Related
Basically I want to take as input text from a file, remove a line from that file, and send the output back to the same file. Something along these lines if that makes it any clearer.
grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name > file_name
however, when I do this I end up with a blank file.
Any thoughts?
Use sponge for this kind of tasks. Its part of moreutils.
Try this command:
grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name | sponge file_name
You cannot do that because bash processes the redirections first, then executes the command. So by the time grep looks at file_name, it is already empty. You can use a temporary file though.
#!/bin/sh
tmpfile=$(mktemp)
grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name > ${tmpfile}
cat ${tmpfile} > file_name
rm -f ${tmpfile}
like that, consider using mktemp to create the tmpfile but note that it's not POSIX.
Use sed instead:
sed -i '/seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}/d' file_name
try this simple one
grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name | tee file_name
Your file will not be blank this time :) and your output is also printed to your terminal.
You can't use redirection operator (> or >>) to the same file, because it has a higher precedence and it will create/truncate the file before the command is even invoked. To avoid that, you should use appropriate tools such as tee, sponge, sed -i or any other tool which can write results to the file (e.g. sort file -o file).
Basically redirecting input to the same original file doesn't make sense and you should use appropriate in-place editors for that, for example Ex editor (part of Vim):
ex '+g/seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}/d' -scwq file_name
where:
'+cmd'/-c - run any Ex/Vim command
g/pattern/d - remove lines matching a pattern using global (help :g)
-s - silent mode (man ex)
-c wq - execute :write and :quit commands
You may use sed to achieve the same (as already shown in other answers), however in-place (-i) is non-standard FreeBSD extension (may work differently between Unix/Linux) and basically it's a stream editor, not a file editor. See: Does Ex mode have any practical use?
One liner alternative - set the content of the file as variable:
VAR=`cat file_name`; echo "$VAR"|grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' > file_name
Since this question is the top result in search engines, here's a one-liner based on https://serverfault.com/a/547331 that uses a subshell instead of sponge (which often isn't part of a vanilla install like OS X):
echo "$(grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name)" > file_name
The general case is:
echo "$(cat file_name)" > file_name
Edit, the above solution has some caveats:
printf '%s' <string> should be used instead of echo <string> so that files containing -n don't cause undesired behavior.
Command substitution strips trailing newlines (this is a bug/feature of shells like bash) so we should append a postfix character like x to the output and remove it on the outside via parameter expansion of a temporary variable like ${v%x}.
Using a temporary variable $v stomps the value of any existing variable $v in the current shell environment, so we should nest the entire expression in parentheses to preserve the previous value.
Another bug/feature of shells like bash is that command substitution strips unprintable characters like null from the output. I verified this by calling dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=1 >> file_name and viewing it in hex with cat file_name | xxd -p. But echo $(cat file_name) | xxd -p is stripped. So this answer should not be used on binary files or anything using unprintable characters, as Lynch pointed out.
The general solution (albiet slightly slower, more memory intensive and still stripping unprintable characters) is:
(v=$(cat file_name; printf x); printf '%s' ${v%x} > file_name)
Test from https://askubuntu.com/a/752451:
printf "hello\nworld\n" > file_uniquely_named.txt && for ((i=0; i<1000; i++)); do (v=$(cat file_uniquely_named.txt; printf x); printf '%s' ${v%x} > file_uniquely_named.txt); done; cat file_uniquely_named.txt; rm file_uniquely_named.txt
Should print:
hello
world
Whereas calling cat file_uniquely_named.txt > file_uniquely_named.txt in the current shell:
printf "hello\nworld\n" > file_uniquely_named.txt && for ((i=0; i<1000; i++)); do cat file_uniquely_named.txt > file_uniquely_named.txt; done; cat file_uniquely_named.txt; rm file_uniquely_named.txt
Prints an empty string.
I haven't tested this on large files (probably over 2 or 4 GB).
I have borrowed this answer from Hart Simha and kos.
