After years of being away from Ruby, I'm back full-force and have just cut my first gem, which includes an executable. Everything works like a charm.
The problem I am facing, however, is that I ALSO have a startup script (not part of the gem istelf) that daemonizes the executable. Additionally, I'd also like for the startup script to point the executable at configuration in a place like /var/
To the best of my knowledge, there's no way with rubygems, gemspec, etc., to specify files getting blown out to other parts of your system during install (e.g. startup script to /etc/init.d, and config to /var/). It certainly wouldn't make sense if you COULD do that.
So... my question is... what IS the proper procedure for automating the installation of something like this. I'm using RHEL, and am wondering if it's, perhaps, time for me to get my feet wet with making my first RPM.
Any thoughts?
You can do it. However it is probably not quite the recommended approach. But yes it is possible to run arbitary code during gem installation using the extensions option.
From the RubyGems Manual:
Usage
spec.extensions << 'ext/rmagic/extconf.rb'
Notes
These files will be run when the gem is installed, causing the
C (or whatever) code to be compiled on the user’s machine.
Just place whatever ruby code you need into the extconf.rb (or equivalent) file.
Examples for building C-extensions from the RubyGems Guides:
http://guides.rubygems.org/c-extensions/
Related
What's the best way to distribute a simple command-line Ruby app to clients in a way that would not require them to manually install Ruby and required Gems?
In my understanding this task boils down just to a couple of lines of SH/BAT code that does Ruby/Gems checks and if not found goes on with Ruby installation with RVM.
So do these lines of code exist already somewhere or will I need to write something on my own?
I've used this project for small scripts in the past, without any issues
http://www.erikveen.dds.nl/rubyscript2exe/
It creates an EXE file out of your ruby script.
If you need something cross-platform, the BAT/sh option is probably best. You could grab RVM, have RVM install ruby, use bundler for your gems, and then launch the script.
The closest I've found is (I believe) releasy: https://github.com/Spooner/releasy
I failed to find any way of producing a Ruby cross platform installation.
I've created a RubyAnywhere script that tries to solve this task.
i've written several Ruby scripts that work together to from a console application.
These scripts are written on an Ubuntu platform, but I want to be able to run them from a Windows platform as well.
The problem I'm currently facing is porting over all the gems. I've downloaded sources of most gems and made some bug fixes on them, but is it possible to package them for example with my scripts so they're available?
I'm thinking a bit DLL like here as Windows does.
I can probably add a readme file, stating which gems are required and where/how to obtain them, but it would be easier if I could package them.
Maybe you could look at http://www.erikveen.dds.nl/rubyscript2exe/index.html which does some packaging for ruby application (including the ruby interpreter, too)
You could also build a gem with your script in it along with all needed gems directly inside the gem. Provided their licences allow you to do that, it could be a reasonable solution ( Gem supports platform flavoured gems http://docs.rubygems.org/read/chapter/20#platform )
I have a bunch of ruby scripts in a folder which is added to $PATH and I think that some of them might be usefult to others. So I want to distribute them and the only 'good' way I know is rubygems (gem containing only binary), it has a very useful advantage of versioning, but also a drawback of initialization time (sometimes it takes some seconds before script starts to run). Are there alternatives?
Gem is good enought for this. I use gem for this purposes as it is very convenient to intall and update.
Gems are built for this. I'm not sure what you think a gem is, but RubyGems is a repository like PEAR for PHP, aptitude for ubuntu, or CPAN for perl, except they contain ruby libraries.
There is no extra overhead or "initialization time" added to your ruby libraries by making them gems. RubyGems simply installs your library - it doesn't do anything else.
Gems are fine for this kind of Ruby script.
To quickly generate a new gem, try out bundle gem.
To quickly distribute gems without using rubygems.org, and in a way that could work for private deployment, check out the idea for microgems.
If you still don't think you need to wrap these in gems, you can simply add the executable bit to your scripts, add shebang lines for ruby, and remove the .rb extension. Then share your script files with whoever wants them.
I've got a ruby web app that uses lilypond to generate sheet music based on user input. I'd like to move the hosting to heroku (I've recently used heroku on a few projects and really liked it, plus my traffic is low enough that it'd be free host it on heroku, for a while at least). However, heroku's dyno architecture doesn't allow you to ssh in and install whatever packages you want...instead, you give it a gems manifest, and it will install the gems for you.
So, if I'm going to deploy to heroku, I'm going to need to package lilypond as a gem. I've released a few pure-ruby gems, but haven't dealt with native extensions or precompiled binaries, or anything like that.
Is it possible to take some precompiled binaries and package it inside a gem? Ideally, this would include binaries for OS X (which I develop on) and debian linux (which is what's running on heroku), and would install the proper binary when the gem was installed.
it is possible, since precompiled binary gems for windows are the norm. Take a look at rake compiler, perhaps.
also https://github.com/rdp/ruby_tutorials_core/wiki/gem (https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Ruby_Programming/RubyGems) might help
-r
I think you've got a few options here:
You could get the Lilypond source and package it into a gem with a native C extension. There are some useful guides on how to do that at http://guides.rubygems.org/c-extensions/ and http://patshaughnessy.net/2011/10/31/dont-be-terrified-of-building-native-extensions
There's also a gem called gitara but I haven't been able to find any information about using it on Heroku. It might be worth emailing the author and asking if he knows anything about that.
You could create a Heroku buildpack that installs Lilypond as part of your deployment. I wasn't able to find any for Lilypond, but there are plenty of examples that do similar things - for example, this one installs Imagemagick (which is included by default on Heroku, so probably not necessary anymore - but hopefully the code is helpful). More documentation at https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/buildpack-api and https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/buildpack-binaries
Based on my reading, I think the buildpack option is the best way to go.
Hopefully this helps!
Instead of precompiling, you should be able to just list the gem in your .gems file, see the Heroku documentation. Of course, this requires your gem builds the native code correctly - this is still a task, but hopefully an easier one.
Would it be possible to override the default "require" by adding automatic download-and-install code for any missing includes (provided that the missing include is published as a ruby gem).
Which would not work in situations where Ruby is not interfaced with a shell. But still I think it would be an interesting idea.
Is there such a mechanism in existence today?
Edit:Removed portion about password check. I just checked and gem install doesn't seem to require me to type my password.
You would be able to hijack require method so as gems are installed when an attempt is made to require them, but still you won't have access to newly installed gem in current process, because gem index has to be reloaded.
I understand the intentions but I think exercise might not be worth it.
When installing a fresh gem the gem will be installed in the GEM_HOME. If that is not writable then it will try in the user's home .gem directory (on *NIX at least).
You could certainly script this. In a way Rail's rake gems:build is just this. Just not on demand.
But, I would recommend against this. You could run into build, versioning, dependency and network issues. And probably security issues as well.
PS: Francis Hwang did something related a while ago, although only as a require, not a require gems.
http://fhwang.net/2005/11/01/urirequire-I-got-yer-Web-2-0-right-here
A better option would be to use bundler and distribute the required gems with the application.
It is also quite simple to write a script to bootstrap the installation of gems if you didn't
want to distribute them with your code (using the bundle install/check commands)