A little history behind this - I'm trying to write a nagios plugin to detect if an nfs mount is unmounted and if a mount is stale, which is where I'm running into a problem.
What I'm trying to achieve is detecting if a mount is stale. The problem I'm trying to work around is the fact that a stale nfs handle causes any action on that directory to hang and timeout after 3-4 minutes. By forcing a timeout onto a stat command inside an nfs mounted directory with read, I should be able to work around that problem.
So I picked up this snippet somewhere, which works perfectly when run manually from the cli on an nfs client (where /www/logs/foo is a stale nfs mount)
$ read -t 2 < <(stat -t /www/logs/foo/*); echo $?
1
The problem comes when I try to incorporate this snippet into a script like so (snippet attached, full script attached at the end):
list_of_mounts=$(grep nfs /etc/fstab | grep -v ^# | awk '{print $2'} | xargs)
exitstatus $LINENO
for X in $list_of_mounts; do
AM_I_EXCLUDED=`echo " $* " | grep " $X " -q; echo $?`
if [ "$AM_I_EXCLUDED" -eq "0" ]; then
echo "" >> /dev/null
#check to see if mount is mounted according to /proc/mounts
elif [ ! `grep --quiet "$X " /proc/mounts; echo $?` -eq 0 ]; then
#mount is not mounted at all, add to list to remount
remount_list=`echo $remount_list $X`;
#now make sure its not stale
elif [ ! "`read -t 2 < <(stat -t $X/*) ; echo $?`" -eq "0" ]; then
stalemount_list=`echo $stalemount_list $X`
fi
Gives me this error:
/usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_nfs_mounts.sh: command substitution: line 46: syntax error near unexpected token `<'
/usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_nfs_mounts.sh: command substitution: line 46: `read -t 2 < <( '
/usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_nfs_mounts.sh: command substitution: line 46: syntax error near unexpected token `)'
/usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_nfs_mounts.sh: command substitution: line 46: ` ) ; echo $?'
/usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_nfs_mounts.sh: line 46: [: stat -t /www/logs/foo/*: integer expression expected
I was able to work around the syntax error by using " read -t 2<<< $(stat -t $X/)" instead of " read -t 2< <(stat -t $X/)", however stat no longer benefits from the timeout on read, which takes me back to the original problem.
While I'm open to new solutions, I'm also curious as to what behavior might be causing this shell vs script difference.
Full nagios check:
#!/bin/bash
usage() {
echo "
Usage:
check_nfs_mounts.sh
It just works.
Optional: include an argument to exclude that mount point
"
}
ok() {
echo "OK - $*"; exit 0
exit
}
warning() {
echo "WARNING - $*"; exit 1
exit
}
critical() {
echo "CRITICAL - $*"; exit 2
exit
}
unknown() {
echo "UNKNOWN - $*"; exit 3
exit
}
exitstatus() {
if [ ! "$?" -eq "0" ] ;
then unknown "Plugin failure - exit code not OK - error line $*"
fi
}
# Get Mounts
list_of_mounts=$(grep nfs /etc/fstab | grep -v ^# | awk '{print $2'} | xargs)
exitstatus $LINENO
for X in $list_of_mounts; do
AM_I_EXCLUDED=`echo " $* " | grep " $X " -q; echo $?`
if [ "$AM_I_EXCLUDED" -eq "0" ]; then
echo "" >> /dev/null
#check to see if mount is mounted according to /proc/mounts
elif [ ! `grep --quiet "$X " /proc/mounts; echo $?` -eq 0 ]; then
#mount is not mounted at all, add to list to remount
remount_list=`echo $remount_list $X`;
#now make sure its not stale
elif [ ! "`read -t 2 <<< $(stat -t $X/*) ; echo $?`" -eq "0" ]; then
stalemount_list=`echo $stalemount_list $X`
fi
done
#Make sure result is a number
if [ -n "$remount_list" ] && [ -n "$stalemount_list" ]; then
critical "Not mounted: $remount_list , Stale mounts: $stalemount_list"
elif [ -n "$remount_list" ] && [ -z "$stalemount_list"]; then
critical "Not mounted: $remount_list"
elif [ -n "$stalemount_list" ] && [ -n "$remount_list" ]; then
critical "Stale mount: $stalemount_list"
elif [ -z "$stalemount_list" ] && [ -z "$remount_list" ]; then
ok "All mounts mounted"
fi
You need to make sure your shebang specifies Bash:
#!/bin/bash
The reason for the error message is that on your system, Bash is symlinked to /bin/sh which is used when there's no shebang or when it's #!/bin/sh.
