I have a newbie LINQ question. I need to create two objects of same type from a list of strings. I need to append a text 'Direct' & "Indirect' to the string and use them as ID to create the two unique objects.
var vStrings = new List { "Milk", "Eggs", "Cheese" };
var vProducts = (from s in vStrings
select new Product { ID = s + "-Direct" })
.Union(
from s in vStrings
select new Product { ID = s + "-InDirect" });
You can see in the example above, I am using a Union to create two different objects, Is there a better way to rewrite this LINQ query?
Thanks for your suggestions
If you ever needed more suffixes, this might be a better way:
var strings = new List<string> { "Milk", "Eggs", "Cheese" };
var suffixes = new List<string> {"-Direct", "-InDirect"};
var products = strings
.SelectMany(_ => suffixes, (x, y) => new Product() {ID = x + y});
And it would only iterate over the original set of strings once.
This way isn't much shorter but I think it would be a little better such as there is only one Concat instead of many Union:
var vProducts2 = (from s in vStrings
select s + "-Direct").Concat(
from s in vStrings
select s + "-InDirect");
Related
I'm trying to display cities names where a count is greater than 1. I can do it easy in SQL and am close in LINQ but can't figure out how to use group and also get a count and display a name
var query = (from c in Consumer
group c
by new { c.City, size = c.City.Count() }
into results
select new { Name = results.Key.City })
.Where(a => size > 0);
The size part doesn't work
try this query:
var list= Consumer.GroupBy(s=>s.City)
.Select(s=>new {
City = s.Key,
size = s.Count(),
})
.Where(s=>s.size>0).ToList();
am a newbie in linq.. am stuck with one scenario. ie,
i have to sort the search results based on user input.
user inputs are Last Name, First Name and Title. for input 3 drop downs are there and i have to sort result based on the values selected.
i tried
order = Request["orders"].Split(',');
var param = order[0];
var p1 = typeof(Test).GetProperty(param);
param = order[1];
var p2 = typeof(Test).GetProperty(param);
param = order[2];
var p3 = typeof(Test).GetProperty(param);
model.Test = (from tests in model.Test
select tests).
OrderBy(x => p1.GetValue(x, null)).
ThenBy(x => p2.GetValue(x, null)).
ThenBy(x => p3.GetValue(x, null));
but it doesn't works.
i want qry like this
from tests in model.Test
select tests).OrderBy(x => x.lastname).
ThenBy(x => x.firstname).ThenBy(x => x.Title);
order[0]== lastname but how can i use it in the place of OrderBy(x => x.order[0])..?
Thanks in advance.
i solved my case as follows
// list of columns to be used for sorting
List<string>order = Request["orders"].Split(',').ToList();
//map the column string to property
var mapp = new Dictionary<string, Func<Test, string>>
{
{"FirstName", x => x.FirstName},
{"LastName", x => x.LastName},
{"SimpleTitle", x => x.SimpleTitle}
};
//user inputted order
var paras = new List<Func<Test, string>>();
foreach (var para in order)
{
if(!string.IsNullOrEmpty(para))
paras.Add(mapp[para]);
}
//sorting
model.Test= model.Test.OrderBy(paras[0]).ThenBy(paras[1]).ThenBy(paras[2]);
Thanks all,
Actually you are looking for dynamic linq query than you can try out Dynamic LINQ (Part 1: Using the LINQ Dynamic Query Library)
which allow to do like this
it means you can dynamically pass string propertyname to short you collection in orderby function
You can also read about : Dynamic query with Linq
You can compose the expression (any Expression) manually from pieces and then append it to the previous part of query. You can find more info, with example in "Sorting in IQueryable using string as column name".
I am using the SelectMany method to create a combination of items from two list of strings. I am able to create the flattended list without any issues, but unable to figure out how to add the index. In the example below, I need to assign the Position property of Product with the Index.
var strings = new List<string> { "Milk", "Eggs", "Cheese" };
var suffixes = new List<string> {"-Direct", "-InDirect"};
var products = strings
.SelectMany((_, index) => suffixes,
(x, y) => new Product {Position = ?, ID = x + y});
Thanks for any help,
You're specifying the index at the wrong place. You need it after the SelectMany. For example:
var products = strings.SelectMany(x => suffixex,
(x, y) => x + y)
.Select((id, index) => new Product { Position = index,
ID = id });
I have a linq query like this:
var accounts =
from account in context.Accounts
from guranteer in account.Gurantors
where guranteer.GuarantorRegistryId == guranteerRegistryId
select new AccountsReport
{
recordIndex = ?
