My enums are stored as int in mongodb (from C# app). Now in Java, when I try to retrieve them, it throws an exception (it seems enum can be converted from string value only). Is there any way I can do it?
Also when I save some collections into mongodb (from Java), it converts enum values to string (not their value/cardinal). Is there any override available?
This can be achieved by writing mongodb-converter on class level but I don't want to write mondodb-converter for each class as these enums are in many different classes.
So do we have something on the field level?
After a long digging in the spring-mongodb converter code,
Ok i finished and now it's working :) here it is (if there is simpler solution i will be happy see as well, this is what i've done ) :
first define :
public interface IntEnumConvertable {
public int getValue();
}
and a simple enum that implements it :
public enum tester implements IntEnumConvertable{
vali(0),secondvali(1),thirdvali(5);
private final int val;
private tester(int num)
{
val = num;
}
public int getValue(){
return val;
}
}
Ok, now you will now need 2 converters , one is simple ,
the other is more complex. the simple one (this simple baby is also handling the simple convert and returns a string when cast is not possible, that is great if you want to have enum stored as strings and for enum that are numbers to be stored as integers) :
public class IntegerEnumConverters {
#WritingConverter
public static class EnumToIntegerConverter implements Converter<Enum<?>, Object> {
#Override
public Object convert(Enum<?> source) {
if(source instanceof IntEnumConvertable)
{
return ((IntEnumConvertable)(source)).getValue();
}
else
{
return source.name();
}
}
}
}
the more complex one , is actually a converter factory :
public class IntegerToEnumConverterFactory implements ConverterFactory<Integer, Enum> {
#Override
public <T extends Enum> Converter<Integer, T> getConverter(Class<T> targetType) {
Class<?> enumType = targetType;
while (enumType != null && !enumType.isEnum()) {
enumType = enumType.getSuperclass();
}
if (enumType == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"The target type " + targetType.getName() + " does not refer to an enum");
}
return new IntegerToEnum(enumType);
}
#ReadingConverter
public static class IntegerToEnum<T extends Enum> implements Converter<Integer, Enum> {
private final Class<T> enumType;
public IntegerToEnum(Class<T> enumType) {
this.enumType = enumType;
}
#Override
public Enum convert(Integer source) {
for(T t : enumType.getEnumConstants()) {
if(t instanceof IntEnumConvertable)
{
if(((IntEnumConvertable)t).getValue() == source.intValue()) {
return t;
}
}
}
return null;
}
}
}
and now for the hack part , i personnaly didnt find any "programmitacly" way to register a converter factory within a mongoConverter , so i digged in the code and with a little casting , here it is (put this 2 babies functions in your #Configuration class)
#Bean
public CustomConversions customConversions() {
List<Converter<?, ?>> converters = new ArrayList<Converter<?, ?>>();
converters.add(new IntegerEnumConverters.EnumToIntegerConverter());
// this is a dummy registration , actually it's a work-around because
// spring-mongodb doesnt has the option to reg converter factory.
// so we reg the converter that our factory uses.
converters.add(new IntegerToEnumConverterFactory.IntegerToEnum(null));
return new CustomConversions(converters);
}
#Bean
public MappingMongoConverter mappingMongoConverter() throws Exception {
MongoMappingContext mappingContext = new MongoMappingContext();
mappingContext.setApplicationContext(appContext);
DbRefResolver dbRefResolver = new DefaultDbRefResolver(mongoDbFactory());
MappingMongoConverter mongoConverter = new MappingMongoConverter(dbRefResolver, mappingContext);
mongoConverter.setCustomConversions(customConversions());
ConversionService convService = mongoConverter.getConversionService();
((GenericConversionService)convService).addConverterFactory(new IntegerToEnumConverterFactory());
mongoConverter.afterPropertiesSet();
return mongoConverter;
}
You will need to implement your custom converters and register it with spring.
http://static.springsource.org/spring-data/data-mongo/docs/current/reference/html/#mongo.custom-converters
Isn't it easier to use plain constants rather than an enum...
int SOMETHING = 33;
int OTHER_THING = 55;
or
public class Role {
public static final Stirng ROLE_USER = "ROLE_USER",
ROLE_LOOSER = "ROLE_LOOSER";
}
String yourRole = Role.ROLE_LOOSER
Related
I have a Money class with factory methods for numeric and String values. I would like to use it as a property of my input Pojos.
