I understand that making web requests is quite well supported in the Portable Class Library. Is there any equivelant of HttpUtility.UrlEncode in the PCL? I need it for Windows Phone and Metro applications.
Use Uri.EscapeUriString and Uri.EscapeDataString
The only difference between the two is that EscapeDataString also encodes the RFC 2396 reserved characters which includes these characters ;/?:#&=+$,
It is important to note that neither of these methods encodes the RFC 2396 unreserved characters which includes -_.!~*'()
So if you need these encoded then you will have to manually encode them.
WebUtility
In portable class libraries lucky enough to be targeting .NET 4.5 (e.g. Profile7), many of the HttpUtility methods have siblings in System.Net.WebUtility.
using System.Net;
WebUtility.UrlEncode("some?string#");
Potential Warning
While some of the sibling methods appear to be identical to their HttpUtility counterparts, this one has a slight difference between the resulting encodings. WebUtility.UrlEncode generates uppercase encodings while HttpUtility.UrlEncode generates lowercase encodings.
WebUtility.UrlEncode("?") // -> "%3F"
HttpUtility.UrlEncode("?") // -> "%3f"
Make It Backwards Compatible
If you are dependent on your PCL code generating exactly what you would have generated with prior HttpUtility code, you could create your own helper method around this method and regex it.
using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
public static string UrlEncodeOldSchool(string value) {
var encodedValue = WebUtility.UrlEncode(value);
return Regex.Replace(encodedValue, "(%[0-9A-F]{2})",
encodedChar => encodedChar.Value.ToLowerInvariant());
}
(Even though this is a simple one, always regex at your own risk.)
Related
I've noticed that the Tool Help Library offers some functions and structures with 2 versions: normal and ending with W. For example: Process32First and Process32FirstW. Since their documentation is identical, I wonder what are the differences between those two?
The W and A versions stand for "wide" and "ANSI". In the past they made different functions, structures and types for both ANSI and unicode strings. For the purpose of this answer, unicode is widechar which is 2 bytes per character and ANSI is 1 byte per character (but it's actually more complicated than that). By supplying both types, the developer can use whichever he wants but the standard today is to use unicode.
If you look at the ToolHelp32 header file it does include both A and W versions of the structures and functions. If you're not finding them, you're not looking hard enough, do an explicit search for the identifiers and you will find them. If you're just doing "view definition" you will find the #ifdef macros. If you still can't find them, change your character set in your Visual Studio project and check again.
Due to wide char arrays being twice the size, structure alignment will be incorrect if you do not use the correct types. Let the macros resolve them for you, by setting the correct character set and using PROCESSENTRY32 instead of indicating A or W, this is the preferred method. Some APIs you are better off using the ANSI version to be honest but that is something you will learn with experience and have to make your own decision.
Here is an excellent article on the topic of character sets / encoding
I have a Unicode representation of a key, e.g. "a", "!", "ä" or "€", and I want to find out what key code (sequence) is used to produce that character. The resulting virtual key code will be given to CGEventCreateKeyboardEvent to simulate keyboard events.
The solution must be keyboard layout independent, e.g. sending "A" must work with any keyboard layout (e.g. Dvorak).
The solution will probably require using something like TISCopyCurrentKeyboardInputSource, but that seems to be deprecated (and I couldn't get it to work either).
I'm using Rust and core_graphics crate. Adding more crates isn't an issue. This Objective-C solution might be possible to adapt.
Does Rust provide a way to decode a single character (unicode-scalar-value to be exact) from a &[u8], which may be multiple bytes, returning a single USV?
Something like GLib's g_utf8_get_char & g_utf8_next_char:
// Example of what glib's functions might look like once ported to Rust.
let i = 0;
while i < slice.len() {
let unicode_char = g_utf8_get_char(&slice[i..]);
// do something with the unicode character
funcion(unicode_char);
// move onto the next.
i += g_utf8_next_char(&slice[i..]);
}
Short of porting parts of the GLib API to Rust, does Rust provide a way to do this, besides some trial & error calls to from_utf8 which stop once the second character is reached?
See GLib's code.
No, there is no such functionality publicly exposed in the Rust standard library as of Rust 1.14.