This is very much possible, you just have to make sure that by the time you write the output, you're writing it to a different file. This can be done by removing the file after opening a file descriptor to it, but before writing to it:
exec 3<file ; rm file; COMMAND <&3 >file ; exec 3>&-
Or line by line, to understand it better :
exec 3<file # open a file descriptor reading 'file'
rm file # remove file (but fd3 will still point to the removed file)
COMMAND <&3 >file # run command, with the removed file as input
exec 3>&- # close the file descriptor
It's still a risky thing to do, because if COMMAND fails to run properly, you'll lose the file contents. That can be mitigated by restoring the file if COMMAND returns a non-zero exit code :
exec 3<file ; rm file; COMMAND <&3 >file || cat <&3 >file ; exec 3>&-
We can also define a shell function to make it easier to use :
# Usage: replace FILE COMMAND
replace() { exec 3<$1 ; rm $1; ${#:2} <&3 >$1 || cat <&3 >$1 ; exec 3>&- }
Example :
$ echo aaa > test
$ replace test tr a b
$ cat test
bbb
Also, note that this will keep a full copy of the original file (until the third file descriptor is closed). If you're using Linux, and the file you're processing on is too big to fit twice on the disk, you can check out this script that will pipe the file to the specified command block-by-block while unallocating the already processed blocks. As always, read the warnings in the usage page.
The following will accomplish the same thing that sponge does, without requiring moreutils:
shuf --output=file --random-source=/dev/zero
The --random-source=/dev/zero part tricks shuf into doing its thing without doing any shuffling at all, so it will buffer your input without altering it.
However, it is true that using a temporary file is best, for performance reasons. So, here is a function that I have written that will do that for you in a generalized way:
# Pipes a file into a command, and pipes the output of that command
# back into the same file, ensuring that the file is not truncated.
# Parameters:
# $1: the file.
# $2: the command. (With $3... being its arguments.)
# See https://stackoverflow.com/a/55655338/773113
siphon()
{
local tmp file rc=0
[ "$#" -ge 2 ] || { echo "Usage: siphon filename [command...]" >&2; return 1; }
file="$1"; shift
tmp=$(mktemp -- "$file.XXXXXX") || return
"$#" <"$file" >"$tmp" || rc=$?
mv -- "$tmp" "$file" || rc=$(( rc | $? ))
return "$rc"
}
There's also ed (as an alternative to sed -i):
# cf. http://wiki.bash-hackers.org/howto/edit-ed
printf '%s\n' H 'g/seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}/d' wq | ed -s file_name
You can use slurp with POSIX Awk:
!/seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}/ {
q = q ? q RS $0 : $0
}
END {
print q > ARGV[1]
}
Example
This does the trick pretty nicely in most of the cases I faced:
cat <<< "$(do_stuff_with f)" > f
Note that while $(…) strips trailing newlines, <<< ensures a final newline, so generally the result is magically satisfying.
(Look for “Here Strings” in man bash if you want to learn more.)
Full example:
#! /usr/bin/env bash
get_new_content() {
sed 's/Initial/Final/g' "${1:?}"
}
echo 'Initial content.' > f
cat f
cat <<< "$(get_new_content f)" > f
cat f
This does not truncate the file and yields:
Initial content.
Final content.
Note that I used a function here for the sake of clarity and extensibility, but that’s not a requirement.
A common usecase is JSON edition:
echo '{ "a": 12 }' > f
cat f
cat <<< "$(jq '.a = 24' f)" > f
cat f
This yields:
{ "a": 12 }
{
"a": 24
}
Try this
echo -e "AAA\nBBB\nCCC" > testfile
cat testfile
AAA
BBB
CCC
echo "$(grep -v 'AAA' testfile)" > testfile
cat testfile
BBB
CCC
I usually use the tee program to do this:
grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name | tee file_name
It creates and removes a tempfile by itself.
Basically I want to take as input text from a file, remove a line from that file, and send the output back to the same file. Something along these lines if that makes it any clearer.
grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name > file_name
however, when I do this I end up with a blank file.
Any thoughts?
Use sponge for this kind of tasks. Its part of moreutils.
Try this command:
grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name | sponge file_name
You cannot do that because bash processes the redirections first, then executes the command. So by the time grep looks at file_name, it is already empty. You can use a temporary file though.
#!/bin/sh
tmpfile=$(mktemp)
grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name > ${tmpfile}
cat ${tmpfile} > file_name
rm -f ${tmpfile}
like that, consider using mktemp to create the tmpfile but note that it's not POSIX.
Use sed instead:
sed -i '/seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}/d' file_name
try this simple one
grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name | tee file_name
Your file will not be blank this time :) and your output is also printed to your terminal.
You can't use redirection operator (> or >>) to the same file, because it has a higher precedence and it will create/truncate the file before the command is even invoked. To avoid that, you should use appropriate tools such as tee, sponge, sed -i or any other tool which can write results to the file (e.g. sort file -o file).
