I'm trying to implement a custom client side validation, but it is not working. I'm basing myself on the article on Codeproject http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/275056/Custom-Client-Side-Validation-in-ASP-NET-MVC3
I also looked here on SO, but I think I'm implementing it in the correct manner, but I'm overlooking something.
My goal is to validate a date (required, date format and not earlier than another date on the form). The first two can be done with data annotations, the last I have to do with custom validation.
I have on my base class some dataannotations (ClassLibrary is in VB.NET):
Imports System.ComponentModel
Imports System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations
<MetadataType(GetType(CM_CONTRACTVALIDATIONData))>
Partial Public Class CM_CONTRACTACTIVATION
'...
End Class
Public Class CM_CONTRACTVALIDATIONdata
'...
<DataType(DataType.Date)>
<Required()>
Public Property TakeBackDeviceWhen
'..
End Class
In the javascript file I have added the custom method:
//validation
$.validator.addMethod("checkPickupDate", function (value, element) {
return false;
});
$("#form").validate({
rules: {
TakeBackDeviceWhen: {
checkPickupDate: true
}
},
messages: {
TakeBackDeviceWhen: {
checkPickupDate: "Test"
}
}
}
);
My chtml file is as follow:
#Html.TextBox("TakeBackDeviceWhen", Model.TakeBackDeviceWhen.HasValue ? Model.TakeBackDeviceWhen.Value.ToShortDateString() : "", new { style = "Width: 200px" })
The resulting HTML is as follow:
<input id="TakeBackDeviceWhen" class="hasDatepicker" type="text" value="" style="Width: 200px" name="TakeBackDeviceWhen" data-val-required="The TakeBackDeviceWhen field is required." data-val="true">
It seems that neither my type validation and my custom validation isn't implemented.
What is going wrong?
OK, solved it. I hope :-)
What did I learned today:
(1) Don't use EditorFor: when you scaffold it from a MVC template, input fields are generated to EditorFor, it seems that you can't add custom unobtrusive validation tags. So, I was trying to get this fixed, untill I changed it to TextBoxFor.
(2) You can add custom validation methods in jQuery, but you can't mix them with unobtrusive validation. After adding a custom method, you have to also add it to the unobtrusive adapters. And don't forget to add jQuery on the bottom :-s (I got this from jQuery.validator.unobtrusive.adapters.addMinMax round trips, doesn't work in MVC3)
$(function () {
$.validator.addMethod("checkpickupdate", function (value, element) {
if (value == "20/09/2012") {
return false;
} else {
return true;
}
});
$.validator.unobtrusive.adapters.addBool("checkpickupdate");
} (jQuery));
(3) Add validation tags to the input field in the htmlAttributes:
#Html.TextBox("TakeBackDeviceWhen", Model.TakeBackDeviceWhen.HasValue ? Model.TakeBackDeviceWhen.Value.ToShortDateString() : "",
new {
style = "Width: 200px",
data_val = "true",
data_val_required = "verplicht!",
data_val_date = "moet datum zijn",
data_val_checkpickupdate = "wow"
})
(4) Datatype data annotations will not enforce a validation. You have to add it like in (3). You can add a custom ValidationAttribute like (for server side validation):
public class MustBeDateAttribute : ValidationAttribute {
public override bool IsValid(object value) {
try
{
DateTime dte = DateTime.Parse(value.ToString());
return true;
}
catch (Exception)
{
return false;
throw;
}
}
}
And this is the resulting html output:
<input type="text" value="" style="Width: 200px" name="TakeBackDeviceWhen" id="TakeBackDeviceWhen" data-val-required="required!" data-val-date="has to be a date" data-val-checkpickupdate="custom error" data-val="true" class="hasDatepicker valid">
As I'm using my ClassLibrary in different projects, I'm now going to try to seperate the dataannotations meta data from the class library (maybe with dependency resolver).
