When I installed MVC4 beta on a development PC, it had a template for SPA (Single Page Application). Today on a different PC with the same setup (VS2010 SP1, win7), I installed MVC4 RC but no longer is the SPA template available (see image). Any one else having this issue? or is this a documented change that I could not find?
Changes from ASP.NET MVC 4 Beta
The major changes from ASP.NET MVC 4 Beta in this release are summarized below:
Removed ASP.NET Single Page Application: ASP.NET Single Page Application (SPA) shipped with ASP.NET MVC 4 Beta as an early preview of the experience for building applications that include significant client-side interactions using JavaScript. SPA won’t ship with the final MVC 4 release, but will continue to evolve outside of the MVC 4 release. Check out the ASP.NET SPA home page for details.
...
http://www.asp.net/whitepapers/mvc4-release-notes
P.S., Wow I am glad that I didn't use it for an app I build right now. I was considering it 3 months ago, but decided not to risk it because MS said that it is experimental.
You can get the SPA template in the Fall 2012 update. More information on the template here and here.
It`s very risky now
For example if you try to run it with System.json for serialization it runs well with WebApi and DBDATAContext methods but it`s impossible to use it with Entities relationship entity circular errors and so on. (There is a solution to change private access of method get, but would be too much work to have to change in all the access methos of all your entities.
Related
Up until now I had been using MVC3 for my apps but with the new update of Visual Studio 2012 I got MVC4. I migrated a few of my apps and now they are broken.
I noticed that the new project template for an Internet application creates a ~/Content/themes/base folder.
And yet, up until now I had been accustomed to use the App_Themes folder for that. In fact, with VS.2013 you can use "Add ASP.NET FOlder | Themes".
So I am now confused with MVC4, has It deprecated the App_Themes folder (which seems more appropriate to me than ~/Content) ? or is there a significant difference?
App_Theme come from ASP.NET Platform and one goal of mvc is get a clean html code
One of the things that ASP.NET MVC is missing is the ability to
easily implement Themes. The older, more mature standard ASP.NET
framework includes theme support via the App_Themes folder; however
limited it can be, it’s still more than ASP.NET MVC currently has.
Well, at least until I wrote this little custom ViewEngine and
ControllerBase class to help out and allow us to very easily implement
Themes within our ASP.NET MVC applications
take a look this helpful article this link
I am currently working on a tool and writing it in MVC SPA (single page application) and just now found out it was removed from the final release. What does that means to my project. do i have to stop working and move to MVC Internet application. I have not found much info in http://www.asp.net/single-page-application
Please let me know the effects and possible work around on this issue
Thanks
You can download the SPA source code from the ASP.NET CodePlex page and compile it, then include the binaries in your application. The current version is not 'complete', but the code that you've been depending on should still be as supported as it was in the Mvc 4 Beta release if you do that.
We are starting a new ASP.NET MVC project. The web application will be used also in a touch pad devices and therefore I am interested on ASP.NET MVC 4 Default Templates as it has feature called Adaptive Rendering and overall it seems to better starting point.
ASP.NET MVC 4 isn't yet ready for the production use, so I was thinking of using only parts of it.
Would the View side of the MVC 4 project (Layout, CSS, JavaScript) work on MVC 3 project?
Of course it does. They are all heavily CSS3 and Html5. So you need to think about browser support rather than MVC runtime dlls.
I encourage you to check the below video out. It is just for you :
http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/BUILD/BUILD2011/TOOL-796T
i am currently learning MVC2. actually working on my first MVC2 project.As the MVC3 beta is launched and available to download. please suggest me should i use MVC3(Beta) or continue with MVC2 and second thing is, if i move to MVC3 then what major advantages i will get from it.
My project is an ERP application.
Please suggest me what should i do.
Thanks
I suggest you take a look at this blog post from Scott Gu :
http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2010/11/09/announcing-the-asp-net-mvc-3-release-candidate.aspx
To name some advantages, you can use the Razor View Engine, which depending on your requirements, it will make your view code nicer. I believe that's the case for an ERP System.
This is not 100% mvc3 related, but with the RC you get NuGet installed with it, if you're planning on using external libraries to help you out, that's a great way to manage them.
Partial Page output caching is a great feature for systems that share bits and pieces across different ui's.
Unobtrusive JavaScript and Validation is also another great new feature that will help you keep your code's maintainability among other benefits.
MVC3 also has some benefits from the dynamic aspects of .NET 4, and that also helps you keep your view code cleaner.
And my end point would be, MVC3 is already on RC stage....it already has Go Live license and support...if you're learning, I would suggest learning the latest, you will get all the knowledge you need to use mvc 1 and 2, and also the new things about mvc 3.
One factor is the release date of MVC 3 compared to the release date of your application, i.e. you should not ship an application based on a beta version of MVC.
If you switch to MVC 3 beta, you should be aware that there may be changes in the final release, so you may have to make changes for each version until the relase, and your application is only guaranteed to work with one specific pre-release version, until the final release of MVC 3.
We are planning to upgrade our technology to VS 2010. But I wonder if the MVC 2.0 is working properly since it has many issues raised from software developer who used it please see here: http://aspnet.codeplex.com/releases/view/41742.I want to use MVC 1.0 in VS 2010 is it compatible?
Indeed as Robaticus said, MVC2 works well and you shouldn't be afraid to use it... but if you really want to stick with MVC 1.0, take the relevant MVC DLLs and copy them into a known lib folder, and then directly link your project to those. By doing this, you will be directly linking to the old MVC libraries which will still work just fine. Just don't link to any of the MVC 2.0 libraries that will undoubtedly be sitting in the Global Assembly Cache.
MVC 2 works great; I'm using it right now. There are some very slight changes to the signature of some framework components, but overall works great. Would recommend 2 because they have a lot of new features to take advantage of and make your life easier.
If you had to, MVC 1 and MVC 2 they give you the source code, which you can include and use in your project, so you are always covered there.
MVC 1 and MVC 2 are compiled in .NET 3.5 SP 1 version, so you may be able to use the MVC 1 DLL directly...
HTH.