I have the following array
t = [
{nil => 1, 10 => 2, 16 => 4, 5=> 10},
{nil => 9, 5 => 2, 17 => 3, 10 => 2},
{10 => 4, 5 => 9, 17 => 1}
]
how can I get this as result?
{nil => [1,9,0],10 => [2,2,4], 16 => [4,0,0], 5 => [10,2,9], 17=>[0,3,1]}
I've seen that I can use something like this
t.group_by{|h| h['key']}
but I'm not sure if I can put a regexp inside the brackets
Thanks in advance
Javier
EDIT:
Is just want to group by each key of each hash inside the array, if the key is not present then the value is 0 for that hash
How about this one for illegibility:
t = [
{nil => 1, 10 => 2, 16 => 4, 5=> 10},
{nil => 9, 5 => 2, 17 => 3, 10 => 2},
{10 => 4, 5 => 9, 17 => 1}
]
# Create hash of possible keys
keys = t.reduce({}) { |m, h| h.each_key { |k| m[k] = [] }; m }
# Iterate through array, for each hash, for each key, append the
# value if key is in hash or zero otherwise
t.reduce(keys) { |m, h| m.each_key { |k| m[k] << (h[k] || 0) }; m }
puts keys
#=> {nil=>[1, 9, 0], 10=>[2, 2, 4], 16=>[4, 0, 0], 5=>[10, 2, 9], 17=>[0, 3, 1]}
Not the most elegant code I've ever written, but it does the job and is easy to understand:
def jqq(a)
keys = []
result = {}
a.each do |h|
keys += h.keys
end
keys.uniq.each do |key|
result[key] = []
a.each do |h|
h.default = 0
result[key] << h[key]
end
end
result
end
t = [
{nil => 1, 10 => 2, 16 => 4, 5=> 10},
{nil => 9, 5 => 2, 17 => 3, 10 => 2},
{10 => 4, 5 => 9, 17 => 1}
]
puts jqq(t)
# {nil=>[1, 9, 0], 10=>[2, 2, 4], 16=>[4, 0, 0], 5=>[10, 2, 9], 17=>[0, 3, 1]}
I do not think there is any any function available
Just gave a try with hash
def do_my_work(data)
hash = {}
#get all keys first
arr.map{|m| m.keys}.flatten.uniq.each {|a| hash[a]=[]}
# Now iterate and fill the values
arr.each do |elm|
hash.each do |k,v|
hash[k] << (elm[k].nil? ? 0 : elm[k])
end
end
end
hash = do_my_work(t)
puts hash
# => {nil=>[1, 9, 0], 10=>[2, 2, 4], 16=>[4, 0, 0], 5=>[10, 2, 9], 17=>[0, 3, 1]}
Related
I want to sum the values of same keys like
arr = [{"69120090" => [1, 2, 3]}, {"69120090" => [4, 5, 6]}]
I need to result in:
result = [{"69120090" => [5, 7, 9]}]
Reduce by Hash#merge! with a block:
arr = [{"69120090"=> [1, 2, 3] }, {"69120090"=> [4, 5, 6] }]
arr.each_with_object({}) do |h, acc|
acc.merge!(h) { |_, v1, v2| v1.zip(v2).map(&:sum) }
end
#⇒ {"69120090"=>[5, 7, 9]}
The above accepts any number of hashes with any number of keys each.
Just to have another option, given the array:
arr = [{ a: [1, 2, 3], b:[8,9,0] }, { a: [4, 5, 6], c: [1,2,3] }, { b: [0,1,2], c: [1,2,3] } ]
You could write:
tmp = Hash.new{ |k,v| k[v] = [] }
arr.each { |h| h.each { |k,v| tmp[k] << v } }
tmp.transform_values { |k| k.transpose.map(&:sum) }
Which returns
tmp #=> {:a=>[5, 7, 9], :b=>[8, 10, 2], :c=>[2, 4, 6]}
As one liner:
(arr.each_with_object(Hash.new{ |k,v| k[v] = [] }) { |h, tmp| h.each { |k,v| tmp[k] << v } }).transform_values { |k| k.transpose.map(&:sum) }
I miss a Hash method in Ruby to transform/map only the values of the hash.
h = { 1 => [9,2,3,4], 2 => [6], 3 => [5,7,1] }
h.map_values { |v| v.size }
#=> { 1 => 4, 2 => 1, 3 => 3 }
How do you archive this in Ruby?
Update: I'm looking for an implementation of map_values().
