How to merge VDPROJ files? - visual-studio-2010

we use SVN in a team work. in the solution there's a project for building MSI file called Setup. the project is indeed a vdproj file.
i've changed Setup.vdproj and found that someone else also changed it and committed the changes before me. so i've to Update, but the SVN itself can't merge them via Update properly (i think so, failure will happen, no?) and i myself can't merge it when it's shown in text mode. there're lots of numbers (GUIDs) there. so i need a visual way to merge my changes with others.
how can i do that?
what's ur idea?
thx

I would at least use the following properties:
svn:eol-style=native
svn:mime-type="application/json; charset=utf-8"
You might also want to require locking:
svn:needs-lock="*"

Related

Commit changes with ankhsvn

I have this problem with ankhsvn:
i have the solution up to date , but not its unique project . When i try to commit i got this error
when i click into Show changes i have some changes in a temporary file integration_finale.csproj
So, What are the reasons of this error? How can i fix it?
The csproj file is not a temp file. It governs your project set-up and settings for references, paths, build details etc.
From how it appears this conflict can (probably) use local as it appears the rest of the file is correct (at least from the image). It appears that the change is just that the SpecificVersion flag for he reference has been changed to the default setting.
Now you should backup this file and confirm the rest of the file is correct. If you corrupt this file you will have to rebuild the project file (csproj).
'Clean' solution via AnkhSVN and get update again
if above does not works then I would suggest you to take backup of your current .csproj file. Then update the file to latest commit version on svn. After which you can merge code and commit your changes.
better use TortoiseSVN
I use ankhsvn, and I know that it has a few bugs. To diagnose (and better handle conflicts too) this kind of problems I use also TortoiseSVN.

Checkin Without Merge in Visual Sourcesafe

I've got a file managed by Visual Sourcesafe 2005 which I have edited. I'd like to check in the file exactly as-is on my box, but VSS always merges it with the file in the repository, breaking my code.
I don't know what I expected to happen...
Is there any way to check the file in without merge shy of deleting the existing file from the repo and adding my copy back in?
I've looked for command line options to no avail.
You could just do "Undo check out" for all files, keeping their local versions on your machine; then again check out this files without getting latest versions from Visual SourceSafe; then check in all of them. In this case history is preserved. You just overwrite latest versions of files without any merge. Seems for me it's what you wanted.
I had the same problem and sorted it out in that way.
I'm putting this answer here, but still really hoping that a better one comes up.
I figured that I can go into the VSS GUI and rename the file to ".old", then add my local file into the repo. It's extremely hacky, but allows me to keep the file history.
Such issue might happen when the file was checked out by multple people and there was a newer version checked in by others after your checkout. (See Four scenarios that merge may be performed #2 of the article for more details.)
I don't see a option in SourceSafe CheckIn command to control that either. If you don't want merge happen, you may exclusively check out the file before editing.

Subversion in multiuser environment with XCode 4.0

I have been using XCode with subversion for some time now, no problem was caused when I was using it as a single developer (I was using 2 commands only, commit and add).
But now I have to share the code with another developer (who has never used any kind of version control) and integrating/merging the code has become a nightmare. No problem occur when we are integrating/merging .h/.m files but as soon as it comes to ".nib", "xcodeproj" and ".xcdatamodeld" files, we really don't know what to do.
Whenever we try to merge "xcodeproj", project was getting corrupt and merging ".xcdatamodeld" was kind of impossible for us.
So I was wondering if someone can share his/her experience on how to effectively use subversion/git/mercurial with XCode 4.0 in multiuser environment? or share a link, which can explain how to use subversion effectively in multiuser environment.
Thanks.
Are you doing this using Subversion? For 90% to 99% of the files in your repository, the standard Subversion workflow of checkout, edit, commit works well. However, for some types of files such as JPEGS and GIFS simply don't merge well. In this case, you'll have to do it the way we use to in the old SCCS and RCS days: Before you can edit and commit a file, you must lock it.
Locking a file prevents others from editing the same file and committing changes while you're doing your work on the file. It's crude, but it works. In Subversion, you can always lock any file you're editing, but if the file has the property svn:needs-lock on it, it will be checked out as read-only. You have to lock the file before editing it to make it writable, and you're not allowed to commit the file unless it is locked.
So, for those files, set the svn:needs-lock property on it.
You can automatically set this property on all newly added files (depending upon suffix) via setting the auto-properties in your Subversion client configuration.
And, if you really, really want to make sure that all .nibs and xcodeproj and all of the other flies of these types have svn:needs-lock set on them, you can use my pre-commit hook which will prevent these files from being committed unless this property is set.
There is no failsafe way to merge these kinds of files that I am aware of. So you will have to
try to ensure that only one person is changing these files at a time. That won't work always, so just log what you changed in the file with the commit message. Then if there is a conflict, you can manually resolve it by taking the version that changed more of the file and redo manually what the other person did.
That's normally not a big deal, like adding a new source file to an .xcodeproject, or changing the alignment of an element in a .nib. It's becoming a problem if your project is huge or your nib is containing the whole interface. For it to work well (which in practice it does), you need to split up your projects into sub-projects if they grow too huge.
I had the same problem with 2 other developers Xcode with git. Unfortunately, Xcode project files are an XML file, tracks file included in the project as well as setting. I'm not certain, but I think .nib files are also XML files as well. Someone can correct me on that.
Git did a great job at merging the Xcode project file, and never really had any problems with our *.nib files either. The only time we did have a problem is when we both added/removed files with the same names, or someone did a lot of heavy removing and adding of a lot of files.
The only way we solved this was to have each other push ann pull as soon as we added/removed files. So that way the person had the latest files, and didn't add them in their own repository then pull the latest commit which had the same file in it. Or they work adding changes to a file that was removed or renamed.
That is the best solution we found, as soon as we added or removed a file have everyone else in the team pull. Not a great solution btw. However, you should be committing often anyways.