Basically redirecting input to the same original file doesn't make sense and you should use appropriate in-place editors for that, for example Ex editor (part of Vim):
ex '+g/seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}/d' -scwq file_name
where:
'+cmd'/-c - run any Ex/Vim command
g/pattern/d - remove lines matching a pattern using global (help :g)
-s - silent mode (man ex)
-c wq - execute :write and :quit commands
You may use sed to achieve the same (as already shown in other answers), however in-place (-i) is non-standard FreeBSD extension (may work differently between Unix/Linux) and basically it's a stream editor, not a file editor. See: Does Ex mode have any practical use?
One liner alternative - set the content of the file as variable:
VAR=`cat file_name`; echo "$VAR"|grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' > file_name
Since this question is the top result in search engines, here's a one-liner based on https://serverfault.com/a/547331 that uses a subshell instead of sponge (which often isn't part of a vanilla install like OS X):
echo "$(grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name)" > file_name
The general case is:
echo "$(cat file_name)" > file_name
Edit, the above solution has some caveats:
printf '%s' <string> should be used instead of echo <string> so that files containing -n don't cause undesired behavior.
Command substitution strips trailing newlines (this is a bug/feature of shells like bash) so we should append a postfix character like x to the output and remove it on the outside via parameter expansion of a temporary variable like ${v%x}.
Using a temporary variable $v stomps the value of any existing variable $v in the current shell environment, so we should nest the entire expression in parentheses to preserve the previous value.
Another bug/feature of shells like bash is that command substitution strips unprintable characters like null from the output. I verified this by calling dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=1 >> file_name and viewing it in hex with cat file_name | xxd -p. But echo $(cat file_name) | xxd -p is stripped. So this answer should not be used on binary files or anything using unprintable characters, as Lynch pointed out.
The general solution (albiet slightly slower, more memory intensive and still stripping unprintable characters) is:
(v=$(cat file_name; printf x); printf '%s' ${v%x} > file_name)
Test from https://askubuntu.com/a/752451:
printf "hello\nworld\n" > file_uniquely_named.txt && for ((i=0; i<1000; i++)); do (v=$(cat file_uniquely_named.txt; printf x); printf '%s' ${v%x} > file_uniquely_named.txt); done; cat file_uniquely_named.txt; rm file_uniquely_named.txt
Should print:
hello
world
Whereas calling cat file_uniquely_named.txt > file_uniquely_named.txt in the current shell:
printf "hello\nworld\n" > file_uniquely_named.txt && for ((i=0; i<1000; i++)); do cat file_uniquely_named.txt > file_uniquely_named.txt; done; cat file_uniquely_named.txt; rm file_uniquely_named.txt
Prints an empty string.
I haven't tested this on large files (probably over 2 or 4 GB).
I have borrowed this answer from Hart Simha and kos.
This is very much possible, you just have to make sure that by the time you write the output, you're writing it to a different file. This can be done by removing the file after opening a file descriptor to it, but before writing to it:
exec 3<file ; rm file; COMMAND <&3 >file ; exec 3>&-
Or line by line, to understand it better :
exec 3<file # open a file descriptor reading 'file'
rm file # remove file (but fd3 will still point to the removed file)
COMMAND <&3 >file # run command, with the removed file as input
exec 3>&- # close the file descriptor
It's still a risky thing to do, because if COMMAND fails to run properly, you'll lose the file contents. That can be mitigated by restoring the file if COMMAND returns a non-zero exit code :
exec 3<file ; rm file; COMMAND <&3 >file || cat <&3 >file ; exec 3>&-
We can also define a shell function to make it easier to use :
# Usage: replace FILE COMMAND
replace() { exec 3<$1 ; rm $1; ${#:2} <&3 >$1 || cat <&3 >$1 ; exec 3>&- }
Example :
$ echo aaa > test
$ replace test tr a b
$ cat test
bbb
Also, note that this will keep a full copy of the original file (until the third file descriptor is closed). If you're using Linux, and the file you're processing on is too big to fit twice on the disk, you can check out this script that will pipe the file to the specified command block-by-block while unallocating the already processed blocks. As always, read the warnings in the usage page.
The following will accomplish the same thing that sponge does, without requiring moreutils:
shuf --output=file --random-source=/dev/zero
The --random-source=/dev/zero part tricks shuf into doing its thing without doing any shuffling at all, so it will buffer your input without altering it.