CreditRegistryId = account.CreditRegistryId,
AccountNumber = account.AccountNo,
}
I want to populate recordIndex with the value of current row number in collection returned by the LINQ. How can I get row number ?
Row number is not supported in linq-to-entities. You must first retrieve records from database without row number and then add row number by linq-to-objects. Something like:
var accounts =
(from account in context.Accounts
from guranteer in account.Gurantors
where guranteer.GuarantorRegistryId == guranteerRegistryId
select new
{
CreditRegistryId = account.CreditRegistryId,
AccountNumber = account.AccountNo,
})
.AsEnumerable() // Moving to linq-to-objects
.Select((r, i) => new AccountReport
{
RecordIndex = i,
CreditRegistryId = r.CreditRegistryId,
AccountNumber = r.AccountNo,
});
LINQ to objects has this builtin for any enumerator:
http://weblogs.asp.net/fmarguerie/archive/2008/11/10/using-the-select-linq-query-operator-with-indexes.aspx
Edit: Although IQueryable supports it too (here and here) it has been mentioned that this does unfortunately not work for LINQ to SQL/Entities.
new []{"aap", "noot", "mies"}
.Select( (element, index) => new { element, index });
Will result in:
{ { element = aap, index = 0 },
{ element = noot, index = 1 },
{ element = mies, index = 2 } }
There are other LINQ Extension methods (like .Where) with the extra index parameter overload
Try using let like this:
int[] ints = new[] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
int counter = 0;
var result = from i in ints
where i % 2 == 0
let number = ++counter
select new { I = i, Number = number };
foreach (var r in result)
{
Console.WriteLine(r.Number + ": " + r.I);
}
I cannot test it with actual LINQ to SQL or Entity Framework right now. Note that the above code will retain the value of the counter between multiple executions of the query.
If this is not supported with your specific provider you can always foreach (thus forcing the execution of the query) and assign the number manually in code.
Because the query inside the question filters by a single id, I think the answers given wont help out. Ofcourse you can do it all in memory client side, but depending how large the dataset is, and whether network is involved, this could be an issue.
If you need a SQL ROW_NUMBER [..] OVER [..] equivalent, the only way I know is to create a view in your SQL server and query against that.
This Tested and Works:
Amend your code as follows:
int counter = 0;
var accounts =
from account in context.Accounts
from guranteer in account.Gurantors
where guranteer.GuarantorRegistryId == guranteerRegistryId
select new AccountsReport
{
recordIndex = counter++
CreditRegistryId = account.CreditRegistryId,
AccountNumber = account.AccountNo,
}
Hope this helps.. Though its late:)
I've got the following code:
List<Person> people = new List<Person>
{
new Person{ Id = 1, Name = "Bob"},
new Person{ Id = 2, Name = "Joe"},
new Person{ Id = 3, Name = "Bob"}
};
var peopleGroupedByName = from p in people
group p by p.Name;
//get all groups where the number of people in the group is > 1
For the life of me I can't figure out how to work with the values returned by the linq query to be able to then filter all of the groups that were returned so that I only have the groups that have more than one item in them.
At the moment I'm banging my head against a wall and I can't quite think of what keywords to use in a google search in order to figure it out for myself.
I'd really appreciate any help on how to do this in Linq cause it seems like it should be very simple to do.
List<Person> people = new List<Person> {
new Person{ Id = 1, Name = "Bob"},
new Person{ Id = 2, Name = "Joe"},
new Person{ Id = 3, Name = "Bob"}
};
var peopleGroupedByName = from p in people
group p by p.Name into peopleGroup
where peopleGroup.Count() > 1
select peopleGroup;
//get all groups where the number of people in the group is > 1
Alternatively, where peopleGroup.Skip(1).Any() as Mehrdad has suggested will generally provide better performance with Linq to Objects since Count() iterates over the entire group's contents, and Skip(1).Any() merely over the first 2 elements - (see his comment for details; Count is fine for group-by clauses).
Aside: For readability, I prefer consistently using either the .GroupBy(... extension method syntax or the group ... by ... into ... query syntax but not both.
var peopleGroupedByName = people.GroupBy(p => p.Name)
.Where(g => g.Count() > 1);
var peopleGroupedByName = from p in people
group p by p.Name into g
where g.Count() > 1
select g;
This is actually quite easy.
var filtererGroups = people
.GroupBy(p => p.Name)
.Where(grp => grp.Count() > 1);
To filter by key you would do something like that.
var filtererGroups = people
.GroupBy(p => p.Name)
.Where(grp => grp.Key == "Bob");