I have done a script on a machine with this command on it
printf -v $1 %s $2
It's working fine on the server that I am using. But when I copied the scripts to another server, I get this error. What am I missing here?
EDIT: What the code does to my script is it declares variables, but is not localized on a function. Here's the complete function
#Declare each property=value as regular bash variable=value
function getProperty {
for x in $(echo ${1} | tr ":" "\n")
do
set -- $(echo ${x} | tr "=" "\n")
printf -v $1 %s $2
#I tried using declare, but the variables become localized to this function only
done
}
Will export work?
export "${1}=$(printf %s "$2")"
I might be barking up the wrong tree here...
Looks like you're trying to take some input in the form of:
var=value:var=value
This will fail if any part of the input contains whitespace, newlines, or glob characters. See: don't read lines with for. It will also fail if the first parameter is ever empty. Because your expansions are unquoted you're dealing with multiple passes of globbing and word-splitting which will probably lead to problems.
Unfortunately, indirect assignment is one of the biggest failures of Bash. If you do this a lot you should seriously consider switching the entire script to ksh where you can use nameref variables. It's very worth it just for that one feature. (The next version of Bash should solve this).
You should use arrays to deal with collections. If you need to deal with key-value pairs like this then you should use Bash 4 and associative arrays. printf -v is the best way to do indirect assignment to an outer scope in a recent enough Bash. If you have Bash 4.2 then you can use declare -g to assign to a global. If your bash is too old to do any of this, upgrade.
Some techniques plus how to use associative arrays are explained here: http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/006
Also read up on how to quote.
Related
Seems that the recommended way of doing indirect variable setting in bash is to use eval:
var=x; val=foo
eval $var=$val
echo $x # --> foo
The problem is the usual one with eval:
var=x; val=1$'\n'pwd
eval $var=$val # bad output here
(and since it is recommended in many places, I wonder just how many scripts are vulnerable because of this...)
In any case, the obvious solution of using (escaped) quotes doesn't really work:
var=x; val=1\"$'\n'pwd\"
eval $var=\"$val\" # fail with the above
The thing is that bash has indirect variable reference baked in (with ${!foo}), but I don't see any such way to do indirect assignment -- is there any sane way to do this?
For the record, I did find a solution, but this is not something that I'd consider "sane"...:
eval "$var='"${val//\'/\'\"\'\"\'}"'"
A slightly better way, avoiding the possible security implications of using eval, is
declare "$var=$val"
Note that declare is a synonym for typeset in bash. The typeset command is more widely supported (ksh and zsh also use it):
typeset "$var=$val"
In modern versions of bash, one should use a nameref.
declare -n var=x
x=$val
It's safer than eval, but still not perfect.
Bash has an extension to printf that saves its result into a variable:
printf -v "${VARNAME}" '%s' "${VALUE}"
This prevents all possible escaping issues.
If you use an invalid identifier for $VARNAME, the command will fail and return status code 2:
$ printf -v ';;;' '%s' foobar; echo $?
bash: printf: `;;;': not a valid identifier
2
eval "$var=\$val"
The argument to eval should always be a single string enclosed in either single or double quotes. All code that deviates from this pattern has some unintended behavior in edge cases, such as file names with special characters.
When the argument to eval is expanded by the shell, the $var is replaced with the variable name, and the \$ is replaced with a simple dollar. The string that is evaluated therefore becomes:
varname=$value
This is exactly what you want.
Generally, all expressions of the form $varname should be enclosed in double quotes, to prevent accidental expansion of filename patterns like *.c.
There are only two places where the quotes may be omitted since they are defined to not expand pathnames and split fields: variable assignments and case. POSIX 2018 says:
Each variable assignment shall be expanded for tilde expansion, parameter expansion, command substitution, arithmetic expansion, and quote removal prior to assigning the value.
This list of expansions is missing the parameter expansion and the field splitting. Sure, that's hard to see from reading this sentence alone, but that's the official definition.
Since this is a variable assignment, the quotes are not needed here. They don't hurt, though, so you could also write the original code as:
eval "$var=\"the value is \$val\""
Note that the second dollar is escaped using a backslash, to prevent it from being expanded in the first run. What happens is:
eval "$var=\"the value is \$val\""
The argument to the command eval is sent through parameter expansion and unescaping, resulting in:
varname="the value is $val"
This string is then evaluated as a variable assignment, which assigns the following value to the variable varname:
the value is value
The main point is that the recommended way to do this is:
eval "$var=\$val"
with the RHS done indirectly too. Since eval is used in the same
environment, it will have $val bound, so deferring it works, and since
now it's just a variable. Since the $val variable has a known name,
there are no issues with quoting, and it could have even been written as:
eval $var=\$val
But since it's better to always add quotes, the former is better, or
even this:
eval "$var=\"\$val\""
A better alternative in bash that was mentioned for the whole thing that
avoids eval completely (and is not as subtle as declare etc):
printf -v "$var" "%s" "$val"
Though this is not a direct answer what I originally asked...
