i am developing a c# user-control # work. the control just loads some infos & data and displays it.
now i want to provide the user of the control with an option to load the data asynchron .. smth like this:
Cntrl.LoadSmthAsync(..)
Cntrl.LoadSmthComplete //EventHandler to give feedback if the Load was successfull.
i decided to make the Download function Async and provide return values throu EventHandlers. but that code got rather complicated .. after all.
here some code to understand what the control should do:
public byte[] LoadByPos(int pos)
{
string url = Pos2Url(pos);
// update gui
this.textBox1.Text = url;
byte[] res = LoadByUrl(url);
// update gui
this.textBox2.Text = BytesToString(res);
return res;
}
public byte[] LoadByUrl(string url)
{
return Download(url);
}
//primary problem: download function
private byte[] Download(string url)
{
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1000 * 30);
return StringToBytes(url);
}
//secondary problem: an other function
private string Pos2Url(int pos)
{
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1000 * 5);
return pos.ToString();
}
// LoadByPosAsync
public delegate void LoadByPosDoneHandler(Object sender, byte[] e);
public event LoadByPosDoneHandler LoadByPosDone;
public void LoadByPosAsync(int pos)
{
string url = Pos2Url(pos);
// update gui
this.textBox1.Text = url;
LoadByUrlDone += new LoadByUrlDoneHandler(LoadByPosAsync_LoadByUrlDone);
LoadByUrlAsync(url);
}
public void LoadByPosAsync_LoadByUrlDone(object sender, byte[] e)
{
// update gui
this.textBox2.Text = BytesToString(e);
LoadByUrlDone = null;
LoadByPosDone(sender, e);
}
//LoadByUrlAsync
public delegate void LoadByUrlDoneHandler(Object sender, byte[] e);
public event LoadByUrlDoneHandler LoadByUrlDone;
public void LoadByUrlAsync(string url)
{
DownloadDone += new DownloadDoneHandler(LoadByUrlAsync_DownloadDone);
DownloadAsync(url);
}
private void LoadByUrlAsync_DownloadDone(object sender, byte[] e)
{
LoadByUrlDone(sender, e);
}
//DownloadAsync
private delegate void DownloadDoneHandler(Object sender, byte[] e);
private event DownloadDoneHandler DownloadDone;
private void DownloadAsync(string url)
{
BackgroundWorker bw_DownloadAsync = new BackgroundWorker();
bw_DownloadAsync.RunWorkerCompleted += new RunWorkerCompletedEventHandler(bw_DownloadAsync_RunWorkerCompleted);
bw_DownloadAsync.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler(bw_DownloadAsync_DoWork);
bw_DownloadAsync.RunWorkerAsync(url);
}
void bw_DownloadAsync_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
byte[] res = Download((string)e.Argument);
e.Result = res;
}
void bw_DownloadAsync_RunWorkerCompleted(object sender, RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
{
DownloadDone(sender, (byte[])e.Result);
}
is there an easier way to accomplish what i am intending to do ?
thx in advance
Is there an easier way to accomplish what I am intending to do?
There's the implementation side separately, but if you're using .NET 4 I would strongly advise you not to use this model for asynchrony. Rather than using event handlers, I'd encourage you to use Task<T>. You can use TaskCompletionSource to create the task if you don't have any inherent support for it, and it means your API will be much easier to use in C# 5, due to the async/await support. At that point, your UI-thread method would look like this:
public async Task<byte[]> LoadByPos(int pos)
{
string url = await Pos2UrlAsync(pos);
// update gui
this.textBox1.Text = url;
byte[] res = await LoadByUrlAsync(url);
// update gui
this.textBox2.Text = BytesToString(res);
return res;
}
The asynchrony will simply flow through your code naturally.
Related
I'm saying i'm not a programmer but a guy who has been learning to program with java for a while. I hope to find the solution to my problem here. I'm trying to program my home automation system and remote control and to do this, I chose to use Kryonet. My problem is that every time I send the data to the server, the client opens a new connection. It's been 3 weeks since googlo and I try to figure out how to do it but with no results.
Every help is seriously appreciated. This is my code. Thank you.
This code work in my home network.