And neither should there be. Rust doesn't believe in a gigantic standard library. Crates are trivial to use and prevent people from rewriting code. Many people have an incorrect opinion (yeah, that's right: an opinion is incorrect) that using dependencies makes their program weaker.
Anything put in the standard library has to be maintained forever. There are zero plans for a Rust 2.0 that would break backwards compatibility. Python is the normal example here, with a multitude of "get data from a URL" parts of the standard library that are all redundant and deprecated now. The Python maintainers have to waste time keeping those working, instead of advancing the language.
Third-party crates allow things to be created, evolve, and die without burdening the entire language.
You can convert a byte slice (&[u8]) into a string slice (&str) by using str::from_utf8 (note that this validates that the whole byte slice is valid UTF-8). You can then use the chars() iterator on the string slice to iterate on each character (char) in the string.
Is it possible to print UTF-8 strings without using platform specific functions?
#include <iostream>
#include <locale>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
ios_base::sync_with_stdio(false);
wcout.imbue(locale("en_US.UTF-8")); // broken on Windows (?)
wstring ws1 = L"Wide string.";
wstring ws2 = L"Wide string with special chars \u20AC"; // Euro character
wcout << ws1 << endl;
wcout << ws2 << endl;
wcout << ws1 << endl;
}
I get this runtime error:
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
what(): locale::facet::_S_create_c_locale name not valid
If I remove the line wcout.imbue(locale("en_US.UTF-8"));, I get only ws1 printed, and just once.
In another question ("How can I cin and cout some unicode text?"), Philipp writes:
"wcin and wcout don't work on Windows, just like the equivalent C functions. Only the native API works." Is it true form MinGW, too?
Thank you for any hint!
Platform:
MinGW/GCC
Windows 7
I haven't used gcc in a mingw environment on Windows, but from what I gather it doesn't support C++ locales.
Since it doesn't support C++ locales this isn't really relevant, but FYI, Windows doesn't use the same locale naming scheme as most other platforms. They use a similar language_country.encoding, but the language and country are not codes, and the encoding is a Windows code page number. So the locale would be "English_United States.65001", however this is not a supported combination (code page 65001 (UTF-8) isn't supported as part of any locale).
The reason that only ws1 prints, and only once is that when the character \u20AC is printed, the stream fails and the fail bit is set. You have to clear the error before anything further will be printed.
C++11 introduced some things that will portably deal with UTF-8, but not everything is supported yet, and the additions don't completely solve the problem. But here's the way things currently stand:
When char16_t and char32_t are supported in VS as native types rather than typedefs you will be able to use the standard codecvt facet specializations codecvt<char16_t,char,mbstate_t> and codecvt<char32_t,char,mbstate_t> which are required to convert between UTF-16 or UTF-32 respectively, and UTF-8 (rather than the execution charset or system encoding). This doesn't work yet because in the current VS (and in VS11DP) these types are only typedefs and template specializations don't work on typedefs, but the code is already in the headers in VS 2010, just protected behind an #ifdef.
The standard also defines some special purpose codecvt facet templates which are supported, codecvt_utf8, and codecvt_utf8_utf16. The former converts between UTF-8 and either UCS-2 or UCS-4 depending on the size of the wide char type you use, and the latter converts between UTF-8 and UTF-16 code units independent of the size of the wide char type.
std::wcout.imbue(std::locale(std::locale::classic(),new std::codecvt_utf8_utf16<wchar_t>()));
std::wcout << L"ØÀéîðüýþ\n";
This will output UTF-8 code units through whatever is attached to wcout. If output has been redirected to file then opening it will show a UTF-8 encoded file. However, because of the console model on Windows, and the way the standard streams are implemented, you will not get correct display of Unicode characters in the command prompt this way (even if you set the console output code page to UTF-8 with SetConsoleOutputCP(CP_UTF8)). The UTF-8 code units are output one at a time, and the console will look at each individual chunk passed to it expecting each chunk (i.e. single byte in this case) passed to be complete and valid encodings. Incomplete or invalid sequences in the chunk (every byte of all multibyte character representations in this case) will be replaced with U+FFFD when the string is displayed.