How to I tell VisualSVN to do a replace instead of a merge?

We're finding ourselves unable to open our project in Visual Studio because SVN is adding lines like
"<<<<<<< .mine"
to our .csproj files.
This is apparently something SVN inserts when it has trouble merging files, but we're not interested in merging things as two people can never have the same file checked out.
How do we set Visual SVN to Replace instead of Merge?
Thanks for any help.
It's doing that because SVN tries to preserve whatever changes you've made to your local working copy. Thats a pretty important aspect to the SVN method of version control so I don't know, and doubt, if its possible to do that. I do know you can tell svn to ignore files, but their changes then won't be committed to the repository, nor updated from the repository.
If its a problem, delete the csproj file, then when you update it will redownload the proper version. Do that whenever theres a problem. If it happens quite a bit, then one of the developers is messing with the file.
Past projects I've worked on had a dozen engineers working on the same projects, and we never had constant merge problems with the .csproj files.
What do you mean by "two people can never have the same file checked out"? I think you are misunderstanding how Subversion works - checkout is not an exclusive lock on a file.
Visual SVN uses Tortoise on the backend I believe. when you are in a conflicted situation (i.e. SVN cannot merge the two versions cleanly) you should have the option you should get a pop up where you have the option to either "Use Local" or "Use Repository". If you choose "Resolve Later" you'll get what you are describing.

SVN: Colleague checked in a folder into repository, but I can't Update my version to it

In showing a colleague how to use SVN yesterday, we created a test folder and file within our existing Visual Studio Solution. We'll call it "Test" folder with two files, "Test.ascx" and "Test.ascx.cs". We added it (or Visual SVN added it, 'cos it's awesome), and committed it. We also added and committed other files elsewhere in the project.
We can see it in the repository (and the other files).
Doing an update on my own machine to pull down these new files resulted in the other files being pulled down correctly, BUT the Test folder does not appear. No matter how many times I try Updating from various points in VS and in TortoiseSVN (urgh) Repo browser, it can't see that there are any changes to pull down.
Where am I going wrong?
This is a known problem.
You can use
$ svn update --depth=infinity
to force the update. With TortoiseSVN, use the "Update to revision" command in the Submenu, then change the depth combobox to "fully recursive".
I've had ghost errors like this before and found the easiest work around is to delete the parent folder and update it's parent:
Project Root
Project
NewFolder
Delete Project, then Update Project Root
We can see it in the repository (and the other files).
...
No matter how many times I try Updating from various points in VS and in TortoiseSVN (urgh) Repo browser, it can't see that there are any changes to pull down.
So you can or cannot see it in the repository browser?
Did you commit and update the parent folder of your Test folder?
I don't know, svn is always telling me to clean, did you try that?
It's not an answer, I know, but I have tried all the solutions you guys have kindly suggested and I just end up with conflicts, crashed TortoiseSVN and built up Karma. Therefore, a trusty edit in the .svn/entries file sorted it.
I have until now been a single developer using SVN just to manage my source code. Other people don't have problems, and I just check in stuff. I use Visual SVN as a layer to frig SVN for .NET (which it isn't great with) and I seem to constantly run into issues. I am performing very simple operations, not even branching/tagging. Simple simple simple. And yet I have issues with it?

Resources