Our product currently installs via 4-5 MSI's which are created from .vdproj files which consist are created from the output from vs 2010 projects and additional information in merge modules.
I have been looking at InstallShield and WIX as a possible replacement due to VS2012 no longer supporting VS Setup Projects (oh no!) so we have to find something else.
I've had a little play with InstallShield and I couldn't really get to grips with it, additional to installing the product, the installer also has to take in a few parameters such as a database name and location etc. I couldn't seem to find a way to get this info into the InstallShield project - This was using InstallSHield limited edition for visual studio though
I'm not sure which would be the best to use? Has anybody had experiences with converting to WIX or IS from a VDPROJ?
EDIT
It looks like WIX is going to be the easiest and I am trying to get to grips with it.
I cant seem to find any useful posts that allow me to direct project output into my WIX installer, and how to create variables. (Without using plugins)
It's hard to give a simple answer because you are actually asking really high level questions that require an understanding of your installation needs and a whole bunch of training in the art of creating installers.
Personally I have installers that are 100% WiX, 100% InstallShield ( Both Limited Edition and Premiere Edition ) and a blend of the two.
Limited Edition is limited but it also does some things really well and provides some features that aren't really there and/or easy to implment in WiX.
One good strategy is to use InstallShield LE as a simple container and then do most of your authoring in WiX. I describe that pattern here in my blog:
Augmenting InstallShield using Windows Installer XML - Certificates
InstallShield Professional and above has a tool for migrating VDPROJ projects but I'd use it with caution. Most VDPROJ installers have some horrible authoring and it would be better to refactor rather then migrate.
I strongly suggest looking at Wix#. See http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/31407/Wix-WixSharp-managed-interface-for-WiX.
Also see the CodePlex home page: http://wixsharp.codeplex.com/
For developers primarily coding in C#, Wix# this would probably be the most simple and comfortable skill set to add, and it is free and directly integrates into the Visual Studio environment. I've been using it with great success in Visual Studio 2012 and 2013.
For C# developers needing to create a Windows Installer MSI to deploy their app, Wix# is perhaps the best replacement for the "Packaging and Deployment" project type that Microsoft removed from Visual Studio starting with VS2012. Wix is a C# front end for the WiX (Windows Installer Xml) Toolset. Using Wix# allows building a complete Windows Installer MSI in the C# language.
Wix# is useful for a broad range of installation/deployment scenarios, and lends itself reasonably well to Continuous Integration scenarios. There are Wix# examples for deploying Windows desktop applications, for installing Windows Services, and installing ASP.NET websites, and many more types of installations.
Wix# handles typical installer requirements, and the Wix# installer code for simple projects is indeed simple. For application installs that are more complex, and require advanced features, Wix# can tap into the power of the full WiX Toolset when needed. For example, when installing a .NET application, a typical requirement would be to install the application exe and dll files, and tailor some .NET configuration files and/or registry entries on the target system.
Below is an example of the C# code for a simple Wix# installer that installs an application on a target system, and modifies some configuration files. This example assumes that you have written a utility named "TailorMyConfig.exe", e.g., a simple C# program that uses ConfigurationManager.AppSettings routines, and you are deploying this exe along with your app.
using System;
using System.Windows.Forms;
using System.Diagnostics;
using Microsoft.Deployment.WindowsInstaller;
using WixSharp;
class Script
{
static public void Main(string[] args)
{
var project = new Project("MyProduct",
new Dir(#"%ProgramFiles%\My Company\My Product",
new File(#"Files\Bin\MyApp.exe"),
new File(#"Files\Bin\TailorMyConfig.exe")),
new ManagedAction("UpdateConfigFile"));
project.Id = new Guid("6f330b47-2577-43ad-9095-1861ba25889b");
Compiler.BuildMsi(project);
}
}
public class MyCustomAction
{
[CustomAction]
public static ActionResult UpdateConfigFile(Session session)
{
if (DialogResult.Yes == MessageBox.Show("Config file update ready to run.\n Update config file(s) now?",
"Config Tailoring Utility",
MessageBoxButtons.YesNo))
{
Process.Start("TailorMyConfig.exe", "Run utility to tailor config file to current system");
}
return ActionResult.Success;
}
}
Note that there are "better" ways to modify a config file using WiX XML features. For simplicity, the example above assumed a custom-written C# exe utility for modifying config files. I would suggest using WiX XML capabilities for doing this instead. You can incorporate nearly any WiX XML capabilities directly into your Wix# setup using the Wix# technique of "XML injection".