In this case, Bash is run as if you had started it with bash --posix which disables some non-POSIX features such as process substitution (<()), but confusingly not others such as here strings (<<<).
Change your shebang and you should be OK.
You can save the output of a subshell in this way:
$ read a < <(echo one)
$ echo $a
one
Or in this way (if you just want to process $a and forget it:
$ ( echo one; echo two) | (read a; echo $a)
one
The first variant will work only in bash. Bourne Shell (/bin/sh) does not support this syntax. May be that is the reason why you get the error message. May be you script is interpreted by /bin/sh not by /bin/bash
Related
I can't tell if something I'm trying here is simply impossible or if I'm really lacking knowledge in bash's syntax. This is the first script I've written.
I've got a Nextcloud instance that I am backing up daily using a script. I want to log the output of the script as it runs to a log file. This is working fine, but I wanted to see if I could also pipe the Nextcloud occ command's output to the log file too.
I've got an if statement here checking if the file scan fails:
if ! sudo -u "$web_user" "$nextcloud_dir/occ" files:scan --all; then
Print "Error: Failed to scan files. Are you in maintenance mode?"
fi
This works fine and I am able to handle the error if the system cannot execute the command. The error string above is sent to this function:
Print()
{
if [[ "$logging" -eq 1 ]] && [ "$quiet_mode" = "No" ]; then
echo "$1" | tee -a "$log_file"
elif [[ "$logging" -eq 1 ]] && [ "$quiet_mode" = "Yes" ]; then
echo "$1" >> "$log_file"
elif [[ "$logging" -eq 0 ]] && [ "$quiet_mode" = "No" ]; then
echo "$1"
fi
}
How can I make it so the output of the occ command is also piped to the Print() function so it can be logged to the console and log file?
I've tried piping the command after ! using | Print without success.
Any help would be appreciated, cheers!
The Print function doesn't read standard input so there's no point piping data to it. One possible way to do what you want with the current implementation of Print is:
if ! occ_output=$(sudo -u "$web_user" "$nextcloud_dir/occ" files:scan --all 2>&1); then
Print "Error: Failed to scan files. Are you in maintenance mode?"
fi
Print "'occ' output: $occ_output"
Since there is only one line in the body of the if statement you could use || instead:
occ_output=$(sudo -u "$web_user" "$nextcloud_dir/occ" files:scan --all 2>&1) \
|| Print "Error: Failed to scan files. Are you in maintenance mode?"
Print "'occ' output: $occ_output"
The 2>&1 causes both standard output and error output of occ to be captured to occ_output.
Note that the body of the Print function could be simplified to:
[[ $quiet_mode == No ]] && printf '%s\n' "$1"
(( logging )) && printf '%s\n' "$1" >> "$log_file"
See the accepted, and excellent, answer to Why is printf better than echo? for an explanation of why I replaced echo "$1" with printf '%s\n' "$1".
How's this? A bit unorthodox perhaps.
Print()
{
case $# in
0) cat;;
*) echo "$#";;
esac |
if [[ "$logging" -eq 1 ]] && [ "$quiet_mode" = "No" ]; then
tee -a "$log_file"
elif [[ "$logging" -eq 1 ]] && [ "$quiet_mode" = "Yes" ]; then
cat >> "$log_file"
elif [[ "$logging" -eq 0 ]] && [ "$quiet_mode" = "No" ]; then
cat
fi
}
With this, you can either
echo "hello mom" | Print
or
Print "hello mom"
and so your invocation could be refactored to
if ! sudo -u "$web_user" "$nextcloud_dir/occ" files:scan --all; then
echo "Error: Failed to scan files. Are you in maintenance mode?"
fi |
Print
The obvious drawback is that piping into a function loses the exit code of any failure earlier in the pipeline.