However, it is true that using a temporary file is best, for performance reasons. So, here is a function that I have written that will do that for you in a generalized way:
# Pipes a file into a command, and pipes the output of that command
# back into the same file, ensuring that the file is not truncated.
# Parameters:
# $1: the file.
# $2: the command. (With $3... being its arguments.)
# See https://stackoverflow.com/a/55655338/773113
siphon()
{
local tmp file rc=0
[ "$#" -ge 2 ] || { echo "Usage: siphon filename [command...]" >&2; return 1; }
file="$1"; shift
tmp=$(mktemp -- "$file.XXXXXX") || return
"$#" <"$file" >"$tmp" || rc=$?
mv -- "$tmp" "$file" || rc=$(( rc | $? ))
return "$rc"
}
There's also ed (as an alternative to sed -i):
# cf. http://wiki.bash-hackers.org/howto/edit-ed
printf '%s\n' H 'g/seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}/d' wq | ed -s file_name
You can use slurp with POSIX Awk:
!/seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}/ {
q = q ? q RS $0 : $0
}
END {
print q > ARGV[1]
}
Example
This does the trick pretty nicely in most of the cases I faced:
cat <<< "$(do_stuff_with f)" > f
Note that while $(…) strips trailing newlines, <<< ensures a final newline, so generally the result is magically satisfying.
(Look for “Here Strings” in man bash if you want to learn more.)
Full example:
#! /usr/bin/env bash
get_new_content() {
sed 's/Initial/Final/g' "${1:?}"
}
echo 'Initial content.' > f
cat f
cat <<< "$(get_new_content f)" > f
cat f
This does not truncate the file and yields:
Initial content.
Final content.
Note that I used a function here for the sake of clarity and extensibility, but that’s not a requirement.
A common usecase is JSON edition:
echo '{ "a": 12 }' > f
cat f
cat <<< "$(jq '.a = 24' f)" > f
cat f
This yields:
{ "a": 12 }
{
"a": 24
}
Try this
echo -e "AAA\nBBB\nCCC" > testfile
cat testfile
AAA
BBB
CCC
echo "$(grep -v 'AAA' testfile)" > testfile
cat testfile
BBB
CCC
I usually use the tee program to do this:
grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name | tee file_name
It creates and removes a tempfile by itself.
I am pretty new to Bash and scripting in general and could use some help. Each word in the first file is separated by \n while the second file could contain anything. If the string in the first file is not found in the second file, I want to output it. Pretty much "check if these words are in these words and tell me the ones that are not"
File1.txt contains something like:
dog
cat
fish
rat
file2.txt contains something like:
dog
bear
catfish
magic ->rat
I know I want to use grep (or do I?) and the command would be (to my best understanding):
$foo.sh file1.txt file2.txt
Now for the script...
I have no idea...
grep -iv $1 $2
Give this a try. This is straight forward and not optimized but it does the trick (I think)
while read line ; do
fgrep -q "$line" file2.txt || echo "$line"
done < file1.txt
There is a funny version below, with 4 parrallel fgrep and the use of an additional result.txt file.
> result.txt
nb_parrallel=4
while read line ; do
while [ $(jobs | wc -l) -gt "$nb_parralel" ]; do sleep 1; done
fgrep -q "$line" file2.txt || echo "$line" >> result.txt &
done < file1.txt
wait
cat result.txt
You can increase the value 4, in order to use more parrallel fgrep, depending on the number of cpus and cores and the IOPS available.
With the -f flag you can tell grep to use a file.
grep -vf file2.txt file1.txt
To get a good match on complete lines, use
grep -vFxf file2.txt file1.txt
As #anubhava commented, this will not match substrings. To fix that, we will use the result of grep -Fof file1.txt file2.txt (all the relevant keywords).
Combining these will give
grep -vFxf <(grep -Fof file1.txt file2.txt) file1.txt
Using awk you can do:
awk 'FNR==NR{a[$0]; next} {for (i in a) if (index(i, $0)) next} 1' file2 file1
rat
You can simply do the following:
comm -2 -3 file1.txt file2.txt
and also:
diff -u file1.txt file2.txt
I know you were looking for a script but I don't think there is any reason to do so and if you still want to have a script you can jsut run the commands from a script.
similar awk
$ awk 'NR==FNR{a[$0];next} {for(k in a) if(k~$0) next}1' file2 file1
rat
I know by
echo text >> file.txt
I can append the "text" to the end of the file file.txt
But is it possible to insert something at the beginning of the file without removing the existing content?
