Combined Lambda dynamically created - linq

I want to build lambda expression :
Expression<Func<MyObject, bool>> predicate = PredicateBuilder.False<MyObject>();
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(MyObject), "f");
if (myOperator == OperateurEnum.EG)
{
var body = Expression.Equal(
Expression.PropertyOrField(param, myProperty),
Expression.Constant(myFilterValue)
);
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<MyObject, bool>>(body, param);
predicate = predicate.Or(lambda);
}
else if (myOperator == OperateurEnum.CT)
{
var body = Expression.Call(
Expression.PropertyOrField(param, myProperty),
"StartsWith",
null,
Expression.Constant(myFilterValue)
);
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<MyObject, bool>>(body, param);
predicate = predicate.Or(lambda);
}
else if ()
{
...
}
var myEx = Expression.Lambda<Func<MyObject, bool>>(predicate.Body, param);
Func<MyObject, bool> lambdaDelegate = myEx.Compile();
I use PredicateBuilder, but I got this error :
variable 'f' of type 'ProactisMvc.Web.ProactisWsServiceReference.Offre' referenced from scope '', but it is not defined
What's wrong ? Is there another solution ?

This last bit is wrong:
var myEx = Expression.Lambda<Func<MyObject, bool>>(predicate.Body, param);
Func<MyObject, bool> lambdaDelegate = myEx.Compile();
You are creating a new expression using predicate's body but with some other parameter. This will mean that that the parameter-expressions used inside the expression- body will not be the ones accepted by the top-level expression!
Perhaps you are confused by PredicateBuilder's magic, but all .Or is doing is combining the two predicates using an || expression, invoking the second predicate using the first predicate's parameter.
I think you just want:
var myDelegate = predicate.Compile();

Related

How to produce a Subquery using non-generic Lambda2

i'm very new to LINQ? please help me
How would you translate the following generic Lambda function into a lambda expression :
objects.Where(objects=>values.Contains(objects.DistrictId) );
I'm trying to create a full lambda expression without any or direct call. Something like :
var innerItem = Expression.Parameter(typeof(Objects), "objects");
var innerProperty = Expression.Property(innerItem, "ID");
var innerMethodExpression = Expression.Call(innerProperty,null);
var innerLambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<Objects, bool>>(innerMethodExpression, innerItem);
var outerItem = Expression.Parameter(typeof(int[]), "item");
var containsMethod = typeof(string).GetMethod("Contains", new[] { typeof(int) });
var containsMethodExpression = Expression.Call(innerMethodExpression, containsMethod, innerLambda);
var outerLambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<Objects, bool>>(containsMethodExpression, outerItem);
collection = collection.AsQueryable<Objects>().Where(outerLambda);
But i can't understand what is wrong
In your example,
The Lambda function is
objects.Where(objects=>values.Contains(objects.DistrictId) );
so your lambda expression should be
Expression<Func<Objects, int>> ObjectsExp = objects=>values.Contains(objects.DistrictId);
Assume DistrictId is integer type for your out Result.

Determine the return type of dynamic type

I have chosen to create an anonymous type for temporary projection in a LINQ Join query. I am using ExpressionTrees, to build the query at runtime. I donot know if the following code would help me with creating a temporary projected sequence.
Here is the code that does the temporary Projection:
private Expression<Func<EntityObject, EntityObject,dynamic>> TempProjectionExpression
{
get
{
return (o, p) => new
{
o = o,
p = p
};
}
}
My Join Query using Expression Trees is given below.
public IQueryable<dynamic> GetQueryExpressionresults3<T, U, V>(IQueryable<T> aEntityCollection1, IQueryable<U> aEntityCollection2, Type[] _TypeArguments ,V _anonymousType, string aPropertyName)
where T : EntityObject
where U : EntityObject
{
ParameterExpression pe = Expression.Parameter(typeof(U), "o");
ParameterExpression pe1 = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "p");
//This should be populated from UI
Expression me = Expression.Property(pe1, typeof(T).GetProperty(aPropertyName));
//This should be populated from UI
Expression me1 = Expression.Property(pe, typeof(U).GetProperty(aPropertyName));
LambdaExpression le = Expression.Lambda<Func<T, int>>(me, new ParameterExpression[] { pe1 });
LambdaExpression le1 = Expression.Lambda<Func<U, int>>(me1, new ParameterExpression[] { pe });
_TypeArguments = new Type[] { aEntityCollection1 .ElementType, aEntityCollection2.ElementType, le.Body.Type, typeof(MovieCollections)};
//_TypeArguments = _TypeArguments.Concat(new Type[] { le.Body.Type, typeof(object) }).ToArray();
MethodCallExpression JoinCallExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), "Join", _TypeArguments, aEntityCollection1.Expression, aEntityCollection2.Expression
, le, le1, TempProjectionExpression);
var oResult = aEntityCollection1.Provider.CreateQuery(JoinCallExpression) as IQueryable<dynamic>;
return oResult;
}
Now the question is, i would like to determine the return type of the TempProjectionExpression, i.e. typeof(dynamic). Is this possible? If yes, then how?
typeof(dynamic) can't do any better than System.Object (which the compiler won't even try to do) which isn't a very interesting result.
You can use returnedResult.GetType(), though, to get its runtime type.
Since dynamic puts off type resolution to runtime, there's no way to tell what the return is before something is actually returned without doing type analysis on your expression tree worthy of the C# compiler itself.

