Is it possible to manually edit the driver to make it function on windows XP?
I guess there are many differences, but it must be possible for simple drivers, kind of porting the locations / buses they use?
Do you mean without re-compilation? If so its not recommended.
If you are willing to compile then use appropriate WDK and select appropriate build environment and try to build. You may have to change the code depending upon any APIs changed/availability.
Also note that drivers are compiled per OS i.e. there are different build environments for WinXP, Windows 2003, Windows Vista, Windows 7 etc.
Related
I currently have a 32-bit PowerBuilder application that we are trying to port over to a Windows 7 64-bit environment. Realizing the obvious that PowerBuilder 10.5 was built previously before Window7 came out and the big also the obvious fact that this application was built within a Windows XP 32-bit environment.
The 32-bit PowerBuilder application spits out the following error message when deployed on a Windows 7 64-bit machine.
Application Terminated. Error: Invalid DataWindow row/column specified at line 44 in function ivvisiblecolumn of object objectwindow
The database profile setup points to an OLEDB and the backend database is MSSQL 2008. Currently the application does run on the Windows7 64-bit environment and seems to be working in an inquiry mode only. Meaning we can read some of the records on the datawindow, but as soon as you try to make a transaction it blows up.
My question is - Is it possible to get a 32-bit app working in a 64-bit environment?
So far the client is asking to come up with possible solutions without the idea of upgrading to PowerBuilder 12.5. Essentially they want to stay at 10.5 but yet get the app working from a 32-bit environment to a 64-bit...apples to oranges if you know what I mean. Further investigation is needed into whether the code will not function in 64bit or dll issues with powerbuilder client runtime in 64bit. They are really trying to stay away from any app rewrite since the application is older than when Christ was a carpenter. The app was originally built in PB 6.5 I think.
So far I have the following ideas but I am new to this:
- I understand that Windows 7 comes with a virtual machine IIRC. I think it's called WOW64. Is it possible to create a virtual on a server and have the users run a 32-bit application inside a 64-bit machine? Then create a shortcut of somekind for the user to simply click on?
We do have a virtual XP machine and a virtual Windows7 64 bit machine for testing. PowerBuilder 10.5 actually installed on Windows 7 and seems to be working fine. However running the application in run mode or debug causes many errors as you can imagine.
The application has been built in XP and run on Windows 7, but the results yeild the above error message.
I have not looked yet into the Run under Compatibility mode, but I am told by the team it will not work.
I have not looked at UAC or ALC User management yet. Could that be something affecting the 64-bit system?
I know this is app unrelated but...I have seen in some cases 32-bit applications work in a windows 64-bit environment by simply targeting certain DLL files. An example case is Microsoft Flight Simulator X where the 32-bit game would crash in windows 7 64-bit. The solution for that was to simply go get a Vista 64-bit DLL file called uiautomationcore.dll and copy that into the windows environment. The Games also have to be installed on the root of C: in order to work.
Does anyone have any recommendations on how I can approach this problem?
I apologize If I'm vague in my notes here.
UPDATE: Has anyone had any experience with PB 10.5 runtime files on a 64 bit machine? I am wondering if the powerbuilder client runtime is installing its dlls into the correct location of the application C:\XXX or can't find it? Wondering how to approach this.
Basically nothing should prevent a 10.5 PB app to run on Win7/64. I develop and run several products in PB11.5 (also a 32bit IDE) on a win7/64. And btw, some older PB like 9 still run on Win7, so is likely PB6.5. The problem must be elsewhere, relative to the app design.
WoW64 (and Wow6432Node in the registry) is not a true VM, it's a bunch of services and system API hooked with fallbacks for 32 bit applications (and legacy applications that do not conform to the novelties introduced since Vista)
Error: Invalid DataWindow row/column specified at line 44 in function ivvisiblecolumn of object objectwindow sounds typically like an incorrectly handled return value (where a computed row number is getting negative or null before trying to access a property or data at that given invalid row), or it could be relative to the way to get back an autoincrement value from the db after an insert
beware of the UAC management that could lead to unexpected behavior with legacy application, especially if the application is using a database: the UAC guidelines tells not to install data managed by the application in the Program Files folder that is now Read only (since Vista - that guideline is since XP). Instead you must put that into a ProgramData sub-directory if it is accessible by everyone and into a user local AppData if the data is just for the current user. Win7/Vista can silently conforms to the standard by duplicating the data locally to the user (in the Users\username\AppData\Local\VirtualStore) while still pretending to the application that it is currently accessing it from Program Files...
you could give a try with Dependency Walker to look for the incorrect dll problems
We moved many of our applications to Windows 7 64bit. The only issue we ran into was with the database connections. You are running a 32bit application so you need to connect to 32bit database. If you bring up "Data Sources (ODBC)" from the control panel, you will be looking at the 64 bit entries. You need to use the 32 bit ODBC found in "C:\Windows\SysWOW64\odbcad32.exe". The Registry entries you need are in the following locations...
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\ODBC\ODBCINST.INI
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\ODBC\ODBCINST.INI\ODBC Drivers
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\ODBC\ODBC.INI
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\ODBC\ODBC.INI\ODBC Data Sources
or
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\ODBC\ODBCINST.INI
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\ODBC\ODBCINST.INI\ODBC Drivers
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\ODBC\ODBC.INI
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\ODBC\ODBC.INI\ODBC Data Sources
I have a program built with VB6 and using some 32-bit DLL's. Will this program run on a 64-bit machine? This page suggests that it should run fine on the Windows on Windows layer, but what about the DLL's?
Yes, both the VB 6 program and the DLLs will work just fine on a 64-bit version of Windows.
