Type converting slices of interfaces - go

Question

I'm curious why Go does't implicitly convert []T to []interface{} when it will implicitly convert T to interface{}. Is there something non-trivial about this conversion that I'm missing?
Example:
func foo([]interface{}) { /* do something */ }
func main() {
var a []string = []string{"hello", "world"}
foo(a)
}
go build complains
cannot use a (type []string) as type []interface {} in function argument
And if I try to do it explicitly, same thing: b := []interface{}(a) complains
cannot convert a (type []string) to type []interface {}
So every time I need to do this conversion (which seems to come up a lot), I've been doing something like this:
b = make([]interface{}, len(a), len(a))
for i := range a {
b[i] = a[i]
}
Is there a better way to do this, or standard library functions to help with these conversions? It seems kind of silly to write 4 extra lines of code every time I want to call a function that can take a list of e.g. ints or strings.

Answer 1

In Go, there is a general rule that syntax should not hide complex/costly operations.
Converting a string to an interface{} is done in O(1) time. Converting a []string to an interface{} is also done in O(1) time since a slice is still one value. However, converting a []string to an []interface{} is O(n) time because each element of the slice must be converted to an interface{}.
The one exception to this rule is converting strings. When converting a string to and from a []byte or a []rune, Go does O(n) work even though conversions are "syntax".
There is no standard library function that will do this conversion for you. Your best option though is just to use the lines of code you gave in your question:
b := make([]interface{}, len(a))
for i := range a {
b[i] = a[i]
}
Otherwise, you could make one with reflect, but it would be slower than the three line option. Example with reflection:
func InterfaceSlice(slice interface{}) []interface{} {
s := reflect.ValueOf(slice)
if s.Kind() != reflect.Slice {
panic("InterfaceSlice() given a non-slice type")
}
// Keep the distinction between nil and empty slice input
if s.IsNil() {
return nil
}
ret := make([]interface{}, s.Len())
for i:=0; i<s.Len(); i++ {
ret[i] = s.Index(i).Interface()
}
return ret
}

Answer 2

The thing you are missing is that T and interface{} which holds a value of T have different representations in memory so can't be trivially converted.
A variable of type T is just its value in memory. There is no associated type information (in Go every variable has a single type known at compile time not at run time). It is represented in memory like this:
value
An interface{} holding a variable of type T is represented in memory like this
pointer to type T
value
So coming back to your original question: why go does't implicitly convert []T to []interface{}?
Converting []T to []interface{} would involve creating a new slice of interface {} values which is a non-trivial operation since the in-memory layout is completely different.

Answer 3

Here is the official explanation: https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/InterfaceSlice
var dataSlice []int = foo()
var interfaceSlice []interface{} = make([]interface{}, len(dataSlice))
for i, d := range dataSlice {
interfaceSlice[i] = d
}

Answer 4

In Go 1.18 or later, use the following function to convert an arbitrary slice type to []interface{} or its alias any:
func ToSliceOfAny[T any](s []T) []any {
result := make([]any, len(s))
for i, v := range s {
result[i] = v
}
return result
}
The Go 1.18 generics feature does not eliminate the need to convert an arbitrary slice to []any. Here's an example of where the conversion is required: The application wants to query a database using the elements of a []string as the variadic query arguments declared as args ...any. The function in this answer allows the application to query the database in a convenient one-liner:
rows, err := db.Query(qs, ToSliceOfAny(stringArgs)...)

Answer 5

Try interface{} instead. To cast back as slice, try
func foo(bar interface{}) {
s := bar.([]string)
// ...
}

Answer 6

In case you need more shorting your code, you can creating new type for helper
type Strings []string
func (ss Strings) ToInterfaceSlice() []interface{} {
iface := make([]interface{}, len(ss))
for i := range ss {
iface[i] = ss[i]
}
return iface
}
then
a := []strings{"a", "b", "c", "d"}
sliceIFace := Strings(a).ToInterfaceSlice()

Answer 7

I was curious how much slower it is convert interface arrays via reflection vs. doing it inside a loop, as described in Stephen's answer. Here's a benchmark comparison of the two approaches:
benchmark iter time/iter bytes alloc allocs
--------- ---- --------- ----------- ------
BenchmarkLoopConversion-12 2285820 522.30 ns/op 400 B/op 11 allocs/op
BenchmarkReflectionConversion-12 1780002 669.00 ns/op 584 B/op 13 allocs/op
So using a loop is ~20% faster than doing it via reflection.
Here's my test code in case you'd like to verify if I did things correctly:
import (
"math/rand"
"reflect"
"testing"
"time"
)
func InterfaceSlice(slice interface{}) []interface{} {
s := reflect.ValueOf(slice)
if s.Kind() != reflect.Slice {
panic("InterfaceSlice() given a non-slice type")
}
// Keep the distinction between nil and empty slice input
if s.IsNil() {
return nil
}
ret := make([]interface{}, s.Len())
for i := 0; i < s.Len(); i++ {
ret[i] = s.Index(i).Interface()
}
return ret
}
type TestStruct struct {
name string
age int
}
var letters = []rune("abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ")
func randSeq(n int) string {
b := make([]rune, n)
for i := range b {
b[i] = letters[rand.Intn(len(letters))]
}
return string(b)
}
func randTestStruct(lenArray int, lenMap int) map[int][]TestStruct {
randomStructMap := make(map[int][]TestStruct, lenMap)
for i := 0; i < lenMap; i++ {
var testStructs = make([]TestStruct, 0)
for k := 0; k < lenArray; k++ {
rand.Seed(time.Now().UnixNano())
randomString := randSeq(10)
randomInt := rand.Intn(100)
testStructs = append(testStructs, TestStruct{name: randomString, age: randomInt})
}
randomStructMap[i] = testStructs
}
return randomStructMap
}
func BenchmarkLoopConversion(b *testing.B) {
var testStructMap = randTestStruct(10, 100)
b.ResetTimer()
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
obj := make([]interface{}, len(testStructMap[i%100]))
for k := range testStructMap[i%100] {
obj[k] = testStructMap[i%100][k]
}
}
}
func BenchmarkReflectionConversion(b *testing.B) {
var testStructMap = randTestStruct(10, 100)
b.ResetTimer()
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
obj := make([]interface{}, len(testStructMap[i%100]))
obj = InterfaceSlice(testStructMap[i%100])
_ = obj
}
}

Answer 8

Though you can use a generic function to convert a slice to a slice of interface{}, it may be most appropriate and cheapest in terms of execution time to change foo to a generic function if possible.
For example:
func foo[T any](slice []T) { /* do something */ }
func main() {
var a []string = []string{"hello", "world"}
foo(a)
}
Now there is no conversion necessary at all.

Answer 9

Convert interface{} into any type.
Syntax:
result := interface.(datatype)
Example:
var employee interface{} = []string{"Jhon", "Arya"}
result := employee.([]string) //result type is []string.