I created some Converters for it, this is the String one:
#Component
public class StringMoneyConverter implements Converter<String, Money> {
#Override
public Money convert(String source) {
return Money.from(source);
}
}
My testing Pojo is very simple:
public class MoneyTestPojo {
private Money value;
//getter and setter ommited
}
I have an endpoint which expects a Pojo:
#PostMapping("/pojo")
public String savePojo(#RequestBody MoneyTestPojo pojo) {
//...
}
Finally, this is the request body:
{
value: "100"
}
I have the following error when I try this request:
JSON parse error: Cannot construct instance of
br.marcellorvalle.Money (although at least one Creator
exists): no String-argument constructor/factory method to deserialize
from String value ('100'); nested exception is
com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.exc.MismatchedInputException: Cannot
construct instance of br.marcellorvalle.Money (although at
least one Creator exists): no String-argument constructor/factory
method to deserialize from String value ('100')\n at [Source:
(PushbackInputStream); line: 8, column: 19] (through reference chain:
br.marcellorvalle.MoneytestPojo[\"value\"])",
If I change Money and add a constructor which receives a String this request works but I really need a factory method as I have to deliver special instances of Money on specific cases (zeros, nulls and empty strings).
Am I missing something?
Edit: As asked, here goes the Money class:
public class Money {
public static final Money ZERO = new Money(BigDecimal.ZERO);
private static final int PRECISION = 2;
private static final int EXTENDED_PRECISION = 16;
private static final RoundingMode ROUNDING = RoundingMode.HALF_EVEN;
private final BigDecimal amount;
private Money(BigDecimal amount) {
this.amount = amount;
}
public static Money from(float value) {
return Money.from(BigDecimal.valueOf(value));
}
public static Money from(double value) {
return Money.from(BigDecimal.valueOf(value));
}
public static Money from(String value) {
if (Objects.isNull(value) || "".equals(value)) {
return null;
}
return Money.from(new BigDecimal(value));
}
public static Money from(BigDecimal value) {
if (Objects.requireNonNull(value).equals(BigDecimal.ZERO)) {
return Money.ZERO;
}
return new Money(value);
}
//(...)
}
Annotating your factory method with #JsonCreator (from the com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation package) will resolve the issue:
#JsonCreator
public static Money from(String value) {
if (Objects.isNull(value) || "".equals(value)) {
return null;
}
return Money.from(new BigDecimal(value));
}
I just tested it, and it worked for me. Rest of your code looks fine except for the sample request (value should be in quotes), but I guess that's just a typo.
Update 1:
If you're unable to make changes to the Money class, I can think of another option - a custom Jackson deserializer:
public class MoneyDeserializer extends StdDeserializer<Money> {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 0L;
public MoneyDeserializer() {
this(null);
}
public MoneyDeserializer(Class<?> vc) {
super(vc);
}
#Override
public Money deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext ctxt)
throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
JsonNode node = jp.getCodec().readTree(jp);
String value = node.textValue();
return Money.from(value);
}
}
Just register it with your ObjectMapper.
It seems that using the org.springframework.core.convert.converter.Converter only works if the Money class is a "#PathVariable" in the controller.
I finally solved it using the com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.util.StdConverter class:
I created the following Converter classes:
public class MoneyJsonConverters {
public static class FromString extends StdConverter<String, Money> {
#Override
public Money convert(String value) {
return Money.from(value);
}
}
public static class ToString extends StdConverter<Money, String> {
#Override
public String convert(Money value) {
return value.toString();
}
}
}
Then I annotated the Pojo with #JsonDeserialize #JsonSerialize accordingly:
public class MoneyTestPojo {
#JsonSerialize(converter = MoneyJsonConverters.ToString.class)
#JsonDeserialize(converter = MoneyJsonConverters.FromString.class)
private Money value;
//getter and setter ommited
}
I try to initialize a Map in my SpringBoot application but I am doing something wrong.