Newer versions of bash support something called "parameter transformation", documented in a section of the same name in bash(1).
"${value#Q}" expands to a shell-quoted version of "${value}" that you can re-use as input.
Which means the following is a safe solution:
eval="${varname}=${value#Q}"
Just for completeness I also want to suggest the possible use of the bash built in read. I've also made corrections regarding -d'' based on socowi's comments.
But much care needs to be exercised when using read to ensure the input is sanitized (-d'' reads until null termination and printf "...\0" terminates the value with a null), and that read itself is executed in the main shell where the variable is needed and not a sub-shell (hence the < <( ... ) syntax).
var=x; val=foo0shouldnotterminateearly
read -d'' -r "$var" < <(printf "$val\0")
echo $x # --> foo0shouldnotterminateearly
echo ${!var} # --> foo0shouldnotterminateearly
I tested this with \n \t \r spaces and 0, etc it worked as expected on my version of bash.
The -r will avoid escaping \, so if you had the characters "\" and "n" in your value and not an actual newline, x will contain the two characters "\" and "n" also.
This method may not be aesthetically as pleasing as the eval or printf solution, and would be more useful if the value is coming in from a file or other input file descriptor
read -d'' -r "$var" < <( cat $file )
And here are some alternative suggestions for the < <() syntax
read -d'' -r "$var" <<< "$val"$'\0'
read -d'' -r "$var" < <(printf "$val") #Apparently I didn't even need the \0, the printf process ending was enough to trigger the read to finish.
read -d'' -r "$var" <<< $(printf "$val")
read -d'' -r "$var" <<< "$val"
read -d'' -r "$var" < <(printf "$val")
Yet another way to accomplish this, without eval, is to use "read":
INDIRECT=foo
read -d '' -r "${INDIRECT}" <<<"$(( 2 * 2 ))"
echo "${foo}" # outputs "4"
Seems that the recommended way of doing indirect variable setting in bash is to use eval:
var=x; val=foo
eval $var=$val
echo $x # --> foo
The problem is the usual one with eval:
var=x; val=1$'\n'pwd
eval $var=$val # bad output here
(and since it is recommended in many places, I wonder just how many scripts are vulnerable because of this...)
In any case, the obvious solution of using (escaped) quotes doesn't really work:
var=x; val=1\"$'\n'pwd\"
eval $var=\"$val\" # fail with the above
The thing is that bash has indirect variable reference baked in (with ${!foo}), but I don't see any such way to do indirect assignment -- is there any sane way to do this?
For the record, I did find a solution, but this is not something that I'd consider "sane"...:
eval "$var='"${val//\'/\'\"\'\"\'}"'"
A slightly better way, avoiding the possible security implications of using eval, is
declare "$var=$val"
Note that declare is a synonym for typeset in bash. The typeset command is more widely supported (ksh and zsh also use it):
typeset "$var=$val"
In modern versions of bash, one should use a nameref.
declare -n var=x
x=$val
It's safer than eval, but still not perfect.
Bash has an extension to printf that saves its result into a variable:
printf -v "${VARNAME}" '%s' "${VALUE}"
This prevents all possible escaping issues.
If you use an invalid identifier for $VARNAME, the command will fail and return status code 2:
$ printf -v ';;;' '%s' foobar; echo $?
bash: printf: `;;;': not a valid identifier
2
eval "$var=\$val"
The argument to eval should always be a single string enclosed in either single or double quotes. All code that deviates from this pattern has some unintended behavior in edge cases, such as file names with special characters.
When the argument to eval is expanded by the shell, the $var is replaced with the variable name, and the \$ is replaced with a simple dollar. The string that is evaluated therefore becomes:
varname=$value
This is exactly what you want.
Generally, all expressions of the form $varname should be enclosed in double quotes, to prevent accidental expansion of filename patterns like *.c.
There are only two places where the quotes may be omitted since they are defined to not expand pathnames and split fields: variable assignments and case. POSIX 2018 says:
Each variable assignment shall be expanded for tilde expansion, parameter expansion, command substitution, arithmetic expansion, and quote removal prior to assigning the value.
This list of expansions is missing the parameter expansion and the field splitting. Sure, that's hard to see from reading this sentence alone, but that's the official definition.