Remember, Wix# is simply a C# front end that emits WiX XML syntax. After Wix# has emitted the WiX XML (wxs file), that wxs file can easily be post-processed to insert additional WiX XML features. Then the resulting wxs file gets compiled by the WiX Toolset into an MSI.
For an example of using XML Injection to incorporate WiX XML features into a Wix# (C#)installation, look here In Wix#, how to avoid creating a physical folder on the target system, when deploying only registry entries?
In that question, see my answer that uses the technique of hooking up a delegate to the "WixSourceGenerated" event.
You could then use this XML injection approach to insert some WiX XML into your installer that would accomplish the config file editing. An example of some typical WiX XML to modify config files is here:
How to modify .NET config files during installation?
Another typical requirement of an installer would be to add or modify Windows Registry entries on a target system. Wix# provides direct support for that using the "RegValue" class. The advantage there is when using Wix# you also get a full "uninstall" capability for free, including uninstalling/reverting registry entries to the pre-install state. This is a natural result of Wix# being built on top of the WiX Toolset and Windows Installer technology. An example of a registry-only Wix# installer is here: In Wix#, how to avoid creating a physical folder on the target system, when deploying only registry entries?
The Wix# approach has been very useful in my environment, and it allows use of the familiar C# skillset without having to jump headfirst into the full complexity of the WiX XML installer technology.
The first accepted answer advocated this approach:
One good strategy is to use InstallShield LE as a simple container and
then do most of your authoring in WiX. I describe that pattern here in
my blog:
http://blog.iswix.com/2011/01/augmenting-installshield-using-windows_19.html
While that is a fine and workable approach, the approach I'm suggesting here has the following advantages:
ADVANTAGES OF USING Wix# PLUS WiX APPROACH
No need whatsoever to deal with InstallShield LE or any other proprietary installer product
The entirety of most installers are written in C# code, a familiar skill set
No need to learn the full WiX toolset environment up-front; you can start with C# code and then add the advanced WiX capabilities as you need them, using XML Injection.
The approach would work well in Continuous Integration environments, with all the components lending themselves to being XCopy-deploy installed on build servers, and all components being eminently suitable for automation by scripting, e.g., Powershell scripts.
If Microsoft changes course AGAIN on installer tools bundled with Visual Studio, you will NOT be impacted.
ELEMENTS IN COMMON WITH IS LE + WIX
Built on top of WiX Toolset capabilities, thus all capabilities of WiX XML can be incorporated into an installer
Many excellent "how-to's" for WiX solutions to deployment problems are available on SO and elsewhere
Generates authentic MSI Windows Installers, complete with uninstall capabilities and all the great features of that technology.
You will want to learn more about WiX and Windows Installer technology when creating installers. Advanced capabilities will often require dropping down into WiX XML.
Both are integrated more or less seamlessly into the Visual Studio environment. (If anything, the Wix# approach would have a slight advantage)
So, while the other approach is a workable solution, I recommend Wix# + WiX Toolset as the path of least aggravation, going forward, for VS2012, VS2013, VS201x. Perhaps the biggest advantage is that you are unlikely to ever have to have to change your underlying deployment technology and approach again, to be blindsided by Microsoft again, no matter what no matter what backroom deals Microsoft's marketing managers make to include or pull deployment technology from Visual Studio.