# more examples
h.map_values { |v| v.reduce(0, :+) }
#=> { 1 => 18, 2 => 6, 3 => 13 }
h.map_values(&:min)
#=> { 1 => 2, 2 => 6, 3 => 1 }
Ruby 2.4 introduced the methods Hash#transform_values and Hash#transform_values! with the desired behavoir.
h = { 1=>[9, 2, 3, 4], 2=>[6], 3=>[5, 7, 1] }
h.transform_values { |e| e.size }
#=> {1=>4, 2=>1, 3=>3}
You can monkey-patch the hash class, like this
class Hash
def map_values
map { |k, v|
[k, yield(v)]
}.to_h
end
end
p ({1 => [1,1,1,1], 2 => [2], 3 => [3,3,3]}.map_values { |e| e.size })
You can also use Hash#update for this:
h = { 1 => [9, 2, 3, 4], 2 => [6], 3 => [5, 7, 1] }
h.update(h) { |_, v| v.size }
#=> { 1 => 4, 2 => 1, 3 => 3 }
It replaces all values that have duplicate keys in one hash with that of another, or, if a block is given, with the result of calling the block. You can pass the original hash as the argument to ensure all values are replaced.
Note that this modifies the hash in place! If you want to preserve the original hash, dup it first:
h.dup.update(h) { |_, v| v.size }
#=> { 1 => 4, 2 => 1, 3 => 3 }
h
#=> { 1 => [9, 2, 3, 4], 2 => [6], 3 => [5, 7, 1] }
This will do the trick for you
h = { 1 => [1,1,1,1], 2 => [2], 3 => [3,3,3] }
h.map {|k,v| [k, v.size] }.to_h
No map, just each
h = { 1 => [1,1,1,1], 2 => [2], 3 => [3,3,3] }
h.each{|k,v| h[k] = v.size}
You can achieve this by:
h.map { |a, b| [a, b.size] }.to_h
#=> {1=>4, 2=>1, 3=>3}
Here is one more way to achieve it:
h = { 1 => [1,1,1,1], 2 => [2], 3 => [3,3,3] }
p h.keys.zip(h.values.map(&:size)).to_h
#=> {1=>4, 2=>1, 3=>3}
There's an implementation of this method in the DeepEnumerable library: https://github.com/dgopstein/deep_enumerable/
It's called shallow_map_values:
>> require 'deep_enumerable'
>> h = { 1 => [9,2,3,4], 2 => [6], 3 => [5,7,1] }
>> h.shallow_map_values { |v| v.size }
=> {1=>4, 2=>1, 3=>3}
I have been trying to combine two hashes in Ruby. For example:
h1 = { "a" => 10, "b" => 20, "c"=>34, "d"=>3}
h2 = { "a" => 11, "b" => 21, "d"=>15}
The output I would like is:
h{"a"=> 10, 11, "b"=>20,21, "c"=> 34, "d"=>3,15}
Each hash has the same key, except the second hash might be missing some. I would like the two values then to be represented by the same key.
This is my unsuccessful code:
h1 = { "a" => 10, "b" => 20, "c"=>34, "d"=>3}
h2 = { "a" => 11, "b" => 21, "d"=>15}
h3= h1.update(h2){|key1, key2, val1, val2 |key1,h2_val=h2}
It gives:
{"a"=>{"a"=>11, "b"=>21, "d"=>15}, "b"=>{"a"=>11, "b"=>21, "d"=>15}, "c"=>34, "d"=>{"a"=>11, "b"=>21, "d"=>15}}
I am just new to Ruby so I assume I am missing something very basic here. I would appreciate any help.
What about:
h1 = { "a" => 10, "b" => 20, "c"=>34, "d"=>3}
h2 = { "a" => 11, "b" => 21, "d"=>15}
p h1.merge(h2){|key, old, new| Array(old).push(new) } #=> {"a"=>[10, 11], "b"=>[20, 21], "c"=>34, "d"=>[3, 15]}
And this is how I would write it to combine more than 2 Hashes:
h1 = { "a" => 10, "b" => 20, "c"=>34, "d"=>3}
h2 = { "a" => 11, "b" => 21, "d"=>15}
h3 = { "a" => 11, "b" => 21, "c"=> 1, "d"=>15}
merge_to_array = -> x,y { x.merge(y){|key, old, new| Array(old).push(new)} }
p [h1,h2,h3].reduce &merge_to_array #=> {"a"=>[10, 11, 11], "b"=>[20, 21, 21], "c"=>[34, 1], "d"=>[3, 15, 15]}
h1 = { "a" => 10, "b" => 20, "c"=>34, "d"=>3}
h2 = { "a" => 11, "b" => 21, "d"=>15}
arr= []
arr << h1 << h2
data= arr.map(&:to_a).flatten(1).reduce({}) {|h,(k,v)| (h[k] ||= []) << v; h}
and it gives
{"a"=>[10, 11], "b"=>[20, 21], "c"=>[34], "d"=>[3, 15]}
As example use #reduce:
h1 = { "a" => 10, "b" => 20, "c"=>34, "d"=>3}
h2 = { "a" => 11, "b" => 21, "d"=>15}
h2.reduce(h1.dup) {|h,(k,v)| h[k] = (h[k] && [h[k], v] || v); h}
# => {"a"=>[10, 11], "b"=>[20, 21], "c"=>34, "d"=>[3, 15]}
It's not entirely clear what you're looking for, because your example output is invalid, but here's what I'd do to merge the two hashes without stomping on the keys:
h1 = { "a" => 10, "b" => 20, "c"=>34, "d"=>3}
h2 = { "a" => 11, "b" => 21, "d"=>15}
new_hash = Hash.new{ |h, k| h[k] = [] }
[*h1, *h2].each { |k, v| new_hash[k] << v }
Which results in:
new_hash # => {"a"=>[10, 11], "b"=>[20, 21], "c"=>[34], "d"=>[3, 15]}
I have a data structure in the following format:
data_hash = [
{ price: 1, count: 3 },
{ price: 2, count: 3 },
{ price: 3, count: 3 }
]
Is there an efficient way to get the values of :price as an array like [1,2,3]?