My config.properties:
myFieldMap.10000.fieldName=MyFieldName
myFieldMap.10000.fieldName2=MyFieldName2
myFieldMap.10001.fieldName=MyFieldName
myFieldMap.10001.fieldName2=MyFieldName2
myFieldMap.10002.fieldName=MyFieldName
myFieldMap.10003.fieldName2=MyFieldName2
...
(Isn't it possible to use some kind of bracket notation like myFieldMap[10001].fieldName for maps (I saw it used for lists).
I tried with my MyConfig.class:
#PropertySource("classpath:config.properties")
#Component
public class MyConfig {
private java.util.Map<Integer, MyMapping> theMappingsMap = new HashMap<Integer, MyMapping>();
public Map<String, MyMapping> getTheMappingsMap() {
return theMappingsMap;
}
public void setTheMappingsMap(Map<String, MyMapping> theMappingsMap) {
this.theMappingsMap= theMappingsMap;
}
public class MyMapping {
private String fieldName;
private String fieldName2;
public String getFieldName() {
return fieldName;
}
public String getFieldName2() {
return fieldName2;
}
public void setFieldName(final String fieldName) {
this.fieldName = fieldName;
}
public void setFieldName2(final String fieldName) {
this.fieldName2 = fieldName;
}
}
}
How do I have to adapt my code to let SpringBoot initialize my configuration (Map) with the definitions in the config.properties file?
You are missing #ConfigurationProperties annotation. Try this
#PropertySource("classpath:config.properties")
#Configuration
#ConfigurationProperties
public class MyConfig {
private java.util.Map<String, MyMapping> myFieldMap = new HashMap<>();
....
}
Another issue with your code is, if you want to make MyMapping class as an inner class of MyConfig, then you need to declare it as static. Or else you can make it as a separate class.
Is it possible to use inheritance in Spring Boot YML configuration classes? If so, how would that be accomplished?
For example:
#ConfigurationProperties(prefix="my-config")
public class Config {
List<Vehicle> vehicles;
}
And the class (or interface) "Vehicle" has two implementations: Truck and Car. So the YAML might look like:
my.config.vehicles:
-
type: car
seats: 3
-
type: truck
axles: 3
I do not think it is possible (at least not that I know of). You could however design your code as follow:
Inject the properties into a Builder object
Define an object with all properties, which we'll call the VehicleBuilder (or factory, you choose its name).
The VehicleBuilders are injected from the Yaml.
You can then retrieve each builder's vehicle in a #PostConstruct block. The code:
#ConfigurationProperties(prefix="my-config")
#Component
public class Config {
private List<VehicleBuilder> vehicles = new ArrayList<VehicleBuilder>();
private List<Vehicle> concreteVehicles;
public List<VehicleBuilder> getVehicles() {
return vehicles;
}
public List<Vehicle> getConcreteVehicles() {
return concreteVehicles;
}
#PostConstruct
protected void postConstruct(){
concreteVehicles = vehicles.stream().map(f -> f.get())
.collect(Collectors.<Vehicle>toList());
}
}
The builder:
public class VehicleBuilder {
private String type;
private int seats;
private int axles;
public Vehicle get() {
if ("car".equals(type)) {
return new Car(seats);
} else if ("truck".equals(type)) {
return new Trunk(axles);
}
throw new AssertionError();
}
public void setType(String type) {
this.type = type;
}
public void setSeats(int seats) {
this.seats = seats;
}
public void setAxles(int axles) {
this.axles = axles;
}
}
I'm trying to use something similar to org.springframework.cache.annotation.Cacheable :
Custom annotation:
#Target(ElementType.METHOD)
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Documented
public #interface CheckEntity {
String message() default "Check entity msg";
String key() default "";
}
Aspect:
#Component
#Aspect
public class CheckEntityAspect {
#Before("execution(* *.*(..)) && #annotation(checkEntity)")
public void checkEntity(JoinPoint joinPoint, CheckEntitty checkEntity) {
System.out.println("running entity check: " + joinPoint.getSignature().getName());
}
}
Service:
#Service
#Transactional
public class EntityServiceImpl implements EntityService {
#CheckEntity(key = "#id")
public Entity getEntity(Long id) {
return new Entity(id);
}
}
My IDE (IntelliJ) doesn't see anything special with the key = "#id" usage in contrast to similar usages for Cacheable where it's shown with different color than plain text. I'm mentioning the IDE part just as a hint in case it helps, it looks like the IDE is aware in advance about these annotations or it just realizes some connection which doesn't exist in my example.
