = divText.nodeValue;
//Determine if the DIV element is longer than it's supposed to be.
if (myDiv.scrollWidth > myDiv.offsetWidth) {
//Percentage Factor is just a way of determining how much text should be removed to append the ellipses
//With variable width fonts, there's no magic number, but 80%, should give you enough room
var percentageFactor = .8;
//This is where the magic happens.
var sliceFactor = ((myDiv.offsetWidth * percentageFactor) * sDisplayText.length) / myDiv.scrollWidth;
sliceFactor = parseInt(sliceFactor); //Get the value as an Integer
sDisplayText = sDisplayText.slice(0, sliceFactor) + "..."; //Append the ellipses
divText.nodeValue = sDisplayText; //Set the nodeValue of the Display Text
}
});
});
</script>
</head>
<body>
<table border="0">
<tr>
<td><div class="div1">Short Value</div></td>
<td><div class="div2">The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog; lots and lots of times</div></td>
<td><div class="div3">Prince</div></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><div class="div1">Longer Value</div></td>
<td><div class="div2">For score and seven year ago</div></td>
<td><div class="div3">Brown, James</div></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><div class="div1">Even Long Td and Div Value</div></td>
<td><div class="div2">Once upon a time</div></td>
<td><div class="div3">Schwarzenegger, Arnold</div></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
I understand this is a JS only fix, but until Mozilla fixes the bug, I'm just not smart enough to come up with a CSS solution.
This example works best for me because the JS is called every time a grid loads in our application. The column-width for each grid vary and we have no control over what type of computer our Firefox users view our app (which, of course, we shouldn't have that control :) ).
This pure CSS solution is really close, except for the fact that it causes ellipsis to appear after every line.
I have simplified a problem I faced in Firefox (the original code is generated by server side controls). Open the following snippet in IE and in Firefox:
<html>
<style>
.AllInline, .AllInline * { display: inline; }
</style>
<span class="AllInline">
Test
<script type="text/javascript">
<!-- var obj = {}; //-->
</script>
</span>
</html>
In IE, I get:
Test
While in Firefox, I get:
Test <!-- var obj = {}; //-->
The content of the script block becomes visible somehow.
I was not expecting the styling rules to be applied to script blocks (can't really see a reason why one would want this either).
Would anyone have an explanation ?
base, basefont, datalist, head, meta, script, style, title, noembed and param tags are hidden by the simple expedient of setting display: none; in html.css (which is a UA stylesheet). So they are subject to being unhidden by page CSS such as your example. area on the other hand has display: none ! important; because it has special internal handling (the image effectively owns the area).
Don't put JavaScript there. Insert it just before </body></html>.
Test your HTMl in the Echochamber.
fascinating bug!
you can add .AllInline script {display: none;} to your css to hide it.