For a more traditional approach, keep your original Print definition and refactor the calling code to
if output=$(sudo -u "$web_user" "$nextcloud_dir/occ" files:scan --all 2>&1); then
: nothing
else
Print "error $?: $output"
Print "Error: Failed to scan files. Are you in maintenance mode?"
fi
I would imagine that the error message will be printed to standard error, not standard output; hence the addition of 2>&1
I included the error code $? in the error message in case that would be useful.
Sending and receiving end of a pipe must be a process, typically represented by an executable command. An if statement is not a process. You can of course put such a statement into a process. For example,
echo a | (
if true
then
cat
fi )
causes cat to write a to stdout, because the parenthesis put it into a child process.
UPDATE: As was pointed out in a comment, the explicit subprocess is not needed. One can also do a
echo a | if true
then
cat
fi
The goal is to create a simple trash utility using a Bourne shell (it's part of an assignment). I am receiving the following error: "line 17: Syntax Error: Unexpected end of file"
I have been staring at the code for a few hours now and I can't see the mistake (probably something simple I am overlooking)
#!/bin/sh
if [$# == 0] ;then
echo "Usage: trash -l | -p | { filename }*"
else
if $1 == '-l'; then
dir $HOME/.trash
else if $1=='-p'; then
rm $HOME/.trash/*
else
for i in ${} ;do
mv i $HOME/.trash
done
fi
fi
Thanks!
This is what I achieved using shellcheck:
#!/bin/sh
if [ $# -eq 0 ] ;then
echo "Usage: trash -l | -p | { filename }*"
else
if [ "$1" = '-l' ]; then
dir "$HOME"/.trash
elif "$1"=='-p'; then
rm "$HOME"/.trash/*
else
for i in ${} ;do
mv "$i" "$HOME"/.trash
done
fi
I receive an email with a syntax bash error from the cron deamon on my server like:
/etc/cron.daily/maldet: line 29: syntax error near unexpected token `fi'
/etc/cron.daily/maldet: line 29: `fi'
I tried some modifications but without success, bash is not my strong language.
The cron daily file:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
export PATH=/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:$PATH
export LMDCRON=1
. /usr/local/maldetect/conf.maldet
if [ -f "/usr/local/maldetect/conf.maldet.cron" ]; then
. /usr/local/maldetect/conf.maldet.cron
fi
find=`which find 2> /dev/null`
if [ "$find" ]; then
# prune any quarantine/session/tmp data older than 7 days
tmpdirs="/usr/local/maldetect/tmp /usr/local/maldetect/sess /usr/local/maldetect/quarantine /usr/local/maldetect/pub"
for dir in $tmpdirs; do
if [ -d "$dir" ]; then
$find $dir -type f -mtime +7 -print0 | xargs -0 rm -f >> /dev/null 2>&1
fi
done
fi
if [ "$autoupdate_version" == "1" ] || [ "$autoupdate_signatures" == "1" ]; then
# sleep for random 1-999s interval to better distribute upstream load
sleep $(echo $RANDOM | cut -c1-3) >> /dev/null 2>&1
fi
if [ "$autoupdate_version" == "1" ]; then
# check for new release version
/usr/local/maldetect/maldet -d >> /dev/null 2>&1
fi
if [ "$autoupdate_signatures" == "1" ]; then
# check for new definition set
/usr/local/maldetect/maldet -u >> /dev/null 2>&1
fi
...
Any idea why I'm getting this?
The script as shown is syntactically correct according to bash -n script.
A syntax error could be caused by malformed sourced scripts. What do bash -n /usr/local/maldetect/conf.maldet and bash -n /usr/local/maldetect/conf.maldet.cron say?
If these are ok, maybe a carriage return (\r) snuck in somewhere? To test, run od -c script and look for a \r.
I need help with replacing the following script with a different format where a configuration file, and a loop is used.