Sorry for my english...
public class MainActivity extends AppCompatActivity {
Button button;
String IP = "";
EditText editText;
TextView textView;
EditText editText3;
public static String msg_response;
public static String msg_request;
#Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);
final Handler handler = new MyHandler();
button = (Button) findViewById(R.id.button);
editText = (EditText) findViewById(R.id.editText);
editText3 = (EditText) findViewById(R.id.editText3);
textView = (TextView) findViewById(R.id.textView);
int MY_PERMISSIONS_REQUEST_INTERNET = 1;
int MY_PERMISSIONS_REQUEST_ACCESS_NETWORK_STATE = 1;
ActivityCompat.requestPermissions(this,
new String[]{Manifest.permission.INTERNET},
MY_PERMISSIONS_REQUEST_INTERNET);
ActivityCompat.requestPermissions(this,
new String[]{Manifest.permission.ACCESS_NETWORK_STATE},
MY_PERMISSIONS_REQUEST_ACCESS_NETWORK_STATE);
int MY_PERMISSIONS_REQUEST_ACCESS_WIFY_STATE = 1;
ActivityCompat.requestPermissions(this,
new String[]{Manifest.permission.ACCESS_WIFI_STATE},
MY_PERMISSIONS_REQUEST_ACCESS_WIFY_STATE);
textView.setText(msg_response);
button.setOnClickListener(new View.OnClickListener() {
#Override
public void onClick(View v) {
try {
msg_request = valueOf(editText3.getText().toString());
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
MyThread myThread = new MyThread(handler);
myThread.start();
}
});
}
private class MyHandler extends Handler {
#Override
public void handleMessage(Message msg) {
Bundle bundle = msg.getData();
if (bundle.containsKey("msg da server")) {
String msgin = bundle.getString("msg da server");
textView.setText(msgin);
}
}
}
class MyThread extends Thread {
private Handler handler;
public MyThread(Handler handler) {
this.handler = handler;
}
public void run() {
System.out.println("MyThread running");
Client client = new Client();
client.start();
Kryo kryoClient = client.getKryo();
kryoClient.register(SampleRequest.class);
kryoClient.register(SampleResponse.class);
try {
client.connect(5000, "192.168.0.101", 54555, 54666);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
client.addListener(new Listener() {
public void received(Connection connection, Object object) {
if (object instanceof SampleResponse) {
SampleResponse response = (SampleResponse) object;
System.out.println(response.text);
msg_response = response.text.toString();
invia_activity(msg_response);
}
}
});
SampleRequest request = new SampleRequest();
request.text = msg_request;
client.sendTCP(request);
}
private void invia_activity(String invia) {
Message msg = handler.obtainMessage();
Bundle b = new Bundle();
b.putString("msg da server", "" + invia);
msg.setData(b);
handler.sendMessage(msg);
}
}
}
I dont have an direct solution, but i have an tutorial for it. I used the same one. So there the connections keeps open, and you can send as many packets as you need. Its without audio, but the code works well. After that you can experiment with the code. It works fine for me. This is the tutorial
I hope i can help you with this.
EDIT:
Maybe you can make an
public static Connection conn;
and you could use that object again and again as your connection to the server.
I would like to make a simple way to write/read to object element in WP7. Something is not working properly. My way of thinking and what I have already done is like that:
First I create a class that represents my object. I added static string just to see if everything works well:
namespace SimpleObject.Objects
{
public class Entry
{
public string entrytitle { get; set; }
public string entrycomment { get; set; }
public string entrycat = "works";
public Entry() { }
public Entry(string Entrytitle, string Entrycomment, string Entrycat)
{
this.entrytitle = Entrytitle;
this.entrycomment = Entrycomment;
this.entrycat = Entrycat;
}
public string entry { get; set; }
}
}
Then, as I read in some articles I need to make some changes in App.xaml.cs Here we go then:
using SimpleObject.Objects;
Before App() I put this:
public static Entry E;
Then in App() this:
UnhandledException += new EventHandler<ApplicationUnhandledExceptionEventArgs>(Application_UnhandledException);
E = new Entry();
InitializeComponent();
Then my UI is two pages. One is a form to input data, second to read. Under application bar button I have:
private void ApplicationBarIconButton_Click(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
Entry E = new Entry
{
entrytitle = TitleTextBox.Text,
entry = CommentTextBox.Text,
};
this.NavigationService.Navigate(new Uri("/Page2.xaml", UriKind.Relative));
MessageBox.Show("Category added!");
}
Finally page that present results:
private void button1_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
TextBlock1.Text = App.E.entrycat;
TextBlock2.Text = App.E.entrytitle;
}
And second TextBlock gives me nothing...