The value in the checkEntity.key is '#id' instead of an expected number.
I tried using ExpressionParser but possibly not in the right way.
The only way to get parameter value inside the checkEntity annotation is by accessing the arguments array which is not what I want because this annotation could be used also in methods with more than one argument.
Any idea?
Adding another simpler way of doing it using Spring Expression. Refer below:
Your Annotation:
#Target(ElementType.METHOD)
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Documented
public #interface CheckEntity {
String message() default "Check entity msg";
String keyPath() default "";
}
Your Service:
#Service
#Transactional
public class EntityServiceImpl implements EntityService {
#CheckEntity(keyPath = "[0]")
public Entity getEntity(Long id) {
return new Entity(id);
}
#CheckEntity(keyPath = "[1].otherId")
public Entity methodWithMoreThanOneArguments(String message, CustomClassForExample object) {
return new Entity(object.otherId);
}
}
class CustomClassForExample {
Long otherId;
}
Your Aspect:
#Component
#Aspect
public class CheckEntityAspect {
#Before("execution(* *.*(..)) && #annotation(checkEntity)")
public void checkEntity(JoinPoint joinPoint, CheckEntitty checkEntity) {
Object[] args = joinPoint.getArgs();
ExpressionParser elParser = new SpelExpressionParser();
Expression expression = elParser.parseExpression(checkEntity.keyPath());
Long id = (Long) expression.getValue(args);
// Do whatever you want to do with this id
// This works for both the service methods provided above and can be re-used for any number of similar methods
}
}
PS: I am adding this solution because I feel this is a simpler/clearner approach as compared to other answers and this might be helpful for someone.
Thanks to #StéphaneNicoll I managed to create a first version of a working solution:
The Aspect
#Component
#Aspect
public class CheckEntityAspect {
protected final Log logger = LogFactory.getLog(getClass());
private ExpressionEvaluator<Long> evaluator = new ExpressionEvaluator<>();
#Before("execution(* *.*(..)) && #annotation(checkEntity)")
public void checkEntity(JoinPoint joinPoint, CheckEntity checkEntity) {
Long result = getValue(joinPoint, checkEntity.key());
logger.info("result: " + result);
System.out.println("running entity check: " + joinPoint.getSignature().getName());
}
private Long getValue(JoinPoint joinPoint, String condition) {
return getValue(joinPoint.getTarget(), joinPoint.getArgs(),
joinPoint.getTarget().getClass(),
((MethodSignature) joinPoint.getSignature()).getMethod(), condition);
}
private Long getValue(Object object, Object[] args, Class clazz, Method method, String condition) {
if (args == null) {
return null;
}
EvaluationContext evaluationContext = evaluator.createEvaluationContext(object, clazz, method, args);
AnnotatedElementKey methodKey = new AnnotatedElementKey(method, clazz);
return evaluator.condition(condition, methodKey, evaluationContext, Long.class);
}
}
The Expression Evaluator
public class ExpressionEvaluator<T> extends CachedExpressionEvaluator {
// shared param discoverer since it caches data internally
private final ParameterNameDiscoverer paramNameDiscoverer = new DefaultParameterNameDiscoverer();
private final Map<ExpressionKey, Expression> conditionCache = new ConcurrentHashMap<>(64);
private final Map<AnnotatedElementKey, Method> targetMethodCache = new ConcurrentHashMap<>(64);
/**
* Create the suitable {#link EvaluationContext} for the specified event handling
* on the specified method.