Related
I am using Model validation and k-state-error css class is not being applied to it in case validation fails. what else i can do to add this class to my datepicker
function onChange(e) {
if (e.date == undefined) {
var item = $(this).find('.k-picker-wrap');
$(item).addClass("k-state-error");
// $(e).css("border-color", "red");
}
}
using this code to add class but it's not working. Perhaps jquery selector is not right
From your code seems that you are trying to implement a validation that checks that the date is required. Why not implementing it as:
HTML:
<input id="date" required/>
JavaScript:
$("#date")
.kendoDatePicker({})
.kendoValidator({
validateOnBlur: true,
messages : {
required : "My custom required message"
}
});
In an MVC3 project, i use an Html.BeginForm to post some (model-)values. Along with those i want to send an extra parameter that is not part of the form (the model) but in the ViewBag. Now, when i use a Button (code in answer here: MVC3 razor Error in creating HtmlButtonExtension), all the form values are posted but the extra parameter remains null. When i use an ActionLink, the parameter is posted but the form values are not :) Any know how i can combine the two? Thanks!
#Html.Button("Generate!", new { id = ViewBag.ProjectID })
#Html.ActionLink("Generate!", "Post", new { id = #ViewBag.ProjectID })
My advice would be to declare a new Object in your App.Domain.Model something like this
namespace App.Domain.Model
{
public class CustomEntity
{
public Project projectEntity { get; set; }
public int variableUsed { get; set; }
}
}
In your view you can acces them easily by using CustomEntity.projectEntity and CustomEntity.variableUsed.
Hope it helps
You can do something like below.
View code
#using (Html.BeginForm("ActionName", "ControllerName", FormMethod.Post, new { #id = "frmId", #name = "frmId" }))
{
#*You have to define input as a type button not as a sumit. you also need to define hidden variable for the extra value.*#
<input type="hidden" name="hndExtraParameter" id="hndExtraParameter" />
<input value="Submit" type="button" id="btnSubmit" onclick="UpdateHiddenValue()" />
}
<script type="text/javascript">
function ValidateUser() {
$("#hndExtraParameter").val('Assignvaluehere');
$("#frmId").submit();
}
</script>
Controller Code
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult ActionName(Model model, string hndExtraParameter)
{
//Do your operation here.
}
In MVC3, there are a way to add or stop validation in a field depending on the value of a drop-drown list with JQuery? I have been trying with Fluent Validation, but with no luck.
Are you using unobtrusive validation? Is so, look at the html and you will see that there are some html5 attributes on your input, something like this:
<input name="product" id="product" data-val="true" data-val-required="Product is required" />
I suppose you could use jQuery to remove the data-val attribute and then the jQuery Validator will skip this item.
$("#product").data("val", false);
Well, that's my guess, try it yourself.
you should use jQuery AddClass Rules
Create jQuery Class
$.validator.addClassRules({
Req: {
required: true
}
});
Validate the Filed by checking the selected value
$("#Selector").blur(function () {
var Val= $("#Selector").val();
if (Val == "Compare to the String") {
$("#Selector").addClass("Req");
}
else {
$("#Selector").removeClass("Req");
}
});
I'm attempting to add a classic Accept Terms and Conditions checkbox on the log on page of an MVC application.
If the user accepts the Terms and Conditions, but fails to log on for some other reason (bad password etc), then I want the Accept T&Cs checkbox not to be checked, so the user is forced to accept the T&Cs on every log on attempt.
The problem is that using Html.CheckboxFor(), after a postback the checkbox retains its previous value, despite the value of the bound Model property.
Here's the code, stripped down to essentials. If you run this code up, check the checkbox, and click the button, you'll be returned to the form with the checkbox still checked, even though the bound model property is false.