You're never setting the global static values. In your button click, it should be this:
private void ApplicationBarIconButton_Click(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
App.E.entrytitle = TitleTextBox.Text,
App.E.entrycat = CommentTextBox.Text,
this.NavigationService.Navigate(new Uri("/Page2.xaml", UriKind.Relative));
}
another option is to forgo the global variable which you're basically only using to pass the value from one page to the next.
You can do this with query string values just like in a web application and pick them up on your page load handler.
private void ApplicationBarIconButton_Click(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
this.NavigationService.Navigate(new Uri("/Page2.xaml?title=TitleTextBox.Text&comment=CommentTextBox.Text", UriKind.Relative));
}
I have a code that adds email id and name in Isolated space. But it is not able to add multiple data. Also, how can I update in case any data was entered incorrectly?
namespace IsoStore
{
public partial class MainPage : PhoneApplicationPage
{
// Constructor
public MainPage()
{
InitializeComponent();
IsolatedStorageSettings appSettings = IsolatedStorageSettings.ApplicationSettings;
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
IsolatedStorageSettings.ApplicationSettings.Add("email", "someone#somewhere.com");
IsolatedStorageSettings.ApplicationSettings.Add("name", "myname");
}
private void button2_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
textBlock1.Text = (string)IsolatedStorageSettings.ApplicationSettings["email"];
textBlock2.Text = (string)IsolatedStorageSettings.ApplicationSettings["name"];
}
}
}
Cleaned up your code a little for you, using a helper method to do the store:
namespace IsoStore
{
public partial class MainPage : PhoneApplicationPage
{
private IsolatedStorageSettings _appSettings;
// Constructor
public MainPage()
{
InitializeComponent();
_appSettings = IsolatedStorageSettings.ApplicationSettings;
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
SaveSetting("email", "someone#somewhere.com");
SaveSetting("name", "myname");
}
private void button2_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
textBlock1.Text = (string)_appSettings["email"];
textBlock2.Text = (string)_appSettings["name"];
}
private void SaveSetting( string setting, string value )
{
if (_appSettings.Contains(setting))
{
_appSettings[setting] = value;
}
else
{
_appSettings.Add(setting, value);
}
}
}
}
Try a few other examples to get your head around using IsolatedStorageSettings.
How to: Store and Retrieve Application Settings Using Isolated Storage
All about WP7 Isolated Storage - Store data in IsolatedStorageSettings
I have in mind 2 options, you either save your data to isolatedStorageFile MSDN Library OR ,this is what i might do in such case, You save under the key email all your emails as one string separate the emails with a char that is not allowed to be in an email, Coma "," lets say, when needed split your string and retrieve it to whatever makes you comfortable.
private void SaveSetting( string setting, string value )
{
if (_appSettings.Contains(setting))
{
_appSettings[settings] = _appSettings[settings] + "," + value;
}
else
{
_appSettings.Add(setting, value);
}
}
please note that this code segment is copied from HiTech Magic' answer.
As most of you experienced, developing a console app is as easy as:
void mainloop(){
while (1){
giveInstructions();
getInput();
if (!process()) break;
printOutput();
}
}
int main(){
mainloop();
return 0;
}
However, in GUI it becomes an issue.
We can still giveInstructions(), process(), and printOutput(), but getInput() wouldn't work because it relies on an event, usually button click or key down.
How can I port a console app to a gui app with minimum code changes? (preferably do not change the main method, and as little change to the mainloop function as possible)
Note: I'm not too comfortable with threading yet.
Since there is no specific language given, I will show an example in C# where you would be able to use the same code as the console app with a simple GUI.