*/
public EvaluationContext createEvaluationContext(Object object, Class<?> targetClass, Method method, Object[] args) {
Method targetMethod = getTargetMethod(targetClass, method);
ExpressionRootObject root = new ExpressionRootObject(object, args);
return new MethodBasedEvaluationContext(root, targetMethod, args, this.paramNameDiscoverer);
}
/**
* Specify if the condition defined by the specified expression matches.
*/
public T condition(String conditionExpression, AnnotatedElementKey elementKey, EvaluationContext evalContext, Class<T> clazz) {
return getExpression(this.conditionCache, elementKey, conditionExpression).getValue(evalContext, clazz);
}
private Method getTargetMethod(Class<?> targetClass, Method method) {
AnnotatedElementKey methodKey = new AnnotatedElementKey(method, targetClass);
Method targetMethod = this.targetMethodCache.get(methodKey);
if (targetMethod == null) {
targetMethod = AopUtils.getMostSpecificMethod(method, targetClass);
if (targetMethod == null) {
targetMethod = method;
}
this.targetMethodCache.put(methodKey, targetMethod);
}
return targetMethod;
}
}
The Root Object
public class ExpressionRootObject {
private final Object object;
private final Object[] args;
public ExpressionRootObject(Object object, Object[] args) {
this.object = object;
this.args = args;
}
public Object getObject() {
return object;
}
public Object[] getArgs() {
return args;
}
}
I think you probably misunderstand what the framework is supposed to do for you vs. what you have to do.
SpEL support has no way to be triggered automagically so that you can access the actual (resolved) value instead of the expression itself. Why? Because there is a context and as a developer you have to provide this context.
The support in Intellij is the same thing. Currently Jetbrains devs track the places where SpEL is used and mark them for SpEL support. We don't have any way to conduct the fact that the value is an actual SpEL expression (this is a raw java.lang.String on the annotation type after all).
As of 4.2, we have extracted some of the utilities that the cache abstraction uses internally. You may want to benefit from that stuff (typically CachedExpressionEvaluator and MethodBasedEvaluationContext).
The new #EventListener is using that stuff so you have more code you can look at as examples for the thing you're trying to do: EventExpressionEvaluator.
In summary, your custom interceptor needs to do something based on the #id value. This code snippet is an example of such processing and it does not depend on the cache abstraction at all.
Spring uses internally an ExpressionEvaluator to evaluate the Spring Expression Language in the key parameter (see CacheAspectSupport)
If you want to emulate the same behaviour, have a look at how CacheAspectSupport is doing it. Here is an snippet of the code:
private final ExpressionEvaluator evaluator = new ExpressionEvaluator();
/**
* Compute the key for the given caching operation.
* #return the generated key, or {#code null} if none can be generated
*/
protected Object generateKey(Object result) {
if (StringUtils.hasText(this.metadata.operation.getKey())) {
EvaluationContext evaluationContext = createEvaluationContext(result);
return evaluator.key(this.metadata.operation.getKey(), this.methodCacheKey, evaluationContext);
}
return this.metadata.keyGenerator.generate(this.target, this.metadata.method, this.args);
}
private EvaluationContext createEvaluationContext(Object result) {
return evaluator.createEvaluationContext(
this.caches, this.metadata.method, this.args, this.target, this.metadata.targetClass, result);
}
I don't know which IDE you are using, but it must deal with the #Cacheable annotation in a different way than with the others in order to highlight the params.
