I use this tutorial to create Plugin Architecture in my solution and I also use ninject for the first time:
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?aid=358360&av=526320&msg=4308834#xx4308834xx
Now in MVC application while user is in the process of checkout I get the payment method he selects and need to retrieve the plugin for the selected payment method. I have succeeded in retrieving plugin controller this way, though I have no idea whether it is safe or acceptable practice:
Type type = Type.GetType(paymentMethod.PaymentMethodPluginType);
//get plugin controller
var paymentController = ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance(type) as BasePaymentController;
//get validations from plugin
var warnings = paymentController.ValidatePaymentForm(form);
//get payment info from plugin
var paymentInfo = paymentController.GetPaymentInfo(form);
//…
I also need to access a plugin class for processing the payment.
I have an interface IPaymentMethod
public partial interface IPaymentMethod
{
void PostProcessPayment (PostProcessPaymentRequest postprocessPaymentRequest);
}
And plugin PaymentProcessor like this
public class PluginPaymentProcessor :IPaymentMethod
{
public void PostProcessPayment (PostProcessPaymentRequest postprocessPaymentRequest)
{
///
}
Now in MVC project I try to access PostProcessPayment method this way
IPaymentMethod pluginpaymentmethod = ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance<IPaymentMethod>(paymentMethod.PaymentProcessor);
here paymentMethod.PaymentProcessor is “MyApp.Plugins.MyPlugin.PluginPaymentProcessor, MyApp.Plugins.MyPlugin,Version=1.0.0.0,Culture=neutral,PublicKeyToken=null”
And want to use pluginpaymentmethod like i do in controller example
pluginpaymentmethod.PostProcessPayment(postProcessPaymentRequest);
but it throws error that resource is not found and pluginpaymentmethod is not loaded. How can I fix it or can you suggest any tutorial with similar implementations? Thank you.
assuming you have a concrete class called MyPlugin which has the IPaymentMethod interface, then your ninject bindings should look a bit like:
private static void RegisterServices(IKernel kernel){
kernel.Bind<IPaymentMethod>().To<MyPlugin>().InRequestScope();
}
check that this is in place in your NinjectWebCommon.cs class under the App_Start folder. A trickier scenario might be that IPaymentMethod has to be registered in the same way that the Ninject IKernel is bound:
kernel.Bind<Func<IKernel>>().ToMethod(ctx => () => new Bootstrapper().Kernel);
that would potentially be a trickier issue to work out.
Related
I'm in the process of building a web api in visual studio 2013 and want to authenticate using OWIN middleware and bearer tokens. However I already have a database and don't want to use Microsoft's new Identity framework as the majority of tables and columns that it auto generates I simply don't need.
Can anyone point me in the right direction of how to apply this type of authentication without having to use the Microsoft Identity framework?
My suggestion would be to use the framework but extend it to use your objects and infrastructure. I am currently in the middle of doing this and landed on this question. Here's how I've tackled it so far:
Step 1: Your own CustomUserObject
Write/Use your own "ApplicationUser" object. In the template project, you want to modify the "IdentityModels" file. It has ApplicationUser object defined in there. Assuming you already have all the properties from your existing app, you will need to add GenerateUserIdentityAsync() method but change the type of the parameter to UserManager manager). After the change, your method signature looks like this:
public async Task<ClaimsIdentity> GenerateUserIdentityAsync(UserManager<CustomUserObject> manager)
Step 2: Define your own IUserStore<> implementation
Add a new class CustomUserStore that implements IUserStore, like so:
public class CustomUserStore : IUserStore<CustomUserObject>
{
private readonly IUserManagerService _userManagerService;
public CustomUserStore(IUserManagerService userManagerService)
{
_userManagerService = userManagerService
}
//implementation code for all of the IUserStore methods here using
//userManagerService or your existing services/classes
}
I am using Unity to inject IUserManagementService's implementation above.