Since this is a variable assignment, the quotes are not needed here. They don't hurt, though, so you could also write the original code as:
eval "$var=\"the value is \$val\""
Note that the second dollar is escaped using a backslash, to prevent it from being expanded in the first run. What happens is:
eval "$var=\"the value is \$val\""
The argument to the command eval is sent through parameter expansion and unescaping, resulting in:
varname="the value is $val"
This string is then evaluated as a variable assignment, which assigns the following value to the variable varname:
the value is value
The main point is that the recommended way to do this is:
eval "$var=\$val"
with the RHS done indirectly too. Since eval is used in the same
environment, it will have $val bound, so deferring it works, and since
now it's just a variable. Since the $val variable has a known name,
there are no issues with quoting, and it could have even been written as:
eval $var=\$val
But since it's better to always add quotes, the former is better, or
even this:
eval "$var=\"\$val\""
A better alternative in bash that was mentioned for the whole thing that
avoids eval completely (and is not as subtle as declare etc):
printf -v "$var" "%s" "$val"
Though this is not a direct answer what I originally asked...
Newer versions of bash support something called "parameter transformation", documented in a section of the same name in bash(1).
"${value#Q}" expands to a shell-quoted version of "${value}" that you can re-use as input.
Which means the following is a safe solution:
eval="${varname}=${value#Q}"
Just for completeness I also want to suggest the possible use of the bash built in read. I've also made corrections regarding -d'' based on socowi's comments.
But much care needs to be exercised when using read to ensure the input is sanitized (-d'' reads until null termination and printf "...\0" terminates the value with a null), and that read itself is executed in the main shell where the variable is needed and not a sub-shell (hence the < <( ... ) syntax).
var=x; val=foo0shouldnotterminateearly
read -d'' -r "$var" < <(printf "$val\0")
echo $x # --> foo0shouldnotterminateearly
echo ${!var} # --> foo0shouldnotterminateearly
I tested this with \n \t \r spaces and 0, etc it worked as expected on my version of bash.
The -r will avoid escaping \, so if you had the characters "\" and "n" in your value and not an actual newline, x will contain the two characters "\" and "n" also.
This method may not be aesthetically as pleasing as the eval or printf solution, and would be more useful if the value is coming in from a file or other input file descriptor
read -d'' -r "$var" < <( cat $file )
And here are some alternative suggestions for the < <() syntax
read -d'' -r "$var" <<< "$val"$'\0'
read -d'' -r "$var" < <(printf "$val") #Apparently I didn't even need the \0, the printf process ending was enough to trigger the read to finish.
read -d'' -r "$var" <<< $(printf "$val")
read -d'' -r "$var" <<< "$val"
read -d'' -r "$var" < <(printf "$val")
Yet another way to accomplish this, without eval, is to use "read":
INDIRECT=foo
read -d '' -r "${INDIRECT}" <<<"$(( 2 * 2 ))"
echo "${foo}" # outputs "4"
echo $fbname | awk -F'[__]' '{print $2 $A_name = $2}'
echo $A_name
I am trying to extract a name within the fbname variable like for example,
newlist_sammy_card.csv So I am trying to get the name sammy which is between the two underscores and assign it to a variable I can use for rest of the script.
The first line prints out sammy, which is what I need, but the second line does not.
Can anyone show me where I am not assinging the variable correctly?
There is a fundamental flaw in your understanding and reasoning. If you invoke awk in your script it is spawned as a program in its own individual right. Therefore all the variables that exist in your current shell are not available to awk and vice versa. As such you can not 'define' variables in awk that are then visible to your shell. What you should do is 'capture' the output of awk, by using the notation $(), and assign it to a variable. Consider this example:
var=$(awk '{print "test"}')
echo $var
This will output
test
Now in your case, we are actually facing an xy-problem. You want to extract sammy from the string newlist_sammy_card.csv and use that as a variable. One possible solution in pure bash is the following:
name="newlist_sammy_card.csv"
temp=${name#*_}
var=${temp%%_*}
echo $var
This will output
sammy
There's a LOT of ways to do what you're asking for, e.g. here's a couple more in addition to the other ideas you've received so far:
$ fbname='newlist_sammy_card.csv'
$ A_name=$(echo "$fbname" | cut -d_ -f2)
$ echo "$A_name"
sammy
or:
$ IFS=_
$ set -- $fbname
$ A_name="$2"
$ echo "$A_name"
sammy
but I wonder if you're approaching your problem completely the wrong way. We can't tell without more info on what you're trying to do though.
You can simply use bash:
str1="newlist_sammy_card.csv"
# replace 'newlist_' from front of the string
str2=${str1#*_}
# replace '_card.csv' from back of the string:
str2=${str2%%_*}
echo "$str2" # Output: sammy
Unfortunately it can't be done in a single run in bash. However it should still perform a lot better than launching any kind of external program.
