What I have is something like
public class BuildingUnit
{
public int ID { get; set; }
*irrelevant stuff removed*
public virtual BuildingUnitInsurance UnitInsurance { get; set; }
}
public class BuildingUnitInsurance
{
public int ID { get; set; }
*irrelevant stuff removed*
public virtual BuildingUnit BuildingUnit { get; set; }
}
What I want to do is have the relationship from the BuildingUnit to the BuildingUnitInsurance be optional, but if it does exist, the relationship from BuildingUnitInsurance to BuildingUnit must exist. I've tried a whole bunch of things with annotations and fluent api but I haven't really gotten anywhere.
The actual business case here is having a view displaying information from the BuildingUnit class, and then on that page it is possible to click a button and pop up a modal to add insurance information. Clicking the 'add insurance' button on that modal will post the insurance information to the controller and at that point it should be saved and the relationship should be created between the BuildingUnit and the BuildingUnitInsurance. Any help with the controller code would be great too since I don't really know what I would have to do there to make those relationships happen.
You need to have a one-to-zero-or-one relationship for BuildingUnit and a one-to-one required for BuildingUnitInsurance. The code below should help you and if not read more on Configuring Relationships.
public class BuildingUnit
{
[Key]
public int ID { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("UnitInsurance")]
public virtual int? UnitInsuranceId { get; set; }
public virtual BuildingUnitInsurance UnitInsurance { get; set; }
}
public class BuildingUnitInsurance
{
[Key]
public int ID { get; set; }
[Required]
[ForeignKey("BuildingUnit")]
public virtual int BuildingUnitId { get; set; }
public virtual BuildingUnit BuildingUnit { get; set; }
}
And then in your OnModelCreating handler:
modelBuilder.Entity<BuildingUnit>.HasOptional(x => x.UnitInsurance).WithRequired();
modelBuilder.Entity<BuildingUnitInsurance>.HasRequired(x => x.BuildingUnit).WithOptional();
Related
I'm using the Code First approach to build the database in this problem. I have the following (partial) entity:
public class Tournament {
public int TournamentID { get; set; }
public String Name { get; set; }
public DateTime? StartDate { get; set; }
public DateTime? EndDate { get; set; }
public int? SportID { get; set; }
public virtual Sport Sport { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Official> Officials { get; set; }
}
In the Official Entity I have this:
public class Official {
public int OfficialID { get; set; }
public String Surname { get; set; }
public String FirstName { get; set; }
public int? TournamentID { get; set; }
public virtual Tournament Tournament { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Match> Matches { get; set; }
}
Using some sample data and checking the SQL Server database, this works as I would expect it to. The tournament has a one-to-many relationship with officials.
The problem I'm having is that I would like the tournament to hold the primary key of an official as the head official. So I would add to the Tournament entity:
public int? OfficialID { get; set; } // foreign key to official table
public virtual Official HeadOfficial { get; set; } // navigation property
If I do this I get an attribute OfficialID and HeadOfficial_OfficialID in my Tournament table and I get TournamentID, Tournament_TournamentID and Tournament_TournamentID1 in my Officials table. I realise I now not only have a one-to-many relationship between Tournament and Official (seeing as a tournament can have many officials), but I also have a one-to-one relationship (seeing as a tournament can only have one head official).
How can I fix this problem?
You can fix the problem by giving EF a hint which navigation properties belong together. EF conventions cannot decide this anymore when you have two navigation properties in a class which refer to the same target class:
public class Tournament {
public int TournamentID { get; set; }
//...
public int? OfficialID { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("OfficialID")]
public virtual Official HeadOfficial { get; set; }
[InverseProperty("Tournament")] // the navigation property in Official class
public virtual ICollection<Official> Officials { get; set; }
}
It's also possible with Fluent API if you prefer that:
modelBuilder.Entity<Tournament>()
.HasOptional(t => t.HeadOfficial)
.WithMany()
.HasForeignKey(t => t.OfficialID);
modelBuilder.Entity<Tournament>()
.HasMany(t => t.Officials)
.WithOptional(o => o.Tournament)
.HasForeignKey(o => o.TournamentID);
I'm trying to find out how I can re-use a simple 'Comment' entity type for multiple scenarios where something is 'commentable' in my application.
At the moment, I have a couple of entities that a user is able to post comments to. Examples include Blogs, Profiles and Photos - these can all be 'commented' on.
I'd like to be able to use the same 'Comment' class for each of these scenarios, but I don't want to end up with one HUGE table full of comments for everything. I figure it would be much more efficient to at least store a table of BlogComments, PhotoComments, and ProfileComments. At the moment, my Comment class looks like this:
public class Comment
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
public int ContextId { get; set; }
[StringLength(256)]
public string Content { get; set; }
public DateTime DatePosted { get; set; }
public virtual Member Author { get; set; }
}
Presumably, I'd need the 'ContextId' field to refer to the particular thing being commented on. This Id might be the Id of a Blog, a Profile or a Photo. I was hoping to be able to refer to comments much like a normal ICollection in these classes, and I have some code like this for the Photos as an example:
public class Photo
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
[StringLength(48)]
public string FileName { get; set; }
public virtual Member Owner { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Comment> Comments { get; set; }
}
I've been pointed to various articles during my searches, but none really seem relevant to my particular situation. How can I map these comment collections to different tables, and avoid having a comment "super-table"?