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
//using form-editor, double-click buttons or use the following
btnInput.Click += new EventHandler(btnInput_Click);
btnContinue.Click += new EventHandler(btnContinue_Click);
giveInstructions();
}
private void giveInstructions()
{
txtInfo.Text = "";
txtInput.Text = "";
//display instructions to multi-line textbox
}
private void btnInput_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
//or you can just add another button for exit.
if (txtInput.Text == "expected value for exit")
{
Application.Exit();
}
else
{
getInput();
}
}
private void getInput()
{
string strInput = txtInput.Text;
//do stuff
printOutput();
}
private void printOutput()
{
//display output to multi-line textbox
}
private void btnContinue_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
giveInstructions();
}
}
I have tried numerous attempts to fix this problem or bug, firstly by deleting the .tbd files from C:\Users\\AppData\Local\Microsoft\VisualStudio\x.0
I have also tried this:
Visual Studio "Tools" menu
"Options" submenu
"Windows Form Designer" tab
"General" tab
Set "AutoToolboxPopulate" to "True"
The ToolBox list is still not populating correctly and the "BackgroundWorker" component I need is grayed out. Any ideas?
At least a workaround: declare the BackgroundWorker in code, but don't forget to dispose it properly:
public class MyForm : Form
{
private BackgroundWorker bgWorker = null;
public MyForm()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.bgWorker = new BackgroundWorker; //TODO: set properties and event handlers
}
public override void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
//TODO: copy from MyForm.Designer.cs and add:
Backgroundworker bgw = this.bgWorker;
this.bgWorker = null;
if (disposing && bgw != null)
{
try
{
//TODO: release event handlers
bgw.Dispose();
}
catch(Exception)
{
/* consumed disposal error */
}
}
}
}
I have found a solution to my problem, using the BackgroundWorker class in C# without using the component from the toolbox. In this case, I needed two seperate backgroundWorkers:
using System.Threading;
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
private BackgroundWorker bw1 = new BackgroundWorker();
private BackgroundWorker bw2 = new BackgroundWorker();
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
bw1.WorkerReportsProgress = true;
bw1.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler(bw1_DoWork);
bw1.RunWorkerCompleted += new RunWorkerCompletedEventHandler(bw1_RunWorkerCompleted);
bw1.ProgressChanged += new ProgressChangedEventHandler(bw1_ProgressChanged);
bw2.WorkerReportsProgress = true;
bw2.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler(bw2_DoWork2);
bw2.RunWorkerCompleted += new RunWorkerCompletedEventHandler(bw2_RunWorkerCompleted);
bw2.ProgressChanged += new ProgressChangedEventHandler(bw1_ProgressChanged);
}
private void bw1_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
StatsProcessor proc = new StatsProcessor();
proc.CompareStats(listText1, listText2);
}
private void bw2_DoWork2(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
StatsParser parser = new StatsParser();
}
private void bw1_RunWorkerCompleted(object sender, RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
{
progressBar2.IsIndeterminate = false;
progressBar2.Value = 100;
btnCompareStats.IsEnabled = true;
}
private void bw2_RunWorkerCompleted(object sender, RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
{
progressBar1.IsIndeterminate = false;
progressBar1.Value = 100;
btnFetchStats.IsEnabled = true;
}
private void bw1_ProgressChanged(object sender, ProgressChangedEventArgs e)
{
this.progressBar2.Value = e.ProgressPercentage;
}
private void bw2_ProgressChanged(object sender, ProgressChangedEventArgs e)
{
this.progressBar1.Value = e.ProgressPercentage;
}
private void btnCompare_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
btnCompareStats.IsEnabled = false;
StatsProcessor proc = new StatsProcessor();
if (bw1.IsBusy != true)
{
progressBar2.IsIndeterminate = true;
// Start the asynchronous operation.
bw1.RunWorkerAsync();
}
}
private void btnFetchStats_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
btnFetchStats.IsEnabled = false;
if (bw2.IsBusy != true)
{
progressBar1.IsIndeterminate = true;
// Start the asynchronous operation.
bw2.RunWorkerAsync();
}
}
}
I would try resetting the toolbox items. Then use the Add Item dialog to put back something you need.