The Model:
namespace Namespace.Web.ViewModels.Account
{
public class LogOnInputViewModel
{
[IsTrue("You must agree to the Terms and Conditions.")]
public bool AcceptTermsAndConditions { get; set; }
}
}
The validation attribute:
public class IsTrueAttribute : ValidationAttribute
{
public IsTrueAttribute(string errorMessage) : base(errorMessage)
{
}
public override bool IsValid(object value)
{
if (value == null) return false;
if (value.GetType() != typeof(bool)) throw new InvalidOperationException("can only be used on boolean properties.");
return (bool)value;
}
}
The View:
#model Namespace.Web.ViewModels.Account.LogOnInputViewModel
#using (Html.BeginForm()) {
#Html.CheckBoxFor(x => x.AcceptTermsAndConditions)
<input type="submit" value="Log On" />
}
The Controller:
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult LogOn(string returnUrl)
{
return View(new LogOnInputViewModel { AcceptTermsAndConditions = false });
}
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult LogOn(LogOnInputViewModel input)
{
return View(new LogOnInputViewModel { AcceptTermsAndConditions = false });
}
I saw the suggestion on asp.net to add a #checked attribute to the CheckboxFor. I tried this, making the view
#model Namespace.Web.ViewModels.Account.LogOnInputViewModel
#using (Html.BeginForm()) {
#Html.CheckBoxFor(x => x.AcceptTermsAndConditions, new { #checked = Model.AcceptTermsAndConditions })
<input type="submit" value="Log On" />
}
And I saw the same behaviour.
Thanks for any help/insights!
Edit: Although I want to override the posted back value, I wish to retain the message if validation of AcceptTermsAndConditions fails (there is a validation attribute on AcceptTermsAndConditions requiring it to be true), so I can't use ModelState.Remove("AcceptTermsAndConditions") which was the otherwise sound answer #counsellorben gave me. I've edited the code above to include the validation attribute - apologies to #counsellorben for not being clearer originally.
You need to clear the ModelState for AcceptTermsAndConditions. By design, CheckBoxFor and other data-bound helpers are bound first against the ModelState, and then against the model if there is no ModelState for the element. Add the following to your POST action:
ModelState.Remove("AcceptTermsAndConditions");
I have discovered what appears to be a bug using MVC 3 with the RemoteAttibute and the ActionNameSelectorAttribute.
I have implemented a solution to support multiple submit buttons on the same view similar to this post: http://blog.ashmind.com/2010/03/15/multiple-submit-buttons-with-asp-net-mvc-final-solution/
The solution works however, when I introduce the RemoteAttribute in my model, the controllerContext.RequestContext.HttpContext.Request no longer contains any of my submit buttons which causes the the "multi-submit-button" solution to fail.
Has anyone else experienced this scenario?
I know this is not a direct answer to your question, but I would propose an alternative solution to the multiple submit-buttons using clientside JQuery and markup instead:
Javascript
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
$("input[type=submit][data-action]").click(function (e) {
var $this = $(this);
var form = $this.parents("form");
var action = $this.attr('data-action');
var controller = $this.attr('data-controller');
form.attr('action', "/" + controller + "/" + action);
form.submit();
e.preventDefault();
});
});
</script>
Html
#using (Html.BeginForm())
{
<input type="text" name="name" id="name" />
<input type="submit" value="Save draft" data-action="SaveDraft" data-controller="Home" />
<input type="submit" value="Publish" data-action="Publish" data-controller="Home" />
}
It might not be as elegant as a code-solution, but it offers somewhat less hassle in that the only thing that actually changes is the action-attribute of the form when a submitbutton is clicked.
Basically what it does is that whenever a submit-button with the attribute data-action set is clicked, it replaces its parent forms action-attribute with a combination of the attributes data-controller and data-action on the clicked button, and then fires the submit-event of the form.
Of course, this particular example is poorly generic and it will always create /Controller/Action url, but this could easily be extended with some more logic in the click-action.