For a free tool WiX is your best choice. If you also are interested in commercial tools, Advanced Installer can help you create/convert the project much faster, without any scripting required. It also has a predefined project template for importing your VDPROJ. For what you need an Enterprise license is required, as you need access to its Dialogs Editor and SQL Scripts features. But you can test all of them in the trial period.
If you want to move to other installation system - NSIS or Inno Setup try this Visual Studio extension: http://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/5e57fe9a-ae5d-4740-a1c3-7a8e278e105b
Related
I have been referencing the following tutorial for creating a Setup Project for WiX v3, however, most WiX tutorials on the internet are targeting a C# application as its base project. I am currently building a Visual C++17 Win32 application that I want to deploy (i.e. create a setup *.msi installer) using WiX, given how powerful WiX is.
Unfortunately, adding a reference to my C++ project yields a yellow bang exclamation point:
Moreover, when trying to reference an icon file, for example, in the Product.wxs file using $(var.TimeTrack.ProjectDir)\TimeTrack.ico reports that it is an "undefined predecessor variable." I have tried unloading the WiX Setup Project and tried validating that the yellow banged Visual C++ project reference is referring to the correct path in the *.wixproj file. The include path appears to be correct:
<ItemGroup>
<ProjectReference Include="..\TimeTrack\TimeTrack.vcxproj">
<Name>TimeTrack</Name>
<!-- More not shown. -->
</ItemGroup>
I did a bit of digging and I cam across this StackOverflow posting that indicated that WiX is dependent on .NET framework. In addition, there seems to be a lot of very old postings (e.g. example 1) on this topic and I just am not entirely sure if I am just misunderstanding something here. According to this post, the WiX project cannot refer to any C/C++ code, but this appears to be referring to "Custom Actions," which appear to be an entirely different topic (?).
All in all, am I doing something wrong or is WiX not capable of deploying C++ applications? Is WiX only meant for deploying C# applications?
WiX has a development dependency on .NET but not an install time dependency.
Files are files. WiX doesn't care if they are C, C++, VB, PowerBuilder, Delphi, .NET, NodeJS, Electron or whatever.
The main differences for .NET vs C/C++ is:
1) .NET typically requires you to check that .NET is installed or author a bootstrapper to install it.
2) .NET core can typically be packaged with the app privately without a system wide installation of .NET core.
3) C/C++ typically requires installing the VCRedist via a bootstrapper or statically linking the files into your application.
4) .NET is "AnyCPU" where as C/C++ is compiled for the platform. MSI is compiled for the platoform. This means for .NET a single x86 MSI can deploy a .NET app that might run 32bit or 64bit depending on how it was built. For C/C++ you might need to create a 32bit MSI and a 64bit MSI for your app.
I have a FOSS tool that helps with learning and authoring WiX. You can read about it here:
http://www.github.com/iswix-llc/iswix-tutorials
The tutorials only hav C# examples but pull requests are welcome. Create your C/C++ application and use a postbuild copy command to stage the files to the Installer\Deploy folder and everything else is mostly the same.
The reason I ask is I want a small installation size and I only use the product for writing code for school work. I will not need 3rd party software, web capability, or integration with other software and applications.
In a comment now you requested for "command line to run the web installer in a certain predefined way say only download and install visual studio core editor and.net components". BTW, the recommendation including installing .NET components was a part of my original answer- now I splitted the answers, one for minimal install and this one for what you requested secondly, including .NET Visual Studio components:
The command line to install core and .net minimal is:
vs_xxxx.exe --layout %CD%\vs2017offline --lang en-US --add Microsoft.VisualStudio.Workload.ManagedDesktop
(set your individual downloaded .exe name for 'vs_xxxx.exe', my downloaded name was for example 'vs_enterprise__873301792.1489161815.exe')
The new installer for Visual Studio gives you a lot of flexibility about which components to install. By default, you'll have no additional features selected. VS will only install what it calls the Visual Studio core editor, which is described as:
The Visual Studio core shell experience including syntax-aware code editing, source code control and work item management.