I have made use of the comprehensive UserManager class that comes with the Microsoft Identity framework but extended the framework to use my API for authentication and authorization. You could write your own UserManager but I found that it is pretty tedious and there is no reason why UserManager could work for most cases of Securing an app.
Step 3: Changes in the IdentityConfig.cs file
Change the class definition to make ApplicationUserManager class inherit from UserManager
You'll need to do the samething in the constructor of this class as well; i.e. have IUserStore. Modify the Create static method's first line to make use of the new store and a wrapper class that provides as a means to be a "DbContext" like so:
public static ApplicationUserManager Create(IdentityFactoryOptions<ApplicationUserManager> options, IOwinContext context)
{
var manager = new ApplicationUserManager(new ApplicationUserStore(context.Get<UserManagementServiceWrapper>()));
//modify the relevant lines after this to suit your needs
...
}
My UserManagementServiceWrapper looks like this (please note that I'm not too happy that it inherits from a concrete UserManagementService class that provides the methods to connect to the service that provides user data, I'm still building this out):
public class UserManagementServiceWrapper : UserManagementService, IDisposable
{
public void Dispose()
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
Step 4: Change the ApplicationDbContext class to return a UserManagementServiceWrapper instance
public class ApplicationDbContext : UserManagementServiceWrapper
{
public static UserManagementServiceWrapper Create()
{
return new UserManagementServiceWrapper();
}
}
And that is pretty much it. You still have to write the implementation for CustomUserStore object but everything should work.
Please note this is not boilerplate code and no where near "code review ready", as I said, I'm still digging deeper into this and building it out to use custom stores, data access objects, services etc. I thought you'll get a good start with some of the things that took me a couple of hours to figure out. I will blog about this when I have a good solution.
Hope this helps.
I prob. dont understand the question entirely but it looks like you are trying to do without the whole owin pipeline?
If not then..
You need to implement few interfaces related to users and roles described as below.
http://www.asp.net/identity/overview/extensibility/overview-of-custom-storage-providers-for-aspnet-identity
Have a look at the following post from Scott Allen
http://odetocode.com/blogs/scott/archive/2013/11/25/asp-net-core-identity.aspx
This way you can use your own tables, DAL and services to create UserManager and RoleManager objects.
Edit: Samples over here should give you some pointers.
Edit2: Custom User Store Example.
IRepository is the object which takes care of CRUD.
public class CustomUserStore : IUserStore<User>,....
{
private readonly IRepository _repository;
public CustomUserStore(IRepository repository)
{
if (repository == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("repository");
_repository = repository;
}
public Task CreateAsync(User user)
{
if (user == null) throw new ArgumentException("user");
_repository.User.Add(user);
return _repository.CommitAsync();
}
...
I'm trying to inject a second repository into my asp.net mvc 3 controller. And I cant get it to work, not sure where to "add another" using Ninject.
I have a void function in global.asa.cs
kernel.Bind<INewsRepository>().To<NewsRepository>();
And in my controller I have:
private INewsRepository _newsRepository;
private IContentRepository _contentRepository;
public NewsController(INewsRepository newsRepository, IContentRepository contentRepository)
{
this._newsRepository = newsRepository;
this._contentRepository = contentRepository;
}
How can I register IContentRepository for the NewsController as well?
I use autofac instead of Ninject but the basics stay the same.
If you got your first dependency injection working then you should be able to bind others as well. You just have to add a new binding in Application_Start() in your Global.asax.
So under your first binding do this as well:
kernel.Bind<IContentRepository>().To<ContentRepository>();
You can have as many bindings as you like.
First off it's a good practice to move the bootstrapping of your application into a separate location. This keeps your Global.asax clean.
You should also be using convention based registration. It will end up saving you lots of time for the bindings you don't need to customize.
So for you I'd probably suggest the following
public static class Bootstrapper()
{
public static void Bootstrap()
{
kernel.Scan( k =>
{
k.FromAssemblyContaining<INewsRepository>();
k.BindWithDefaultConventions();
});
}
}
And in your Global.asax you add this..