First, if you are using ruby < 1.9:
array = [
{:price => 1, :count => 3},
{:price => 2, :count => 3},
{:price => 3, :count => 3}
]
Then to get what you need:
array.map{|x| x[:price]}
There is a closed question that redirects here asking about handing map a Symbol to derive a key. This can be done using an Enumerable as a middle-man:
array = [
{:price => 1, :count => 3},
{:price => 2, :count => 3},
{:price => 3, :count => 3}
]
array.each.with_object(:price).map(&:[])
#=> [1, 2, 3]
Beyond being slightly more verbose and more difficult to understand, it also slower.
Benchmark.bm do |b|
b.report { 10000.times { array.map{|x| x[:price] } } }
b.report { 10000.times { array.each.with_object(:price).map(&:[]) } }
end
# user system total real
# 0.004816 0.000005 0.004821 ( 0.004816)
# 0.015723 0.000606 0.016329 ( 0.016334)
I'd like to be able to subtract two hashes and get a third hash in Ruby.
The two hashes look like this:
h1 = {"Cat" => 100, "Dog" => 5, "Bird" => 2, "Snake" => 10}
h1.default = 0
h2 = {"cat" => 50, "dog" => 3, "BIRD" => 4, "Mouse" => 75, "Snake" => 10}
h2.default = 0
I'd like to be able to call a method on h1 like this:
h1.difference(h2)
and get this hash as a result:
{"Cat" => 50, "Dog" => 2, "BIRD" => -2, "Mouse" => -75}
I'd like to create a new hash with keys from both Hashes and the values of the new hash to be the value of the key in the first hash minus the value of that key in the second hash. The catch is that I'd like this Hash method to work regardless of the case of the keys. In other words, I'd like "Cat" to match up with "cat".
Here's what I have so far:
class Hash
def difference(another_hash)
(keys + another_hash.keys).map { |key| key.strip }.uniq.inject(Hash.new(0)) { |acc, key| acc[key] = (self[key] - another_hash[key]); acc }.delete_if { |key, value| value == 0 }
end
end
This is OK, but, unfortunately, the result isn't what I want.
Any help would be appreciated.
How about converting the hashes to sets.
require 'set'
h1 = {"Cat" => 100, "Dog" => 5, "Bird" => 2, "Snake" => 10}
h1.default = 0
h2 = {"cat" => 50, "dog" => 3, "BIRD" => 4, "Mouse" => 75, "Snake" => 10}
h2.default = 0
p (h1.to_set - h2.to_set)
#=> #<Set: {["Cat", 100], ["Dog", 5], ["Bird", 2]}>
As a recommendation...
I've used something like this in the past:
class Hash
def downcase_keys
Hash[map{ |k,v| [k.downcase, v]}]
end
def difference(other)
Hash[self.to_a - other.to_a]
end
alias :- :difference
end
which lets me do things like:
irb(main):206:0> h1.downcase_keys - h2.downcase_keys
{
"cat" => 100,
"dog" => 5,
"bird" => 2
}
irb(main):207:0> h2.downcase_keys - h1.downcase_keys
{
"cat" => 50,
"dog" => 3,
"bird" => 4,
"mouse" => 75
}
The alias gives you the nice syntax of using - instead of difference, similar to using - for Arrays and Sets. You can still use difference though:
irb(main):210:0> h1.downcase_keys.difference(h2.downcase_keys)
{
"cat" => 100,
"dog" => 5,
"bird" => 2
}
irb(main):211:0> h2.downcase_keys.difference(h1.downcase_keys)
{
"cat" => 50,
"dog" => 3,
"bird" => 4,
"mouse" => 75
}
I always normalize my hash keys, and don't allow variants to leak in. It makes processing the hashes much too difficult when you don't know what the keys are called, so I'd highly recommend doing that as a first step. It's a code-maintenance issue.