Lambda Expressions: How to analyze how a delegate is stored as an Expression?

This code:
var lambda = Products.Where( p => p.name == "chair");
can be written like this code:
var propertyName = "name";
var value = "chair";
var arg = Expression.Parameter(typeof(Product), "p");
var property = typeof(Product).GetProperty(propertyName);
var comparison = Expression.Equal(
Expression.MakeMemberAccess(arg, property),
Expression.Constant(value));
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<Product, bool>>(comparison, arg).Compile();
If I have any Lambda expression like this:
Products.Where( p => p.name.Contains("chair") );
How could I determine how to write the Expression like above? Is there a way to "debug" the expression tree so that I can program it manually?
EDIT:
I saw promising answers here but it didn't end up with working code. Here's their version (the error is the StartsWith method is given a non-string value):
ParameterExpression p = Expression.Parameter(typeof(Product), "p");
MethodInfo method = typeof(string).GetMethod("StartsWith",
new[] { typeof(string) });
var containsMethodExp = Expression.Call(p, method,
Expression.Constant("root"), p);
Just let the compiler do the work.
If you instead of
func<string,bool> MyLambda = p => p.name.Contains("chair");
write
Expression<func<string,bool>> MyExpression = p => p.name.Contains("chair");
Then you get a nice "MyExpression" that you can inspect in a debugger.