Thanks,
You can use cat and a temporary file:
echo 'text' | cat - file.txt > temp && mv temp file.txt
You can use ed, the standard editor:
stuff="this is the stuff you want to prepend to file"
ed -s file.txt < <(printf '%s\n' 1 i "$stuff" . wq) > /dev/null
If you have several lines to add, put them in an array, like so:
stuffs=( "this is the first line you want to prepend to file" "lalala the second line" "my gorilla loves bananas in this third line" )
ed -s file.txt < <(printf '%s\n' 1 i "${stuffs[#]}" . wq) > /dev/null
The only limitation is inserting a line that only consists of a single period. Sigh.
ed is the standard editor. This method involves no temp files! if you choose this method, you'll genuinely be editing the file (so you won't change permissions and ownerships). It's probably one of the most efficient methods. A more efficient method (used for huuuuge files) is to deal directly with dd. But you certainly don't want that here.
As Georgi Kirilov suggests in the comments below, you can use this method without any bashisms as so:
stuffs=( "I love oranges, but my gorilla loves bananas" )
printf '%s\n' 1 i "$stuff" . wq | ed -s file.txt > /dev/null
provided your system comes with a printf (and very, very likely it does).
Yes you can do it via sed:
sed -i '' '1i\
some-text
' file
OR using awk:
awk -v T=some-text 'NR==1{print T} 1' file
Without any external utility:
echo -e "some-text\n$(<file)" > file
Basically I want to take as input text from a file, remove a line from that file, and send the output back to the same file. Something along these lines if that makes it any clearer.
grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name > file_name
however, when I do this I end up with a blank file.
Any thoughts?
Use sponge for this kind of tasks. Its part of moreutils.
Try this command:
grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name | sponge file_name
You cannot do that because bash processes the redirections first, then executes the command. So by the time grep looks at file_name, it is already empty. You can use a temporary file though.
#!/bin/sh
tmpfile=$(mktemp)
grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name > ${tmpfile}
cat ${tmpfile} > file_name
rm -f ${tmpfile}
like that, consider using mktemp to create the tmpfile but note that it's not POSIX.
Use sed instead:
sed -i '/seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}/d' file_name
try this simple one
grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name | tee file_name
Your file will not be blank this time :) and your output is also printed to your terminal.
You can't use redirection operator (> or >>) to the same file, because it has a higher precedence and it will create/truncate the file before the command is even invoked. To avoid that, you should use appropriate tools such as tee, sponge, sed -i or any other tool which can write results to the file (e.g. sort file -o file).
Basically redirecting input to the same original file doesn't make sense and you should use appropriate in-place editors for that, for example Ex editor (part of Vim):
ex '+g/seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}/d' -scwq file_name
where:
'+cmd'/-c - run any Ex/Vim command
g/pattern/d - remove lines matching a pattern using global (help :g)
-s - silent mode (man ex)
-c wq - execute :write and :quit commands
You may use sed to achieve the same (as already shown in other answers), however in-place (-i) is non-standard FreeBSD extension (may work differently between Unix/Linux) and basically it's a stream editor, not a file editor. See: Does Ex mode have any practical use?
One liner alternative - set the content of the file as variable:
VAR=`cat file_name`; echo "$VAR"|grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' > file_name
Since this question is the top result in search engines, here's a one-liner based on https://serverfault.com/a/547331 that uses a subshell instead of sponge (which often isn't part of a vanilla install like OS X):
echo "$(grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name)" > file_name
The general case is:
echo "$(cat file_name)" > file_name
Edit, the above solution has some caveats:
printf '%s' <string> should be used instead of echo <string> so that files containing -n don't cause undesired behavior.
Command substitution strips trailing newlines (this is a bug/feature of shells like bash) so we should append a postfix character like x to the output and remove it on the outside via parameter expansion of a temporary variable like ${v%x}.
Using a temporary variable $v stomps the value of any existing variable $v in the current shell environment, so we should nest the entire expression in parentheses to preserve the previous value.
Another bug/feature of shells like bash is that command substitution strips unprintable characters like null from the output. I verified this by calling dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=1 >> file_name and viewing it in hex with cat file_name | xxd -p. But echo $(cat file_name) | xxd -p is stripped. So this answer should not be used on binary files or anything using unprintable characters, as Lynch pointed out.