Since both are 32-bit, they will run under the Windows-on-Windows 64 (WoW64) subsystem, which effectively emulates a 32-bit operating system on the 64-bit versions of Windows.
I've run many such programs myself with nary a hitch.
Beyond Explorer extensions and kernel mode drivers (neither of which you've written in VB 6), any compatibility problems that you might experience are almost certainly the result of bugs in your own code, which are easily fixed upon detection. Ask more questions about that when you find them.
Are the DLLs built with VB6 as well? Or are they native?
If you are dealing with 100% VB6, then in my experience, yes they tend to run with minimal problems (I maintained a number of plug-ins for another program that were mostly implemented as VB6 COM components, around the time that Windows 7 came out).
It will all of course depend on what libraries your code is using, whether or not you are accessing locations such as %PROGRAMFILES% etc, calling code in native libraries. These things can cause small problems but it is possible to work around them.
Microsoft are still supporting the VB6 runtime on 64-bit windows
Yes, it works, and if you have any problems they will help you.
Is there any solution to run a Windows XP executable on a Windows CE or Windows Mobile Device? Actually I think it is almost impossible or at least it would be very tricky however, I have a client says that the vendor of his Windows based application declared that the app runs on Windows XP as well as Windows CE.
Is this possible? Is there any way to convert Windows XP executable (native machine code) to Windows CE (running on x86 CPU) executable?
Native code won't work out the box because the Win32 and WinCE API's are similar, but quite different at the same time. Even when they overlap, WinCE expects the API to live in coredll.dll instead of system32.dll and friends.
If it's a simple app, and you know exactly what APIs are being called, you could write a wrapper coredll.dll that exposes the WinCE style APIs. There will be lots of unicode conversion involved!
If it's a .net compact framework application it will run if the app only references the parts of the API that are common to compact framework and the full .net framework.
It's possible to develop a cross-platform .net app that shares the bulk of the code, and has separate pinvoke layers for the CE and XP APIs respectively (if you are using them).
Converting the final executable may be well-nigh impossible in some cases, but if the vendor deliberately designed it to work on both systems, then it probably does (the task would be much easier for someone who possessed the source code).
I'm developing a windows app (it depends on DirectShow, so no Linux, etc).
It will run, for now, in XP and Windows 7 (no Vista support).
However, there's a piece of code that behaves very differently in XP or Windows 7, so I need to know in which system I am, to make a workaround. As I don't support Vista -and even if I did, I guess there wouldn't be much differences- I don't care if Vista and 7 are identified as the same OS, although I'd prefer they weren't.
Just in case, I'm developing in c++, and I don't want to maintain two different executables, and I'd prefer a language-agnostic way to do it.
So, my question: What's The Right Way(tm) to check at run-time which windows version is running?
The article referenced by Naveen has an important remark, that might be relevant for your scenario, too:
Identifying the current operating system is usually not the best way to determine whether a particular operating system feature is present. This is because the operating system may have had new features added in a redistributable DLL. Rather than using GetVersionEx to determine the operating system platform or version number, test for the presence of the feature itself.
Checking for a particular feature can be done using the IsOS function.
GetVersionEx can be used to retrieve the OS version. However, be aware that the OS will identify differently depending on whether compatibility mode is in effect or not.
I'm migrating my development workstation from 32-bit Vista to 64-bit Vista.
The production platform is 32-bit Windows Server and SQL Server 2008.
Does anyone know of any issues with migrating the code base?
EDIT:
the system consists of web forms, c# code, stored procedures.
there is also ajax.net, ssrs, ssis, and dynamic reports/graphs from dundas.
however, i think other users might appreciate any lessons learned or feedback in general regarding this move.
FINDINGS:
As of Jan 24, 2009
Checkpoint VPN does not support Vista 64 (actually it seems that very few do)
Cropper utility required special download and rebuild to work on Vista 64 (Cropper looks very nice, but it lacks scrollable window capture)
The lack of support for Vista 64 made it not worth while for me. I wish someone would have mentioned the lack of VPN support, but there is currently no vpn vendor that supports 64 bit clients.... So be forwarned - as of 1/28/2009 - using Vista 64 is not a good option for those of us who need vpn.
I have done exactly this - migrated my workstation to Vista 64 whilst still deploying code to 32-bit Win2008 servers.
Generally, your biggest problem will be the WOW64 emulation layer - which means that 32-bit processes and 64-bit processes see different versions of the same resources (registry keys, system folders, and so on.) In .NET, there's an enumeration System.Environment.SpecialFolder which will give you safely abstracted access to Program Files, Application Data and other potentially risky system folders. You'll also need to force IIS to run in 32-bit compatibility mode (it can't run 64-bit and 32-bit web apps simultaneously) - instructions at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/894435
There's nothing insurmountable, though - I'm successfully compiling COM-visible .NET assemblies on Vista x64 (setting the compiler to target x86 CPUs), and then deploying them alongside ASP.NET and legacy ASP code running 32-bit COM objects on a 32-bit server, and it's all working very well. There's some notes you might find useful posted on my blog; biggest headache I encountered personally was that 32-bit applications (including my favourite text editor) can't see C:\Windows\System32 any more... but even that's easy enough to work around.
Don't use hard coded names for system folders.
(a bad idea anyway)
I have come across one issue with Vista 64:
Program Files
Program files may be stored in Program Files x86 or in Program Files you may have to code around this if any of your code makes assumptions about where programs are stored - even if you have done the right thing and used environment variables, as there are 2 locations there are now 2 different environment variables. You need to know which of these your app will be installed in, which will be different if you target any CPU from if you target x86.
I had much trouble with adding 3rd party 32 bit ISAPI handler to IIS on 64 bit w2k3 server (php) I had to make IIS run in 32 bit compatibility mode. If it's all managed I can think of no serious problem though.