[FedoraC]$ cat script.sh
#!/bin/bash
grep -q /tmp /etc/fstab
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "True"
else
echo "False"
fi
mount | grep ' /tmp' | grep nodev
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "True"
else
echo "False"
fi
mount | grep /tmp | grep nosuid
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "True"
else
echo "False"
fi
So far I have the following script which should take the values from a source/conf file and run each command found in the conf file one by one. After the command is executed the output would be "True" or "False"
conf file is formed by Unix commands: /opt/conf1
[FedoraC]$ cat conf1
grep -q /tmp /etc/fstab
mount | grep /tmp | grep nodev
mount | grep /tmp | grep nosuid
mount | grep /tmp | grep noexec
[FedoraC]$ cat new_script.sh
#!/bin/bash
. conf1
for i in $#;
do $i
if [ $i -eq 0 ]; then
echo "Passed"
else
echo "Failed"
fi
done
Instead of displaying the output based on the conditional statement, the script runs each line one by one from conf1, and not echo messages are seen.
Can I get some help please.
try this:
#! bin/bash
while read L; do
echo $L'; exit $?'|sh
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo Pass
else
echo Failed
fi
done < conf1
The more robust and canonical way to do this would be to have a directory /opt/conf1.d/, and put each of your lines as an executable script in this directory. You can then do
for file in /opt/conf1.d/*
do
[[ -x $file ]] || continue
if "$file"
then
echo "Passed"
else
echo "Failed"
fi
done
This has the advantages of supporting multi-line scripts, or scripts with more complex logic. It also lets you write the check script in any language, and lets scripts and packages add and remove contents easily and non-interactively.
If you really want to stick with your design, you can do it with:
while IFS= read -r line
do
if ( eval "$line" )
then
echo "Passed"
else
echo "Failed"
fi
done < /opt/conf1
The parentheses in the if statement runs eval in a subshell, so that lines can't interfere with each other by setting variables or exiting your entire loop.
I wrote a little bash script called "wp", which upload files to an ftp server. It uses the wput utility. It takes the list of files from a text file. When uploading is ready it comments out the line with a double cross in the text file. The success of the upload is detected according to the last line in the logfile. My question is how can I avoid multiple starting of my script? I am trying to detect with pgrep if the instance is running, but doesn't work correctly:
#!/bin/bash
if [ "$(pgrep ^wp$|wc -l)" -eq "2" ]
then
echo "$(pgrep ^wp$)"
echo "$(pgrep ^wp$|wc -l)"
echo "wp script is starting..."
else
echo "$(pgrep ^wp$)"
echo "$(pgrep ^wp$|wc -l)"
echo "wp script is already running!"
exit
fi
server="ftp://username:password#ftp.ftpserver.com"
logfile=~/uploads.log
listfile=~/uploads.txt
list_backup=~/uploads_bak000.txt
while read f;
do
ret=""
if [ "${f:0:1}" = "#" -o "$f"1 = 1 ]
then
if [ "$f"1 = 1 ]
then
:
#echo "invalid string: "$f
else
#first character is remark sign # then empty command -> :
echo "remark line skipped: "$f
fi
else
#while string $ret is empty
while [ -z "$ret" ]
do
wput "$f" --tries=-1 "$server" 2>&1|tee -a $logfile #> /dev/null
ret=$(tail -n 1 "$logfile"|grep "FINISHED\|Nothing\|Skipped\|Transfered")
done
if [ -n "$ret" ]
then
cat $listfile > $list_backup
awk -v f="$f" '{if ($0==f && $0!~/#/) print "#" $0; else print $0;}' $list_backup > $listfile
fi
fi
done < $listfile
There are quick-n-dirty solutions that use ps with grep (don't do this).
It is better to use a lock file as a "mutex". A nice way of doing this is by using a directory as a lock file (http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/045).
I would also suggest taking a look at:
http://mywiki.wooledge.org/ProcessManagement#How_do_I_make_sure_only_one_copy_of_my_script_can_run_at_a_time.3F
, which mentions use of setlock(http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/setlock.html) that abstracts the lock file handling for you.