Pankrates's answer explains the problem with the OP's approach well and offers a pure shell solution using shell parameter expansion.
Here's another pure shell solution, using a single command based on the read builtin:
Using bash, with a here-string:
IFS=_ read -r _ A_name _ <<<"$fbname"
POSIX-compliant equivalent, using a here-doc:
IFS=_ read -r _ A_name _ <<EOF
$fbname
EOF
If $fbname contains 'newlist_sammy_card.csv', $A_name will contain 'sammy' afterward.
IFS=_ tells read to split the input into tokens by _ instances.
Note that by directly prepending IFS=... to read, the effect of setting $IFS is localized to the read command - no need to restore the original $IFS later.
read -r _ A_name _ ... reads input unmodified (-r - no interpretation of backslash escape sequences)
Note that _ on either side of A_name is the - customary - name of a dummy variable that is used for input that is of no interest, but is needed to positionally extract the token of interest.
It is a mere coincidence in this case that the name of this dummy variable is the same as the $IFS character.
In this case: $_ receives the 1st field (before the first _ char. in the input), and is then overwritten with any remaining fields after the 2nd field, where the 2nd field is read into the variable of interest, $A_name.
I would like my bash script to check the name of the directory where it is run. Something like:
#!/bin/bash
path=eval 'pwd'
dirname=eval 'basename $path'
But it doesn't work: I get
./foo.sh: line 5: basename $path: command not found
How can I fix it? Also, once I get dirname to contain the correct dirname, I'd like to convert it to lowercase, to test it. I'm able to do this on the command line with awk:
echo $dirname | awk '{print tolower($0)}'
but how do I capture the return value into a variable?
Why not use:
#!/bin/bash
path=`pwd`
dirname=`basename $path | awk '{print tolower($0)}'`
Or if you want to do it as a one liner:
dirname=`pwd | xargs basename | awk '{print tolower($0)}'`
You can rewrite it to
dirname=eval "basename $path"
With single-quotes, you don't get shell expansion, but you want $path getting expanded.
BTW: I'd suggesst using
path=$(basename $path)
It's way more generic and better readable if you do something like
path=$(basename $(pwd))
or to get the lowercase result
path=$(basename $(pwd) | awk '{print tolower($0)}')
or
path=$(basename $(pwd) | tr 'A-Z' 'a-z' )
The form
x=y cmd
means to temporarily set environment variable x to value y and then run cmd, which is how these lines are interpreted:
path=eval 'pwd'
dirname=eval 'basename $path'
That is, they aren't doing what you seem to expect at all, instead setting an environment variable to the literal value eval and then running (or failing to find) a command. As others have said, the way to interpolate the results of a command into a string is to put it inside $(...) (preferred) or `...` (legacy). And, as a general rule, it's safer to wrap those in double quotes (as it is safer to wrap any interpolated reference in quotes).
path="$(pwd)"
dirname="$(basename "$path")"
(Technically, in this case the outer quotes aren't strictly necessary. However, I'd say it's still a good habit to have.)
B=$(echo "Some text that has CAPITAL letters " | awk '{print tolower($0)}')
eval executes command passed to it, but it returns only command exit status code, so you cannot really use it in set operator. The way to go to embed command into set operator either to use right single quotes or $()
So the script will look like this:
#!/bin/bash
curr_path=$(pwd)
echo $curr_path
curr_dir=$(basename $curr_path)
echo $curr_dir
echo $curr_dir | awk '{print tolower($0)}'
Your code doesn't work because you use single quotes rather than double quotes. Single quotes prevent variable expansion, thus $path is not expanded into the path you want to use and is taken as it is, as it if were a string.
Your awk invocation would not work for the same reason as well.
Although you could solve the problem replacing single quotes with double quotes, like this:
#!/bin/bash
path=eval "pwd"
dirname=eval "basename $path"
I would suggest using grave accents instead (). There's no reason to useeval` in this case. Plus, you can also use it to collect the return value you are interested in:
#!/bin/bash
path=`pwd`
dirname=`basename $path`
variable=`echo $dirname | awk "{print tolower($0)}"`
Here's an excerpt from my answer to What platform independent way to find directory of shell executable in shell script? which, in itself, fully answers your question aside from the lowercase part, which, in my opinion, has been duly addressed many times in other answers here.