If instead of using iostreams you use the C function puts to write out an entire UTF-8 encoded string (and if the console output code page is correctly set) then you can print a UTF-8 string and have it displayed in the console. The same codecvt facets can be used with some other C++11 convinence classes to do this:
std::wstring_convert<std::codecvt_utf8_utf16<wchar_t>,wchar_t> convert;
puts(convert(L"ØÀéîðüýþ\n).to_bytes().c_str());
The above is still not quite portable, because it assumes that wchar_t is UTF-16, which is the case on Windows but not on most other platforms, and it is not required by the standard. (In fact my understanding is that it's not technically conforming because UTF-16 needs multiple code units to represent some characters and the standard requires that all characters in the chosen encoding must be representable in a single wchar_t).
std::wstring_convert<std::codecvt_utf8<wchar_t>,wchar_t> convert;
The above will portably handle UCS-4 and USC-2, but won't work outside the Basic Multilingual Plane on platforms using UTF-16.
You could use the conditional type trait to select between these two facets based on the size of wchar_t and get something that mostly works:
std::wstring_convert<
std::conditional<sizeof(wchar_t)==2,std::codecvt_utf8_utf16<wchar_t>,
std::codecvt_utf8<wchar_t>
>::type,
wchar_t
> convert;
Or just use preprocessor macros to define an appropriate typedef, if your coding standards allow macros.
Windows support for UTF-8 is pretty poor, and whilst it's possible to do it using the Windows API it's not at all fun, also, your question specifies that you DON'T want to use platform specific functions...
As for doing it in 'standard C++', I'm not sure if it's possible under Windows without platform specific code. HOWEVER, there are numerous third party libraries available which will abstract away these platform details and allow you to write portable code.
I have recently updated my applications to use UTF-8 internally with the help of the Boost.Locale library.
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_48_0/libs/locale/doc/html/index.html
Its locale generation class will allow you to generate a UTF-8 based locale object which you can then imbue into all the standard streams etc.
I am using this right now under both MSVC and GCC via MinGW-w64 successfully! I highly suggest you check it out. Yes, unfortunately it's not technically 'standard C++', however Boost is available pretty much everywhere, and is practically a de-facto standard, so I don't think that's a huge concern.
I've looked at a number of other posts here and elsewhere (see below), but I still don't have a clear answer to this question: How does windows wchar_t handle unicode characters outside the basic multilingual plane?
That is:
many programmers seem to feel that UTF-16 is harmful because it is a variable-length code.
wchar_t is 16-bits wide on windows, but 32-bits wide on Unix/MacOS
The Windows APIs use wide-characters, not Unicode.
So what does Windows do when you want to code something like 𠂊 (U+2008A) Han Character on Windows?
The implementation of wchar_t under the Windows stdlib is UTF-16-oblivious: it knows only about 16-bit code units.
So you can put a UTF-16 surrogate sequence in a string, and you can choose to treat that as a single character using higher level processing. The string implementation won't do anything to help you, nor to hinder you; it will let you include any sequence of code units in your string, even ones that would be invalid when interpreted as UTF-16.
Many of the higher-level features of Windows do support characters made out of UTF-16 surrogates, which is why you can call a file 𐐀.txt and see it both render correctly and edit correctly (taking a single keypress, not two, to move past the character) in programs like Explorer that support complex text layout (typically using Windows's Uniscribe library).
But there are still places where you can see the UTF-16-obliviousness shining through, such as the fact you can create a file called 𐐀.txt in the same folder as 𐐨.txt, where case-insensitivity would otherwise disallow it, or the fact that you can create [U+DC01][U+D801].txt programmatically.
This is how pedants can have a nice long and basically meaningless argument about whether Windows “supports” UTF-16 strings or only UCS-2.
Windows used to use UCS-2 but adopted UTF-16 with Windows 2000. Windows wchar_t APIs now produce and consume UTF-16.
Not all third party programs handle this correctly and so may be buggy with data outside the BMP.
Also, note that UTF-16, being a variable length encoding, does not conform to the C or C++ requirements for an encoding used with wchar_t. This causes some problems such as some standard functions that take a single wchar_t, such as wctomb, can't handle characters beyond the BMP on Windows, and Windows defining some additional functions that use a wider type in order to be able to handle single characters outside the BMP. I forget what function it was, but I ran into a Windows function that returned int instead of wchar_t (and it wasn't one where EOF was a possible result).