Otherwise, you could create a map of the original key names and their normalized names, but you run into problems if your hash contains two unique-case keys, such as 'key' and 'KEY', because normalizing will stomp on one.
Sorry that due to the time limit (I have to take care of my baby boy now), only figured out this stupid but working code:
h1 = {"Cat" => 100, "Dog" => 5, "Bird" => 2, "Snake" => 10}
h1.default = 0
h2 = {"cat" => 50, "dog" => 3, "BIRD" => 4, "Mouse" => 75, "Snake" => 10}
h2.default = 0
h3 = {"Cat" => 50, "Dog" => 2, "BIRD" => -2, "Mouse" => -75}
class Hash
def difference(subtrahend)
diff = {}
self.each_pair do |k1, v1|
flag = false
subtrahend.each_pair do |k2, v2|
if k1.downcase == k2.downcase
flag = true
v_diff = v1 - v2
break if v_diff == 0
v_diff > 0 ? diff[k1] = v_diff : diff[k2] = v_diff
end
end
diff[k1] = v1 unless flag
end
subtrahend.each_pair do |k2, v2|
flag = false
self.each_pair do |k1, v1|
if k1.downcase == k2.downcase
flag = true
break
end
end
diff[k2] = -v2 unless flag
end
return diff
end
end
h1.difference(h2) == h3 ? puts("Pass") : puts("Fail") #=> "Pass"
I got this to the resque https://github.com/junegunn/insensitive_hash
then follow your procedure but slighly tweaked as requirement
require 'insensitive_hash'
h1 = {"Cat" => 100, "Dog" => 5, "Bird" => 2, "Snake" => 10}.insensitive
h1.default = 0
h2 = {"cat" => 50, "dog" => 3, "BIRD" => 4, "Mouse" => 75, "Snake" => 10}.insensitive
h2.default = 0
class Hash
def difference(another_hash)
(keys + another_hash.keys).map { |key|
key.downcase }.uniq.inject(Hash.new(0)) do |acc, key|
val = self[key] - another_hash[key]
acc[key] = val if val!= 0
acc
end
end
end
h1.difference(h2)
# => {"cat"=>50, "dog"=>2, "bird"=>-2, "mouse"=>-75}
This time I would like to provide another solution: normalized -> store original key value pairs -> grab the original key who has larger value as the key for the difference.
h1 = {"Cat" => 100, "Dog" => 5, "Bird" => 2, "Snake" => 10}
h1.default = 0
h2 = {"cat" => 50, "dog" => 3, "BIRD" => 4, "Mouse" => 75, "Snake" => 10}
h2.default = 0
h3 = {"Cat" => 50, "Dog" => 2, "BIRD" => -2, "Mouse" => -75}
class Hash
def difference(subtrahend)
# create a hash which contains all normalized keys
all_pairs = (self.keys.map{|x| x.downcase} + subtrahend.keys.map{|x| x.downcase}).uniq.inject({}) do |pairs, key|
pairs[key] = []
pairs
end
#=> {"mouse"=>[], "cat"=>[], "snake"=>[], "bird"=>[], "dog"=>[]}
# push original key value pairs into array which is the value of just created hash
[self, subtrahend].each_with_index do |hsh, idx|
hsh.each_pair { |k, v| all_pairs[k.downcase].push([k, v]) }
all_pairs.each_value { |v| v.push([nil, 0]) if v.size == idx }
end
#=> {"mouse"=>[[nil, 0], ["Mouse", 75]], "cat"=>[["Cat", 100], ["cat", 50]], "snake"=>[["Snake", 10], ["Snake", 10]], "bird"=>[["Bird", 2], ["BIRD", 4]], "dog"=>[["Dog", 5], ["dog", 3]]}
results = {}
all_pairs.each_value do |values|
diff = values[0][1] - values[1][1]
# always take the key whose value is larger
if diff > 0
results[values[0][0]] = diff
elsif diff < 0
results[values[1][0]] = diff
end
end
return results
end
end
puts h1.difference(h2).inspect #=> {"Cat" => 50, "Dog" => 2, "BIRD" => -2, "Mouse" => -75}
h1.difference(h2) == h3 ? puts("Pass") : puts("Fail") #=> "Pass"
According to what you described, this one does a pretty good job. The result is exactly what you've shown (key is not normalized in the final result, but depends on whose value is bigger).