Bootstrapper.Bootstrap();
Then I would suggest you spend some time on Google reading about ninject conventions.
What's a good way to validate a model when information external to the model is required in order for the validation to take place? For example, consider the following model:
public class Rating {
public string Comment { get; set; }
public int RatingLevel { get; set; }
}
The system administrator can then set the RatingLevels for which a comment is required. These settings are available through a settings service.
So, in order to fully validate the model I need information external to it, in this case the settings service.
I've considered the following so far:
Inject the service into the model. The DefaultModelBinder uses System.Activator to create the object so it doesn't go through the normal dependency resolver and I can't inject the service into the model without creating a new model binder (besides which, that doesn't feel like the correct way to go about it).
Inject the service into an annotation. I'm not yet sure this is possible but will investigate further soon. It still feels clumsy.
Use a custom model binder. Apparently I can implement OnPropertyValidating to do custom property validation. This seems the most preferable so far though I'm not yet sure how to do it.
Which method, above or not, is best suited to this type of validation problem?
Option 1 doesn't fit. The only way it would work would be to pull in the dependency via the service locator anti-pattern.
Option 2 doesn't work. Although I couldn't see how this was possible because of the C# attribute requirements, it is possible. See the following for references:
Resolving IoC Container Services for Validation Attributes in ASP.NET MVC
NInjectDataAnnotationsModelValidatorProvider
Option 3: I didn't know about this earlier, but what appears to be a very powerful way to write validators is to use the ModelValidator class and a corresponding ModelValidatorProvider.
First, you create your custom ModelValidatorProvider:
public class CustomModelValidatorProvider : ModelValidatorProvider
{
public CustomModelValidatorProvider(/* Your dependencies */) {}
public override IEnumerable<ModelValidator> GetValidators(ModelMetadata metadata, ControllerContext context)
{
if (metadata.ModelType == typeof(YourModel))
{
yield return new YourModelValidator(...);
}
}
}
ASP.NET MVC's IDependencyResolver will attempt to resolve the above provider, so as long as it's registered with your IoC container you won't need to do anything else. And then the ModelValidator:
public class EntryRatingViewModelValidatorMvcAdapter : ModelValidator
{
public EntryRatingViewModelValidatorMvcAdapter(
ModelMetadata argMetadata,
ControllerContext argContext)
: base(argMetadata, argContext)
{
_validator = validator;
}
public override IEnumerable<ModelValidationResult> Validate(object container)
{
if (/* error condition */)
{
yield return new ModelValidationResult
{
MemberName = "Model.Member",
Message = "Rating is required."
};
}
}
}
As the provider is retrieved through the IDependencyResolver and the provider has full control over the returned ModelValidators I was easily able to inject the dependencies and perform necessary validation.
You could try fluent validation. It supports asp.net mvc and DI so you can inject external services into your validators.
Assuming that you want both client and server-side validation of the model based upon the values returned from the service, I would opt for 2., Inject the service into an annotation.
I give some sample code in my response to this question about adding validators to a model. The only additional step in your case is that you will need to inject your service into your class inheriting from DataAnnotationsModelValidatorProvider.
What about just simply using IValidateableObject and in that method determine if validation is appropriate or not and setting the errors there?
How do I use IValidatableObject?
I use the nuget template way of ninjectning my MVC3 app,
which means I have use WebActivator to invoke a method on a static class that in turn creates a Ninject bootstrapper and hooks up to MVC3.
That works fine for Controller, adapters etc. But I want to have another Webactivator activated class which gets its dependencies using Ninject.
I got it to work with a poor mans solution, but I would prefer a more elegant solution.
