What I want to do is to delete part of a list specified in another list i.e. e.g.
?- deleteSome([1,4,3,3,2,2],[1,2,4],Z).
Z = [3,3,2].
I first defined the following. No problem there.
deleteOne(X, [X|Z], Z).
deleteOne(X, [V|Z], [V|Y]) :-
X \== V,
deleteOne(X,Z,Y).
Then, the following does not work as expected.
deleteSome([], [], _).
deleteSome([X|Xs], Y, Zs) :-
deleteSome(Xs, Y, [X|Zs]).
deleteSome([X|Xs], Y, Zs) :-
member(X,Y),
deleteOne(X,Y,Y),
deleteSome(Xs, Y, Zs).
I would use the powerful select/3 builtin
deleteSome(L, D, R) :-
select(E, L, L1),
select(E, D, D1),
!, deleteSome(L1, D1, R).
deleteSome(L, _, L).
test:
?- deleteSome([1,4,3,3,2,2],[1,2,4],Z).
Z = [3, 3, 2].
I must admit, I don't understand your deleteSome code at all. Here's what I'd do (no Prolog here, so might contain errors):
deleteSome(X, [], X).
deleteSome(X, [Y|Ys], Z) :-
deleteOne(Y, X, T),
deleteSome(T, Ys, Z).
I.e. If there's nothing to delete, no change. Otherwise, the result is when we delete the first of the to-deletes, and then delete the rest of them.
There is some confusion in that it seems your deleteOne has (Original, ToDelete, Result) parameters, but deleteSome has (ToDelete, Original, Result). For consistency, I'd rather rewrite it so the signatures are compatible:
deleteSome([], Y, Y).
deleteSome([X|Xs], Y, Z) :-
deleteOne(X, Y, T),
deleteSome(Xs, T, Z).
Related
I am struggling to identify a way to convert a list to string. This list is the output from a findall predicate.
see below my code.
edge(a,b).
edge(a,c).
edge(b,c).
edge(c,d).
edge(c,e).
edge(d,e).
edge(f,g).
edge(g,h).
route(X, Z, []) :- edge(X, Z).
route(X, Z, [Y|T]) :- edge(X, Y), route(Y, Z, T).
allways(X, Y) :- findall(E, (route(X, Y, E), write(E), nl), _).
%allways(X, Y) :- findall(E, (route(X, Y, E), with_output_to(atom(_),maplist(write, E)), nl), _).
%allways(X, Y) :- findall(E, (route(X, Y, E), atomic_list_concat(E,'',A), nl), _),write(A).
my output
?- allways(a,e).
[b,c]
[b,c,d]
[c]
[c,d]
expected output
?- allways(a,e).
bc
bcd
c
cd
I tried different ways to convert the list to string using with_output_to predicate and atomic_list_concat predicate but nothing works.
When you say "string", what do you mean?
There are many predicates for concatenating a list to an atom. In your case atomic_list_concat/2 sounds about right.
Your problem however is in how you wrote the findall, you are capturing the wrong variable.
?- findall(Str, ( route(a, e, E), atomic_list_concat(E, Str) ), Strs),
forall(member(Str, Strs), format("~w~n", [Str])).
or, if you do not need the list at all, do not use findall at all.
?- forall(( route(a, e, E),
atomic_list_concat(E, Str)
),
format("~w~n", [Str])).
I'm new to Prolog and I'm trying to get my head around lists. The problem I'm struggling with is:
Given numbers in the form of lists (1 : [x], 3: [x, x, x]), implement the 'times' predicate /3.
E.g.: times([x, x], [x, x, x], R).
R = [x, x, x, x, x, x].
The plus, and successor predicates where 2 previous points of the exercise. I know I'm not using the successor predicate, but it didn't seem that useful later on.
This is what i've tried so far
successor([], [x]).
successor([X|T], R) :-
append([X|T], [X], R).
plus(L1, L2, R) :- append(L1, L2, R).
times([], _, []).
times(_, [], []).
times([_], L, L).
times(L, [_], L).
times([_|T], L2, R) :- plus(L2, R, RN),
times(T, L2, RN).
The output is:
R is [].
I think you make things too complicated here. You can define successor as:
successor(T, [x|T]).
We can define plus/3 as:
plus([], T, T).
plus([x|R], S, [x|T]) :-
plus(R, S, T).
This is more or less the implementation of append/3, except that here we check if the first list only contains x.
For times/3 we know that if the first item is empty, the result is empty:
times([], _, []).
and for a times/3 where the first item has shape [x|R], we need to add the second item to the result of a call to times/3 with R:
times([x|R], S, T) :-
times(R, S, T1),
plus(S, T1, T).
So putting it all together, we obtain:
successor(T, [x|T]).
plus([], T, T).
plus([x|R], S, [x|T]) :-
plus(R, S, T).
times([], _, []).
times([x|R], S, T) :-
times(R, S, T1),
plus(S, T1, T).