With this, you'll get support for TextMate language grammars (you can install any you want), but you won't have the overhead of installing any language services or project types. So far, VS is a glorified editor; this minimal install will take 600MB. If you're looking for something smaller, you should probably consider Visual Studio Code instead.
Workloads
The first tab of the new VS installer is the Workloads section. This gives you some pre-packaged feature groups targeted at specific development platforms. There are separate categories of workloads (Windows, Web, Gaming, and Other) and taking the Windows category for example, there are 3 different workloads available: UWP, .NET Desktop (like WinForms and WPF), and C++ Desktop development.
Each workload has required and optional features. Some of the optional features will be selected by default as they are "recommended". You can slim down by unselecting these.
If the workloads are too heavy-handed for you, you can use...
Individual components
On this tab, you can piece together any single components you want. If a workload seems too large, you can see what components it would install, then go to this tab and pick the smaller set you would like.
Note that some components do have dependencies (sometimes numerous), and the installer will show you all of the dependent packages added. If you try to remove them, it will notify you of dependent components that will also be removed.
You have the following alternatives:
1.
Minimal Visual Studio: Start the standard Visual Studio web installer, and select nothing, then you get the minimal installation for only the development environment (IDE), especially editor.
2.
If this is too big for you, you can use something similar to Visual Studio, for example, you can Visual Studio Code editor or you can use SharpDevelop as an alternative to Visual Studio. Open Source and smaller footprint.
You can work with every editor on the commandline using "csc.exe myhomework.cs" (CSharp compiler).
3.
The solution with smallest footprint (without Visual Studio):
Just use the editor you are used to, even notepad is possible: Depending on your .NET version and Windows directory, the compiler can be found for example here:
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\csc.exe
or
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.5\csc.exe
The 64 bit versions of those you get in the mirrored folders "Framework64" instead of "Framework"..
Normally you would like to download the whole .NET SDK (developer pack) additionally, but for a single homework, csc.exe might be enough.
Here is the developer pack for .NET 6.2 framework (Visual Studio uses that as kind of a kernel too).
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=53321
I have an application which I have built in Visual Studio 2012, one part of which is in C# and one part of which is in C++. The GUI for the application uses a third party GUI control.
Consequently I have three dependencies that need to be checked for and installed with my project:
The Microsoft Visual C++ redistributable
The .NET framework 4.5
The GUI control
My installer for the project is currently built using WiX. Is there a way to make WiX do the following?:
At install time check for the presence of (e.g.) the C++ redistributable and install it if it is not present
Remove these components at uninstall (if and only if they were installed at install time, obviously)
If not, my guess would be that the answer is to create another C# project which can run each msi in turn, but I'd like to be able to do the whole thing through WiX - is it possible? If so, how?
WiX has added to its original purpose of being a Windows Installer toolset. It now has a bootstrapper/chainer/bundler/reboot manager/package manager, sometimes called Burn. In Visual Studio, it is accessible via the WiX Bootstrapper project template.
You'd need to have a WiX Setup project for your application. Then define a chain sequence for the four setups. VC and .NET should be marked permanent because you don't known if and when they should be uninstalled. Same thing probably goes for the GUI control. That leaves your application, which the bootstrapper will uninstall when it is uninstalled.
You could create a bootstrapper to install your application and its prerequisites.
WiX toolset provides all necessary tools for you to create a bundle that contains different packages, one of it would be your own MSI.
Have a look at Burn and the WiX toolset documentation. The How To Guides show ways to achieve exactly what you want, for example there is a tutorial describing how to Install the .NET Framework using a bootstrapper.
Maybe the Standard Bootstrapper Application is what you are looking for. Or have a look at customized Managed Bootstrapper Applications. For example the fancy Visual Studio 2012 installer is a WiX MBA. But be warned, in my opinion a MBA is a lot of work.
I am quite new to Windows Installers, i faced some problems, but finally accomplished what i wanted. One important question remains for me. I can't figure out where i can download or how to create or update bootstrapper packages.