The general solution (albiet slightly slower, more memory intensive and still stripping unprintable characters) is:
(v=$(cat file_name; printf x); printf '%s' ${v%x} > file_name)
Test from https://askubuntu.com/a/752451:
printf "hello\nworld\n" > file_uniquely_named.txt && for ((i=0; i<1000; i++)); do (v=$(cat file_uniquely_named.txt; printf x); printf '%s' ${v%x} > file_uniquely_named.txt); done; cat file_uniquely_named.txt; rm file_uniquely_named.txt
Should print:
hello
world
Whereas calling cat file_uniquely_named.txt > file_uniquely_named.txt in the current shell:
printf "hello\nworld\n" > file_uniquely_named.txt && for ((i=0; i<1000; i++)); do cat file_uniquely_named.txt > file_uniquely_named.txt; done; cat file_uniquely_named.txt; rm file_uniquely_named.txt
Prints an empty string.
I haven't tested this on large files (probably over 2 or 4 GB).
I have borrowed this answer from Hart Simha and kos.
This is very much possible, you just have to make sure that by the time you write the output, you're writing it to a different file. This can be done by removing the file after opening a file descriptor to it, but before writing to it:
exec 3<file ; rm file; COMMAND <&3 >file ; exec 3>&-
Or line by line, to understand it better :
exec 3<file # open a file descriptor reading 'file'
rm file # remove file (but fd3 will still point to the removed file)
COMMAND <&3 >file # run command, with the removed file as input
exec 3>&- # close the file descriptor
It's still a risky thing to do, because if COMMAND fails to run properly, you'll lose the file contents. That can be mitigated by restoring the file if COMMAND returns a non-zero exit code :
exec 3<file ; rm file; COMMAND <&3 >file || cat <&3 >file ; exec 3>&-
We can also define a shell function to make it easier to use :
# Usage: replace FILE COMMAND
replace() { exec 3<$1 ; rm $1; ${#:2} <&3 >$1 || cat <&3 >$1 ; exec 3>&- }
Example :
$ echo aaa > test
$ replace test tr a b
$ cat test
bbb
Also, note that this will keep a full copy of the original file (until the third file descriptor is closed). If you're using Linux, and the file you're processing on is too big to fit twice on the disk, you can check out this script that will pipe the file to the specified command block-by-block while unallocating the already processed blocks. As always, read the warnings in the usage page.
The following will accomplish the same thing that sponge does, without requiring moreutils:
shuf --output=file --random-source=/dev/zero
The --random-source=/dev/zero part tricks shuf into doing its thing without doing any shuffling at all, so it will buffer your input without altering it.
However, it is true that using a temporary file is best, for performance reasons. So, here is a function that I have written that will do that for you in a generalized way:
# Pipes a file into a command, and pipes the output of that command
# back into the same file, ensuring that the file is not truncated.
# Parameters:
# $1: the file.
# $2: the command. (With $3... being its arguments.)
# See https://stackoverflow.com/a/55655338/773113
siphon()
{
local tmp file rc=0
[ "$#" -ge 2 ] || { echo "Usage: siphon filename [command...]" >&2; return 1; }
file="$1"; shift
tmp=$(mktemp -- "$file.XXXXXX") || return
"$#" <"$file" >"$tmp" || rc=$?
mv -- "$tmp" "$file" || rc=$(( rc | $? ))
return "$rc"
}
There's also ed (as an alternative to sed -i):
# cf. http://wiki.bash-hackers.org/howto/edit-ed
printf '%s\n' H 'g/seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}/d' wq | ed -s file_name
You can use slurp with POSIX Awk:
!/seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}/ {
q = q ? q RS $0 : $0
}
END {
print q > ARGV[1]
}
Example
This does the trick pretty nicely in most of the cases I faced:
cat <<< "$(do_stuff_with f)" > f
Note that while $(…) strips trailing newlines, <<< ensures a final newline, so generally the result is magically satisfying.
(Look for “Here Strings” in man bash if you want to learn more.)
Full example:
#! /usr/bin/env bash
get_new_content() {
sed 's/Initial/Final/g' "${1:?}"
}
echo 'Initial content.' > f
cat f
cat <<< "$(get_new_content f)" > f
cat f
This does not truncate the file and yields:
Initial content.
Final content.
Note that I used a function here for the sake of clarity and extensibility, but that’s not a requirement.
A common usecase is JSON edition:
echo '{ "a": 12 }' > f
cat f
cat <<< "$(jq '.a = 24' f)" > f
cat f
This yields:
{ "a": 12 }
{
"a": 24
}
Try this
echo -e "AAA\nBBB\nCCC" > testfile
cat testfile
AAA
BBB
CCC
echo "$(grep -v 'AAA' testfile)" > testfile
cat testfile
BBB
CCC
I usually use the tee program to do this:
grep -v 'seg[0-9]\{1,\}\.[0-9]\{1\}' file_name | tee file_name
It creates and removes a tempfile by itself.