I am currently displaying the output of a subprocess onthe python shell (in my case iDLE on windows) by using a pipe and displaying each line.
I want to do this with a subprocess that has user input, so that the prompt will appear on the python console, and the user can enter the result, and the result can be send to the subprocess.
Is there a way to do this?
Use process.stdin.write.
Remember to set stdin = subprocess.PIPE when you call subprocess.Popen.
Related
I'm new to subprocesses in python, I need to spawn a number of independent subprocesses, keep them alive and pass commands into them. At first sight, subprocess library is what I'm looking for.
I've read the documenations for it and as I'm understanding to pass any command into the subprocess, I'd have to specify the input.
I need to run commands via windows command line, hence the toy example below is good enough that if I have it working, I'm pretty much done. Running code below via IDLE opens a new cmd window, printing a list of cwd files, however I can't write to it as stdin is not specified (would be writing to it using p.stdin.write('DIR') with 'DIR' being an example command).
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE
p = Popen(['cmd', '/K', 'DIR'])
Therefore I specify the stdin as PIPE, as per documentations.
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE
p = Popen(['cmd', '/K', 'DIR'], stdin=PIPE)
However, running the second snippet of code instantly terminates the opened cmd window. Is that the expected behavior? As far as I could find in the documentations, only p.kill() or p.terminate() end the child process. If so, what are the possible workarounds? If not, what am I doing incorrectly, what other libraries should I be using? Thanks!
I have an input file called 0.in. To get the output I do ./a.out < 0.in in the Bash Shell.
Now, I have several such files (more than 500) and I want to automate this process using Python's subprocess module.
I tried doing this:
data=subprocess.Popen(['./a.out','< 0.in'],stdout=subprocess.PIPE,stdin=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()
Nothing was printed (data[0] was blank) when I ran this. What is the right method to do what I want to do?
Redirection using < is a shell feature, not a python feature.
There are two choices:
Use shell=True and let the shell handle redirection:
data = subprocess.Popen(['./a.out < 0.in'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE, shell=True).communicate()
Let python handle redirection:
with open('0.in') as f:
data = subprocess.Popen(['./a.out'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stdin=f).communicate()
The second option is usually preferred because it avoids the vagaries of the shell.
If you want to capture stderr in data, then add stderr=subprocess.PIPE to the Popen command. Otherwise, stderr will appear on the terminal or wherever python's error messages are being sent.
What I would like to do is:
run a ruby script...
that executes a shell command
and redirects it to a named pipe accessible outside the script
from the system shell, read from that pipe
That is, have the Ruby script capture some command output and redirect it in such a way that it's connectable to from outside the script?
I want to mention that the script cannot simply start and exit, since it's a REPL. The idea is that using the REPL you would be able to run a command and redirect its output elsewhere to consume it.
Using abort and an exit message, will pass the message to STDERR (and the script will fail with exit code 1). You can pass this shell command output in this way.
This is possibly not the only (or best) way, but it has worked for me in the past.
[edit]
You can also redirect the output to a file (using standard methods), and read that file outside the ruby script.
require 'open3'
stdin, stderr, status = Open3.capture3(commandline)
stdin.chomp #Here, you should ge
Incase, if someone wanted to use you can get the output via stdin.chomp
Right now, I have the following code to capture a character in ruby using the IO.read,
tty_param = `stty -g`
system 'stty raw -echo'
capt = IO.read '/dev/stdin', 1
system "stty #{tty_param}"
The code is called through a key-binding, so I'll be in the middle of an application like vim or just the bash prompt, when this is called.
What I'm wondering is, how do I send the characters back to my process once I've finished running my program?
Open3 can be what you are looking for.
Open3 grants you access to stdin, stdout, stderr and a thread to wait
for the child process when running another program. You can specify
various attributes, redirections, current directory, etc., of the
program in the same way as for Process.spawn.
I am designing a ruby program that needs to run a command and store it a variable.
var = exec('some command');
This doesn't work the way I want it to, it just prints the output from the command prompt and then ends the program.
So is there a function that doesn't end the program, doesn't print the cmd output and stores the information in a variable?
Thanks in advance.
You need to use either Ruby's built in backtick syntax, or use %x
output = `some command`
or
output = %x(some "command")
Open3 grants you access to stdin, stdout, stderr and a thread to wait
the child process when running another program. You can specify
various attributes, redirections, current directory, etc., of the
program as Process.spawn.
See the various ways of executing a command