Calling System.Linq.Queryable methods using types resolved at runtime

I'm building a LINQ-based query generator.
One of the features is being able to specify an arbitrary server-side projection as part of the query definition. For example:
class CustomerSearch : SearchDefinition<Customer>
{
protected override Expression<Func<Customer, object>> GetProjection()
{
return x => new
{
Name = x.Name,
Agent = x.Agent.Code
Sales = x.Orders.Sum(o => o.Amount)
};
}
}
Since the user must then be able to sort on the projection properties (as opposed to Customer properties), I recreate the expression as a Func<Customer,anonymous type> instead of Func<Customer, object>:
//This is a method on SearchDefinition
IQueryable Transform(IQueryable source)
{
var projection = GetProjection();
var properProjection = Expression.Lambda(projection.Body,
projection.Parameters.Single());
In order to return the projected query, I'd love to be able to do this (which, in fact, works in an almost identical proof of concept):
return Queryable.Select((IQueryable<TRoot>)source, (dynamic)properProjection);
TRoot is the type parameter in SearchDefinition. This results in the following exception:
Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder.RuntimeBinderException:
The best overloaded method match for
'System.Linq.Queryable.Select<Customer,object>(System.Linq.IQueryable<Customer>,
System.Linq.Expressions.Expression<System.Func<Customer,object>>)'
has some invalid arguments
at CallSite.Target(Closure , CallSite , Type , IQueryable`1 , Object )
at System.Dynamic.UpdateDelegates.UpdateAndExecute3[T0,T1,T2,TRet]
(CallSite site, T0 arg0, T1 arg1, T2 arg2)
at SearchDefinition`1.Transform(IQueryable source) in ...
If you look closely, it's inferring the generic parameters incorrectly: Customer,object instead of Customer,anonymous type, which is the actual type of the properProjection expression (double-checked)
My workaround is using reflection. But with generic arguments, it's a real mess:
var genericSelectMethod = typeof(Queryable).GetMethods().Single(
x => x.Name == "Select" &&
x.GetParameters()[1].ParameterType.GetGenericArguments()[0]
.GetGenericArguments().Length == 2);
var selectMethod = genericSelectMethod.MakeGenericMethod(source.ElementType,
projectionBody.Type);
return (IQueryable)selectMethod.Invoke(null, new object[]{ source, projection });
Does anyone know of a better way?
Update: the reason why dynamic fails is that anonymous types are defined as internal. That's why it worked using a proof-of-concept project, where everything was in the same assembly.
I'm cool with that. I'd still like to find a cleaner way to find the right Queryable.Select overload.
The fix is so simple it hurts:
[assembly: InternalsVisibleTo("My.Search.Lib.Assembly")]
Here's my test as requested. This on a Northwind database and this works fine for me.
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var dc = new NorthwindDataContext();
var source = dc.Categories;
Expression<Func<Category, object>> expr =
c => new
{
c.CategoryID,
c.CategoryName,
};
var oldParameter = expr.Parameters.Single();
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(oldParameter.Type, oldParameter.Name);
var body = expr.Body;
body = RebindParameter(body, oldParameter, parameter);
Console.WriteLine("Parameter Type: {0}", parameter.Type);
Console.WriteLine("Body Type: {0}", body.Type);
var newExpr = Expression.Lambda(body, parameter);
Console.WriteLine("Old Expression Type: {0}", expr.Type);
Console.WriteLine("New Expression Type: {0}", newExpr.Type);
var query = Queryable.Select(source, (dynamic)newExpr);
Console.WriteLine(query);
foreach (var item in query)
{
Console.WriteLine(item);
Console.WriteLine("\t{0}", item.CategoryID.GetType());
Console.WriteLine("\t{0}", item.CategoryName.GetType());
}
Console.Write("Press any key to continue . . . ");
Console.ReadKey(true);
Console.WriteLine();
}
static Expression RebindParameter(Expression expr, ParameterExpression oldParam, ParameterExpression newParam)
{
switch (expr.NodeType)
{
case ExpressionType.Parameter:
var parameterExpression = expr as ParameterExpression;
return (parameterExpression.Name == oldParam.Name)
? newParam
: parameterExpression;
case ExpressionType.MemberAccess:
var memberExpression = expr as MemberExpression;
return memberExpression.Update(
RebindParameter(memberExpression.Expression, oldParam, newParam));
case ExpressionType.AndAlso:
case ExpressionType.OrElse:
case ExpressionType.Equal:
case ExpressionType.NotEqual:
case ExpressionType.LessThan:
case ExpressionType.LessThanOrEqual:
case ExpressionType.GreaterThan:
case ExpressionType.GreaterThanOrEqual:
var binaryExpression = expr as BinaryExpression;
return binaryExpression.Update(
RebindParameter(binaryExpression.Left, oldParam, newParam),
binaryExpression.Conversion,
RebindParameter(binaryExpression.Right, oldParam, newParam));
case ExpressionType.New:
var newExpression = expr as NewExpression;
return newExpression.Update(
newExpression.Arguments
.Select(arg => RebindParameter(arg, oldParam, newParam)));
case ExpressionType.Call:
var methodCallExpression = expr as MethodCallExpression;
return methodCallExpression.Update(
RebindParameter(methodCallExpression.Object, oldParam, newParam),
methodCallExpression.Arguments
.Select(arg => RebindParameter(arg, oldParam, newParam)));
default:
return expr;
}
}
Also, dynamic method resolution doesn't really do much for you in this case as there are only two very distinct overloads of Select(). Ultimately you just need to remember that you won't have any static type checking on your results since you don't have any static type information. With that said, this will also work for you (using the above code example):
var query = Queryable.Select(source, expr).Cast<dynamic>();
Console.WriteLine(query);
foreach (var item in query)
{
Console.WriteLine(item);
Console.WriteLine("\t{0}", item.CategoryID.GetType());
Console.WriteLine("\t{0}", item.CategoryName.GetType());
}

