I compiled a vala program by using following command:
valac test.vala
Of course am I able to run the program on my computer, but when I am trying to run the .exe file on a different one I get following error:
libglib-***.dll is missing on this computer
This is how my source code looks like:
using GLib;
int main(string[] args)
{
bool running = true;
while(running)
{
print("Hello World\n");
}
return 0;
}
The error is pretty clear, but what can I do against it? Thanks in advance.
Along your exe file you will need to install all the libraries you use (glib, gio, etc ...) and their own dependencies (Gtk will require gdk,cairo,pango, and some more).
Edit: take a look at this question on SO, the minimal dependencies are listed.
Related
I am writing a rust script, which I place into my bin folder in the end, so its useable from everywhere. All I do is compile my two rust files into a releasable executable. My rust files look as follows:
// main.rs
mod where_are;
fn main() {
println!("{}", where_are::birthdays());
}
// where_are.rs
pub fn birthdays() -> &'static str { return "~/.birthdays"; }
That gets compiled with sudo cargo build --release. Then the target/release/birthdays file gets copied to usr/local/bin/birthdays. Now when I try to execute birthdays I get following error:
[1] 44039 killed birthdays
Any help would be appreciated!
Important information: If I execute the compiled file before I move it into the bin folder it works perfectly
I studied the HIDL using Nfc code in AOSP .
As i know, when INfc.hal is compiled, INfc.h is autogenerated like following picture.
In NxpService.cpp, there is code like following
#include <android/hardware/nfc/1.1/INfc.h>
But, I couldn't find that path.
where is the real path of android/hardware/nfc/1.1/INfc.h?
In addition, I became curious how gcc compile works in NxpService.cpp that uses INfc.h.
Could you explain how gcc compiler can find INfc.h and work without compile error?
INfc.hal
Path: /hardware/interfaces/nfc/1.1/INfc.hal
Android.bp
hidl_interface {
name: "android.hardware.nfc#1.1",
root: "android.hardware",
NxpService.cpp
Path: /hardware/nxp/nfc/1.1/NxpService.cpp
#include <android/hardware/nfc/1.1/INfc.h>
...
int main(){
sp<INfc> nfc_service = new Nfc();
status_t status = nfc_service->registerAsService();
android.hardware.nfc#1.1 would be at hardware/interfaces/nfc/1.1/ here.
The mappings for Android provided interfaces to their actual location are shown here https://source.android.com/devices/architecture/hidl/interfaces.
The files you look for are all auto-generated by hidl-gen, and they usually locate in out directory, e.g.
$ANDROID_ROOT/out/soong/.intermediates/hardware/interfaces/nfc/1.1/android.hardware.nfc#1.1_genc++_headers/gen/android/hardware/nfc/1.1
I have a simple Scala code that i want to run from osx Terminal.
Currently, my code runs in intellij.
object test
{
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit =
{
// my code
}
}
So i have this .scala path:
/Users/rdave/projects/test.scala
This is what i have tried from osx Terminal:
scala /Users/rdave/projects/test.scala
scalac /Users/rdave/projects/test.scala
And got command not found
command not found
Is generated by the terminal, signaling that it can't find your executable
As the docs suggest:
Path and Environment
For quick access, add scala and scalac to your path. For example:
Environment Variable Value (example)
Unix $SCALA_HOME /usr/local/share/scala
$PATH $PATH:$SCALA_HOME/bin
After this, you will be able to call scala and scalac without any errors.
Better yet, put your code in the "standard" directory structure (your scala class would therefore end up in /Users/rdave/projects/myproject/src/main/scala/) and run sbt console. You will have access to all your code and be able to use the REPL for experimentation.
I have to instrument gcc for some purposes. The goal is to be able to track what GCC functions are called during a particularly compile. Unfortunately I'm not really familiar with the architecture of GCC so I need a little help. I tried the following steps:
1) Hacking gcc/Makefile.in and adding "-finstrument-functions" flag to T_CFLAGS.