Just a tip :)
i'm not sure that its a bug in mvc 3 as it's not something that you were expecting. the RemoteAttribute causes javascript to intercept and validate the form with an ajax post. to do that, the form post is probably canceled, and when the validation is complete, the form's submit event is probably called directly, rather than using the actual button clicked. i can see where that would be problematic in your scenario, but it makes sense. my suggestion, either don't use the RemoteAttributeand validate things yourself, or don't have multiple form actions.
The problem manifests itself when the RemoteAttribute is used on a model in a view where mutliple submit buttons are used. Regardless of what "multi-button" solution you use, the POST no longer contains any submit inputs.
I managed to solve the problem with a few tweeks to the ActionMethodSelectorAttribute and the addition of a hidden view field and some javascript to help wire up the pieces.
ViewModel
public class NomineeViewModel
{
[Remote("UserAlreadyRegistered", "Nominee", AdditionalFields="Version", ErrorMessage="This Username is already registered with the agency.")]
public string UserName { get; set; }
public int Version {get; set;}
public string SubmitButtonName{ get; set; }
}
ActionMethodSelectorAttribute
public class OnlyIfPostedFromButtonAttribute : ActionMethodSelectorAttribute
{
public String SubmitButton { get; set; }
public String ViewModelSubmitButton { get; set; }
public override Boolean IsValidForRequest(ControllerContext controllerContext, MethodInfo methodInfo)
{
var buttonName = controllerContext.HttpContext.Request[SubmitButton];
if (buttonName == null)
{
//This is neccessary to support the RemoteAttribute that appears to intercepted the form post
//and removes the submit button from the Request (normally detected in the code above)
var viewModelSubmitButton = controllerContext.HttpContext.Request[ViewModelSubmitButton];
if ((viewModelSubmitButton == null) || (viewModelSubmitButton != SubmitButton))
return false;
}
// Modify the requested action to the name of the method the attribute is attached to
controllerContext.RouteData.Values["action"] = methodInfo.Name;
return true;
}
}
View
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
$(function () {
$("input[type=submit][data-action]").click(function (e) {
var action = $(this).attr('data-action');
$("#SubmitButtonName").val(action);
});
});
</script>
<% using (Html.BeginForm())
{%>
<p>
<%= Html.LabelFor(m => m.UserName)%>
<%= Html.DisplayFor(m => m.UserName)%>
</p>
<input type="submit" name="editNominee" value="Edit" data-action="editNominee" />
<input type="submit" name="sendActivationEmail" value="SendActivationEmail" data-action="sendActivationEmail" />
<%=Html.HiddenFor(m=>m.SubmitButtonName) %>
<% } %>
Controller
[AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)]
[ActionName("Details")]
[OnlyIfPostedFromButton(SubmitButton = "editNominee", ViewModelSubmitButton = "SubmitButtonName")]
public ActionResult DetailsEditNominee(NomineeViewModel nom)
{
return RedirectToAction("Edit", "Nominee", new { id = nom.UserName });
}
[AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)]
[ActionName("Details")]
[OnlyIfPostedFromButton(SubmitButton = "sendActivationEmail", ViewModelSubmitButton = "SubmitButtonName")]
public ActionResult DetailsSendActivationEmail(NomineeViewModel nom)
{
return RedirectToAction("SendActivationEmail", "Nominee", new { id = nom.UserName });
}
[OutputCache(Location = OutputCacheLocation.None, NoStore = true)]
public ActionResult UserAlreadyRegistered(string UserName, int Version)
{
//Only validate this property for new records (i.e. Version != zero)
return Version != 0 ? Json(true, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet)
: Json(! nomineeService.UserNameAlreadyRegistered(CurrentLogonDetails.TaxAgentId, UserName), JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
I encountered the same issue.
I also attached an on submit event to prepare the form before submit. Interestingly, when I insert a break point in the on submit function, and then continue, the problem has disappeared.
I ended up with an Ajax form by removing the Remote attribute and validate the field using the ModelState.