Your annotation can be used with methods with more than 1 parameter, but that doesn't mean you can't use the arguments array. Here's a sollution:
First we have to find the index of the "id" parameter. This you can do like so:
private Integer getParameterIdx(ProceedingJoinPoint joinPoint, String paramName) {
MethodSignature methodSignature = (MethodSignature) joinPoint.getSignature();
String[] parameterNames = methodSignature.getParameterNames();
for (int i = 0; i < parameterNames.length; i++) {
String parameterName = parameterNames[i];
if (paramName.equals(parameterName)) {
return i;
}
}
return -1;
}
where "paramName" = your "id" param
Next you can get the actual id value from the arguments like so:
Integer parameterIdx = getParameterIdx(joinPoint, "id");
Long id = joinPoint.getArgs()[parameterIdx];
Of course this assumes that you always name that parameter "id". One fix there could be to allow to specify the parameter name on the annotation, something like
#Target(ElementType.METHOD)
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Documented
public #interface CheckEntity {
String message() default "Check entity msg";
String key() default "";
String paramName() default "id";
}
I'm trying to call Spring's ControllerLinkBuilder.methodOn() with a non-String type, which always fails. And I don't know which kind of Converter to use and where to register it.
Here's my Controller:
#RestController
#RequestMapping("/companies")
class CompanyController {
#RequestMapping(value="/{c}", method=RequestMethod.GET)
void getIt(#PathVariable Company c) {
System.out.println(c);
Link link = linkTo(methodOn(getClass()).getIt(c));
}
}
The System.out.println(c) works well. My Company Domain object get's fetched from DB. (I'm using DomainClassConverter)
But the other way doesn't work: ConverterNotFoundException: No converter found capable of converting from type #PathVariable Company to type String
Do I just need a Converter<Company, String>? And where should I register it? I tried something within the addFormatters(FormatterRegistry registry) method of WebMvcConfigurationSupport, but it did just display the same error. But after all I'm not sure what exactly I tried...
I had the same issue, it is a bug. If you don't want to do copy & paste on every controller you can try something like this in your WebMvcConfigurationSupport. It works for me.
#Override
public void addFormatters(final FormatterRegistry registry) {
super.addFormatters(registry);
try {
Class<?> clazz = Class.forName("org.springframework.hateoas.mvc.AnnotatedParametersParameterAccessor$BoundMethodParameter");
Field field = clazz.getDeclaredField("CONVERSION_SERVICE");
field.setAccessible(true);
DefaultFormattingConversionService service = (DefaultFormattingConversionService) field.get(null);
for (Converter<?, ?> converter : beanFactory.getBeansOfType(Converter.class).values()) {
service.addConverter(converter);
}
}
catch (Exception ex) {
throw new RuntimeException(ex);
}
}
Found a "solution". It requires a lot copy & paste from Spring's classes, but at least it works!
Basically I had to copy org.springframework.hateoas.mvc.AnnotatedParametersParameterAccessor and change two lines:
class AnnotatedParametersParameterAccessor {
...
static class BoundMethodParameter {
// OLD: (with this one you can't call addConverter())
// private static final ConversionService CONVERSION_SERVICE = new DefaultFormattingConversionService();
// NEW:
private static final FormattingConversionService CONVERSION_SERVICE = new DefaultFormattingConversionService();
...
public BoundMethodParameter(MethodParameter parameter, Object value, AnnotationAttribute attribute) {
...
// ADD:
CONVERSION_SERVICE.addConverter(new MyNewConverter());
}
...
}
This class get's used by ControllerLinkBuilderFactory. So I had to copy & paste that, too.
And this one get's used by ControllerLinkBuilder. Also copy & paste.
My Converter just does myDomainObject.getId().toString():
public class MyNewConverter implements Converter<Company, String> {
#Override
public String convert(Company source) {
return source.getId().toString();
}
}
Now you can use the copy&pasted ControllerLinkBuilder inside the controller and it works as expected!
I developed a framework to render links in spring hateoas and it supports annotated parameters (#PathVariable and #RequestParam) and arbitrary parameters types.
In order to render these arbitrary types you have to create a spring bean that implements com.github.osvaldopina.linkbuilder.argumentresolver.ArgumentResolver interface.