I am trying to make this Prolog query:
placeRedBlocks(4, X), findall(Y, loopReplace(X, Y), A).
which outputs this:
A = [[r, r, r, b], [r, r, r, r], [b, r, r, r]],
X = [b, b, b, b]
work in the code if I only type in
placeRedBlocks(4, X).
The code I am using:
printList([ ]).
printList([H|T]) :- print(H), nl, printList(T).
placeRedBlocks(Length, List) :-
findall('b', between(1, Length, _), List).
replace([_|T], 0, X, [X|T]).
replace([H|T], I, X, [H|R]):-
I > -1,
NI is I-1,
% write([H|T]),
replace(T, NI, X, R), !.
% replace(L, _, _, L).
placeRedBlockUnit(A,_,0,_,A):- !.
placeRedBlockUnit(Line,Index,NumElm,Elm,NLine) :-
replace(Line,Index,Elm,BLine),
Index1 is Index+1,
NumElm1 is NumElm-1,
placeRedBlockUnit(BLine,Index1,NumElm1,Elm,NLine).
loopReplace(ListToReplace, NewList) :-
length(ListToReplace, Len),
TotalCount is Len-3,
between(0, TotalCount, Iterations),
between(3, Len, Size),
placeRedBlockUnit(ListToReplace, Iterations, Size, 'r', NewList).
Unfortunately, if I change placeRedBlocks to this it doesn't work.
placeRedBlocks(Length, List) :-
findall('b', between(1, Length, _), List),
findall(Y, loopReplace(List, Y), _).
and I only get:
X = [b, b, b, b]
What is happening here?
Is it possible for it to return back to the same list?
I realized that as long as I use a variable twice in a predicate I don't need to make it a parameter to my predicate.
Changing this
placeRedBlocks(Length, List) :-
findall('b', between(1, Length, _), List)
to this
placeRedBlocks(Length, List3) :-
findall('b', between(1, Length, _), List),
findall(Y, loopReplace(List, Y), List2),
append([List], List2, List3).
made me able to use the queries in the predicate while also keeping the predicate at 2 parameters.
I am working on a roster system project in prolog, and am using a modified search and insert structure based on an example provided by our professor. However, when I try to run my implementation of it, the provided record list is never inserted into the roster, even if there are no other elements present. I am not very familiar with prolog, and this issue is throwing me for a loop.
My implementation of the search/insert method is as follows:
search(_, [], 0).
search([X,_,_], [[X, _, _]|_], 1).
search([_,Y,_], [[_, Y, _]|_], 1).
search([X,Y,Z], [[_, _, _]|T], C) :- search([X, Y, Z], T, C).
searchinsert([X, Y, Z], L, L) :- search([X, Y, Z], L, 1).
searchinsert([X, Y, Z], L, [[X, _, _] | L]) :- search([X, Y, Z], L, 0).
searchinsert([X, Y, Z], L, [[_, Y, _] | L]) :- search([X, Y, Z], L, 0).
As designed, it should reject the provided record list if either the first or second element match that of another element in the roster. The function is called as follows:
process(4, X) :-
nl,
write('\tInsert student into roster.'), nl,
read_student_info([A, B, C]),
nl, nl, searchinsert([A, B, C], X, X).
Maybe just change the last call:
..., searchinsert([A, B, C], X, 1).
so X has a chance to be instantiated to a list. But you should rethink the 'data flow' of your process/2 driver, likely it's missing an argument.
I have a problem with predicate which works in that way that it takes list of atoms:
nopolfont([to,jest,tekśćik,'!'],L).
and in result
L = [to,jest,tekscik,'!'].
I have problem with make_swap and swap predicates. So far I have:
k(ś,s).
k(ą,a).
% etc.
swap(X,W) :- name(X,P), k(P,Y), !, name(Y,W).
swap(X,X).
make_swap(A,W)
:- atom(A),!,
name(A,L),
swap(L,NL),
name(W,NL).
nopolfont([],[]).
nopolfont([H|T],[NH|S]) :- make_swap(H,NH), nopolfont(T,S).
Is there any elegant way to do this?
This is also quite elegant:
polish_char_replacer(X, Y) :-
k(X, Y),
!.
polish_char_replacer(X, X).
nopolfont(Atoms1, Atoms2) :-
maplist(replace(polish_char_replacer), Atoms1, Atoms2).
replace(Goal, Atom1, Atom2) :-
atom_chars(Atom1, Chars1),
maplist(Goal, Chars1, Chars2),
atom_chars(Atom2, Chars2).
Probably as elegant as it can get:
k(ś,s).
k(ą,a).
swap(X,W) :- name(P,[X]), k(P,Y), !, name(Y,[W]).
swap(X,X).
list_swap([], []).
list_swap([H|T], [W|S]) :-
swap(H, W),
list_swap(T, S).
atom_swap(A,W) :-
atom(A), !,
name(A, L),
list_swap(L,S),
name(W, S).
nopolfont([],[]).
nopolfont([H|T],[NH|S]) :-
atom_swap(H,NH),
nopolfont(T,S).
Also, obviously define this, to get the expected result, but I assume this is in the % etc
k(ć, c).