My application needed SQL server compact 3.5 and the bootstrapper package was installed on my hard disk by VS2008. What i wanted was SQL server compact 3.5 SP2 and i also needed an offline installation. I searched a lot on the internet, but could net figure out how to upgrade my SQLCE bootstrapper package to SP2, moreover i could not figure out where to download, create or upgrade these bootstrapper packages like e.g. .Net Framework myself.
I do know how to use Bootstrapper Manifest Generator in case i need to create a bootstrapper package, but to use BMG to create Microsoft packages i think i a short on information (i could not find too musch about this as well) to create correct package and product XMLs.
Maybe i am just silly, but if someone could explain me in what way i can update or upgrade my offline bootstrapper packages in ht Microsoft SDK folder, i will be grateful. It will save me a lot of misery next time.
Thanks a lot in advance!
Svatja
P.S. I obtained the SQLCE SP2 package by downloading and installing VS2010 express on my Vista test PC.
As far as I know, there is currently no simple answer to the bootstrapper problem, but I'll try to point you to some possible solutions:
I'm not familiar with the Bootstrapper Manifest Generator, but my understanding is that the VS bootstrapper is not very flexible. I remember I looked at it briefly and decided against it.
Since your question is tagged Wix I'll assume that you're aware of Wix 3.6's "Burn" bootstrapper currently in development. The present recommendation is that if you're planning to ship in the fall, you should pick up the Wix 3.6 dependency and start working with Burn. I consider this a very risky choice since there is no guarantee that Burn will actually be done in time.
I've used the Microsoft .NET Framework Setup.exe Bootstrapper Sample as the basis of a simple bootstrapper before. The idea here is to replace the logic to check for .NET Framework with logic to check for the SQL server you require. Then either install SQL Server by executing the redistributable, or skip the SQL Server installation and go straight into your MSI installation.
If you want to provide a user experience beyond regular MSI dialogs, you could look into creating an external UI, although documentation for this is scarce. I recently completed a WPF external UI bootstrapper. The way I tackled this was creating a C# version of the MsiSetExternalUI Handler Sample using Wix's DTF, and then integrated it into a WPF wizard based on this MVVM Wizard sample.
I hope that can at least get you started on choosing the right bootstrapper solution for your deployment. Good luck!
I have an app that on first installer run needs a boostrapper where you can choose the language of the installed app, install .net framework if it's not there yet and some other prerequisites.
I've taken a look at the WiX How To: Install the .NET Framework Using a Bootstrapper
but I don't see how to use this for other custom prerequisites.
What's the best bootstrapper to use for this?
After the app is installed we have an update check on the app startup. if a new version exists we need to download it and upgrade the software.
This wouldn't be a silent upgrade because the EULA and some other stuff might change in the meantime so we still need a GUI for those checks in the updater msi. So i'm considering different options on how to do this.
My first thought was to have 2 separate installers.
The first one would be with the bootstrapper and full GUI, the other would be with minimal GUI for updates.
Is there a better option?
I'd also like the access to the update installer on the to be limited to only users that have the software actually installed.
i'm not quite sure of the best way to do this.
I'm familiar with the WiX upgrade process itself with the upgrade code etc... so that's not the issue.
I'm just looking for a way to design all this in the best way possible.
Any ideas are appreciated. I'm using WiX 3.0.5419.0 from Visual Studio 2008.
I've taken a look at the WiX How To:
Install the .NET Framework Using a
Bootstrapper but I don't see how to
use this for other custom
prerequisites.
You can use the same technique (i.e. the msbuild GenerateBootStrapper task) to install custom prerequisites, but you'll have to author your own bootstrapper packages.
One way to do this is to study the existing bootstrapper packages in C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\SDK\v2.0\BootStrapper\Packages\ (or the ones in the Windows SDK) and read the documentation of the Bootstrapper Manifest XML format. The bootstrapper generator tool might also be helpful.
As for auto-updating your application: it's not supported by wix. I believe there were once plans to add this functionality under the name clickthrough, but I don't think those plans ever matured. If they did, I can't find any documentation about it.