The interface has 3 methods:
public boolean resolveFor(MethodParameter methodParameter)
Is used to determine if the ArgumentResolver can be used to deal with the methodParameter. For example:
public boolean resolveFor(MethodParameter methodParameter) {
return UserDefinedType.class.isAssignableFrom(methodParameter.getParameterType());
}
Defines that this ArgumentResover will be used for UserDefinedType.
public void augmentTemplate(UriTemplateAugmenter uriTemplateAugmenter, MethodParameter methodParameter)
Is used to include in the uriTemplate associated with the method the proper template parts. For example:
#Override
public void augmentTemplate(UriTemplateAugmenter uriTemplateAugmenter, MethodParameter methodParameter) {
uriTemplateAugmenter.addToQuery("value1");
uriTemplateAugmenter.addToQuery("value2");
}
adds 2 query parameters (value1 and value2) to the uri template.
public void setTemplateVariables(UriTemplate template, MethodParameter methodParameter, Object parameter, List<String> templatedParamNames)
Sets in the template the values for the template variables. For example:
#Override
public void setTemplateVariables(UriTemplate template, MethodParameter methodParameter, Object parameter, List<String> templatedParamNames) {
if (parameter != null && ((UserDefinedType) parameter).getValue1() != null) {
template.set("value1", ((UserDefinedType) parameter).getValue1());
}
else {
template.set("value1", "null-value");
}
if (parameter != null && ((UserDefinedType) parameter).getValue2() != null) {
template.set("value2", ((UserDefinedType) parameter).getValue2());
}
else {
template.set("value2", "null-value");
}
}
gets the UserDefinedType instance and use it to sets the templates variables value1 and value2 defined in augmentTemplate method.
A ArgumentResolver complete example would be:
#Component
public class UserDefinedTypeArgumentResolver implements ArgumentResolver {
#Override
public boolean resolveFor(MethodParameter methodParameter) {
return UserDefinedType.class.isAssignableFrom(methodParameter.getParameterType());
}
#Override
public void augmentTemplate(UriTemplateAugmenter uriTemplateAugmenter, MethodParameter methodParameter) {
uriTemplateAugmenter.addToQuery("value1");
uriTemplateAugmenter.addToQuery("value2");
}
#Override
public void setTemplateVariables(UriTemplate template, MethodParameter methodParameter, Object parameter, List<String> templatedParamNames) {
if (parameter != null && ((UserDefinedType) parameter).getValue1() != null) {
template.set("value1", ((UserDefinedType) parameter).getValue1());
}
else {
template.set("value1", "null-value");
}
if (parameter != null && ((UserDefinedType) parameter).getValue2() != null) {
template.set("value2", ((UserDefinedType) parameter).getValue2());
}
else {
template.set("value2", "null-value");
}
}
}
and for the following link builder:
linksBuilder.link()
.withRel("user-type")
.fromControllerCall(RootRestController.class)
.queryParameterForUserDefinedType(new UserDefinedType("v1", "v2"));
to the following method:
#RequestMapping("/user-defined-type")
#EnableSelfFromCurrentCall
public void queryParameterForUserDefinedType(UserDefinedType userDefinedType) {
}
would generate the following link:
{
...
"_links": {
"user-type": {
"href": "http://localhost:8080/user-defined-type?value1=v1&value2=v2"
}
...
}
}
full config in spring boot. same as Franco Gotusso's answer just provide more detail.
```
/**
* This configuration file is to fix bug of Spring Hateoas.
* please check https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-hateoas/issues/118.
*/
#Component
public class MvcConfig extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter {
#Autowired
private ApplicationContext applicationContext;
#Override
public void addFormatters(final FormatterRegistry registry) {
super.addFormatters(registry);
try {
Class<?> clazz = Class.forName("org.springframework.hateoas.mvc."
+ "AnnotatedParametersParameterAccessor$BoundMethodParameter");
Field field = clazz.getDeclaredField("CONVERSION_SERVICE");
field.setAccessible(true);
DefaultFormattingConversionService service =
(DefaultFormattingConversionService) field.get(null);
for (Formatter<?> formatter : applicationContext
.getBeansOfType(Formatter.class).values()) {
service.addFormatter(formatter);
}
for (Converter<?, ?> converter : applicationContext
.getBeansOfType(Converter.class).values()) {
service.addConverter(converter);
}
} catch (Exception ex) {
throw new RuntimeException(ex);
}
}
}
```