How can I select documents based on values within the embedded documents? For instance, I have class r that has a list of i classes. I want to select all r's that have i.name=="foo".
If you want to select all r's that have at least one i with i.Name == "foo" you can use this query:
var result = collectionOfRs.Where(r => r.ListOfIs.Any(i => i.Name == "foo"));
If you want to select all r's that have all i's with i.Name == "foo" you can use this one:
var result = collectionOfRs.Where(r => r.ListOfIs.All(i => i.Name == "foo"));
Related
I got this linq query which searches for selected values in my database using dropdowns.
Is there a way to hide the "join" in the linq query if the ddlCategory is null? I want this because the result of the search shows duplicated-rows because my documents can have many Categories.?? hope you understand what i mean.. Can anyone help??
var documents = from d in data.tblDocuments
join sc in data.tblSubCategories on d.DocId equals sc.DocId
orderby d.Docyear descending
where
(string.IsNullOrEmpty(person) || d.DocPerson.Equals(person)) &&
(string.IsNullOrEmpty(year) || d.Docyear.Equals(year)) &&
(string.IsNullOrEmpty(law) || d.DocLaw.Equals(law)) &&
(string.IsNullOrEmpty(court) || d.DocCourt.Equals(court)) &&
(string.IsNullOrEmpty(category) || sc.CategoryId.Equals(category)) &&
(string.IsNullOrEmpty(casenr) || d.DocNr.Equals(casenr))
select d;
Use lambda syntax:
var query = data.tblDocuments;
if (condition) // conditionally add join
query = query.Join(data.tblSubCategories.Where(sc => sc.CategoryId == category),
d => d.DocId, sc => sc.DocId, (d,sc) => d);
// continue to compose query
query = query.OrderByDescending(d => d.Docyear)
.Where(d => ...);
BTW you can compose filtering based on conditions:
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(person))
query = query.Where(d => d.DocPerson == person);
First Table is the View and Second is the result I want
This below query works fine
List<BTWStudents> students = (from V in db.vwStudentCoursesSD
where classIds.Contains(V.Class.Value)
select new BTWStudents
{
StudentId = V.StudentId
Amount= V.PaymentMethod == "Cashier Check" ? V.Amount: "0.00"
}).Distinct().ToList();
But I changed it to List to add string formatting(see below)
List<BTWStudents> students = (from V in db.vwStudentCoursesSD
where classIds.Contains(V.Class.Value)
select new {V}).ToList().Select(x => new BTWStudents
{
StudentId = V.StudentId
Amount= V.PaymentMethod == "Cashier Check" ? String.Format("{0:c}",V.Amount): "0.00"
}).Distinct().ToList();
With this Second Query I get this
Why is distinct not working in the second query?
When working with objects (in your case a wrapped anonymous type because you are using Select new {V} rather than just Select V), Distinct calls the object.Equals when doing the comparison. Internally, this checks the object's hash code. You'll find in this case, the hash code of the two objects is different even though the fields contain the same values. To fix this, you will need to override Equals on the object type or pass a custom IEqualityComparer implementation into the Distinct overload. You should be able to find a number of examples online searching for "Distinct IEqualityComparer".
Try this (moved your distinct to the first query and corrected your bugged if/then/else):
List<BTWStudents> students = (from V in db.vwStudentCoursesSD
where classIds.Contains(V.Class.Value)
select new {V}).Distinct().ToList().Select(x => new BTWStudents
{
classId = V.Class.HasValue ? V.Class.Value : 0,
studentName = V.StudentName,
paymentAmount = V.PaymentMethod == "Cashier Check" ? String.Format("{0:c}",x.V.AmountOwed): "0.00"
}).ToList();
You can get around using Distinct all together if you Group by StudentID
var studentsGroupedByPayment =
(from V in db.vwStudentCoursesSD
where classIds.Contains(V.Class.Value)
group V by V.StudentId into groupedV
select new
{
StudentID = groupedV.Key,
Amount = string.Format("{0:C}",
groupedV.First().PaymentMethod == "Cashier Check" ?
groupedV.First().Amount : 0.0)
}
).ToList();
I have the following linq-to-entities query with 2 joined tables that I would like to add pagination to:
IQueryable<ProductInventory> data = from inventory in objContext.ProductInventory
join variant in objContext.Variants
on inventory.VariantId equals variant.id
where inventory.ProductId == productId
where inventory.StoreId == storeId
orderby variant.SortOrder
select inventory;
I realize I need to use the .Join() extension method and then call .OrderBy().Skip().Take() to do this, I am just gettting tripped up on the syntax of Join() and can't seem to find any examples (either online or in books).
NOTE: The reason I am joining the tables is to do the sorting. If there is a better way to sort based on a value in a related table than join, please include it in your answer.
2 Possible Solutions
I guess this one is just a matter of readability, but both of these will work and are semantically identical.