What's unique about my answer is that when I was attempting to write it for the other question I encountered your exact problem - how do I store the function's results in a variable? Well, as you can see, with some help, I hit upon a pretty simple and very powerful solution:
I can pass the function a sort of messenger variable and dereference any explicit use of the resulting function's argument's $1 name with eval as necessary, and, upon the function routine's completion, I use eval and a backslashed quoting trick to assign my messenger variable the value I desire without ever having to know its name.
In full disclosure, though this was the solution to my problem, it was not by any means my solution. I've had several occasions to visit there before, but some of his descriptions, though probably brilliant, are a little out of my league, and so I thought others might benefit if include my own version of how this works in the previous paragraph. Though of course it was very simple to understand once I did, for this one especially, I had to think long and hard to figure out how it might work. Anyway, you can find that and more at Rich's sh tricks and I have also excerpted the relevant portion of his page below my own answer's excerpt.
...
EXCERPT:
...
Though not strictly POSIX yet, realpath is a GNU core app since 2012. Full disclosure: never heard of it before I noticed it in the info coreutils TOC and immediately thought of [the linked] question, but using the following function as demonstrated should reliably, (soon POSIXLY?), and, I hope, efficiently
provide its caller with an absolutely sourced $0:
% _abs_0() {
> o1="${1%%/*}"; ${o1:="${1}"}; ${o1:=`realpath "${1}"`}; eval "$1=\${o1}";
> }
% _abs_0 ${abs0:="${0}"} ; printf %s\\n "${abs0}"
/no/more/dots/in/your/path2.sh
EDIT: It may be worth highlighting that this solution uses POSIX parameter expansion to first check if the path actually needs expanding and resolving at all before attempting to do so. This should return an absolutely sourced $0via a messenger variable (with the notable exception that it will preserve symlinks) as efficiently as I could imagine it could be done whether or not the path is already absolute.
...
(minor edit: before finding realpath in the docs, I had at least pared down my version of [the version below] not to depend on the time field [as it does in the first ps command], but, fair warning, after testing some I'm less convinced ps is fully reliable in its command path expansion capacity)
On the other hand, you could do this:
ps ww -fp $$ | grep -Eo '/[^:]*'"${0#*/}"
eval "abs0=${`ps ww -fp $$ | grep -Eo ' /'`#?}"
...
And from Rich's sh tricks:
...
Returning strings from a shell function
As can be seen from the above pitfall of command substitution, stdout is not a good avenue for shell functions to return strings to their caller, unless the output is in a format where trailing newlines are insignificant. Certainly such practice is not acceptable for functions meant to deal with arbitrary strings. So, what can be done?
Try this:
func () {
body here
eval "$1=\${foo}"
}
Of course ${foo} could be replaced by any sort of substitution. The key trick here is the eval line and the use of escaping. The “$1” is expanded when the argument to eval is constructed by the main command parser. But the “${foo}” is not expanded at this stage, because the “$” has been quoted. Instead, it’s expanded when eval evaluates its argument. If it’s not clear why this is important, consider how the following would be bad:
foo='hello ; rm -rf /'
dest=bar
eval "$dest=$foo"
But of course the following version is perfectly safe:
foo='hello ; rm -rf /'
dest=bar
eval "$dest=\$foo"
Note that in the original example, “$1” was used to allow the caller to pass the destination variable name as an argument the function. If your function needs to use the shift command, for instance to handle the remaining arguments as “$#”, then it may be useful to save the value of “$1” in a temporary variable at the beginning of the function.
Hi I need to go over characters in string in bash including spaces. How can I do it?
Bash does support substrings directly (If that's what the OP wants):
$ A='Hello World!'
$ echo "${A:3:5}"
lo Wo
$ echo "${A:5:3}"
Wo
$ echo "${A:7:3}"
orl
The expansion used is generalized as:
${PARAMETER:OFFSET:LENGTH}
PARAMETER is your variable name. OFFSET and LENGTH are numeric expressions as used by `let'. See the bash info page on shell parameter expansion for more information, since there are a few important details on this.
Therefore, if you want to e.g. print all the characters in the contents of a variable each on its own line you could do something like this:
$ for ((i=0; i<${#A}; i++)); do echo ${A:i:1}; done
The advantage of this method is that you don't have to store the string elsewhere, mangle its contents or use external utilities with process substitution.
Not sure what you really mean, but in almost all cases, problems with strings including spaces can be solved by quoting them.
So, if you've got a nice day, try "a nice day" or 'a nice day'.
You use some external tool for it. The bash shell is really meant to be used to glue other programs together in usually simple combinations.
Depending on what you need, you might use cut, awk, sed or even perl.
Try this
#/bin/bash
str="so long and thanks for all the fish"
while [ -n "$str" ]
do
printf "%c\n" "$str"
str=${str#?}
done