2) I have an already implemented and tested version of start_test and end_test functions. They are called from gcc/main.c, before and after toplev_main() call. The containing file is linked to gcc (the object is added to OBJS-common and the dependency is defined later in gcc/Makefile.in)
3) Downloading prerequisites with contrib/download_prerequisites.
4) Executing the configuration from a clean build directory (on the same level with the source dir): ./../gcc-4.6.2/configure --prefix="/opt/gcc-4.6.2/" --enable-languages="c,c++"
5) Starting the build with "make all"
This way I runned out of memory, although I had 28G.
Next I tried to remove the T_CFLAGS settings from the Makefile and give -finstrument-functions to the make command: make CFLAGS="-finstrument-functions". The build was successful this way but when I tried to compile something it resulted empty output files. (Theoretically end_test should have written its result to a given file.)
What do I make wrong?
Thanks in advance!
Unless you specifically exclude it from being instrumented, main itself is subject to instrumentation, so placing calls to your start_test and end_test inside main is not how you want to do it. The 'correct' way to ensure that the file is opened and closed at the right times is to define a 'constructor' and 'destructor', and GCC automatically generates calls to them before and after main:
void start_test (void)
__attribute__ ( (no_instrument_function, constructor));
void end_test (void)
__attribute__ ( (no_instrument_function, destructor));
/* FILE to write profiling information. */
static FILE *profiler_out;
void start_test (void)
{
profiler_out = fopen ("profiler.out", "w");
if (profiler_out == NULL)
exit (-1);
}
void end_test (void)
{
fclose (profiler_out);
}
Footnotes:
Read more about constructor, destructor and no_instrument_function attributes here. They are function attributes that GCC understands.
Read this excellent guide to instrumentation, on the IBM website.
I know these questions have been asked before but everything suggest using GNUStep. Is there a way to use Foundation without GNUStep? This is also a learning question for me (like if it's possible to do by linking files or something)
I have Cygwin and gcc installed. I got all the Libraries from CocoaTron as in here: http://code.google.com/p/cocotron/source/browse/
I added the library folder to the OBJC_INCLUDE_PATH and the C_INCLUDE_PATH and it doesn't complain about not being able to find Foundation.h anymore.
But I get other errors like:
$ gcc intro.m -o intro
In file included from /cocoa/CoreFoundation/CFBase.h:144,
from /cocoa/CoreFoundation/CFAttributedString.h:8,
from /cocoa/CoreFoundation/CoreFoundation.h:42,
from /cocoa/Foundation/Foundation.h:37,
from car.h:1,
from intro.m:2:
/cocoa/CoreFoundation/CFString.h:88: error: parse error before "va_list"
In file included from /cocoa/Foundation/NSAffineTransform.h:9,
from /cocoa/Foundation/Foundation.h:41,
from car.h:1,
from intro.m:2:
/cocoa/Foundation/NSGeometry.h:9:32: Foundation/NSObject.h: No such file or directory
In file included from /cygdrive/d/Allebrum Resources/C Libraries/cocoa/Foundation/NSAffineTransform.h:9,
from /cygdrive/d/Allebrum Resources/C Libraries/cocoa/Foundation/Foundation.h:41,
from car.h:1,
from intro.m:2:
I'm sorry for the novice question, I was just interested in running a few test and didn't want to install GNUStep.
I mean, a really simple example like:
//car.h
#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
#interface Car : NSObject{
}
- (void)addGas;
#end
#include <stdio.h>
#import "car.h"
int main(int argc, const char * argv[]){
printf("Hello");
return 0;
}
Yes, I know this example doesn't need objC ;) I was just trying to follow along with a tutorial.
Thanks for the help!
Looking at the Cocotron's requirements page and general information page, it seems that it only supports development on the Mac. What it provides is the ability to build a Windows- or Linux-compatible product… on your Mac.
So, as far as I can tell, at this time, you can't use Cocotron to develop on Windows. You'll still have to use GNUstep.