Any help, pointers or advice would be hugely appreciated :)
You can create an abstract Comment class and inherit from it specific comments such as PhotoComment, ProfileComment. You will be able to map the comments to different tables.
public abstract class Comment
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
[StringLength(256)]
public string Content { get; set; }
public DateTime DatePosted { get; set; }
public virtual Member Author { get; set; }
}
public class PhotoComment : Comment
{
public int PhotoId { get; set; }
public virtual Photo Photo { get; set; }
}
public class Photo
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
[StringLength(48)]
public string FileName { get; set; }
public virtual Member Owner { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<PhotoComment> Comments { get; set; }
}
I'm trying to create some complex form scheme in a .NET MVC 3 project (or so I think). I'll show a wireframe so that you can understand better.
As you can see from the pic above, it's a form to create a new Car Dealership. I can choose from many available car's manufacturers (in the Add a tab), and each selection creates a new tab in the panel underneath it. In each panel there's a html fieldset, and I can add some new cars on it.
In the end, I want to submit all the form, which comprehends the data from the dealership (e.g. name), the car's brands that it has and the cars available for each brand. How can I do it with MVC 3? I don't know how exactly should I instantiate the model Car Dealership and its respective View. What should the cars in the panels be? An array of inputs? And how can I separate the inputs from one tab from the ones of another? All of this, using Razor!
My real-world scenario is a little bit more complicated, but I'll start by this so that I can try to solve the rest by myself. I'm using jQuery/jQuery UI, but I'm opened to other javascript alternatives (like Backbone, etc - I just don't know them yet). Thanks in advance!
UPDATE (1):
These are my models so far:
public class CarDealership
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<ManufactorOnDealership> ManufactorsOnDealership { get; set; }
}
public class Manufactor
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<ManufactorOnDealership> DealershipsOfManufactor { get; set; }
}
// Junction class: I believe it's needed because the list of Cars belongs to this relationship
public class ManufactorOnDealership
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int CarDealershipId { get; set; }
public int ManufactorId { get; set; }
public virtual CarDealership CarDealership { get; set; }
public virtual Manufactor Manufactor { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Car> CarsOnDealership { get; set; }
}
public class Car
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<ManufactorOnDealership> Manufactors { get; set; }
}
This is a question about Models, ASP.NET MVC 3 and relationships. I'm using the code-first approach.
Imagine this simple typical scenario of an User with its Blog Posts:
public class User
{
public virtual int UserId { get; set; }
public virtual string Nickname { get; set; }
public virtual List<Post> Posts { get; set; }
}
public class Post
{
public virtual int PostId { get; set; }
public virtual string BlogText { get; set; }
}
I made it very very simple.
Well. When I create a controller using the Controller with Read/Write actions and views using Entity Framework, the collection of Posts is not considered. It's being ignored. So, I can't get this relationship to work.
If, in place of the collection, there was a single object (public virtual string Email, for example) it works normally.
I'm asking myself and to you:
Why
How do I put references to collections in my model?
It should be a simple task, I really can't understand why it doesn't work.
Thank you.
POCO should look like below to have one-to-many relationship:
public class Post
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string BlogText { get; set; }
public virtual User User { get; set; }
}
public class User
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Nickname { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Post> Posts { get; set; }
}
I'm having trouble passing view information from my Get/Create action to my view. Here are my three model classes;
public class Competition
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int CompetitionId { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Prize { get; set; }
}
public class CompetitionEntry
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int CompetitionEntryId { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Email { get; set; }
public int CompetitionId { get; set; }
}
public class CompetitionEntryViewModel
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public Competition Competitions { get; set; }
public int CompetitionId { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Email { get; set; }
}
Here is my Get/Create action in CompetitionEntry Controller;
public ActionResult Create(int id)
{
CompetitionEntryViewModel competitionentryviewmodel = db.CompetitionEntriesView.Find(id);
return View(competitionentryviewmodel);
}
I know this doesn't work. The id parameter goes into the URL fine. How to I get access to my Competition class in th Get action? I need to be able to show the competion name on my Create Competition entry view.
Thanks in advance!
public ActionResult Create(int id)
{
var data = db.CompetitionEntriesView.Find(id);
CompetitionEntryViewModel competitionentryviewmodel = new CompetitionEntryViewModel();
competitionentryviewmodel.CompetitionName = data.Name;
return View(competitionentryviewmodel);
}
What you are trying to do is build an object graph and display it through a view model. In order to do this, you need to map your domain model(s) to your view model.
You can do the mapping yourself by writing a lot of code (re-inventing the wheel), or, you could consider using third party tools to do this for you. I recommend you use an AutoMapper as it is very simple to use imo.
The other problem is that your view model contains a domain model. This is likely to cause you a lot of headache in near future. If I were you, I would replace Competition with CompetitionViewModel.
I would also consider creating a view model for a list of competitions, i.e. CompetitionsViewModel. Look into partial views to see how you can display a list of competitions.
Good luck