First I make sure my Webactivator class uses the PostApplicationStartMethod invoke, since the Ninject module uses the PreApplicationStartMethod I can ensure that ninject has been loaded and is ready to go.. THen in the Start method I do
var workers = DependencyResolver.Current.GetServices<IWorker>();
To get my dependencies, the whole class looks like this
[assembly: WebActivator.PostApplicationStartMethod(typeof(SHB.DALA.Web.App_Start.WorkflowRunner), "Start")]
namespace SHB.DALA.Web.App_Start
{
public static class WorkflowRunner
{
public static void Start()
{
var workers = DependencyResolver.Current.GetServices<IWorker>();
//Do stuff with worker collection
}
}
}
There must be a more elegant solution right?
WebActivator (ASP.NET really) doesn't have any knowledge of Ninject project and therefore cannot have any parameters injected. You would need a Ninject WebActivator extension (the same way you have a Ninject MVC extension) to achieve it. But frankly this is a bit of a catch-22: you want WebActivator to setup Ninject and at the same time Ninject to setup WebActivator.
I can think of 2 possible scenarios for you:
leave the code as it is - I honestly don't know why you don't like your WorkflowRunner class. It is a nice, small class, no other code has any dependency on it, You obtain your references through a DependencyResolver which abstracts you from Ninject itself, your workflow initialization is nicely encapsulated there. I do not smell anything wrong here, really.
Initialize your workflows in the other WebActivator class, where setup Ninject. You know there that your Ninject is initialized and you can still keep workflow initialization code in a separate class.
I would obviously choose 1. if I were you.
If you already have the Ninject bootstrapper working, are you sure you need another solution? For non-controller dependencies, I use a BindingFactory class which has a GetInstance() method. This just calls the Get() method on the Kernel object.
public class BindingFactory
{
private static readonly IKernel Kernel = new StandardKernel(new DefaultServices());
public static T GetInstance<T>()
{
return Kernel.Get<T>();
}
public static IController GetControllerInstance(Type controllerType)
{
return Kernel.Get(controllerType) as IController;
}
}
I then use a NinjectControllerFactory which utilises the BindingFactory.
public class NinjectControllerFactory : DefaultControllerFactory
{
protected override IController GetControllerInstance(RequestContext context, Type controllerType)
{
if (controllerType == null)
return null;
return BindingFactory.GetControllerInstance(controllerType);
}
}
So I'm thinking you could just adapt your current implementation.
Has anyone got the SNAP AOP framework working with MVC 3 and Ninject.
The samples given when adding Snap using NuGet to an MVC 3 project don't specifcally work well with a previously added NInject package. I have tried to get it working based on the normal NInject approach but just cannot get it to actually intercept!
Can anyone show how to do this in code please?
I figured it out with the latest version of Ninject through NuGet which now adds a class call NinjectMVC3 in a new AppStart folder in the MVC3 application.
The code I used is as folows:
In the automatically created NinjectMVC3.cs CreateKernel() method:-
private static IKernel CreateKernel()
{
// Wire it up with AOP
NinjectAopConfiguration.NinjectAopConfigure();
//var kernel = new StandardKernel(); // Removed
RegisterServices(NinjectAopConfiguration._container.Kernel);
return NinjectAopConfiguration._container.Kernel;
}
I also wired up Ninject for the various injection targets in RegisterServices() method.
Next I took the sample code generated by NuGet when adding SNAP.Ninject to the MVC 3 application, renamed it NinjectAOP.cs and made it look like this:
public static class NinjectAopConfiguration
{
public readonly static NinjectAspectContainer _container;
static NinjectAopConfiguration()
{
_container = new NinjectAspectContainer();
}
public static void NinjectAopConfigure()
{
SnapConfiguration.For(_container).Configure(c =>
{
c.IncludeNamespace("MyNamespace.Model.*");
c.Bind<ExceptionLoggingInterceptor>().To<ExceptionLoggingAttribute>();
});
}
}
I also needed to do an assembly binding redirect for Ninject as follows because there is an assembly version conflict somewhere for Ninject:
I hope this helps someone.
I invite anyone to have a look and see if they can improve this please.