1
IQueryable<ProductInventory> data = objContext.ProductInventory
.Where(y => y.ProductId == productId)
.Where(y => y.StoreId == storeId)
.Join(objContext.Variants,
pi => pi.VariantId,
v => v.id,
(pi, v) => new { Inventory = pi, Variant = v })
.OrderBy(y => y.Variant.SortOrder)
.Skip(skip)
.Take(take)
.Select(x => x.Inventory);
2
var query = from inventory in objContext.ProductInventory
where inventory.ProductId == productId
where inventory.StoreId == storeId
join variant in objContext.Variants
on inventory.VariantId equals variant.id
orderby variant.SortOrder
select inventory;
var paged = query.Skip(skip).Take(take);
Kudos to Khumesh and Pravin for helping with this. Thanks to the rest for contributing.
Define the join in your mapping, and then use it. You really don't get anything by using the Join method - instead, use the Include method. It's much nicer.
var data = objContext.ProductInventory.Include("Variant")
.Where(i => i.ProductId == productId && i.StoreId == storeId)
.OrderBy(j => j.Variant.SortOrder)
.Skip(x)
.Take(y);
Add following line to your query
var pagedQuery = data.Skip(PageIndex * PageSize).Take(PageSize);
The data variable is IQueryable, so you can put add skip & take method on it. And if you have relationship between Product & Variant, you donot really require to have join explicitly, you can refer the variant something like this
IQueryable<ProductInventory> data =
from inventory in objContext.ProductInventory
where inventory.ProductId == productId && inventory.StoreId == storeId
orderby inventory.variant.SortOrder
select new()
{
property1 = inventory.Variant.VariantId,
//rest of the properties go here
}
pagedQuery = data.Skip(PageIndex * PageSize).Take(PageSize);
My answer here based on the answer that is marked as true
but here I add a new best practice of the code above
var data= (from c in db.Categorie.AsQueryable().Join(db.CategoryMap,
cat=> cat.CategoryId, catmap => catmap.ChildCategoryId,
cat, catmap) => new { Category = cat, CategoryMap = catmap })
select (c => c.Category)
this is the best practice to use the Linq to entity because when you add AsQueryable() to your code; system will converts a generic System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable to a generic System.Linq.IQueryable which is better for .Net engine to build this query at run time
thank you Mr. Khumesh Kumawat
You would simply use your Skip(itemsInPage * pageNo).Take(itemsInPage) to do paging.
on my page, I need to show a list of tools.
var tools = _toolRepository.GetAll().Where(t => t.IsActive == true).OrderByDescending(t => t.PostDate).Take(50).ToList();
I also need to show how many Votes each tool got, I can write a separate query to do that, but that will double the number of queries.
is there a way to combine them together?
here's my database structure.
Tool
id
name
postDate
ToolVote
id
ToolId
UserId
How about:
var tools = _toolRepository.GetAll().Where(t => t.IsActive == true).OrderByDescending(t => t.PostDate).Take(50).Select(tool => new { Tool = tool, votes = ToolVotes.Where(tv => tv.ToolID == tool.ToolID)} ).ToList();
Assuming that you have 1 to * relationship you can use left join.
I can't test this query but it should look something like this
var query = (from tool in _toolRepository.GetAll().Where(t => t.IsActive == true).OrderByDescending(t => t.PostDate).Take(50)
join toolVote in toolVotes on tool.id equals toolVote.ToolId
into toolsTemp
from toolTemp in toolsTemp.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new { Tool = tool, Count = toolTemp == null ? 0 : toolTemp.Count})
.ToList();
I tried to use the suggestion provided here for using In operator in linq but, i am not able to convert my requirement into LINQ statement.
Below is the SQL query which i need to convert to Linq
select *
from navigator_user_field_property
where user_id = 'albert'
and field_id in (
select field_id
from navigator_entity_field_master
where entity_id = 1
and use_type = 0)
order by field_id
I want this to be converted to a Efficient Linq.
Most of the answers deal with the predetermined list of string array which is not working in my case.
Thanks
Looks like a join to me:
var query = from navigator in db.NavigatorUserFieldProperties
where navigator.UserId == "albert"
join field in db.NavigatorEntityFieldMasters
.Where(f => f.EntityId == 1 && f.UseType == 0)
on navigator.FieldId equals field.FieldId
select navigator;
Note that this will return the same value multiple times if there are multiple fields with the same ID - but I suspect that's not the case.
You could do a more literal translation like this:
var query = from navigator in db.NavigatorUserFieldProperties
where navigator.UserId == "albert" &&
db.NavigatorEntityFieldMasters
.Where(f => f.EntityId == 1 && f.UseType == 0)
.select(f => f.FieldId)
.Contains(navigator.FieldId)
select navigator;
... and that may end up translating to the same SQL... but I'd personally go with the join.
Here is an efficient and readable LINQ query:
var fields =
from field in db.navigator_entity_field_masters
where field.entity_id == 1 && field.user_type == 0
select field;
var properties =
from property in db.navigator_user_field_properties
where property.user_id == "albert"
where fields.Contains(property.field)
select property;
Look mama!! Without joins ;-)