Dynamically Adding a GroupBy to a Lambda Expression

Ok, I'll admit that I don't entirely "get" lambda expressions and LINQ expression trees yet; a lot of what I'm doing is cutting and pasting and seeing what works. I've looked over lots of documentation, but I still haven't found the my "aha" moment yet.
With that being said...
I'm attempting to dynamically add a GroupBy expression to my Linq expression. I followed the question here:
Need help creating Linq.Expression to Enumerable.GroupBy
and tried to implement what I saw there.
First off, I've got entity classes for my database, and a table calledObjCurLocViewNormalized
I've got an method that does the initial call,
public IQueryable<ObjCurLocViewNormalized> getLocations()
{
IQueryable<ObjCurLocViewNormalized> res = (from loc in tms.ObjCurLocViewNormalized
select loc);
return res;
}
so I can call:
IQueryable<MetAmericanLinqDataModel.ObjCurLocViewNormalized> locations = american.getLocations();
No problem so far.
Now, I want to group by an arbitrary column, with a call like this:
var grouped = locations.addGroupBy(childLocationFieldName);
Right now, I have a method :
static public System.Linq.IQueryable<System.Linq.IGrouping<string, TResult>> addGroupBy<TResult>(this IQueryable<TResult> query, string columnName)
{
var providerType = query.Provider.GetType();
// Find the specific type parameter (the T in IQueryable<T>)
var iqueryableT = providerType.FindInterfaces((ty, obj) => ty.IsGenericType && ty.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(IQueryable<>), null).FirstOrDefault();
var tableType = iqueryableT.GetGenericArguments()[0];
var tableName = tableType.Name;
var data = Expression.Parameter(iqueryableT, "query");
var arg = Expression.Parameter(tableType, tableName);
var nameProperty = Expression.PropertyOrField(arg, columnName);
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<TResult, string>>(nameProperty, arg);
var expression = Expression.Call(typeof(Enumerable),
"GroupBy",
new Type[] { tableType, typeof(string) },
data,
lambda);
var predicate = Expression.Lambda<Func<TResult, String>>(expression, arg); // this is the line that produces the error I describe below
var result = query.GroupBy(predicate).AsQueryable();
return result;
}
All this compiles ok, but when I run it, I get the error:
System.ArgumentException: Expression of type 'System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable`1[System.Linq.IGrouping`2[System.String,MetAmericanLinqDataModel.ObjCurLocViewNormalized]]' cannot be used for return type 'System.String'
and the error comes from this line:
var predicate = Expression.Lambda<Func<TResult, String>>(expression, arg);
I'm copying and adapting this code from successful work I did in dynamically added Where clauses to an expression. So I'm sort of stabbing in the dark here.
If anyone out there can help to shed some light on this, Obviously posting complete working code and doing all my thinking for me would be great :), but if you could just lay out just why this is wrong, or how to wrap my head around these concepts, that would be great. If you can point to documentation that can really help be bridge the gap between the basics of lambda expressions, and building dynamic expression trees, that would be great. There's obviously big holes in my knowledge, but I think this information could be useful to others.
thanks everyone for your time, and of course if I find the answer elsewhere, I'll post it here.
Thanks again.
Don
The solution should be pretty simple:
public static IQueryable<IGrouping<TColumn, T>> DynamicGroupBy<T, TColumn>(
IQueryable<T> source, string column)
{
PropertyInfo columnProperty = typeof(T).GetProperty(column);
var sourceParm = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "x");
var propertyReference = Expression.Property(sourceParm, columnProperty);
var groupBySelector = Expression.Lambda<Func<T, TColumn>>(propertyReference, sourceParm);
return source.GroupBy(groupBySelector);
}
Assuming a sample class like this:
public class TestClass
{
public string TestProperty { get; set; }
}
You invoke it like this:
var list = new List<TestClass>();
var queryable = list.AsQueryable();
DynamicGroupBy<TestClass, string>(queryable, "TestProperty");
All that you need to do to make it work is the following:
static public IQueryable<IGrouping<TValue, TResult>> addGroupBy<TValue, TResult>(
this IQueryable<TResult> query, string columnName)
{
var providerType = query.Provider.GetType();
// Find the specific type parameter (the T in IQueryable<T>)
const object EmptyfilterCriteria = null;
var iqueryableT = providerType
.FindInterfaces((ty, obj) => ty.IsGenericType && ty.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(IQueryable<>), EmptyfilterCriteria)
.FirstOrDefault();
Type tableType = iqueryableT.GetGenericArguments()[0];
string tableName = tableType.Name;
ParameterExpression data = Expression.Parameter(iqueryableT, "query");
ParameterExpression arg = Expression.Parameter(tableType, tableName);
MemberExpression nameProperty = Expression.PropertyOrField(arg, columnName);
Expression<Func<TResult, TValue>> lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<TResult, TValue>>(nameProperty, arg);
//here you already have delegate in the form of "TResult => TResult.columnName"
return query.GroupBy(lambda);
/*var expression = Expression.Call(typeof(Enumerable),
"GroupBy",
new Type[] { tableType, typeof(string) },
data,
lambda);
var predicate = Expression.Lambda<Func<TResult, String>>(expression, arg); // this is the line that produces the error I describe below
var result = query.GroupBy(predicate).AsQueryable();
return result;*/
}
And you will call you expression in the following manner:
var grouped = locations.addGroupBy<string, ObjCurLocViewNormalized>(childLocationFieldName);
First generic parameter "string" us used for saying explicilty what type of elements you a grouping on. For example you can group by "int" field and method call will be like following:
var grouped = locations.addGroupBy<int, ObjCurLocViewNormalized>(someFieldNameWithTheTypeOfInt);
Edit
Just to finish this solution your way:
//return query.GroupBy(lambda);
MethodCallExpression expression = Expression.Call(typeof (Enumerable),
"GroupBy",
new[] { typeof(TResult), typeof(TValue) },
data,
lambda);
var result = Expression.Lambda(expression, data).Compile().DynamicInvoke(query);
return ((IEnumerable<IGrouping<TValue, TResult>>)result).AsQueryable();

Resources